超级军网外媒：侵略者后代哀叹对中国壮大实力的担心
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/04/29 06:45:22
卡塔尔半岛电视台网站6月25日文章，原题：为何中国可能是更好的超级大国 泰戈尔曾说，掌握世界资源的国家害怕中国崛起并希望推迟该时刻的到来。直至上世纪中叶，中国仍遭受列强欺压。但如今泰戈尔有关中国的预言似乎已应验，侵略者的当代继承人们正哀叹对中国与日俱增的实力的担心。由于连年的侵略战争、不负责任的暗杀和对法治的藐视，当今美国已丧失曾在国际事务中的盛誉。而中国的经济和国际影响力持续上升。它能否成为比美国更负责任、更远离暴力和更具建设性的超级大国？
美国建立在民族自决基础上，但其外交政策一直拒绝给予他国同样的权利。中国的历史比美国长4000年，且在大部分时期都是最富强的国家之一。但它向来保持无为与和平外交，而非对他国武力掠夺和施暴。中国传统文化曾遭受近代西方列强凌辱和文革破坏，但其传统的和谐世界观仍存在于现代中国的全球关系中。
就在美国在中东沉溺于施展帝国主义霸权，用残忍军事力量和惩罚性经济封锁针对平民之际，中国则在该地区打造互利和相互尊重的关系。中国的政策当然也是出于本国利益，但相对西方极端利己且强制性说教的言论而言，中国坦率的实用主义是令人耳目一新的选项。
面对中国崛起的伟岸身躯，西方政客试图喋喋不休地论说任何崛起中大国不可避免的“成长烦恼”，并将此作为其不成熟的证据。中国绝非完美，但中国及其民众却长年遭受不公平妖魔化。那些谣传通常是某些人歇斯底里的宣传，因为他们害怕自己的特权受到挑战。
尽管在大多数主要事务上，中国尚未拥有制衡美国的力量，但其地位正在上升。它不仅将成为全球事务中受欢迎的参与者，还将为其他有抱负的大国树立负责任的典范形象。(作者莫塔扎·侯赛因，丁雨晴译)
http://mil.huanqiu.com/paper/2013-06/4067932.html卡塔尔半岛电视台网站6月25日文章，原题：为何中国可能是更好的超级大国 泰戈尔曾说，掌握世界资源的国家害怕中国崛起并希望推迟该时刻的到来。直至上世纪中叶，中国仍遭受列强欺压。但如今泰戈尔有关中国的预言似乎已应验，侵略者的当代继承人们正哀叹对中国与日俱增的实力的担心。由于连年的侵略战争、不负责任的暗杀和对法治的藐视，当今美国已丧失曾在国际事务中的盛誉。而中国的经济和国际影响力持续上升。它能否成为比美国更负责任、更远离暴力和更具建设性的超级大国？
美国建立在民族自决基础上，但其外交政策一直拒绝给予他国同样的权利。中国的历史比美国长4000年，且在大部分时期都是最富强的国家之一。但它向来保持无为与和平外交，而非对他国武力掠夺和施暴。中国传统文化曾遭受近代西方列强凌辱和文革破坏，但其传统的和谐世界观仍存在于现代中国的全球关系中。
就在美国在中东沉溺于施展帝国主义霸权，用残忍军事力量和惩罚性经济封锁针对平民之际，中国则在该地区打造互利和相互尊重的关系。中国的政策当然也是出于本国利益，但相对西方极端利己且强制性说教的言论而言，中国坦率的实用主义是令人耳目一新的选项。
面对中国崛起的伟岸身躯，西方政客试图喋喋不休地论说任何崛起中大国不可避免的“成长烦恼”，并将此作为其不成熟的证据。中国绝非完美，但中国及其民众却长年遭受不公平妖魔化。那些谣传通常是某些人歇斯底里的宣传，因为他们害怕自己的特权受到挑战。
尽管在大多数主要事务上，中国尚未拥有制衡美国的力量，但其地位正在上升。它不仅将成为全球事务中受欢迎的参与者，还将为其他有抱负的大国树立负责任的典范形象。(作者莫塔扎·侯赛因，丁雨晴译)
http://mil.huanqiu.com/paper/2013-06/4067932.html
美国建立在民族自决基础上，但其外交政策一直拒绝给予他国同样的权利。中国的历史比美国长4000年，且在大部分时期都是最富强的国家之一。但它向来保持无为与和平外交，而非对他国武力掠夺和施暴。中国传统文化曾遭受近代西方列强凌辱和文革破坏，但其传统的和谐世界观仍存在于现代中国的全球关系中。
就在美国在中东沉溺于施展帝国主义霸权，用残忍军事力量和惩罚性经济封锁针对平民之际，中国则在该地区打造互利和相互尊重的关系。中国的政策当然也是出于本国利益，但相对西方极端利己且强制性说教的言论而言，中国坦率的实用主义是令人耳目一新的选项。
面对中国崛起的伟岸身躯，西方政客试图喋喋不休地论说任何崛起中大国不可避免的“成长烦恼”，并将此作为其不成熟的证据。中国绝非完美，但中国及其民众却长年遭受不公平妖魔化。那些谣传通常是某些人歇斯底里的宣传，因为他们害怕自己的特权受到挑战。
尽管在大多数主要事务上，中国尚未拥有制衡美国的力量，但其地位正在上升。它不仅将成为全球事务中受欢迎的参与者，还将为其他有抱负的大国树立负责任的典范形象。(作者莫塔扎·侯赛因，丁雨晴译)
http://mil.huanqiu.com/paper/2013-06/4067932.html卡塔尔半岛电视台网站6月25日文章，原题：为何中国可能是更好的超级大国 泰戈尔曾说，掌握世界资源的国家害怕中国崛起并希望推迟该时刻的到来。直至上世纪中叶，中国仍遭受列强欺压。但如今泰戈尔有关中国的预言似乎已应验，侵略者的当代继承人们正哀叹对中国与日俱增的实力的担心。由于连年的侵略战争、不负责任的暗杀和对法治的藐视，当今美国已丧失曾在国际事务中的盛誉。而中国的经济和国际影响力持续上升。它能否成为比美国更负责任、更远离暴力和更具建设性的超级大国？
美国建立在民族自决基础上，但其外交政策一直拒绝给予他国同样的权利。中国的历史比美国长4000年，且在大部分时期都是最富强的国家之一。但它向来保持无为与和平外交，而非对他国武力掠夺和施暴。中国传统文化曾遭受近代西方列强凌辱和文革破坏，但其传统的和谐世界观仍存在于现代中国的全球关系中。
就在美国在中东沉溺于施展帝国主义霸权，用残忍军事力量和惩罚性经济封锁针对平民之际，中国则在该地区打造互利和相互尊重的关系。中国的政策当然也是出于本国利益，但相对西方极端利己且强制性说教的言论而言，中国坦率的实用主义是令人耳目一新的选项。
面对中国崛起的伟岸身躯，西方政客试图喋喋不休地论说任何崛起中大国不可避免的“成长烦恼”，并将此作为其不成熟的证据。中国绝非完美，但中国及其民众却长年遭受不公平妖魔化。那些谣传通常是某些人歇斯底里的宣传，因为他们害怕自己的特权受到挑战。
尽管在大多数主要事务上，中国尚未拥有制衡美国的力量，但其地位正在上升。它不仅将成为全球事务中受欢迎的参与者，还将为其他有抱负的大国树立负责任的典范形象。(作者莫塔扎·侯赛因，丁雨晴译)
http://mil.huanqiu.com/paper/2013-06/4067932.html
典型的铁血体，这种帖子最好少发
泰戈尔曾说，掌握世界资源的国家害怕中国崛起并希望推迟该时刻的到来。
老泰啊，你的子孙们正在干这种螳臂当车的事啊，快点带走他们吧。
老泰啊，你的子孙们正在干这种螳臂当车的事啊，快点带走他们吧。
着留给我们孙子的孙子看去吧，我们还要埋头苦干30年。
妥妥的铁血体 莫非MK800重出江湖？亲 译文是要附上原文链接的哦
第三世界有知音呀，就凭这么客观的看待兔子
再给兔子5年10年，还中东和东亚一个清静！（这总是一个美好的愿望吧！）
世界人民大团结万岁！
再给兔子5年10年，还中东和东亚一个清静！（这总是一个美好的愿望吧！）
世界人民大团结万岁！
历史上中国现在世界之巅当然是无为与和平 就像以比尔盖茨的身家当然不会去惦记别人家里块八毛的存款 现在可不同 咱们是发展中国家 改争的一分也不能少 利益当前 我们不介意背上欺负残疾人的骂名 名声有不能当饭吃 正义永远现在胜利者一边来自: Android客户端
鬼佬们日暮穷途了！
ivorli 发表于 2013-6-27 13:01 
妥妥的铁血体 莫非MK800重出江湖？
亲 译文是要附上原文链接的哦
德艺双馨的处女苍老师怎么只是只黑桃7
妥妥的铁血体 莫非MK800重出江湖？
亲 译文是要附上原文链接的哦
德艺双馨的处女苍老师怎么只是只黑桃7
最起码有一句话是对的！
那就是……他们慌了。。。
那就是……他们慌了。。。
出来混，总是要还的。父债总是要子还的
典型的铁血体，这种帖子最好少发
这文章是真的，巴铁论坛有原文链接
这文章是真的，巴铁论坛有原文链接
妥妥的铁血体 莫非MK800重出江湖？
亲 译文是要附上原文链接的哦
这还真是外国人写的
亲 译文是要附上原文链接的哦
这还真是外国人写的
水平堪比大字报啊 。铿锵有力 。让文卫武功的屌丝们不知所措了 。 这侯赛因这货 是马甲吧。
写得真好。鄙视动不动就给人扣“铁血体”帽子的。
真的么？ 裤衩很红
呵呵这个国外友人觉悟不低啊
ivorli 发表于 2013-6-27 13:01
妥妥的铁血体 莫非MK800重出江湖？
亲 译文是要附上原文链接的哦
可能需要翻墙http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth ... 62584334716870.html
PDF里也有转这篇文章。
妥妥的铁血体 莫非MK800重出江湖？
亲 译文是要附上原文链接的哦
可能需要翻墙http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth ... 62584334716870.html
PDF里也有转这篇文章。
Why China might be a better superpower
Unlike the US, China does not have a substantial history of invading and subjugating the inhabitants of far-flung lands.
Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/chi ... .html#ixzz2XP3YYCTp
Until the mid-20th century, China suffered what has been termed as the "Century of Humiliation" - a period of subjugation and oppression by Western military powers (as well as the Japanese). During this time Western imperialists flooded the country with drugs, raped and murdered its subjects with impunity and - due to both insatiable greed and abject ignorance to concepts such as culture and history - wantonly desecrated the priceless monuments of ancient Chinese civilisation.
At the outset of this period - when hordes of English soldiers destroyed Beijing's ancient Summer Palace in an orgy of looting and arson - Major General Charles Gordon said, "You can scarcely imagine the beauty and magnificence of the places we burnt" - which in many ways was emblematic of the entire carnivorous project of Western imperialism in Asia, Africa and Latin America.
Today, however, Rabindranath Tagore's prophecy about China seems to have come to fruition, and the modern heirs to rapacious criminals such as Gordon now openly lament their fear of rising Chinese power.
In the place of the former colonial forces such as England and France, however, today, sits the US, the world's only remaining military superpower. While since the fall of the Soviet Union the US has been widely considered to be the preeminent nation globally, in recent years it has fallen into an observable malaise.
Due to its wars of aggression, institutionalised torture, unaccountable assassination programmes and general contempt for the rule of law, the American government has today sacrificed whatever was once considered admirable about its role in international affairs. Furthermore, it is fast sacrificing what was once most admirable about it domestically, as once-cherished civil liberties are being forfeited and its citizens are being compelled to submit to an opaque and pervasive surveillance state.
While China is far less free domestically, in international affairs the country continues to ascend both economically and in terms of international influence. It is thus worth asking, is this a positive development for the world at large? Could China be a more responsible, less violent and more constructive superpower than the US?
Historical contrasts
Over its history, the US has undoubtedly provided much for the betterment of mankind in the fields of science, arts, good governance and human development. The country continues to produce some of the most exceptional contributors in all these areas, and for all the cruel excesses of the US government the American people are among the most generous, hospitable and high-achieving population in the world. The US is by no means a monolith and its impressive ideological diversity continues to be one of its enduring strengths.
- VIDEO - China accuses EU of trade 'discrimination'
However, while the US was founded on the principle of national self-determination, throughout its history, its foreign policy has been based on denying that same right to others around the globe. From the early 20th century invasions and occupations of the Philippines and Haiti, the CIA coups against democratic governments in Iran and Chile, up to the near genocidal military onslaughts against the Vietnamese and Iraqi people, the US - in a relatively short time frame - has left a trail of destruction around the world which is without parallel in human history.
While couched in the deeply cynical rhetoric of freedom and democracy, the body count left by US militarism and colonial exploitation runs to millions. It has been well-documented that what has motivated these brutally malicious policies (aside from naked greed) is a crude sense of racism and a chauvinistic belief in "Manifest Destiny" - the same ruthlessly imperialistic ideology which helped justify the holocaust committed against the indigenous people of the Americas and which drove the Atlantic slave trade.
China, despite existing as a unified country 4,000 years longer than the US, conspicuously does not have such a history of invading and subjugating the inhabitants of far-flung lands. While it has had its share of localised conflicts, there is nothing in its history - even over the many centuries during which China was as at the peak of its historical power - that is remotely comparable to the industrialised exploitation and mass-murder which has characterised the Western colonial project.
Despite being one of the wealthiest and powerful countries on earth for most of its existence, China's relationship with the outside world has traditionally been characterised more by Sino-centric inertia and peaceable exchange than by armed pillage and the export of violence to foreign lands. As surmised by the famed 19th century scholar of Buddhism, Zhang Taiyin:
"Asian countries… rarely invaded one another and treated each other respectfully with the Confucian virtue of benevolence."
While China has in many ways been torn from its traditional culture by traumatic recent encounters with Western imperialist powers and the subsequent upheavals of Mao's Cultural Revolution, the country's traditionally harmonious worldview ("harmony" being a recurring theme in Chinese political culture) is still seen in modern China's global relations.
China's peaceful rise
To achieve its foreign policy goals in Iraq, the US embarked on a decades-long campaign of violence against the Iraqi people which culminated in the brutal invasion and occupation of the country in 2003. While the US succeeded in destroying the lives of millions of innocent Iraqi civilians, it failed to create an outcome which was of benefit to it and ultimately left the country with its influence and prestige greatly eroded.
China, however, has in many ways emerged as the "winner" of the Iraq war, as it is today by far the biggest beneficiary of Iraqi crude oil contracts. In stark contrast to the US primitive and brutal approach to the country, China has used soft-power to great effect and is now the most influential commercial player in the country's oil boom.
Thanks to its efforts China is today recognised as a major investor in the future of Iraq. According to the New York Times, Chinese executives are now even impressing their Iraqi counterparts by speaking with them in flawless, Iraqi-accented Arabic.
The contrast between China's culturally sensitive approach and the contemptuous and violent attitude taken by the US in Iraq cannot be overstated. In fact, these contrasts are in many ways a reflection of the differing worldviews and historical backgrounds of the two countries.
While the US seems committed to exert imperial hegemony over the Middle East using brute military force and punitive economic blockades against civilians, China has publically committed to a policy of "peacefully rising" and has built mutually beneficial and respectful relationships throughout the region.
While Chinese polices are no less self-interested, the country's forthright pragmatism is a refreshing alternative to the blatantly cynical and manipulative moralising rhetoric of Western powers. Shallow accusations of Chinese colonialism in Africa (based on Chinese commercial investments in the region) appear borne more of Western fears of Chinese power than of legitimate concerns about African self-determination.
Evidence suggests that China's influence in Africa has been built on the basis of mutual economic interest and its investments have coincided with historically unprecedented economic growth among the people of the continent. The contrast with the unrelentingly murderous and rapacious history of actual Western colonialism in Africa could not be starker.
-VIDEO - Have lessons been learnt from the Iraq war?
A multipolar world
China today is a burgeoning player in global affairs, making forays into the Israel/Palestine conflict, taking material steps to confront environmental issues and pushing its "soft-power" approach to international relations to new lengths. In the face of its rising stature many pundits and political figures have attempted to harp upon the inevitable growing pains of any rising power and cite this as evidence of its immaturity.
While China is by no measure perfect, for years the country and its people have been unjustly demonised by those whose own hands are caked in the blood of untold number of innocents. Allegations of purported Chinese malevolence should be viewed for what they most often are - the hysterical propaganda of those who are fearful and insecure about competition for their own privileged position.
The US however should not fear the rising tide of Chinese influence. Rather, it should warmly welcome it. In a unipolar world, the US government was free to act out its most self-destructive tendencies and was devoid of any pressure to reform in order to compete with a major adversary. Indeed, the US achieved its most admirable feats when it was facing serious competition from Soviet Russia.
While China is not yet a large enough player to individually balance the US on most major issues, its status is rising. When working within the emerging "BRICS" bloc of countries, it is capable of constraining unilateral US actions. This is good for both the American and Chinese people, as the existence of a multipolar world will mean that neither government will be able to delve into unchecked excess and military adventurism.
However, as China's relationship with the US and other major powers develops, there is no doubt that the country has finally come to equal terms with its former oppressors. China's ascendance signifies the fruition of Tagore's prophecy and the long victory of the Chinese people over Western imperialism.
If China continues its remarkably successful policy of "peacefully rising" while pursuing continued self-improvement and reform, it will remain both a welcome player in global affairs and a responsible model for other aspiring world powers.
Murtaza Hussain is a Toronto-based writer and analyst focused on issues related to Middle Eastern politics.
Follow him on Twitter: @MazMHussain
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial policy.
SOURCE : Why China might be a better superpower - Opinion - Al Jazeera English
Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/chi ... .html#ixzz2XP3RALpP
Unlike the US, China does not have a substantial history of invading and subjugating the inhabitants of far-flung lands.
Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/chi ... .html#ixzz2XP3YYCTp
Until the mid-20th century, China suffered what has been termed as the "Century of Humiliation" - a period of subjugation and oppression by Western military powers (as well as the Japanese). During this time Western imperialists flooded the country with drugs, raped and murdered its subjects with impunity and - due to both insatiable greed and abject ignorance to concepts such as culture and history - wantonly desecrated the priceless monuments of ancient Chinese civilisation.
At the outset of this period - when hordes of English soldiers destroyed Beijing's ancient Summer Palace in an orgy of looting and arson - Major General Charles Gordon said, "You can scarcely imagine the beauty and magnificence of the places we burnt" - which in many ways was emblematic of the entire carnivorous project of Western imperialism in Asia, Africa and Latin America.
Today, however, Rabindranath Tagore's prophecy about China seems to have come to fruition, and the modern heirs to rapacious criminals such as Gordon now openly lament their fear of rising Chinese power.
In the place of the former colonial forces such as England and France, however, today, sits the US, the world's only remaining military superpower. While since the fall of the Soviet Union the US has been widely considered to be the preeminent nation globally, in recent years it has fallen into an observable malaise.
Due to its wars of aggression, institutionalised torture, unaccountable assassination programmes and general contempt for the rule of law, the American government has today sacrificed whatever was once considered admirable about its role in international affairs. Furthermore, it is fast sacrificing what was once most admirable about it domestically, as once-cherished civil liberties are being forfeited and its citizens are being compelled to submit to an opaque and pervasive surveillance state.
While China is far less free domestically, in international affairs the country continues to ascend both economically and in terms of international influence. It is thus worth asking, is this a positive development for the world at large? Could China be a more responsible, less violent and more constructive superpower than the US?
Historical contrasts
Over its history, the US has undoubtedly provided much for the betterment of mankind in the fields of science, arts, good governance and human development. The country continues to produce some of the most exceptional contributors in all these areas, and for all the cruel excesses of the US government the American people are among the most generous, hospitable and high-achieving population in the world. The US is by no means a monolith and its impressive ideological diversity continues to be one of its enduring strengths.
- VIDEO - China accuses EU of trade 'discrimination'
However, while the US was founded on the principle of national self-determination, throughout its history, its foreign policy has been based on denying that same right to others around the globe. From the early 20th century invasions and occupations of the Philippines and Haiti, the CIA coups against democratic governments in Iran and Chile, up to the near genocidal military onslaughts against the Vietnamese and Iraqi people, the US - in a relatively short time frame - has left a trail of destruction around the world which is without parallel in human history.
While couched in the deeply cynical rhetoric of freedom and democracy, the body count left by US militarism and colonial exploitation runs to millions. It has been well-documented that what has motivated these brutally malicious policies (aside from naked greed) is a crude sense of racism and a chauvinistic belief in "Manifest Destiny" - the same ruthlessly imperialistic ideology which helped justify the holocaust committed against the indigenous people of the Americas and which drove the Atlantic slave trade.
China, despite existing as a unified country 4,000 years longer than the US, conspicuously does not have such a history of invading and subjugating the inhabitants of far-flung lands. While it has had its share of localised conflicts, there is nothing in its history - even over the many centuries during which China was as at the peak of its historical power - that is remotely comparable to the industrialised exploitation and mass-murder which has characterised the Western colonial project.
Despite being one of the wealthiest and powerful countries on earth for most of its existence, China's relationship with the outside world has traditionally been characterised more by Sino-centric inertia and peaceable exchange than by armed pillage and the export of violence to foreign lands. As surmised by the famed 19th century scholar of Buddhism, Zhang Taiyin:
"Asian countries… rarely invaded one another and treated each other respectfully with the Confucian virtue of benevolence."
While China has in many ways been torn from its traditional culture by traumatic recent encounters with Western imperialist powers and the subsequent upheavals of Mao's Cultural Revolution, the country's traditionally harmonious worldview ("harmony" being a recurring theme in Chinese political culture) is still seen in modern China's global relations.
China's peaceful rise
To achieve its foreign policy goals in Iraq, the US embarked on a decades-long campaign of violence against the Iraqi people which culminated in the brutal invasion and occupation of the country in 2003. While the US succeeded in destroying the lives of millions of innocent Iraqi civilians, it failed to create an outcome which was of benefit to it and ultimately left the country with its influence and prestige greatly eroded.
China, however, has in many ways emerged as the "winner" of the Iraq war, as it is today by far the biggest beneficiary of Iraqi crude oil contracts. In stark contrast to the US primitive and brutal approach to the country, China has used soft-power to great effect and is now the most influential commercial player in the country's oil boom.
Thanks to its efforts China is today recognised as a major investor in the future of Iraq. According to the New York Times, Chinese executives are now even impressing their Iraqi counterparts by speaking with them in flawless, Iraqi-accented Arabic.
The contrast between China's culturally sensitive approach and the contemptuous and violent attitude taken by the US in Iraq cannot be overstated. In fact, these contrasts are in many ways a reflection of the differing worldviews and historical backgrounds of the two countries.
While the US seems committed to exert imperial hegemony over the Middle East using brute military force and punitive economic blockades against civilians, China has publically committed to a policy of "peacefully rising" and has built mutually beneficial and respectful relationships throughout the region.
While Chinese polices are no less self-interested, the country's forthright pragmatism is a refreshing alternative to the blatantly cynical and manipulative moralising rhetoric of Western powers. Shallow accusations of Chinese colonialism in Africa (based on Chinese commercial investments in the region) appear borne more of Western fears of Chinese power than of legitimate concerns about African self-determination.
Evidence suggests that China's influence in Africa has been built on the basis of mutual economic interest and its investments have coincided with historically unprecedented economic growth among the people of the continent. The contrast with the unrelentingly murderous and rapacious history of actual Western colonialism in Africa could not be starker.
-VIDEO - Have lessons been learnt from the Iraq war?
A multipolar world
China today is a burgeoning player in global affairs, making forays into the Israel/Palestine conflict, taking material steps to confront environmental issues and pushing its "soft-power" approach to international relations to new lengths. In the face of its rising stature many pundits and political figures have attempted to harp upon the inevitable growing pains of any rising power and cite this as evidence of its immaturity.
While China is by no measure perfect, for years the country and its people have been unjustly demonised by those whose own hands are caked in the blood of untold number of innocents. Allegations of purported Chinese malevolence should be viewed for what they most often are - the hysterical propaganda of those who are fearful and insecure about competition for their own privileged position.
The US however should not fear the rising tide of Chinese influence. Rather, it should warmly welcome it. In a unipolar world, the US government was free to act out its most self-destructive tendencies and was devoid of any pressure to reform in order to compete with a major adversary. Indeed, the US achieved its most admirable feats when it was facing serious competition from Soviet Russia.
While China is not yet a large enough player to individually balance the US on most major issues, its status is rising. When working within the emerging "BRICS" bloc of countries, it is capable of constraining unilateral US actions. This is good for both the American and Chinese people, as the existence of a multipolar world will mean that neither government will be able to delve into unchecked excess and military adventurism.
However, as China's relationship with the US and other major powers develops, there is no doubt that the country has finally come to equal terms with its former oppressors. China's ascendance signifies the fruition of Tagore's prophecy and the long victory of the Chinese people over Western imperialism.
If China continues its remarkably successful policy of "peacefully rising" while pursuing continued self-improvement and reform, it will remain both a welcome player in global affairs and a responsible model for other aspiring world powers.
Murtaza Hussain is a Toronto-based writer and analyst focused on issues related to Middle Eastern politics.
Follow him on Twitter: @MazMHussain
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial policy.
SOURCE : Why China might be a better superpower - Opinion - Al Jazeera English
Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/chi ... .html#ixzz2XP3RALpP
抢了我的给我还回来，吃了我的给我吐出来。
最近坛子里混货很多，敌人就在身边，要小心！
nhgime 发表于 2013-6-27 12:17
典型的铁血体，这种帖子最好少发
参考消息上已有。
典型的铁血体，这种帖子最好少发
参考消息上已有。
cyrixlove 发表于 2013-6-27 15:06
历史上中国现在世界之巅当然是无为与和平 就像以比尔盖茨的身家当然不会去惦记别人家里块八毛的存款 现在可 ...
汉唐两代的辉煌说到底是环首刀和陌刀砍出来的。
历史上中国现在世界之巅当然是无为与和平 就像以比尔盖茨的身家当然不会去惦记别人家里块八毛的存款 现在可 ...
汉唐两代的辉煌说到底是环首刀和陌刀砍出来的。
这。。不管西方如何抹黑，还是有雪亮的眼睛。
其实西方侵略者确实是害怕的
感谢和平共处五项原则，对亚非拉等不发达国家我们要坚持友好100年不变，该挣钱挣钱，该建设建设，到2050建国百年时跟某些国家算算总账！
筒子们，拭目以待
友邦无需惊诧，我兔外强中干而已，不成气候还好，没看到日本的哀叹。说明他们还在岛里
我觉得写得不错
列子御风 发表于 2013-6-27 19:04
汉唐两代的辉煌说到底是环首刀和陌刀砍出来的。
不是说匈奴入侵吗？虽远必诛的前提是犯我天朝
汉唐两代的辉煌说到底是环首刀和陌刀砍出来的。
不是说匈奴入侵吗？虽远必诛的前提是犯我天朝
保定面酱 发表于 2013-6-27 20:09
不是说匈奴入侵吗？虽远必诛的前提是犯我天朝
大汉朝对草原河套的蚕食鲸吞，看上去也是蛮没有风度的。
不是说匈奴入侵吗？虽远必诛的前提是犯我天朝
大汉朝对草原河套的蚕食鲸吞，看上去也是蛮没有风度的。
西方人却是现在很不满意, 已经不能随便出入中国国境, 自由进出故宫博物馆往自家拿东西了