【原创翻译】News:F-22 猛禽需要头盔指示系统(头盔瞄 ...

来源:百度文库 编辑:超级军网 时间:2024/05/06 13:13:13


====================================================================================================

NOTE:楼主非外语专业,无工科背景,无军事知识,因此译文仅供参考,个别专用词靠LZ根据所接收的知识内容主观推测,不具有100%准确性。希望大家轻点拍砖。。。如有翻译不准确的地方,欢迎指正!{:soso_e183:}

另外,请万能的版主们加分鼓励一下{:soso_e120:} @angadow @PLA @贼特


====================================================================================================

原文标题:


F-22 Raptors need helmet-mounted cueing system to take full advantage of AIM-9X
F-22 猛禽需要头盔指示系统来充分利用 AIM - 9X


By:   Dave Majumdar Washington DC


原文正文:

Even after the US Air Force's fleet of Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor air superiority fighters starts receiving full Raytheon AIM-9X Sidewinder high off-boresight missle capability in 2017, the aircraft needs a helmet-mounted cueing system (HMCS) to use the weapon to its full potential. That is even taking into account the AIM-9X Block I and Block II's helmetless high off-boresight (HHOBS) capability.
甚至在2017年美国空军洛克希德马丁F-22猛禽空中优势战斗机机群开始接收整个雷声AIM-9X响尾蛇高离轴角发射导弹的能力之后, 飞机还是需要一套头盔指示系统(HMCS)来使用武器以充分发挥其潜能。这还甚至考虑到AIM-9X Block I与Block II的无头盔(瞄准具)高离轴角发射(HHOBS)能力。

"Without a helmet, that means the missile will need a very tight cue from somewhere," one F-22 pilot says. "[That's] something that is not always available in a dynamic, turning environment."
以为F-22的飞行员说,“如果没有头盔(瞄准具),就意味着导弹需要从其他地方获得一个非常密封的导引头。”(PS. tight cue是不是翻译成“密封导引头”?我查了一下,头盔瞄准具是利用工业自动化控制的’无线电相关定位‘原理解决头盔瞄准具与红外导弹导引头的联动控制,用以解决扩大空对空导弹的“离轴”发射能力。根据这些描述,我理解这里的cue应该是说导弹的导引头吧,tight的话原意有紧的、密封的,如果没有头盔瞄准具,是不是就应该需要密封的导引头?欢迎大家给我科普谢谢~) “当然这东西在一个动态、旋转的环境下并不是总能获得的。”
(这个翻译更合理,多谢@PLA 指正---》)如果没有头盔瞄准具,那么响尾蛇弹发射前需要的精确引导就得来自于其它方式,比如靠通过机头指向来满足射界要求和发射条件,而这种发射条件在实际空战格斗中往往很难实现,或者转瞬即逝难以把握。

To be clear, the AIM-9X is a huge improvement over the AIM-9M version even without a HMCS . "Don't get me wrong, it will still be better than having a 9M, but it won't be anything close to what a fighter with a helmet and an externally carried missile has," the pilot says. "Hence, probably not the savior we've all been waiting on."
需要明确,AIM-9X较AIM-9M相比已是一次巨大的改进,即使没有头盔指示系统(HMCS)。“别误会,这当然比用9M更好,但它不会是接近于有头盔和外部装有导弹的战斗机的一个东西。” 飞行员说。 “因此,可能并不是我们一直等待着的救世主。”

The USAF has a number of options available, if funding could be secured. One relatively simple plug-and-play solution is Gentex's Scorpion HMCS, which is a color, paddle-based system that is already in use on some versions of the Lockheed F-16 flown by the USAF's Air National Guard. Another possibility would be VSI's Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing System II (JHMCS II), a version of which uses an optical tracker to measure head movements.
美空军有许多可选方案,只要资金可以确保。其中相对简单的一个即插即用的方案就是Gentex的蝎子头盔指示系统(HMCS), 这是一个彩色的带开关(paddle这里是指开关?手动遥控杆?)的系统,该系统已经被美国空军的空中国民警卫队所飞的洛克希德F-16的某些型号中使用。另一种可能性则是VSI的联合头盔指引系统II(JHMCS II),就是使用一种光学跟踪装置来测量头部移动的系统。

At longer ranges, the Block II AIM-9X, especially, will be a huge improvement for the Raptor. "LOAL [Lock-on after Launch] is great for the longer range shots, which will be nice as it basically gives us an additional two BVR [beyond visual range] weapons," the pilot says.
在更远的距离上,尤其是Block II AIM-9X 将对猛禽有巨大的改进。飞行员说: “LOAL[射后锁定]更适合较远距离的射击,这将非常好,因为这基本上给我们额外的2个BVR[超视距] 武器。"

Even without a HMCS, the AIM-9X cannot be fielded to the Raptor fleet soon enough.
即使没有头盔指示系统(HMCS),AIM-9X也不会很快地被投入到猛禽机群中。

"We've been screaming for years that the F-22 needs to have the capability fielded, and fast," the Raptor pilot says. "Once the jets transitions from BVR [beyond visual range] to WVR [within visual range] with only AIM-9M-9s it is hugely vulnerable."
“我们已经叫了多年F-22需要装备这样的能力,而且要快速。” 猛禽的飞行员说。 “一旦喷射机从BVR[超视距]迁移到WVR[视距内] ,却只有AIM-9M-9s, 那将不堪一击(极其脆弱)。”

The huge advantage offered by such a high off-boresight missile in combination with a HMCS may give a third or fourth-generation fighter a decided edge over the fifth-generation Raptor (with AIM-9Ms) in a visual range encounter.
这种高离轴角发射导弹结合一套头盔指示系统(HMCS)索提供的最大优势是,在一个可视距离的相遇下,相较第五代猛禽(带AIM-9Ms),可以给一个三代或者四代战斗机一个明确的界限。


原文出处:


http://www.flightglobal.com/news ... e-of-aim-9x-381748/

====================================================================================================

NOTE:楼主非外语专业,无工科背景,无军事知识,因此译文仅供参考,个别专用词靠LZ根据所接收的知识内容主观推测,不具有100%准确性。希望大家轻点拍砖。。。如有翻译不准确的地方,欢迎指正!{:soso_e183:}

另外,请万能的版主们加分鼓励一下{:soso_e120:} @angadow @PLA @贼特


====================================================================================================

原文标题:


F-22 Raptors need helmet-mounted cueing system to take full advantage of AIM-9X
F-22 猛禽需要头盔指示系统来充分利用 AIM - 9X


By:   Dave Majumdar Washington DC


原文正文:

Even after the US Air Force's fleet of Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor air superiority fighters starts receiving full Raytheon AIM-9X Sidewinder high off-boresight missle capability in 2017, the aircraft needs a helmet-mounted cueing system (HMCS) to use the weapon to its full potential. That is even taking into account the AIM-9X Block I and Block II's helmetless high off-boresight (HHOBS) capability.
甚至在2017年美国空军洛克希德马丁F-22猛禽空中优势战斗机机群开始接收整个雷声AIM-9X响尾蛇高离轴角发射导弹的能力之后, 飞机还是需要一套头盔指示系统(HMCS)来使用武器以充分发挥其潜能。这还甚至考虑到AIM-9X Block I与Block II的无头盔(瞄准具)高离轴角发射(HHOBS)能力。

"Without a helmet, that means the missile will need a very tight cue from somewhere," one F-22 pilot says. "[That's] something that is not always available in a dynamic, turning environment."
以为F-22的飞行员说,“如果没有头盔(瞄准具),就意味着导弹需要从其他地方获得一个非常密封的导引头。”(PS. tight cue是不是翻译成“密封导引头”?我查了一下,头盔瞄准具是利用工业自动化控制的’无线电相关定位‘原理解决头盔瞄准具与红外导弹导引头的联动控制,用以解决扩大空对空导弹的“离轴”发射能力。根据这些描述,我理解这里的cue应该是说导弹的导引头吧,tight的话原意有紧的、密封的,如果没有头盔瞄准具,是不是就应该需要密封的导引头?欢迎大家给我科普谢谢~) “当然这东西在一个动态、旋转的环境下并不是总能获得的。”
(这个翻译更合理,多谢@PLA 指正---》)如果没有头盔瞄准具,那么响尾蛇弹发射前需要的精确引导就得来自于其它方式,比如靠通过机头指向来满足射界要求和发射条件,而这种发射条件在实际空战格斗中往往很难实现,或者转瞬即逝难以把握。

To be clear, the AIM-9X is a huge improvement over the AIM-9M version even without a HMCS . "Don't get me wrong, it will still be better than having a 9M, but it won't be anything close to what a fighter with a helmet and an externally carried missile has," the pilot says. "Hence, probably not the savior we've all been waiting on."
需要明确,AIM-9X较AIM-9M相比已是一次巨大的改进,即使没有头盔指示系统(HMCS)。“别误会,这当然比用9M更好,但它不会是接近于有头盔和外部装有导弹的战斗机的一个东西。” 飞行员说。 “因此,可能并不是我们一直等待着的救世主。”

The USAF has a number of options available, if funding could be secured. One relatively simple plug-and-play solution is Gentex's Scorpion HMCS, which is a color, paddle-based system that is already in use on some versions of the Lockheed F-16 flown by the USAF's Air National Guard. Another possibility would be VSI's Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing System II (JHMCS II), a version of which uses an optical tracker to measure head movements.
美空军有许多可选方案,只要资金可以确保。其中相对简单的一个即插即用的方案就是Gentex的蝎子头盔指示系统(HMCS), 这是一个彩色的带开关(paddle这里是指开关?手动遥控杆?)的系统,该系统已经被美国空军的空中国民警卫队所飞的洛克希德F-16的某些型号中使用。另一种可能性则是VSI的联合头盔指引系统II(JHMCS II),就是使用一种光学跟踪装置来测量头部移动的系统。

At longer ranges, the Block II AIM-9X, especially, will be a huge improvement for the Raptor. "LOAL [Lock-on after Launch] is great for the longer range shots, which will be nice as it basically gives us an additional two BVR [beyond visual range] weapons," the pilot says.
在更远的距离上,尤其是Block II AIM-9X 将对猛禽有巨大的改进。飞行员说: “LOAL[射后锁定]更适合较远距离的射击,这将非常好,因为这基本上给我们额外的2个BVR[超视距] 武器。"

Even without a HMCS, the AIM-9X cannot be fielded to the Raptor fleet soon enough.
即使没有头盔指示系统(HMCS),AIM-9X也不会很快地被投入到猛禽机群中。

"We've been screaming for years that the F-22 needs to have the capability fielded, and fast," the Raptor pilot says. "Once the jets transitions from BVR [beyond visual range] to WVR [within visual range] with only AIM-9M-9s it is hugely vulnerable."
“我们已经叫了多年F-22需要装备这样的能力,而且要快速。” 猛禽的飞行员说。 “一旦喷射机从BVR[超视距]迁移到WVR[视距内] ,却只有AIM-9M-9s, 那将不堪一击(极其脆弱)。”

The huge advantage offered by such a high off-boresight missile in combination with a HMCS may give a third or fourth-generation fighter a decided edge over the fifth-generation Raptor (with AIM-9Ms) in a visual range encounter.
这种高离轴角发射导弹结合一套头盔指示系统(HMCS)索提供的最大优势是,在一个可视距离的相遇下,相较第五代猛禽(带AIM-9Ms),可以给一个三代或者四代战斗机一个明确的界限。


原文出处:


http://www.flightglobal.com/news ... e-of-aim-9x-381748/
多谢版主支持~~{:soso_e120:}
AIM-9X+AIM-120D的组合还是很给力的。不过响尾蛇在F22的内置弹仓中,导引头不能外露,怎么与头瞄联动?难道狗斗时候要一直开着弹舱门?
响尾蛇导弹通电后会有提示音,锁定之后会变化,那个cue应该指的就是这个,所以tight cue其实估计直译成射界小就可以了
本人早就说F-22现在根本不成熟,也不堪用,只不过有一个非常好的平台而已,想当机皇请升级电子系统,就这还来威慑中国,看来也就能威慑威慑了,问题是我们怕吗?
firewille 发表于 2013-2-1 14:07
响尾蛇导弹通电后会有提示音,锁定之后会变化,那个cue应该指的就是这个,所以tight cue其实估计直译成射界 ...
Without a helmet, that means the missile will need a very tight cue from somewhere," one F-22 pilot says. "[That's] something that is not always available in a dynamic, turning environment.

need a very tight cue from somewhere,应该不是指“射界小”吧,我理解是如果没有头盔瞄准具,那么响尾蛇弹发射前需要的精确引导就得来自于其它方式,比如靠通过机头指向来满足射界要求和发射条件,而这种发射条件在实际空战格斗中往往很难实现,或者转瞬即逝难以把握。
啊,果然是美女啊,求果照
PLA 发表于 2013-2-2 00:06
Without a helmet, that means the missile will need a very tight cue from somewhere," one F-22 pilo ...
多谢版主指点~~
一个很有意思的现实是:美帝从来没有在实战中用过娘娘,而更加昂贵更加先进的b2 却经过实战检验,跟以前把最新武器投入实战检验的惯例不一样,到底为什么?
雨泓 发表于 2013-2-2 13:48
一个很有意思的现实是:美帝从来没有在实战中用过娘娘,而更加昂贵更加先进的b2 却经过实战检验,跟以前把最 ...
F-22服役后,跟谁实战?利比亚?问题是利比亚战争中,B2也没上场哦。最多是F-15E。

虽然没有在战役中出现,但伴飞图95,前进到韩国乌山和日本嘉守纳却是事实,可以认为是实用了。
雨泓 发表于 2013-2-2 13:48
一个很有意思的现实是:美帝从来没有在实战中用过娘娘,而更加昂贵更加先进的b2 却经过实战检验,跟以前把最 ...
没有作战的对象呀

作为制空战斗机运泥巴实在太浪费了,你有把好剑就非得切菜用吗
雨泓 发表于 2013-2-2 13:48
一个很有意思的现实是:美帝从来没有在实战中用过娘娘,而更加昂贵更加先进的b2 却经过实战检验,跟以前把最 ...
拒说有不为人知的缺陷:D
还是伊朗人给力,不要给md脸面,赶快用新战机跟f22交战,看看谁先拔头筹?