[转帖]提前泄漏胡哥接权的人被正式拘捕!

来源:百度文库 编辑:超级军网 时间:2024/04/29 15:54:25
<P>China Formally Arrests NYT Researcher for Secrets</P>
<P>Reuters
Thursday, October 21, 2004; 9:41 AM

<P>
<P>BEIJING (Reuters) - China has formally arrested a New York Times researcher detained last month for passing state secrets to foreigners, a crime that carries a maximum sentence of death, his lawyer said on Thursday. </P>
<P>"He was arrested yesterday, completely and formally arrested," lawyer Mo Shaoping said. </P>
<P>"The crime is the same as when he was detained -- illegally providing state secrets to foreigners. At its most serious, it can carry the death sentence." </P>
<P>Zhao Yan, a former reporter for the magazine China Reform, was detained in late September on suspicion of helping break the sensitive news that leader Jiang Zemin would retire from politics, according to sources familiar with the case. </P>
<P>The New York Times has denied the accusation that its researcher was involved in such a crime and has lobbied the U.S. government to press China for his release. </P>
<P>Zhao's arrest comes less than a week before a visit to Beijing by Secretary of State Colin Powell who raised the case last month in a meeting with his Chinese counterpart, Foreign Minister Li Zhaoxing. </P>
<P>A Foreign Ministry spokesman said in September Zhao was held on suspicion of illegally possessing state secrets, a crime that carries a lighter maximum sentence than passing secrets to foreigners, but Mo said he had been charged with the latter, more serious, crime. </P>
<P>"It's still in the investigation phase. Once that is done, there is the procuratorial investigation and prosecution phase, and only then is there the possibility of a court hearing," Mo said. "Anything is possible." </P>
<P>Before joining the Times, Zhao had exposed corruption and tested the boundaries of official tolerance of media freedoms in a series of run-ins with authorities. </P>
<P>Mo said he had yet to see Zhao, but was preparing an application for permission to visit. </P>
<P>Relations between the United States and China have been gradually improving, especially with increased economic and diplomatic cooperation, but Washington is critical of Beijing for its human rights record</P>
<P>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A50928-2004Oct21.html</P>
[此贴子已经被作者于2004-10-21 23:07:31编辑过]
<P>China Formally Arrests NYT Researcher for Secrets</P>
<P>Reuters
Thursday, October 21, 2004; 9:41 AM

<P>
<P>BEIJING (Reuters) - China has formally arrested a New York Times researcher detained last month for passing state secrets to foreigners, a crime that carries a maximum sentence of death, his lawyer said on Thursday. </P>
<P>"He was arrested yesterday, completely and formally arrested," lawyer Mo Shaoping said. </P>
<P>"The crime is the same as when he was detained -- illegally providing state secrets to foreigners. At its most serious, it can carry the death sentence." </P>
<P>Zhao Yan, a former reporter for the magazine China Reform, was detained in late September on suspicion of helping break the sensitive news that leader Jiang Zemin would retire from politics, according to sources familiar with the case. </P>
<P>The New York Times has denied the accusation that its researcher was involved in such a crime and has lobbied the U.S. government to press China for his release. </P>
<P>Zhao's arrest comes less than a week before a visit to Beijing by Secretary of State Colin Powell who raised the case last month in a meeting with his Chinese counterpart, Foreign Minister Li Zhaoxing. </P>
<P>A Foreign Ministry spokesman said in September Zhao was held on suspicion of illegally possessing state secrets, a crime that carries a lighter maximum sentence than passing secrets to foreigners, but Mo said he had been charged with the latter, more serious, crime. </P>
<P>"It's still in the investigation phase. Once that is done, there is the procuratorial investigation and prosecution phase, and only then is there the possibility of a court hearing," Mo said. "Anything is possible." </P>
<P>Before joining the Times, Zhao had exposed corruption and tested the boundaries of official tolerance of media freedoms in a series of run-ins with authorities. </P>
<P>Mo said he had yet to see Zhao, but was preparing an application for permission to visit. </P>
<P>Relations between the United States and China have been gradually improving, especially with increased economic and diplomatic cooperation, but Washington is critical of Beijing for its human rights record</P>
<P>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A50928-2004Oct21.html</P>
[此贴子已经被作者于2004-10-21 23:07:31编辑过]
他到底知道什么样的state secrets啊?好像没有说清楚哦..............E文不好..................
呵呵,如果华盛顿邮报的消息也可信,那么母猪也会爬树了!
<P>正式被以非法泄漏国家极密罪逮捕。</P><P>事情本来没什么。其中一段可见美国人的跋扈!</P><P>The New York Times has denied the accusation that its researcher was involved in such a crime and has lobbied the U.S. government to press China for his release.</P><P>纽约时报否认他的人员卷入,要求美国政府向中国施压释放赵岩(音)。混蛋,我们国家没有法律吗?还没有审判、调查,只因为当事人所属报社否认就要求释放?什么逻辑呀!</P>
<B>以下是引用<I>loverguy</I>在2004-10-21 23:14:00的发言:</B>
呵呵,如果华盛顿邮报的消息也可信,那么母猪也会爬树了!

<P>
<P>华盛顿邮报是美国大报呀!代表美国主流,谈不上可信不可信。</P>
<P>泄漏的是江总退休,胡哥接任的消息,然后他就被抓接受调查。</P>
<P>路透社的消息?</P><P>纽约时报的记者有那么神通广大吗?</P>
<B>以下是引用<I>lumuyu</I>在2004-10-21 23:19:00的发言:</B>


<P>
<P>华盛顿邮报是美国大报呀!代表美国主流,谈不上可信不可信。</P>
<P>泄漏的是江总退休,胡哥接任的消息,然后他就被抓接受调查。</P>

<P>应该同江core退休,胡哥上台没有关系,偶单位两三年前就有内部传闻了,并且在内参上有很明显的顶胡倾向。大家一看就明白了..............</P>
有没有翻译过的文章呀
<B>以下是引用<I>沪渝MM</I>在2004-10-21 23:26:00的发言:</B>
&gt;
<P>应该同江core退休,胡哥上台没有关系,偶单位两三年前就有内部传闻了,并且在内参上有很明显的顶胡倾向。大家一看就明白了..............</P>

<P>文章原文如此,而且他也确实在文章发表之后不久被捕。是不是还涉及其他泄密行为就不清楚了。</P>
<B>以下是引用<I>lumuyu</I>在2004-10-21 23:28:00的发言:</B>
&gt;
<P>文章原文如此,而且他也确实在文章发表之后不久被捕。是不是还涉及其他泄密行为就不清楚了。</P>

<P>估计是涉及其他机密,原文也没有说,可能为了提高眼球率,把江core和胡哥的故事摆上台</P>
[em06][em35][em42]
<P>作为记者得到一个消息,在报纸上发表,算不了什么。</P><P>重要的是谁把消息告诉记者的,决不能轻易放了这个记者,一定要把他后面的鼹鼠挖出来。</P>
<P>9494</P><P>大家不要搞混淆了</P><P>华盛顿邮报是美国比较中立的一个大报,跟纽约时报一样,在美国很有影响力</P><P>而经常刊登一些耸人听闻的反华消息的,是华盛顿时报.</P><P>time 和 post 可不一样啊</P>
华盛顿邮报还不需要这么做.

而华盛顿时报是小报,自然要靠骇人听闻的消息吸引眼球.
<B>以下是引用<I>chengyin</I>在2004-10-22 0:34:00的发言:</B>

<P>9494</P>
<P>大家不要搞混淆了</P>
<P>华盛顿邮报是美国比较中立的一个大报,跟纽约时报一样,在美国很有影响力</P>
<P>而经常刊登一些耸人听闻的反华消息的,是华盛顿时报.</P>
<P>time 和 post 可不一样啊</P>


中立?搞笑!
<P>更正上面的,华盛顿邮报是右派报纸,基本上是政府的口舌。</P><P>这个人也许干了什么更严重的事。自作自受。</P>
光凭推测写这么个东西不会把他怎么样,可能他拿到了什么文件。时报还是很严谨的,当然也回有他的倾向性,但坦白的说,最少在文风上,我宁可看他也不去看《人民日报》的党八股,不过要看完一份时报是不可能的,太厚了!《今日美国》精短些也更活泼些。
只要他不是美国公民,我们逮捕他没有什么问题。
***得了咽喉癌?那抓此人岂非证实了消息?
有些事即使全国人民都知道也不能说
<B>以下是引用<I>正义的朋友</I>在2004-10-22 16:23:00的发言:</B>
有些事即使全国人民都知道也不能说


你怎么泻露了中宣部的座右铭?抓起来,判5年!
<P>扯淡的事情~!</P><P>他真正泄密的东西,估计美国人也不想拿出来说明白,所以就找一个借口说是因为“泄露江胡交接信息”做说辞罢了</P><P>类似手段,看看冷战期间各国处理间谍的,就一切都明白了——双方都不会把间谍真正做的事情拿到台面上来说的!</P>
<P>说告诉他的着才是重要的说</P><P>抓一些跑腿的,没有什么意义啊</P>
<B>以下是引用<I>f22</I>在2004-10-22 16:37:00的发言:</B>


你怎么泻露了中宣部的座右铭?抓起来,判5年!


[em08][em08][em08][em08][em08][em08]寒一个
主要是他搞错自己的位置了,这种事情怎么能由他来宣布呢!?太想出风头结果。。。
这样的消息居然是一个记者泄露出去的,请问保密工作怎么做的?消息先前是怎么传出来的,内定的?地球人都知道不是胡哥接班又是谁,有必要定记者的罪吗?可以看出我们国家的所谓会议不仅是停留在作秀~~~
<B>以下是引用<I>Superbow</I>在2004-10-22 18:00:00的发言:</B>

<P>扯淡的事情~!</P>
<P>他真正泄密的东西,估计美国人也不想拿出来说明白,所以就找一个借口说是因为“泄露江胡交接信息”做说辞罢了</P>
<P>类似手段,看看冷战期间各国处理间谍的,就一切都明白了——双方都不会把间谍真正做的事情拿到台面上来说的!</P>


同意,一定是泄露了别的东西。
<P>很简单的道理,不在于它到底泄露了什么,关键是我们没有准备泄漏的接班内容他是怎么提前知道的?</P>
<P>太假了</P>