想起西班牙烧鞋事件，美军坛震精中国提美国建桥和青岛跨 ...

-->http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2009748/That-bridge-far-Worlds-longest-sea-bridge-opens-traffic-China--hold-title-years.html?ITO=1490

青岛跨海大桥
So, it took them 4 years and just under $1 billion to build the world's longest sea spanning bridge at 26.4 miles long.
4年，10亿美元一内，世界最长，26.4英里
It is scheduled to take S.F. bay area workers 11 years and $6.3 billion (which apparently includes the cheap Chinese labor costs mentioned in this article) to build a bridge that's 2.2 miles long.
三蕃湾工人要11年63亿美元（还动用了廉价的中国人帮忙)，2.2英里长。
-->http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_span_replacement_of_the_San_Francisco_%E2%80%93_Oakland_Bay_Bridge

U.S. rate = 0.2 miles built per year; $5 billion spent per mile.
China rate = 6.6 miles built per year; $0.038 billion spent per mile.
美国速度 = 0.2英里每年，50亿每英里
中国书牍 = 6.6英里每年，3千8百万每英里
At those rates, if the same bridge in China were to be built in the U.S., it would take about 132 years (~33x longer) and roughly 132 billion (~132x cost) to build.
按这个美国速度，中国桥要是在美国，要132年，1320亿美元。


-->http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2009748/That-bridge-far-Worlds-longest-sea-bridge-opens-traffic-China--hold-title-years.html?ITO=1490

青岛跨海大桥
So, it took them 4 years and just under $1 billion to build the world's longest sea spanning bridge at 26.4 miles long.
4年，10亿美元一内，世界最长，26.4英里
It is scheduled to take S.F. bay area workers 11 years and $6.3 billion (which apparently includes the cheap Chinese labor costs mentioned in this article) to build a bridge that's 2.2 miles long.
三蕃湾工人要11年63亿美元（还动用了廉价的中国人帮忙)，2.2英里长。
-->http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_span_replacement_of_the_San_Francisco_%E2%80%93_Oakland_Bay_Bridge

U.S. rate = 0.2 miles built per year; $5 billion spent per mile.
China rate = 6.6 miles built per year; $0.038 billion spent per mile.
美国速度 = 0.2英里每年，50亿每英里
中国书牍 = 6.6英里每年，3千8百万每英里
At those rates, if the same bridge in China were to be built in the U.S., it would take about 132 years (~33x longer) and roughly 132 billion (~132x cost) to build.
按这个美国速度，中国桥要是在美国，要132年，1320亿美元。

To compare the current S.F. bridge project (Eastern span 2.2 miles long) - The existing bridge (Western span 4.46 miles long) was started in 1933 and completed in 1936 for a total cost of $77 million. That's 1.49 miles per year at a cost of 17.2 million per mile built.
-->http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco_%E2%80%93_Oakland_Bay_Bridge
和现在的三蕃大桥项目（2.2英里）比较，旧桥4.46英里长，1993年开建，1936年完工，价值7亿7千万美元。1.49英里每年，1亿7千万每英里。
Obviously, costs have gone up in the U.S. from 17.2 million per mile to $5 billion per mile. WOW!
However, check out the time spent: from nearly 1.5 miles of bridge built per year...down to 0.2 miles built per year. A 7.5 fold decrease in productivity. WOWx2!
美国人在退步，又贵又慢。
LZ:中国人准备好没有？白人有时不讲理的。鸦片战争不是不会重演。

How can the U.S expect to continue to compete in what is now clearly a global market with such marked decrease in productivity and extreme expense here?
美国如何才能继续在全球市场竞争
We cannot...
我们不能
But in all fairness, how many Chinese died in the making of that bridge? How many permanently injured? How long will that bridge stand against the elements?
但公正来说，多少中国人在建桥时死亡或伤残，桥在各种因素下能用多久？
The Chinese CEs, MEs, and SEs are not noted for building for permanence and are noted for graft. The one area I worry about most is that China had slipped in substandard steel, substandard welds, and substandard rigging and fabrication in our bridge. The Bay Bridge has to be able to withstand a 7.5 earthquake, 125-150MPH winds from all compass points, and the corrosive
我们的桥要可以抵御7.5级地震，125-150英里里每小时大风，海水腐蚀，
中国有豆腐渣...
aspect of the seawater. Not sure what that Chinese bridge was designed to handle. Also not sure if graft and corruption may have led to less than ideal quality materials used in its construction.

从中印对比到现在的中美对比，有点意思。

我看yahoo，大部分美国人都是羡慕的，都拿三藩市来比

青岛这个桥在胶州湾内，靠近北岸，水不深，建造成本和难度无法跟洋山跨海大桥相比。

dada2000 发表于 2011-7-3 20:01
青岛这个桥在胶州湾内，靠近北岸，水不深，建造成本和难度无法跟洋山跨海大桥相比。
+1 的确是这样