局座又立功了！

刚才看了一个讲南海的新闻，加拿大多伦多星报的（多伦多地区最大报）。我好长时间没看过了，今天突然心血来潮想看看冰球的新闻，结果在首页上就发现这个好东东。文章非常长，我都没看完，所以不全发了，就发点引用局座评论DDG-1000的话。这个写新闻的明显是局座手下！

Chinese Rear Admiral Zhang Zhaozhong, a professor at China’s National Defence University, said the DDG-1000’s high-tech design wouldn’t protect it from a group of fishing boats packed with explosives. If enough fishing boats could be mobilized, the DDG-1000 “would be a goner,” Zhaozhong said recently on CCTV, China’s public broadcaster.

History would seem to support Zhaozhong.

意思就是局座发话了，一堆装炸弹的渔船就能轻松搞定美的的驱逐舰！然后记者也发话了，说历史也证明局座是对的
最后又狂举了一大堆例子

http://www.thestar.com/news/worl ... ce-in-the-china-sea刚才看了一个讲南海的新闻，加拿大多伦多星报的（多伦多地区最大报）。我好长时间没看过了，今天突然心血来潮想看看冰球的新闻，结果在首页上就发现这个好东东。文章非常长，我都没看完，所以不全发了，就发点引用局座评论DDG-1000的话。这个写新闻的明显是局座手下！

Chinese Rear Admiral Zhang Zhaozhong, a professor at China’s National Defence University, said the DDG-1000’s high-tech design wouldn’t protect it from a group of fishing boats packed with explosives. If enough fishing boats could be mobilized, the DDG-1000 “would be a goner,” Zhaozhong said recently on CCTV, China’s public broadcaster.

History would seem to support Zhaozhong.

意思就是局座发话了，一堆装炸弹的渔船就能轻松搞定美的的驱逐舰！然后记者也发话了，说历史也证明局座是对的
最后又狂举了一大堆例子

http://www.thestar.com/news/worl ... ce-in-the-china-sea