超级军网联合国未认可日本对冲之鸟礁主张 中方表示欢迎
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/04/27 22:16:42
联合国未认可日本对冲之鸟礁主张 中方表示欢迎
http://www.sina.com.cn 2012年05月16日 中国新闻网
![]()
日本媒体曾宣称的联合国批准的日延伸大陆架申请示意图，其中包括冲之鸟礁附近海域。
中新网5月16日电 中国外交部(微博)发言人洪磊16日就大陆架界限委员会公布涉冲之鸟礁问题处理结果答记者问时说，日本依据冲之鸟礁主张的外大陆架未获得委员会认可。日方声称冲之鸟礁被委员会认定为“岛”，这是毫无根据的。
有记者问：日前，大陆架界限委员会公布了委员会对日本外大陆架划界案涉冲之鸟礁问题的处理结果。此前，日本媒体曾援引日本外务省发布的消息称，委员会认可日本31万平方公里的外大陆架主张，包括“冲之鸟岛”以北的四国海盆区块；中方认为是“岩礁”的“冲之鸟岛”也被列为划定大陆架的定点之一，可见其已被认定为“岛”。中方对此有何评论？
洪磊说，根据大陆架界限委员会公布的有关信息，委员会已通过了其关于日本外大陆架划界案的处理意见。日本依据冲之鸟礁主张的外大陆架未获得委员会认可。日方声称冲之鸟礁被委员会认定为“岛”，这是毫无根据的。
洪磊说，事实是，日方提请大陆架界限委员会审议的外大陆架权利主张约74万平方公里，最终仅31万平方公里获得委员会认可。在未被委员会认可的外大陆架主张中，包括了日本依据冲之鸟礁主张的、面积约25万平方公里的南九州—帕劳洋脊区块。
洪磊表示，日方提及委员会认可了位于冲之鸟礁以北的四国海盆区块，但事实上该区块是基于日本其他陆地领土的外大陆架，与冲之鸟礁无关。
洪磊说，日本向委员会提出外大陆架划界案后，中国和韩国多次照会联合国(微博)秘书长，强调根据国际法，不适合人类居住的冲之鸟礁不应有专属经济区和大陆架，要求委员会不认可日本依据冲之鸟礁主张的外大陆架。许多国家也对日方涉冲之鸟礁非法主张提出异议。委员会对于日本划界案涉冲之鸟礁问题的处理公正合理，符合国际法，维护了国际社会整体利益，中方对此表示欢迎。
http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2012-05-16/125124425352.shtml
联合国未认可日本对冲之鸟礁主张 中方表示欢迎
http://www.sina.com.cn 2012年05月16日 中国新闻网
![]()
日本媒体曾宣称的联合国批准的日延伸大陆架申请示意图，其中包括冲之鸟礁附近海域。
中新网5月16日电 中国外交部(微博)发言人洪磊16日就大陆架界限委员会公布涉冲之鸟礁问题处理结果答记者问时说，日本依据冲之鸟礁主张的外大陆架未获得委员会认可。日方声称冲之鸟礁被委员会认定为“岛”，这是毫无根据的。
有记者问：日前，大陆架界限委员会公布了委员会对日本外大陆架划界案涉冲之鸟礁问题的处理结果。此前，日本媒体曾援引日本外务省发布的消息称，委员会认可日本31万平方公里的外大陆架主张，包括“冲之鸟岛”以北的四国海盆区块；中方认为是“岩礁”的“冲之鸟岛”也被列为划定大陆架的定点之一，可见其已被认定为“岛”。中方对此有何评论？
洪磊说，根据大陆架界限委员会公布的有关信息，委员会已通过了其关于日本外大陆架划界案的处理意见。日本依据冲之鸟礁主张的外大陆架未获得委员会认可。日方声称冲之鸟礁被委员会认定为“岛”，这是毫无根据的。
洪磊说，事实是，日方提请大陆架界限委员会审议的外大陆架权利主张约74万平方公里，最终仅31万平方公里获得委员会认可。在未被委员会认可的外大陆架主张中，包括了日本依据冲之鸟礁主张的、面积约25万平方公里的南九州—帕劳洋脊区块。
洪磊表示，日方提及委员会认可了位于冲之鸟礁以北的四国海盆区块，但事实上该区块是基于日本其他陆地领土的外大陆架，与冲之鸟礁无关。
洪磊说，日本向委员会提出外大陆架划界案后，中国和韩国多次照会联合国(微博)秘书长，强调根据国际法，不适合人类居住的冲之鸟礁不应有专属经济区和大陆架，要求委员会不认可日本依据冲之鸟礁主张的外大陆架。许多国家也对日方涉冲之鸟礁非法主张提出异议。委员会对于日本划界案涉冲之鸟礁问题的处理公正合理，符合国际法，维护了国际社会整体利益，中方对此表示欢迎。
http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2012-05-16/125124425352.shtml
http://www.sina.com.cn 2012年05月16日 中国新闻网
中新网5月16日电 中国外交部(微博)发言人洪磊16日就大陆架界限委员会公布涉冲之鸟礁问题处理结果答记者问时说，日本依据冲之鸟礁主张的外大陆架未获得委员会认可。日方声称冲之鸟礁被委员会认定为“岛”，这是毫无根据的。
有记者问：日前，大陆架界限委员会公布了委员会对日本外大陆架划界案涉冲之鸟礁问题的处理结果。此前，日本媒体曾援引日本外务省发布的消息称，委员会认可日本31万平方公里的外大陆架主张，包括“冲之鸟岛”以北的四国海盆区块；中方认为是“岩礁”的“冲之鸟岛”也被列为划定大陆架的定点之一，可见其已被认定为“岛”。中方对此有何评论？
洪磊说，根据大陆架界限委员会公布的有关信息，委员会已通过了其关于日本外大陆架划界案的处理意见。日本依据冲之鸟礁主张的外大陆架未获得委员会认可。日方声称冲之鸟礁被委员会认定为“岛”，这是毫无根据的。
洪磊说，事实是，日方提请大陆架界限委员会审议的外大陆架权利主张约74万平方公里，最终仅31万平方公里获得委员会认可。在未被委员会认可的外大陆架主张中，包括了日本依据冲之鸟礁主张的、面积约25万平方公里的南九州—帕劳洋脊区块。
洪磊表示，日方提及委员会认可了位于冲之鸟礁以北的四国海盆区块，但事实上该区块是基于日本其他陆地领土的外大陆架，与冲之鸟礁无关。
洪磊说，日本向委员会提出外大陆架划界案后，中国和韩国多次照会联合国(微博)秘书长，强调根据国际法，不适合人类居住的冲之鸟礁不应有专属经济区和大陆架，要求委员会不认可日本依据冲之鸟礁主张的外大陆架。许多国家也对日方涉冲之鸟礁非法主张提出异议。委员会对于日本划界案涉冲之鸟礁问题的处理公正合理，符合国际法，维护了国际社会整体利益，中方对此表示欢迎。
http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2012-05-16/125124425352.shtml
联合国未认可日本对冲之鸟礁主张 中方表示欢迎
http://www.sina.com.cn 2012年05月16日 中国新闻网
中新网5月16日电 中国外交部(微博)发言人洪磊16日就大陆架界限委员会公布涉冲之鸟礁问题处理结果答记者问时说，日本依据冲之鸟礁主张的外大陆架未获得委员会认可。日方声称冲之鸟礁被委员会认定为“岛”，这是毫无根据的。
有记者问：日前，大陆架界限委员会公布了委员会对日本外大陆架划界案涉冲之鸟礁问题的处理结果。此前，日本媒体曾援引日本外务省发布的消息称，委员会认可日本31万平方公里的外大陆架主张，包括“冲之鸟岛”以北的四国海盆区块；中方认为是“岩礁”的“冲之鸟岛”也被列为划定大陆架的定点之一，可见其已被认定为“岛”。中方对此有何评论？
洪磊说，根据大陆架界限委员会公布的有关信息，委员会已通过了其关于日本外大陆架划界案的处理意见。日本依据冲之鸟礁主张的外大陆架未获得委员会认可。日方声称冲之鸟礁被委员会认定为“岛”，这是毫无根据的。
洪磊说，事实是，日方提请大陆架界限委员会审议的外大陆架权利主张约74万平方公里，最终仅31万平方公里获得委员会认可。在未被委员会认可的外大陆架主张中，包括了日本依据冲之鸟礁主张的、面积约25万平方公里的南九州—帕劳洋脊区块。
洪磊表示，日方提及委员会认可了位于冲之鸟礁以北的四国海盆区块，但事实上该区块是基于日本其他陆地领土的外大陆架，与冲之鸟礁无关。
洪磊说，日本向委员会提出外大陆架划界案后，中国和韩国多次照会联合国(微博)秘书长，强调根据国际法，不适合人类居住的冲之鸟礁不应有专属经济区和大陆架，要求委员会不认可日本依据冲之鸟礁主张的外大陆架。许多国家也对日方涉冲之鸟礁非法主张提出异议。委员会对于日本划界案涉冲之鸟礁问题的处理公正合理，符合国际法，维护了国际社会整体利益，中方对此表示欢迎。
http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2012-05-16/125124425352.shtml
这位置跟《孤岛危机》中外星人降落的岛屿位置很接近啊。
最好能公布一下我们认可的日本领海地图。
Item 6
Submission made by Japan5
Consideration of draft recommendations
16. The Commission resumed its consideration of the draft recommendations,
which had been introduced to it by the Subcommission at the twenty-eighth session
(see CLCS/72, paras. 12-15).
17. Addressing the Shikoku Basin Region, the Commission did not agree that the
whole area beyond the formula lines should be included in the continental shelf of
Japan, and therefore amended the draft recommendations.
18. Addressing the Southern Kyushu-Palau Ridge Region, the Commission noted
that, in accordance with the decision taken by the Commission at its twenty-fourth
session (see CLCS/64, para. 26), the Subcommission had prepared the draft
recommendations on all parts of the submission. The Commission also recalled that,
according to the same decision, it would not take action on certain parts of those
recommendations until it decided to do so. The Commission also took note of all the
relevant communications received from China, Japan, Palau, the Republic of Korea
and the United States of America, including the most recent communications
received from China, Japan and the Republic of Korea.
__________________
4 Pursuant to paragraph 11 (3) of section V of annex III to the Rules of Procedure, the summary of
the recommendations will be made public by the Secretary-General on the website dedicated to
the work of the Commission at www.un.org/Dept/los.
5 Submission made on 12 November 2008; see www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_
files/submission_jpn.htm.
4 12-32632
----------------------- Page 5-----------------------
CLCS/74
19. The Commission proceeded to a formal vote on whether it should take action
on the part of the recommendations relating to the Southern Kyushu-Palau Ridge
Region. Responding to a question as to whether this was a matter of substance or of
procedure, the Chairperson ruled that it was one of substance, requiring a two-thirds
majority. That ruling was contested and subsequently upheld by a simple majority of
8 votes in favour, 7 against and 1 abstention. The Commission then discussed the
method of voting and decided to follow rule 38 of the Rules of Procedure, which
stipulates that “the Commission shall normally vote by a show of hands”.
Thereafter, the Commission voted on the proposal to take action on the part of the
draft recommendations relating to the Southern Kyushu-Palau Ridge Region. The
proposal did not receive a two-thirds majority of votes: out of 16 members, 5 were
in favour, 8 were against and 3 abstained. The Commission considered that it would
not be in a position to take action on the parts of the recommendations relating to
the Southern Kyushu-Palau Ridge Region until such time as the matters referred to
in the communications referred to above had been resolved.
Adoption of recommendations
20. On 19 April 2012, the Commission adopted by consensus the
“Recommendations of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf in
regard to the submission made by Japan on 12 November 2008”.
21. Pursuant to article 6, paragraph 3, of annex II to the Convention, the
recommendations, including a summary thereof,4 were submitted in writing to the
coastal State and to the Secretary-General on 26 April 2012.
Submission made by Japan5
Consideration of draft recommendations
16. The Commission resumed its consideration of the draft recommendations,
which had been introduced to it by the Subcommission at the twenty-eighth session
(see CLCS/72, paras. 12-15).
17. Addressing the Shikoku Basin Region, the Commission did not agree that the
whole area beyond the formula lines should be included in the continental shelf of
Japan, and therefore amended the draft recommendations.
18. Addressing the Southern Kyushu-Palau Ridge Region, the Commission noted
that, in accordance with the decision taken by the Commission at its twenty-fourth
session (see CLCS/64, para. 26), the Subcommission had prepared the draft
recommendations on all parts of the submission. The Commission also recalled that,
according to the same decision, it would not take action on certain parts of those
recommendations until it decided to do so. The Commission also took note of all the
relevant communications received from China, Japan, Palau, the Republic of Korea
and the United States of America, including the most recent communications
received from China, Japan and the Republic of Korea.
__________________
4 Pursuant to paragraph 11 (3) of section V of annex III to the Rules of Procedure, the summary of
the recommendations will be made public by the Secretary-General on the website dedicated to
the work of the Commission at www.un.org/Dept/los.
5 Submission made on 12 November 2008; see www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_
files/submission_jpn.htm.
4 12-32632
----------------------- Page 5-----------------------
CLCS/74
19. The Commission proceeded to a formal vote on whether it should take action
on the part of the recommendations relating to the Southern Kyushu-Palau Ridge
Region. Responding to a question as to whether this was a matter of substance or of
procedure, the Chairperson ruled that it was one of substance, requiring a two-thirds
majority. That ruling was contested and subsequently upheld by a simple majority of
8 votes in favour, 7 against and 1 abstention. The Commission then discussed the
method of voting and decided to follow rule 38 of the Rules of Procedure, which
stipulates that “the Commission shall normally vote by a show of hands”.
Thereafter, the Commission voted on the proposal to take action on the part of the
draft recommendations relating to the Southern Kyushu-Palau Ridge Region. The
proposal did not receive a two-thirds majority of votes: out of 16 members, 5 were
in favour, 8 were against and 3 abstained. The Commission considered that it would
not be in a position to take action on the parts of the recommendations relating to
the Southern Kyushu-Palau Ridge Region until such time as the matters referred to
in the communications referred to above had been resolved.
Adoption of recommendations
20. On 19 April 2012, the Commission adopted by consensus the
“Recommendations of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf in
regard to the submission made by Japan on 12 November 2008”.
21. Pursuant to article 6, paragraph 3, of annex II to the Convention, the
recommendations, including a summary thereof,4 were submitted in writing to the
coastal State and to the Secretary-General on 26 April 2012.