米帝媒体对网易腾讯在枪击案上节操的谴责…干爹不给脸… ...

来源:百度文库 编辑:超级军网 时间:2024/04/27 16:19:30
Just a few hours after the gunshots took place, an atmosphere of mourning covered the USC University Park Campus as students gathered for a vigil, remembering the two Chinese graduate students who were killed Wednesday morning. Meanwhile, several Chinese media irritated international students in the U.S.-- especially fellow Trojans-- with distorted reports of the incident.

On well-known Chinese websites such as“qq.com”and“163.com”, the story's title read“In Los Angeles, Two Chinese students were killed in a BMW.”
The reporter continued to remind readers of the BMW's importance to the story, stating that the BMW car was a brand new car worth $60,000. However, the BMW was later discovered to be a 2003 model that the male victim bought for about $10,000, reported The LA Times.
Because of the“$60,000 BMW" claim, the two students were criticized by Chinese media as being the“2nd generation of the rich”-- a negative connotation in China-- referring to kids from rich families who do not study or work; just take advantage of their family background and spend money. Contrary to the stigma, the two victims were described by their classmates as being hard-working students who saved money instead of spending loosely.
The Chinese media reporters not only offended the victims with misinformed labels, but Internet users also gloated over the story, leaving the following malicious comments:

“Good job of killing them, kill more‘2nd generation of the rich’.”

“Highly celebrate the death of the rich kids in American!!!!”

“Driving BMW, not worth sympathy.”


USC Chinese students said they felt a huge betrayal by their country and are extremely disappointed by the comments made.

“The reporters distort the truth and possess the stereotype of“2nd generation of the rich”on Chinese students who study abroad,”said Yujiao Xian, a freshman at USC.
Another USC freshman shared the same sentiments.
“The media only pictures that we party or have fun, but they do not see us working hard in order to pursue a better future," said Clement Huang.

“The Internet users who maliciously attacked the victims and the students who study abroad are just jealous that they can afford to study abroad and may have a brighter future," said Hanwen Lei.
A family friend of the female victim Ying Wu requested that the media reporters in attendance at Wednesday's memorial follow moral guidelines and only report the facts.
The 163.com website has since fixed its headline and the inaccurate details after receiving requests from the public while qq.com's comments remained unchanged.Just a few hours after the gunshots took place, an atmosphere of mourning covered the USC University Park Campus as students gathered for a vigil, remembering the two Chinese graduate students who were killed Wednesday morning. Meanwhile, several Chinese media irritated international students in the U.S.-- especially fellow Trojans-- with distorted reports of the incident.

On well-known Chinese websites such as“qq.com”and“163.com”, the story's title read“In Los Angeles, Two Chinese students were killed in a BMW.”
The reporter continued to remind readers of the BMW's importance to the story, stating that the BMW car was a brand new car worth $60,000. However, the BMW was later discovered to be a 2003 model that the male victim bought for about $10,000, reported The LA Times.
Because of the“$60,000 BMW" claim, the two students were criticized by Chinese media as being the“2nd generation of the rich”-- a negative connotation in China-- referring to kids from rich families who do not study or work; just take advantage of their family background and spend money. Contrary to the stigma, the two victims were described by their classmates as being hard-working students who saved money instead of spending loosely.
The Chinese media reporters not only offended the victims with misinformed labels, but Internet users also gloated over the story, leaving the following malicious comments:

“Good job of killing them, kill more‘2nd generation of the rich’.”

“Highly celebrate the death of the rich kids in American!!!!”

“Driving BMW, not worth sympathy.”


USC Chinese students said they felt a huge betrayal by their country and are extremely disappointed by the comments made.

“The reporters distort the truth and possess the stereotype of“2nd generation of the rich”on Chinese students who study abroad,”said Yujiao Xian, a freshman at USC.
Another USC freshman shared the same sentiments.
“The media only pictures that we party or have fun, but they do not see us working hard in order to pursue a better future," said Clement Huang.

“The Internet users who maliciously attacked the victims and the students who study abroad are just jealous that they can afford to study abroad and may have a brighter future," said Hanwen Lei.
A family friend of the female victim Ying Wu requested that the media reporters in attendance at Wednesday's memorial follow moral guidelines and only report the facts.
The 163.com website has since fixed its headline and the inaccurate details after receiving requests from the public while qq.com's comments remained unchanged.
这些看不明白的洋文哪位大神翻译一下
不是美国佬自己的FOX先这样报道的么?选择性失明?
这些看不明白的洋文哪位大神翻译一下
就是良心媒体说他们死在bmw上引起网民狂欢…米帝媒体表示这不道德
搜索了下,这条新闻是南加州大学自己的新闻网站上的,算是校内新闻吧。

http://www.neontommy.com/news/20 ... nese-students-usc-0
不是美国佬自己的FOX先这样报道的么?选择性失明?
我比较好奇网易和腾讯怎么看这东西…
http://www.neontommy.com/news/2012/04/chinese-media-irritates-chinese-students-usc-0

我觉得那些网站编辑为了奖金 把受害者亲人搞得自杀也毫不犹豫。
http://www.neontommy.com/news/20 ... nese-students-usc-0
网易的人如果聪明点,应该能够看出来狡兔死走狗烹的前途吧
大致看了一下,就是说国内知名网站(里面两个.com大家都懂的),将报道重点放在了bmw上,说这车多少钱,而实际上这车不值这么多。
然后就说因为这车两人就被定性为富二代(同时解释了富二代是什么)。
再然后就是翻译网友评选,都是诸如“死得好”“应该多死两个之类的”。

写得比较无力,而且感觉像是中国人写的。
mmff 发表于 2012-4-13 22:52
大致看了一下,就是说国内知名网站(里面两个.com大家都懂的),将报道重点放在了bmw上,说这车多少钱,而实 ...
有些媒体确实是这样,一件很普通的新闻,在它们嘴里能变出它们所期待的关注,这个新闻刚出,超大就有网友预料到这种结局了!
对于 这些媒体高层不管,我怀疑就是纵容指示,弄翻船浑水摸鱼!
还有赵本山移民新闻,我记得好像上面下过文件不能光依靠网友的微博爆料就能撰写新闻!
这个英文新闻,,应该是中国人写的吧。。。
这文章读着不对味,不对味
这文章是要给中国人看原文的吧,看起来这么无压力中文化的感觉。