超级军网英国的世界遗产的冲突
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/04/27 08:07:34
In each of these seemingly disparate conflicts, the seeds of violence were sown by one system – British colonialism and its malevolent engineering of sectarianism. It is an indictment of British rulers that decades on, and sometimes centuries on, people’s lives are still being blighted by the legacy of Britain’s predatory, criminal history.”
It’s been a busy news week for British colonialism, or more accurately, the violent legacy of British colonialism. A rash of ongoing or renewed conflicts across the globe speaks of the detriment that the once-powerful British bequeathed and for which people of today have to contend with through injustice and in some cases immense human suffering.
In Northern Ireland, Belfast city has seen resurgent riots between pro-British Protestant youths and Irish nationalist Catholics, with extensive injuries, property damage and a painful reminder of sectarian bloodletting in recent years.
Over in the South Atlantic, Argentines and their government are up in arms over the London government’s proposal to hold a referendum on the future status of the Malvinas Islands, the British colony off Argentina otherwise known as the Falklands.
In the Middle East, Israel has committed yet more crimes against the besieged Palestinian people when fighter jets bombed the coastal Gaza strip, adding to the daily abject misery and terror of inhabitants.
Elsewhere in the Middle East, the people of Bahrain and Saudi Arabia continue their street agitations for democratic freedom from despotic monarchial rulers. In Bahrain, the calls for democracy were given added impetus when a court upheld the sentences against 20 political leaders, some of whom have been imprisoned for life.
Further East on the atlas, in the military junta of Myanmar, formerly known as British Burma, the persecution of thousands of Rohingya Muslims continues unabated, with hundreds killed at the hands of Buddhist gangs after being burned out of their shanty homes.
In each of these seemingly disparate conflicts, the seeds of violence were sown by one system – British colonialism and its malevolent engineering of sectarianism. It is an indictment of British rulers that decades on, and sometimes centuries on, people’s lives are still being blighted by the legacy of Britain’s predatory, criminal history.
In Northern Ireland, a peace settlement was reached after nearly 30 years of an anti-imperialist war between the guerrilla Irish Republican Army and the British forces. More than 3,000 people were killed during that conflict, which British government counter-insurgency policy succeeded in distorting into a sectarian bloodbath between pro-British Protestant loyalists and the mainly Catholic Irish nationalist population. The origins of that conflict lay in the gerrymandering of Ireland by the British colonial rulers when they partitioned the island in 1920-21 – against international and democratic norms – into a pro-British northern statelet and a nominally independent southern state.
The British colonial rulers inculcated a supremacist mindset among the Protestant community in the new Northern Ireland, copperfastening the privileged misrule with political, economic and social discrimination against Catholics. Many Protestant working-class communities were in truth not much better off materially than their Catholic counterparts, but nevertheless British sectarian policy implanted deep seeds of hatred and distrust as a means of dividing and ruling.
The latest outbreak of rioting in Belfast was sparked when Catholics tried to hold a peaceful commemorative march at the weekend. Sections within the Protestant community could not tolerate such a demonstration, even though the 1998 peace accord supposedly guarantees religious and cultural equality in Northern Ireland. The mindset of sectarian hatred inherited from British colonial subjugation of Irish national rights is still a live issue. Politicians in London may tut-tut at the street mayhem in Belfast, but this is a manifestation of Britain’s illegitimate meddling in Ireland.
British involvement in Ireland accrues from a self-styled mandate that stems from the historical implantation of a pro-British citizenry. The same gerrymandering to thwart natural territorial rights can be seen in the ongoing dispute over the Malvinas Islands, which were forcibly dispossessed from Argentina by Britain in 1833 and renamed the Falklands Islands. The two countries went to war briefly in 1982 after Argentinian troops occupied the territory. Argentina has substantial territorial claims to the islands off its coast, however Britain maintains that it has legal right to possession because the islanders, who descend from British colonizers, insist that they want to retain British status. This is classic British subjective gerrymandering to “get the right result”.
The British government continues to rankle Buenos Aires because it refuses to comply with United Nations resolutions to enter into a negotiated settlement. The latest move by British Prime Minister David Cameron to hold a referendum in the Malvinas on the future of the islands has been denounced by Argentina as a further British obstacle to resolving the dispute. Given the huge oil and fishing resources around the territory, and the recent militarization of the area by the British, the risk of a resumption of war cannot be discounted.
A different kind of British social engineering for colonial expedience is seen in today’s plight of Myanmar’s Rohingya Muslims. These people were introduced by the British rulers of Burma and imperial India. The Rohingyas were transplanted from what became Bangladesh to the Southeast Asian British colony of Burma to serve as labourers and servants for their white masters. Although the Muslim Rohingyas have now lived in Myanmar for generations, they have never been accepted by the indigenous majority Buddhists, and they have endured decades of brutal persecution. This persecution has escalated recently with massacres and burning of villages and shanty towns. One possible factor is that following an official visit to Myanmar by British Prime Minister Cameron earlier this year, the ruling junta may feel they have gained the favour of the Western powers, who are eager to open up trade and investment, and thus are emboldened to resume their genocidal policy against the Rohingyas. Sacrificed in the past to do menial work for their British masters, these people are being sacrificed again as pawns for British capital.
The legacy of British misrule and exploitation spans the globe, but its centerpiece for bequeathed suffering must be the Middle East region. Today, the people of Palestine live as strangers in their own land, dispossessed of their rights and their homes to live in the world’s biggest open-air concentration camp. This week saw Israeli warplanes bomb the impoverished Palestinians living under rubble and makeshift houses in Gaza. In truth, this is not news. Such crimes against humanity occur on a weekly basis in the Zionist-occupied Palestinian land, thanks in part to British political support, as well as American and European.
A look at historical maps of the Holy Land shows an inversion of politics and demographics between 1947 and today. In 1947, there was no state of Israel. British-controlled Palestine was a unitary territory predominated with Palestinian Muslims, as well as minorities of Christians and Jews. But the British rulers seduced by Jewish capitalists arrogated the right to deliver on the secretive Balfour Declaration of 1917 and hand over the territory to Zionists led by Chaim Weizmann and Ben Gurion. Today, the Palestinians are reduced to subsist on two diminishing territorial enclaves crucified by walls and checkpoints, their homes demolished and bombed at will by American-supplied Israeli warplanes and drones.
In the Persian Gulf monarchies of Saudi Arabia and Bahrain, the majority of people struggle to win democratic freedoms from the British imposition of despotic rulers. The Houses of Saud and Khalifa were grafted on to the majority Arab people by the House of Windsor to function as imperialist constructs to deliver oil wealth. These despotic rulers defy all norms of democracy and human rights thanks to the protection of British and American military might. The ongoing popular protests against these absolute monarchies in Saudi Arabia and Bahrain, and the silence from London and Washington, demonstrates the legacy of British misrule that these people are having to suffer in the present day. It also demonstrates the rank hypocrisy and cynicism of these powers and their Arab despots who claim to be supporting democracy and human rights in Syria.
This week, a Bahraini court upheld the sentences against 20 political leaders and human rights activists whose only “crime” was to peacefully call for elected government to replace the British-imposed and US-supported Khalifa absolute dictator. The political leaders include figures like Hasan Mushaima and Ebrahim Sharif; the human rights activists include Abdulhadi Al Khawaja and Abduljalil Al Singace. These are men of integrity and noble conscience. All were brutalized, tortured, illegally detained and forced to make trumped-up confessions.
Meanwhile, the British-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism revealed that the Bahraini king, Hamad Al Khalifa, donated $4.7 million dollars to the British military academy Sandhurst – the academy that has functioned as a supplier of British militarism to the world over the centuries.
The above is only a snapshot of the ongoing legacy of British misrule across the planet. At the height of the British Empire, in the early 20th century, it is reckoned that Britain asserted domination over some 20 per cent of the Earth’s landmass. Many more painful legacies could therefore be added to the litany of violence and suffering that so many people have to live with today.
The point is not to revisit history as some distant, past event. The point is to understand the seeds of conflict in today’s world so that some attempt can be made at creating a solution from an accurate understanding of the root causes of conflict.
A further point is to accurately assess the moral and political bankruptcy of Britain’s rulers in present world conflicts. When the British government pokes its moralizing finger at Iran or into the sovereign affairs of Syria, it should be seen as not only illegitimate, but as the bearer of conflict, suffering and destruction. The British government should be seen as having no positive role to play in resolving any conflict. Indeed, if it gets its covert way in Syria, the British involvement there will result in a hateful sectarian bloodbath, in much the same way that it has overseen in Libya along with its American, French and Arab despotic allies.
Britain may once upon a time have ruled the waves. Today, its mischief-making rulers should be waved away with contempt.
在这些看似不同的冲突，暴力的种子播种的一个系统–英国殖民主义和宗派主义的恶毒的工程。这是对英国统治者，几十年来，有时世纪，人们的生活仍受到传统英国掠夺，犯罪历史。”
这是繁忙的一周新闻英国殖民主义，或者更准确地说，暴力遗产的英国殖民主义。皮疹持续或新的冲突在全球各地的损害，一度强大的英国留下，今天的人们不得不与通过不公正和在某些情况下，巨大的人类苦难。
在北爱尔兰，贝尔法斯特市出现了死灰复燃的骚乱亲英新教徒之间的年轻人和爱尔兰民族主义者的天主教徒，与广泛的伤害，财产损害和痛苦地提醒人们的宗派暴力近年来。
在南大西洋，阿根廷人，他们的政府是在武器的伦敦政府提议举行公投的未来地位的马尔维纳斯群岛，英国殖民地阿根廷，否则称为福克兰群岛。
在中东，以色列犯下了更多的罪行被围困的巴勒斯坦人民当战机轰炸了加沙地带的海岸，增加每日悲惨的苦难和恐惧的居民。
在中东其他国家，巴林人和阿拉伯继续他们的街道噪音民主自由从专制君主统治者。在巴林，呼吁民主得到补充动力，当法院维持了20句对政治领导人，他们中的一些已经被终身监禁。
再往东的阿特拉斯，在缅甸军政府，前身为英国缅甸，迫害的数以千计的罗辛亚MSL继续有增无减，战死在手中的佛教团伙被烧毁的棚屋里。
在这些看似不同的冲突，暴力的种子播种的一个系统–英国殖民主义和宗派主义的恶毒的工程。这是对英国统治者，几十年来，有时世纪，人们的生活仍受到传统英国掠夺，犯罪史。
在北爱尔兰，和平解决是经过近30年的反帝国主义的战争的游击队之间的爱尔兰共和军和英军。超过3000人死亡，在这一冲突中，英国政府平叛政策成功地扭曲成一个亲英新教徒之间的教派屠杀的主要支持者和天主教的爱尔兰民族人口。起源的这种冲突躺在更改爱尔兰被英国殖民统治者的时候，他们在岛–1920年至1921年国际民主规范–到亲英北小国和名义上独立的南部。
英国殖民统治者灌输一个优越的心态在基督教社区在新的北爱尔兰，copperfastening特权暴政的政治，经济和社会歧视天主教徒。许多新教的工人阶级的社区的真理没有更好的物质比天主教同行，但英国的宗教政策深深植入种子的仇恨和不信任作为一种手段，分而治之。
最近爆发在贝尔法斯特暴乱的起因是天主教徒试图举行和平纪念日的周末。部分在新教社会不能容忍这样一个示范，尽管1998个和平协定理应保障宗教和文化的平等在北爱尔兰。心态宗派仇恨继承了英国殖民镇压爱尔兰民族权利仍是个大问题。政客在伦敦会咳在街道在贝尔法斯特混乱，但是这是一个表现的英国的非法干涉爱尔兰。
英国在爱尔兰累计从自封的任务，源于历史植入一个亲英的公民。同样的不平等阻碍自然领土权利可以看到在争执马尔维纳斯群岛，被强行剥夺了来自阿根廷的英国1833和改名为福克兰群岛。两国开战后在1982阿根廷军队占领的领土。阿根廷拥有丰富的领土要求的岛屿的海域，然而英国认为它具有法律权利拥有因为岛上的居民，谁从英国殖民者，坚持说他们想保留英国的地位。这是典型的英国主观选区划分“得到正确的结果”。
英国政府继续怨恨是因为布宜诺斯艾利斯拒绝遵守联合国决议进入协商解决。最近英国首相戴维·卡梅伦举行公投在马尔维纳斯群岛的未来一直谴责阿根廷作为英国的障碍，进一步解决争端。由于巨大的石油和渔业资源的领土，以及最近的军事化的地区的英国，风险恢复战争不能打折扣。
一种不同的英国社会工程学殖民私利是看到在今天的困境，缅甸罗辛亚MSL。这些人是由英国缅甸统治者和印度帝国。罗辛亚族人被移植到了孟加拉东南亚英国殖民地的缅甸充当劳工和臣仆的白人。虽然MSL罗辛亚族人现在居住在缅甸的后代，他们从来没有被接受的土著大多数佛教徒，他们已经经历了几十年的残酷的迫害。这种迫害已经升级，最近与屠杀和焚烧村庄和棚户区。一个可能的因素是，在正式访问缅甸的英国首相卡梅伦在今年的早些时候，执政的军政府可能觉得他们获得青睐的西方列强，谁热衷于开放贸易和投资，从而鼓励恢复其种族灭绝政策对罗辛亚族人。牺牲过去做粗活的英国大师，这些人被牺牲的棋子再为英国首都。
传统的英国暴政和剥削遍布全球，但其核心遗留下的痛苦必须是中东地区。今天，巴勒斯坦人民的生活陌生人在自己的土地，剥夺了他们的权利和他们的家庭生活在世界上最大的露天集中营。本周，以色列战机轰炸贫穷下生活的巴勒斯坦人在加沙的瓦砾和临时住房。事实上，这不是新闻。这种反人类罪行发生在每周一次的zionist-occupied巴勒斯坦土地，多亏了英国的政治支持，以及美国和欧洲。
纵观历史圣地地图显示反演的政治和人口之间1947和今天。1947，没有任何国家对以色列。英国控制的巴勒斯坦是一个单一的领土和巴勒斯坦MSL占主导地位，以及少数民族的基督徒和犹太人。但英国统治者诱惑的犹太资本家僭取权利将在神秘贝尔福宣言1917和移交领土的犹太复国主义者由哈伊姆魏茨曼和本古里安。今天，巴勒斯坦被减少以2减少领土飞地钉在十字架上的墙壁和检查站，他们的家园被摧毁和轰炸将american-supplied以色列飞机和无人驾驶飞机。
在波斯海湾君主制的沙乌地阿拉伯和巴林，大多数人努力争取民主自由的从英国实行专制统治者。房子的沙特和哈里发被嫁接到大多数阿拉伯人民的众议院温莎的功能作为帝国主义的构建提供石油财富。这些专制统治者无视所有规范的民主和人权的保护下的英国和美国的军事力量。目前的普遍抗议这些绝对君主制在沙乌地阿拉伯和巴林，和沉默的伦敦和华盛顿的遗产，表明英国暴政，这些人都有患在目前的一天。它还表明秩虚伪和玩世不恭的这些权力和他们的阿拉伯独裁者声称支持民主和人权在叙利亚。
本周，巴林法庭支持句20政治领导人和人权活动人士的“罪行”是和平呼吁当选政府取代british-imposed和us-supported哈里发绝对独裁者。政治领导人包括人物哈桑mushaima和杉谢里夫；人权活动家包括铝和铝singace abduljalil Khawa阿卜杜勒·哈迪。这些人的正直和高尚的良心。所有被摧残，酷刑，非法拘留和强迫使捏造的自白。
与此同时，英国的新闻调查局透露，巴林国王，哈马德哈里发，捐出4700000美元的英国桑赫斯特军事学院–学院，充当供应商英国军国主义世界的世纪。
以上仅是一个快照的持续不断的遗产英国暴政整个地球。在高度的大英帝国，上世纪第二十年代初期，它认为英国宣称统治20 %的地球的陆地。该多痛苦
In each of these seemingly disparate conflicts, the seeds of violence were sown by one system – British colonialism and its malevolent engineering of sectarianism. It is an indictment of British rulers that decades on, and sometimes centuries on, people’s lives are still being blighted by the legacy of Britain’s predatory, criminal history.”
It’s been a busy news week for British colonialism, or more accurately, the violent legacy of British colonialism. A rash of ongoing or renewed conflicts across the globe speaks of the detriment that the once-powerful British bequeathed and for which people of today have to contend with through injustice and in some cases immense human suffering.
In Northern Ireland, Belfast city has seen resurgent riots between pro-British Protestant youths and Irish nationalist Catholics, with extensive injuries, property damage and a painful reminder of sectarian bloodletting in recent years.
Over in the South Atlantic, Argentines and their government are up in arms over the London government’s proposal to hold a referendum on the future status of the Malvinas Islands, the British colony off Argentina otherwise known as the Falklands.
In the Middle East, Israel has committed yet more crimes against the besieged Palestinian people when fighter jets bombed the coastal Gaza strip, adding to the daily abject misery and terror of inhabitants.
Elsewhere in the Middle East, the people of Bahrain and Saudi Arabia continue their street agitations for democratic freedom from despotic monarchial rulers. In Bahrain, the calls for democracy were given added impetus when a court upheld the sentences against 20 political leaders, some of whom have been imprisoned for life.
Further East on the atlas, in the military junta of Myanmar, formerly known as British Burma, the persecution of thousands of Rohingya Muslims continues unabated, with hundreds killed at the hands of Buddhist gangs after being burned out of their shanty homes.
In each of these seemingly disparate conflicts, the seeds of violence were sown by one system – British colonialism and its malevolent engineering of sectarianism. It is an indictment of British rulers that decades on, and sometimes centuries on, people’s lives are still being blighted by the legacy of Britain’s predatory, criminal history.
In Northern Ireland, a peace settlement was reached after nearly 30 years of an anti-imperialist war between the guerrilla Irish Republican Army and the British forces. More than 3,000 people were killed during that conflict, which British government counter-insurgency policy succeeded in distorting into a sectarian bloodbath between pro-British Protestant loyalists and the mainly Catholic Irish nationalist population. The origins of that conflict lay in the gerrymandering of Ireland by the British colonial rulers when they partitioned the island in 1920-21 – against international and democratic norms – into a pro-British northern statelet and a nominally independent southern state.
The British colonial rulers inculcated a supremacist mindset among the Protestant community in the new Northern Ireland, copperfastening the privileged misrule with political, economic and social discrimination against Catholics. Many Protestant working-class communities were in truth not much better off materially than their Catholic counterparts, but nevertheless British sectarian policy implanted deep seeds of hatred and distrust as a means of dividing and ruling.
The latest outbreak of rioting in Belfast was sparked when Catholics tried to hold a peaceful commemorative march at the weekend. Sections within the Protestant community could not tolerate such a demonstration, even though the 1998 peace accord supposedly guarantees religious and cultural equality in Northern Ireland. The mindset of sectarian hatred inherited from British colonial subjugation of Irish national rights is still a live issue. Politicians in London may tut-tut at the street mayhem in Belfast, but this is a manifestation of Britain’s illegitimate meddling in Ireland.
British involvement in Ireland accrues from a self-styled mandate that stems from the historical implantation of a pro-British citizenry. The same gerrymandering to thwart natural territorial rights can be seen in the ongoing dispute over the Malvinas Islands, which were forcibly dispossessed from Argentina by Britain in 1833 and renamed the Falklands Islands. The two countries went to war briefly in 1982 after Argentinian troops occupied the territory. Argentina has substantial territorial claims to the islands off its coast, however Britain maintains that it has legal right to possession because the islanders, who descend from British colonizers, insist that they want to retain British status. This is classic British subjective gerrymandering to “get the right result”.
The British government continues to rankle Buenos Aires because it refuses to comply with United Nations resolutions to enter into a negotiated settlement. The latest move by British Prime Minister David Cameron to hold a referendum in the Malvinas on the future of the islands has been denounced by Argentina as a further British obstacle to resolving the dispute. Given the huge oil and fishing resources around the territory, and the recent militarization of the area by the British, the risk of a resumption of war cannot be discounted.
A different kind of British social engineering for colonial expedience is seen in today’s plight of Myanmar’s Rohingya Muslims. These people were introduced by the British rulers of Burma and imperial India. The Rohingyas were transplanted from what became Bangladesh to the Southeast Asian British colony of Burma to serve as labourers and servants for their white masters. Although the Muslim Rohingyas have now lived in Myanmar for generations, they have never been accepted by the indigenous majority Buddhists, and they have endured decades of brutal persecution. This persecution has escalated recently with massacres and burning of villages and shanty towns. One possible factor is that following an official visit to Myanmar by British Prime Minister Cameron earlier this year, the ruling junta may feel they have gained the favour of the Western powers, who are eager to open up trade and investment, and thus are emboldened to resume their genocidal policy against the Rohingyas. Sacrificed in the past to do menial work for their British masters, these people are being sacrificed again as pawns for British capital.
The legacy of British misrule and exploitation spans the globe, but its centerpiece for bequeathed suffering must be the Middle East region. Today, the people of Palestine live as strangers in their own land, dispossessed of their rights and their homes to live in the world’s biggest open-air concentration camp. This week saw Israeli warplanes bomb the impoverished Palestinians living under rubble and makeshift houses in Gaza. In truth, this is not news. Such crimes against humanity occur on a weekly basis in the Zionist-occupied Palestinian land, thanks in part to British political support, as well as American and European.
A look at historical maps of the Holy Land shows an inversion of politics and demographics between 1947 and today. In 1947, there was no state of Israel. British-controlled Palestine was a unitary territory predominated with Palestinian Muslims, as well as minorities of Christians and Jews. But the British rulers seduced by Jewish capitalists arrogated the right to deliver on the secretive Balfour Declaration of 1917 and hand over the territory to Zionists led by Chaim Weizmann and Ben Gurion. Today, the Palestinians are reduced to subsist on two diminishing territorial enclaves crucified by walls and checkpoints, their homes demolished and bombed at will by American-supplied Israeli warplanes and drones.
In the Persian Gulf monarchies of Saudi Arabia and Bahrain, the majority of people struggle to win democratic freedoms from the British imposition of despotic rulers. The Houses of Saud and Khalifa were grafted on to the majority Arab people by the House of Windsor to function as imperialist constructs to deliver oil wealth. These despotic rulers defy all norms of democracy and human rights thanks to the protection of British and American military might. The ongoing popular protests against these absolute monarchies in Saudi Arabia and Bahrain, and the silence from London and Washington, demonstrates the legacy of British misrule that these people are having to suffer in the present day. It also demonstrates the rank hypocrisy and cynicism of these powers and their Arab despots who claim to be supporting democracy and human rights in Syria.
This week, a Bahraini court upheld the sentences against 20 political leaders and human rights activists whose only “crime” was to peacefully call for elected government to replace the British-imposed and US-supported Khalifa absolute dictator. The political leaders include figures like Hasan Mushaima and Ebrahim Sharif; the human rights activists include Abdulhadi Al Khawaja and Abduljalil Al Singace. These are men of integrity and noble conscience. All were brutalized, tortured, illegally detained and forced to make trumped-up confessions.
Meanwhile, the British-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism revealed that the Bahraini king, Hamad Al Khalifa, donated $4.7 million dollars to the British military academy Sandhurst – the academy that has functioned as a supplier of British militarism to the world over the centuries.
The above is only a snapshot of the ongoing legacy of British misrule across the planet. At the height of the British Empire, in the early 20th century, it is reckoned that Britain asserted domination over some 20 per cent of the Earth’s landmass. Many more painful legacies could therefore be added to the litany of violence and suffering that so many people have to live with today.
The point is not to revisit history as some distant, past event. The point is to understand the seeds of conflict in today’s world so that some attempt can be made at creating a solution from an accurate understanding of the root causes of conflict.
A further point is to accurately assess the moral and political bankruptcy of Britain’s rulers in present world conflicts. When the British government pokes its moralizing finger at Iran or into the sovereign affairs of Syria, it should be seen as not only illegitimate, but as the bearer of conflict, suffering and destruction. The British government should be seen as having no positive role to play in resolving any conflict. Indeed, if it gets its covert way in Syria, the British involvement there will result in a hateful sectarian bloodbath, in much the same way that it has overseen in Libya along with its American, French and Arab despotic allies.
Britain may once upon a time have ruled the waves. Today, its mischief-making rulers should be waved away with contempt.
在这些看似不同的冲突，暴力的种子播种的一个系统–英国殖民主义和宗派主义的恶毒的工程。这是对英国统治者，几十年来，有时世纪，人们的生活仍受到传统英国掠夺，犯罪历史。”
这是繁忙的一周新闻英国殖民主义，或者更准确地说，暴力遗产的英国殖民主义。皮疹持续或新的冲突在全球各地的损害，一度强大的英国留下，今天的人们不得不与通过不公正和在某些情况下，巨大的人类苦难。
在北爱尔兰，贝尔法斯特市出现了死灰复燃的骚乱亲英新教徒之间的年轻人和爱尔兰民族主义者的天主教徒，与广泛的伤害，财产损害和痛苦地提醒人们的宗派暴力近年来。
在南大西洋，阿根廷人，他们的政府是在武器的伦敦政府提议举行公投的未来地位的马尔维纳斯群岛，英国殖民地阿根廷，否则称为福克兰群岛。
在中东，以色列犯下了更多的罪行被围困的巴勒斯坦人民当战机轰炸了加沙地带的海岸，增加每日悲惨的苦难和恐惧的居民。
在中东其他国家，巴林人和阿拉伯继续他们的街道噪音民主自由从专制君主统治者。在巴林，呼吁民主得到补充动力，当法院维持了20句对政治领导人，他们中的一些已经被终身监禁。
再往东的阿特拉斯，在缅甸军政府，前身为英国缅甸，迫害的数以千计的罗辛亚MSL继续有增无减，战死在手中的佛教团伙被烧毁的棚屋里。
在这些看似不同的冲突，暴力的种子播种的一个系统–英国殖民主义和宗派主义的恶毒的工程。这是对英国统治者，几十年来，有时世纪，人们的生活仍受到传统英国掠夺，犯罪史。
在北爱尔兰，和平解决是经过近30年的反帝国主义的战争的游击队之间的爱尔兰共和军和英军。超过3000人死亡，在这一冲突中，英国政府平叛政策成功地扭曲成一个亲英新教徒之间的教派屠杀的主要支持者和天主教的爱尔兰民族人口。起源的这种冲突躺在更改爱尔兰被英国殖民统治者的时候，他们在岛–1920年至1921年国际民主规范–到亲英北小国和名义上独立的南部。
英国殖民统治者灌输一个优越的心态在基督教社区在新的北爱尔兰，copperfastening特权暴政的政治，经济和社会歧视天主教徒。许多新教的工人阶级的社区的真理没有更好的物质比天主教同行，但英国的宗教政策深深植入种子的仇恨和不信任作为一种手段，分而治之。
最近爆发在贝尔法斯特暴乱的起因是天主教徒试图举行和平纪念日的周末。部分在新教社会不能容忍这样一个示范，尽管1998个和平协定理应保障宗教和文化的平等在北爱尔兰。心态宗派仇恨继承了英国殖民镇压爱尔兰民族权利仍是个大问题。政客在伦敦会咳在街道在贝尔法斯特混乱，但是这是一个表现的英国的非法干涉爱尔兰。
英国在爱尔兰累计从自封的任务，源于历史植入一个亲英的公民。同样的不平等阻碍自然领土权利可以看到在争执马尔维纳斯群岛，被强行剥夺了来自阿根廷的英国1833和改名为福克兰群岛。两国开战后在1982阿根廷军队占领的领土。阿根廷拥有丰富的领土要求的岛屿的海域，然而英国认为它具有法律权利拥有因为岛上的居民，谁从英国殖民者，坚持说他们想保留英国的地位。这是典型的英国主观选区划分“得到正确的结果”。
英国政府继续怨恨是因为布宜诺斯艾利斯拒绝遵守联合国决议进入协商解决。最近英国首相戴维·卡梅伦举行公投在马尔维纳斯群岛的未来一直谴责阿根廷作为英国的障碍，进一步解决争端。由于巨大的石油和渔业资源的领土，以及最近的军事化的地区的英国，风险恢复战争不能打折扣。
一种不同的英国社会工程学殖民私利是看到在今天的困境，缅甸罗辛亚MSL。这些人是由英国缅甸统治者和印度帝国。罗辛亚族人被移植到了孟加拉东南亚英国殖民地的缅甸充当劳工和臣仆的白人。虽然MSL罗辛亚族人现在居住在缅甸的后代，他们从来没有被接受的土著大多数佛教徒，他们已经经历了几十年的残酷的迫害。这种迫害已经升级，最近与屠杀和焚烧村庄和棚户区。一个可能的因素是，在正式访问缅甸的英国首相卡梅伦在今年的早些时候，执政的军政府可能觉得他们获得青睐的西方列强，谁热衷于开放贸易和投资，从而鼓励恢复其种族灭绝政策对罗辛亚族人。牺牲过去做粗活的英国大师，这些人被牺牲的棋子再为英国首都。
传统的英国暴政和剥削遍布全球，但其核心遗留下的痛苦必须是中东地区。今天，巴勒斯坦人民的生活陌生人在自己的土地，剥夺了他们的权利和他们的家庭生活在世界上最大的露天集中营。本周，以色列战机轰炸贫穷下生活的巴勒斯坦人在加沙的瓦砾和临时住房。事实上，这不是新闻。这种反人类罪行发生在每周一次的zionist-occupied巴勒斯坦土地，多亏了英国的政治支持，以及美国和欧洲。
纵观历史圣地地图显示反演的政治和人口之间1947和今天。1947，没有任何国家对以色列。英国控制的巴勒斯坦是一个单一的领土和巴勒斯坦MSL占主导地位，以及少数民族的基督徒和犹太人。但英国统治者诱惑的犹太资本家僭取权利将在神秘贝尔福宣言1917和移交领土的犹太复国主义者由哈伊姆魏茨曼和本古里安。今天，巴勒斯坦被减少以2减少领土飞地钉在十字架上的墙壁和检查站，他们的家园被摧毁和轰炸将american-supplied以色列飞机和无人驾驶飞机。
在波斯海湾君主制的沙乌地阿拉伯和巴林，大多数人努力争取民主自由的从英国实行专制统治者。房子的沙特和哈里发被嫁接到大多数阿拉伯人民的众议院温莎的功能作为帝国主义的构建提供石油财富。这些专制统治者无视所有规范的民主和人权的保护下的英国和美国的军事力量。目前的普遍抗议这些绝对君主制在沙乌地阿拉伯和巴林，和沉默的伦敦和华盛顿的遗产，表明英国暴政，这些人都有患在目前的一天。它还表明秩虚伪和玩世不恭的这些权力和他们的阿拉伯独裁者声称支持民主和人权在叙利亚。
本周，巴林法庭支持句20政治领导人和人权活动人士的“罪行”是和平呼吁当选政府取代british-imposed和us-supported哈里发绝对独裁者。政治领导人包括人物哈桑mushaima和杉谢里夫；人权活动家包括铝和铝singace abduljalil Khawa阿卜杜勒·哈迪。这些人的正直和高尚的良心。所有被摧残，酷刑，非法拘留和强迫使捏造的自白。
与此同时，英国的新闻调查局透露，巴林国王，哈马德哈里发，捐出4700000美元的英国桑赫斯特军事学院–学院，充当供应商英国军国主义世界的世纪。
以上仅是一个快照的持续不断的遗产英国暴政整个地球。在高度的大英帝国，上世纪第二十年代初期，它认为英国宣称统治20 %的地球的陆地。该多痛苦
It’s been a busy news week for British colonialism, or more accurately, the violent legacy of British colonialism. A rash of ongoing or renewed conflicts across the globe speaks of the detriment that the once-powerful British bequeathed and for which people of today have to contend with through injustice and in some cases immense human suffering.
In Northern Ireland, Belfast city has seen resurgent riots between pro-British Protestant youths and Irish nationalist Catholics, with extensive injuries, property damage and a painful reminder of sectarian bloodletting in recent years.
Over in the South Atlantic, Argentines and their government are up in arms over the London government’s proposal to hold a referendum on the future status of the Malvinas Islands, the British colony off Argentina otherwise known as the Falklands.
In the Middle East, Israel has committed yet more crimes against the besieged Palestinian people when fighter jets bombed the coastal Gaza strip, adding to the daily abject misery and terror of inhabitants.
Elsewhere in the Middle East, the people of Bahrain and Saudi Arabia continue their street agitations for democratic freedom from despotic monarchial rulers. In Bahrain, the calls for democracy were given added impetus when a court upheld the sentences against 20 political leaders, some of whom have been imprisoned for life.
Further East on the atlas, in the military junta of Myanmar, formerly known as British Burma, the persecution of thousands of Rohingya Muslims continues unabated, with hundreds killed at the hands of Buddhist gangs after being burned out of their shanty homes.
In each of these seemingly disparate conflicts, the seeds of violence were sown by one system – British colonialism and its malevolent engineering of sectarianism. It is an indictment of British rulers that decades on, and sometimes centuries on, people’s lives are still being blighted by the legacy of Britain’s predatory, criminal history.
In Northern Ireland, a peace settlement was reached after nearly 30 years of an anti-imperialist war between the guerrilla Irish Republican Army and the British forces. More than 3,000 people were killed during that conflict, which British government counter-insurgency policy succeeded in distorting into a sectarian bloodbath between pro-British Protestant loyalists and the mainly Catholic Irish nationalist population. The origins of that conflict lay in the gerrymandering of Ireland by the British colonial rulers when they partitioned the island in 1920-21 – against international and democratic norms – into a pro-British northern statelet and a nominally independent southern state.
The British colonial rulers inculcated a supremacist mindset among the Protestant community in the new Northern Ireland, copperfastening the privileged misrule with political, economic and social discrimination against Catholics. Many Protestant working-class communities were in truth not much better off materially than their Catholic counterparts, but nevertheless British sectarian policy implanted deep seeds of hatred and distrust as a means of dividing and ruling.
The latest outbreak of rioting in Belfast was sparked when Catholics tried to hold a peaceful commemorative march at the weekend. Sections within the Protestant community could not tolerate such a demonstration, even though the 1998 peace accord supposedly guarantees religious and cultural equality in Northern Ireland. The mindset of sectarian hatred inherited from British colonial subjugation of Irish national rights is still a live issue. Politicians in London may tut-tut at the street mayhem in Belfast, but this is a manifestation of Britain’s illegitimate meddling in Ireland.
British involvement in Ireland accrues from a self-styled mandate that stems from the historical implantation of a pro-British citizenry. The same gerrymandering to thwart natural territorial rights can be seen in the ongoing dispute over the Malvinas Islands, which were forcibly dispossessed from Argentina by Britain in 1833 and renamed the Falklands Islands. The two countries went to war briefly in 1982 after Argentinian troops occupied the territory. Argentina has substantial territorial claims to the islands off its coast, however Britain maintains that it has legal right to possession because the islanders, who descend from British colonizers, insist that they want to retain British status. This is classic British subjective gerrymandering to “get the right result”.
The British government continues to rankle Buenos Aires because it refuses to comply with United Nations resolutions to enter into a negotiated settlement. The latest move by British Prime Minister David Cameron to hold a referendum in the Malvinas on the future of the islands has been denounced by Argentina as a further British obstacle to resolving the dispute. Given the huge oil and fishing resources around the territory, and the recent militarization of the area by the British, the risk of a resumption of war cannot be discounted.
A different kind of British social engineering for colonial expedience is seen in today’s plight of Myanmar’s Rohingya Muslims. These people were introduced by the British rulers of Burma and imperial India. The Rohingyas were transplanted from what became Bangladesh to the Southeast Asian British colony of Burma to serve as labourers and servants for their white masters. Although the Muslim Rohingyas have now lived in Myanmar for generations, they have never been accepted by the indigenous majority Buddhists, and they have endured decades of brutal persecution. This persecution has escalated recently with massacres and burning of villages and shanty towns. One possible factor is that following an official visit to Myanmar by British Prime Minister Cameron earlier this year, the ruling junta may feel they have gained the favour of the Western powers, who are eager to open up trade and investment, and thus are emboldened to resume their genocidal policy against the Rohingyas. Sacrificed in the past to do menial work for their British masters, these people are being sacrificed again as pawns for British capital.
The legacy of British misrule and exploitation spans the globe, but its centerpiece for bequeathed suffering must be the Middle East region. Today, the people of Palestine live as strangers in their own land, dispossessed of their rights and their homes to live in the world’s biggest open-air concentration camp. This week saw Israeli warplanes bomb the impoverished Palestinians living under rubble and makeshift houses in Gaza. In truth, this is not news. Such crimes against humanity occur on a weekly basis in the Zionist-occupied Palestinian land, thanks in part to British political support, as well as American and European.
A look at historical maps of the Holy Land shows an inversion of politics and demographics between 1947 and today. In 1947, there was no state of Israel. British-controlled Palestine was a unitary territory predominated with Palestinian Muslims, as well as minorities of Christians and Jews. But the British rulers seduced by Jewish capitalists arrogated the right to deliver on the secretive Balfour Declaration of 1917 and hand over the territory to Zionists led by Chaim Weizmann and Ben Gurion. Today, the Palestinians are reduced to subsist on two diminishing territorial enclaves crucified by walls and checkpoints, their homes demolished and bombed at will by American-supplied Israeli warplanes and drones.
In the Persian Gulf monarchies of Saudi Arabia and Bahrain, the majority of people struggle to win democratic freedoms from the British imposition of despotic rulers. The Houses of Saud and Khalifa were grafted on to the majority Arab people by the House of Windsor to function as imperialist constructs to deliver oil wealth. These despotic rulers defy all norms of democracy and human rights thanks to the protection of British and American military might. The ongoing popular protests against these absolute monarchies in Saudi Arabia and Bahrain, and the silence from London and Washington, demonstrates the legacy of British misrule that these people are having to suffer in the present day. It also demonstrates the rank hypocrisy and cynicism of these powers and their Arab despots who claim to be supporting democracy and human rights in Syria.
This week, a Bahraini court upheld the sentences against 20 political leaders and human rights activists whose only “crime” was to peacefully call for elected government to replace the British-imposed and US-supported Khalifa absolute dictator. The political leaders include figures like Hasan Mushaima and Ebrahim Sharif; the human rights activists include Abdulhadi Al Khawaja and Abduljalil Al Singace. These are men of integrity and noble conscience. All were brutalized, tortured, illegally detained and forced to make trumped-up confessions.
Meanwhile, the British-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism revealed that the Bahraini king, Hamad Al Khalifa, donated $4.7 million dollars to the British military academy Sandhurst – the academy that has functioned as a supplier of British militarism to the world over the centuries.
The above is only a snapshot of the ongoing legacy of British misrule across the planet. At the height of the British Empire, in the early 20th century, it is reckoned that Britain asserted domination over some 20 per cent of the Earth’s landmass. Many more painful legacies could therefore be added to the litany of violence and suffering that so many people have to live with today.
The point is not to revisit history as some distant, past event. The point is to understand the seeds of conflict in today’s world so that some attempt can be made at creating a solution from an accurate understanding of the root causes of conflict.
A further point is to accurately assess the moral and political bankruptcy of Britain’s rulers in present world conflicts. When the British government pokes its moralizing finger at Iran or into the sovereign affairs of Syria, it should be seen as not only illegitimate, but as the bearer of conflict, suffering and destruction. The British government should be seen as having no positive role to play in resolving any conflict. Indeed, if it gets its covert way in Syria, the British involvement there will result in a hateful sectarian bloodbath, in much the same way that it has overseen in Libya along with its American, French and Arab despotic allies.
Britain may once upon a time have ruled the waves. Today, its mischief-making rulers should be waved away with contempt.
在这些看似不同的冲突，暴力的种子播种的一个系统–英国殖民主义和宗派主义的恶毒的工程。这是对英国统治者，几十年来，有时世纪，人们的生活仍受到传统英国掠夺，犯罪历史。”
这是繁忙的一周新闻英国殖民主义，或者更准确地说，暴力遗产的英国殖民主义。皮疹持续或新的冲突在全球各地的损害，一度强大的英国留下，今天的人们不得不与通过不公正和在某些情况下，巨大的人类苦难。
在北爱尔兰，贝尔法斯特市出现了死灰复燃的骚乱亲英新教徒之间的年轻人和爱尔兰民族主义者的天主教徒，与广泛的伤害，财产损害和痛苦地提醒人们的宗派暴力近年来。
在南大西洋，阿根廷人，他们的政府是在武器的伦敦政府提议举行公投的未来地位的马尔维纳斯群岛，英国殖民地阿根廷，否则称为福克兰群岛。
在中东，以色列犯下了更多的罪行被围困的巴勒斯坦人民当战机轰炸了加沙地带的海岸，增加每日悲惨的苦难和恐惧的居民。
在中东其他国家，巴林人和阿拉伯继续他们的街道噪音民主自由从专制君主统治者。在巴林，呼吁民主得到补充动力，当法院维持了20句对政治领导人，他们中的一些已经被终身监禁。
再往东的阿特拉斯，在缅甸军政府，前身为英国缅甸，迫害的数以千计的罗辛亚MSL继续有增无减，战死在手中的佛教团伙被烧毁的棚屋里。
在这些看似不同的冲突，暴力的种子播种的一个系统–英国殖民主义和宗派主义的恶毒的工程。这是对英国统治者，几十年来，有时世纪，人们的生活仍受到传统英国掠夺，犯罪史。
在北爱尔兰，和平解决是经过近30年的反帝国主义的战争的游击队之间的爱尔兰共和军和英军。超过3000人死亡，在这一冲突中，英国政府平叛政策成功地扭曲成一个亲英新教徒之间的教派屠杀的主要支持者和天主教的爱尔兰民族人口。起源的这种冲突躺在更改爱尔兰被英国殖民统治者的时候，他们在岛–1920年至1921年国际民主规范–到亲英北小国和名义上独立的南部。
英国殖民统治者灌输一个优越的心态在基督教社区在新的北爱尔兰，copperfastening特权暴政的政治，经济和社会歧视天主教徒。许多新教的工人阶级的社区的真理没有更好的物质比天主教同行，但英国的宗教政策深深植入种子的仇恨和不信任作为一种手段，分而治之。
最近爆发在贝尔法斯特暴乱的起因是天主教徒试图举行和平纪念日的周末。部分在新教社会不能容忍这样一个示范，尽管1998个和平协定理应保障宗教和文化的平等在北爱尔兰。心态宗派仇恨继承了英国殖民镇压爱尔兰民族权利仍是个大问题。政客在伦敦会咳在街道在贝尔法斯特混乱，但是这是一个表现的英国的非法干涉爱尔兰。
英国在爱尔兰累计从自封的任务，源于历史植入一个亲英的公民。同样的不平等阻碍自然领土权利可以看到在争执马尔维纳斯群岛，被强行剥夺了来自阿根廷的英国1833和改名为福克兰群岛。两国开战后在1982阿根廷军队占领的领土。阿根廷拥有丰富的领土要求的岛屿的海域，然而英国认为它具有法律权利拥有因为岛上的居民，谁从英国殖民者，坚持说他们想保留英国的地位。这是典型的英国主观选区划分“得到正确的结果”。
英国政府继续怨恨是因为布宜诺斯艾利斯拒绝遵守联合国决议进入协商解决。最近英国首相戴维·卡梅伦举行公投在马尔维纳斯群岛的未来一直谴责阿根廷作为英国的障碍，进一步解决争端。由于巨大的石油和渔业资源的领土，以及最近的军事化的地区的英国，风险恢复战争不能打折扣。
一种不同的英国社会工程学殖民私利是看到在今天的困境，缅甸罗辛亚MSL。这些人是由英国缅甸统治者和印度帝国。罗辛亚族人被移植到了孟加拉东南亚英国殖民地的缅甸充当劳工和臣仆的白人。虽然MSL罗辛亚族人现在居住在缅甸的后代，他们从来没有被接受的土著大多数佛教徒，他们已经经历了几十年的残酷的迫害。这种迫害已经升级，最近与屠杀和焚烧村庄和棚户区。一个可能的因素是，在正式访问缅甸的英国首相卡梅伦在今年的早些时候，执政的军政府可能觉得他们获得青睐的西方列强，谁热衷于开放贸易和投资，从而鼓励恢复其种族灭绝政策对罗辛亚族人。牺牲过去做粗活的英国大师，这些人被牺牲的棋子再为英国首都。
传统的英国暴政和剥削遍布全球，但其核心遗留下的痛苦必须是中东地区。今天，巴勒斯坦人民的生活陌生人在自己的土地，剥夺了他们的权利和他们的家庭生活在世界上最大的露天集中营。本周，以色列战机轰炸贫穷下生活的巴勒斯坦人在加沙的瓦砾和临时住房。事实上，这不是新闻。这种反人类罪行发生在每周一次的zionist-occupied巴勒斯坦土地，多亏了英国的政治支持，以及美国和欧洲。
纵观历史圣地地图显示反演的政治和人口之间1947和今天。1947，没有任何国家对以色列。英国控制的巴勒斯坦是一个单一的领土和巴勒斯坦MSL占主导地位，以及少数民族的基督徒和犹太人。但英国统治者诱惑的犹太资本家僭取权利将在神秘贝尔福宣言1917和移交领土的犹太复国主义者由哈伊姆魏茨曼和本古里安。今天，巴勒斯坦被减少以2减少领土飞地钉在十字架上的墙壁和检查站，他们的家园被摧毁和轰炸将american-supplied以色列飞机和无人驾驶飞机。
在波斯海湾君主制的沙乌地阿拉伯和巴林，大多数人努力争取民主自由的从英国实行专制统治者。房子的沙特和哈里发被嫁接到大多数阿拉伯人民的众议院温莎的功能作为帝国主义的构建提供石油财富。这些专制统治者无视所有规范的民主和人权的保护下的英国和美国的军事力量。目前的普遍抗议这些绝对君主制在沙乌地阿拉伯和巴林，和沉默的伦敦和华盛顿的遗产，表明英国暴政，这些人都有患在目前的一天。它还表明秩虚伪和玩世不恭的这些权力和他们的阿拉伯独裁者声称支持民主和人权在叙利亚。
本周，巴林法庭支持句20政治领导人和人权活动人士的“罪行”是和平呼吁当选政府取代british-imposed和us-supported哈里发绝对独裁者。政治领导人包括人物哈桑mushaima和杉谢里夫；人权活动家包括铝和铝singace abduljalil Khawa阿卜杜勒·哈迪。这些人的正直和高尚的良心。所有被摧残，酷刑，非法拘留和强迫使捏造的自白。
与此同时，英国的新闻调查局透露，巴林国王，哈马德哈里发，捐出4700000美元的英国桑赫斯特军事学院–学院，充当供应商英国军国主义世界的世纪。
以上仅是一个快照的持续不断的遗产英国暴政整个地球。在高度的大英帝国，上世纪第二十年代初期，它认为英国宣称统治20 %的地球的陆地。该多痛苦
In each of these seemingly disparate conflicts, the seeds of violence were sown by one system – British colonialism and its malevolent engineering of sectarianism. It is an indictment of British rulers that decades on, and sometimes centuries on, people’s lives are still being blighted by the legacy of Britain’s predatory, criminal history.”
It’s been a busy news week for British colonialism, or more accurately, the violent legacy of British colonialism. A rash of ongoing or renewed conflicts across the globe speaks of the detriment that the once-powerful British bequeathed and for which people of today have to contend with through injustice and in some cases immense human suffering.
In Northern Ireland, Belfast city has seen resurgent riots between pro-British Protestant youths and Irish nationalist Catholics, with extensive injuries, property damage and a painful reminder of sectarian bloodletting in recent years.
Over in the South Atlantic, Argentines and their government are up in arms over the London government’s proposal to hold a referendum on the future status of the Malvinas Islands, the British colony off Argentina otherwise known as the Falklands.
In the Middle East, Israel has committed yet more crimes against the besieged Palestinian people when fighter jets bombed the coastal Gaza strip, adding to the daily abject misery and terror of inhabitants.
Elsewhere in the Middle East, the people of Bahrain and Saudi Arabia continue their street agitations for democratic freedom from despotic monarchial rulers. In Bahrain, the calls for democracy were given added impetus when a court upheld the sentences against 20 political leaders, some of whom have been imprisoned for life.
Further East on the atlas, in the military junta of Myanmar, formerly known as British Burma, the persecution of thousands of Rohingya Muslims continues unabated, with hundreds killed at the hands of Buddhist gangs after being burned out of their shanty homes.
In each of these seemingly disparate conflicts, the seeds of violence were sown by one system – British colonialism and its malevolent engineering of sectarianism. It is an indictment of British rulers that decades on, and sometimes centuries on, people’s lives are still being blighted by the legacy of Britain’s predatory, criminal history.
In Northern Ireland, a peace settlement was reached after nearly 30 years of an anti-imperialist war between the guerrilla Irish Republican Army and the British forces. More than 3,000 people were killed during that conflict, which British government counter-insurgency policy succeeded in distorting into a sectarian bloodbath between pro-British Protestant loyalists and the mainly Catholic Irish nationalist population. The origins of that conflict lay in the gerrymandering of Ireland by the British colonial rulers when they partitioned the island in 1920-21 – against international and democratic norms – into a pro-British northern statelet and a nominally independent southern state.
The British colonial rulers inculcated a supremacist mindset among the Protestant community in the new Northern Ireland, copperfastening the privileged misrule with political, economic and social discrimination against Catholics. Many Protestant working-class communities were in truth not much better off materially than their Catholic counterparts, but nevertheless British sectarian policy implanted deep seeds of hatred and distrust as a means of dividing and ruling.
The latest outbreak of rioting in Belfast was sparked when Catholics tried to hold a peaceful commemorative march at the weekend. Sections within the Protestant community could not tolerate such a demonstration, even though the 1998 peace accord supposedly guarantees religious and cultural equality in Northern Ireland. The mindset of sectarian hatred inherited from British colonial subjugation of Irish national rights is still a live issue. Politicians in London may tut-tut at the street mayhem in Belfast, but this is a manifestation of Britain’s illegitimate meddling in Ireland.
British involvement in Ireland accrues from a self-styled mandate that stems from the historical implantation of a pro-British citizenry. The same gerrymandering to thwart natural territorial rights can be seen in the ongoing dispute over the Malvinas Islands, which were forcibly dispossessed from Argentina by Britain in 1833 and renamed the Falklands Islands. The two countries went to war briefly in 1982 after Argentinian troops occupied the territory. Argentina has substantial territorial claims to the islands off its coast, however Britain maintains that it has legal right to possession because the islanders, who descend from British colonizers, insist that they want to retain British status. This is classic British subjective gerrymandering to “get the right result”.
The British government continues to rankle Buenos Aires because it refuses to comply with United Nations resolutions to enter into a negotiated settlement. The latest move by British Prime Minister David Cameron to hold a referendum in the Malvinas on the future of the islands has been denounced by Argentina as a further British obstacle to resolving the dispute. Given the huge oil and fishing resources around the territory, and the recent militarization of the area by the British, the risk of a resumption of war cannot be discounted.
A different kind of British social engineering for colonial expedience is seen in today’s plight of Myanmar’s Rohingya Muslims. These people were introduced by the British rulers of Burma and imperial India. The Rohingyas were transplanted from what became Bangladesh to the Southeast Asian British colony of Burma to serve as labourers and servants for their white masters. Although the Muslim Rohingyas have now lived in Myanmar for generations, they have never been accepted by the indigenous majority Buddhists, and they have endured decades of brutal persecution. This persecution has escalated recently with massacres and burning of villages and shanty towns. One possible factor is that following an official visit to Myanmar by British Prime Minister Cameron earlier this year, the ruling junta may feel they have gained the favour of the Western powers, who are eager to open up trade and investment, and thus are emboldened to resume their genocidal policy against the Rohingyas. Sacrificed in the past to do menial work for their British masters, these people are being sacrificed again as pawns for British capital.
The legacy of British misrule and exploitation spans the globe, but its centerpiece for bequeathed suffering must be the Middle East region. Today, the people of Palestine live as strangers in their own land, dispossessed of their rights and their homes to live in the world’s biggest open-air concentration camp. This week saw Israeli warplanes bomb the impoverished Palestinians living under rubble and makeshift houses in Gaza. In truth, this is not news. Such crimes against humanity occur on a weekly basis in the Zionist-occupied Palestinian land, thanks in part to British political support, as well as American and European.
A look at historical maps of the Holy Land shows an inversion of politics and demographics between 1947 and today. In 1947, there was no state of Israel. British-controlled Palestine was a unitary territory predominated with Palestinian Muslims, as well as minorities of Christians and Jews. But the British rulers seduced by Jewish capitalists arrogated the right to deliver on the secretive Balfour Declaration of 1917 and hand over the territory to Zionists led by Chaim Weizmann and Ben Gurion. Today, the Palestinians are reduced to subsist on two diminishing territorial enclaves crucified by walls and checkpoints, their homes demolished and bombed at will by American-supplied Israeli warplanes and drones.
In the Persian Gulf monarchies of Saudi Arabia and Bahrain, the majority of people struggle to win democratic freedoms from the British imposition of despotic rulers. The Houses of Saud and Khalifa were grafted on to the majority Arab people by the House of Windsor to function as imperialist constructs to deliver oil wealth. These despotic rulers defy all norms of democracy and human rights thanks to the protection of British and American military might. The ongoing popular protests against these absolute monarchies in Saudi Arabia and Bahrain, and the silence from London and Washington, demonstrates the legacy of British misrule that these people are having to suffer in the present day. It also demonstrates the rank hypocrisy and cynicism of these powers and their Arab despots who claim to be supporting democracy and human rights in Syria.
This week, a Bahraini court upheld the sentences against 20 political leaders and human rights activists whose only “crime” was to peacefully call for elected government to replace the British-imposed and US-supported Khalifa absolute dictator. The political leaders include figures like Hasan Mushaima and Ebrahim Sharif; the human rights activists include Abdulhadi Al Khawaja and Abduljalil Al Singace. These are men of integrity and noble conscience. All were brutalized, tortured, illegally detained and forced to make trumped-up confessions.
Meanwhile, the British-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism revealed that the Bahraini king, Hamad Al Khalifa, donated $4.7 million dollars to the British military academy Sandhurst – the academy that has functioned as a supplier of British militarism to the world over the centuries.
The above is only a snapshot of the ongoing legacy of British misrule across the planet. At the height of the British Empire, in the early 20th century, it is reckoned that Britain asserted domination over some 20 per cent of the Earth’s landmass. Many more painful legacies could therefore be added to the litany of violence and suffering that so many people have to live with today.
The point is not to revisit history as some distant, past event. The point is to understand the seeds of conflict in today’s world so that some attempt can be made at creating a solution from an accurate understanding of the root causes of conflict.
A further point is to accurately assess the moral and political bankruptcy of Britain’s rulers in present world conflicts. When the British government pokes its moralizing finger at Iran or into the sovereign affairs of Syria, it should be seen as not only illegitimate, but as the bearer of conflict, suffering and destruction. The British government should be seen as having no positive role to play in resolving any conflict. Indeed, if it gets its covert way in Syria, the British involvement there will result in a hateful sectarian bloodbath, in much the same way that it has overseen in Libya along with its American, French and Arab despotic allies.
Britain may once upon a time have ruled the waves. Today, its mischief-making rulers should be waved away with contempt.
在这些看似不同的冲突，暴力的种子播种的一个系统–英国殖民主义和宗派主义的恶毒的工程。这是对英国统治者，几十年来，有时世纪，人们的生活仍受到传统英国掠夺，犯罪历史。”
这是繁忙的一周新闻英国殖民主义，或者更准确地说，暴力遗产的英国殖民主义。皮疹持续或新的冲突在全球各地的损害，一度强大的英国留下，今天的人们不得不与通过不公正和在某些情况下，巨大的人类苦难。
在北爱尔兰，贝尔法斯特市出现了死灰复燃的骚乱亲英新教徒之间的年轻人和爱尔兰民族主义者的天主教徒，与广泛的伤害，财产损害和痛苦地提醒人们的宗派暴力近年来。
在南大西洋，阿根廷人，他们的政府是在武器的伦敦政府提议举行公投的未来地位的马尔维纳斯群岛，英国殖民地阿根廷，否则称为福克兰群岛。
在中东，以色列犯下了更多的罪行被围困的巴勒斯坦人民当战机轰炸了加沙地带的海岸，增加每日悲惨的苦难和恐惧的居民。
在中东其他国家，巴林人和阿拉伯继续他们的街道噪音民主自由从专制君主统治者。在巴林，呼吁民主得到补充动力，当法院维持了20句对政治领导人，他们中的一些已经被终身监禁。
再往东的阿特拉斯，在缅甸军政府，前身为英国缅甸，迫害的数以千计的罗辛亚MSL继续有增无减，战死在手中的佛教团伙被烧毁的棚屋里。
在这些看似不同的冲突，暴力的种子播种的一个系统–英国殖民主义和宗派主义的恶毒的工程。这是对英国统治者，几十年来，有时世纪，人们的生活仍受到传统英国掠夺，犯罪史。
在北爱尔兰，和平解决是经过近30年的反帝国主义的战争的游击队之间的爱尔兰共和军和英军。超过3000人死亡，在这一冲突中，英国政府平叛政策成功地扭曲成一个亲英新教徒之间的教派屠杀的主要支持者和天主教的爱尔兰民族人口。起源的这种冲突躺在更改爱尔兰被英国殖民统治者的时候，他们在岛–1920年至1921年国际民主规范–到亲英北小国和名义上独立的南部。
英国殖民统治者灌输一个优越的心态在基督教社区在新的北爱尔兰，copperfastening特权暴政的政治，经济和社会歧视天主教徒。许多新教的工人阶级的社区的真理没有更好的物质比天主教同行，但英国的宗教政策深深植入种子的仇恨和不信任作为一种手段，分而治之。
最近爆发在贝尔法斯特暴乱的起因是天主教徒试图举行和平纪念日的周末。部分在新教社会不能容忍这样一个示范，尽管1998个和平协定理应保障宗教和文化的平等在北爱尔兰。心态宗派仇恨继承了英国殖民镇压爱尔兰民族权利仍是个大问题。政客在伦敦会咳在街道在贝尔法斯特混乱，但是这是一个表现的英国的非法干涉爱尔兰。
英国在爱尔兰累计从自封的任务，源于历史植入一个亲英的公民。同样的不平等阻碍自然领土权利可以看到在争执马尔维纳斯群岛，被强行剥夺了来自阿根廷的英国1833和改名为福克兰群岛。两国开战后在1982阿根廷军队占领的领土。阿根廷拥有丰富的领土要求的岛屿的海域，然而英国认为它具有法律权利拥有因为岛上的居民，谁从英国殖民者，坚持说他们想保留英国的地位。这是典型的英国主观选区划分“得到正确的结果”。
英国政府继续怨恨是因为布宜诺斯艾利斯拒绝遵守联合国决议进入协商解决。最近英国首相戴维·卡梅伦举行公投在马尔维纳斯群岛的未来一直谴责阿根廷作为英国的障碍，进一步解决争端。由于巨大的石油和渔业资源的领土，以及最近的军事化的地区的英国，风险恢复战争不能打折扣。
一种不同的英国社会工程学殖民私利是看到在今天的困境，缅甸罗辛亚MSL。这些人是由英国缅甸统治者和印度帝国。罗辛亚族人被移植到了孟加拉东南亚英国殖民地的缅甸充当劳工和臣仆的白人。虽然MSL罗辛亚族人现在居住在缅甸的后代，他们从来没有被接受的土著大多数佛教徒，他们已经经历了几十年的残酷的迫害。这种迫害已经升级，最近与屠杀和焚烧村庄和棚户区。一个可能的因素是，在正式访问缅甸的英国首相卡梅伦在今年的早些时候，执政的军政府可能觉得他们获得青睐的西方列强，谁热衷于开放贸易和投资，从而鼓励恢复其种族灭绝政策对罗辛亚族人。牺牲过去做粗活的英国大师，这些人被牺牲的棋子再为英国首都。
传统的英国暴政和剥削遍布全球，但其核心遗留下的痛苦必须是中东地区。今天，巴勒斯坦人民的生活陌生人在自己的土地，剥夺了他们的权利和他们的家庭生活在世界上最大的露天集中营。本周，以色列战机轰炸贫穷下生活的巴勒斯坦人在加沙的瓦砾和临时住房。事实上，这不是新闻。这种反人类罪行发生在每周一次的zionist-occupied巴勒斯坦土地，多亏了英国的政治支持，以及美国和欧洲。
纵观历史圣地地图显示反演的政治和人口之间1947和今天。1947，没有任何国家对以色列。英国控制的巴勒斯坦是一个单一的领土和巴勒斯坦MSL占主导地位，以及少数民族的基督徒和犹太人。但英国统治者诱惑的犹太资本家僭取权利将在神秘贝尔福宣言1917和移交领土的犹太复国主义者由哈伊姆魏茨曼和本古里安。今天，巴勒斯坦被减少以2减少领土飞地钉在十字架上的墙壁和检查站，他们的家园被摧毁和轰炸将american-supplied以色列飞机和无人驾驶飞机。
在波斯海湾君主制的沙乌地阿拉伯和巴林，大多数人努力争取民主自由的从英国实行专制统治者。房子的沙特和哈里发被嫁接到大多数阿拉伯人民的众议院温莎的功能作为帝国主义的构建提供石油财富。这些专制统治者无视所有规范的民主和人权的保护下的英国和美国的军事力量。目前的普遍抗议这些绝对君主制在沙乌地阿拉伯和巴林，和沉默的伦敦和华盛顿的遗产，表明英国暴政，这些人都有患在目前的一天。它还表明秩虚伪和玩世不恭的这些权力和他们的阿拉伯独裁者声称支持民主和人权在叙利亚。
本周，巴林法庭支持句20政治领导人和人权活动人士的“罪行”是和平呼吁当选政府取代british-imposed和us-supported哈里发绝对独裁者。政治领导人包括人物哈桑mushaima和杉谢里夫；人权活动家包括铝和铝singace abduljalil Khawa阿卜杜勒·哈迪。这些人的正直和高尚的良心。所有被摧残，酷刑，非法拘留和强迫使捏造的自白。
与此同时，英国的新闻调查局透露，巴林国王，哈马德哈里发，捐出4700000美元的英国桑赫斯特军事学院–学院，充当供应商英国军国主义世界的世纪。
以上仅是一个快照的持续不断的遗产英国暴政整个地球。在高度的大英帝国，上世纪第二十年代初期，它认为英国宣称统治20 %的地球的陆地。该多痛苦
机翻够恶心的。。。
這機翻我竟然看得懂。
无论是英文还是中文都看不懂……