超级军网老美在思考是否要武力解决利比亚问题，美国人民很喜感啊
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/04/29 22:25:09
据说有些议员大叫要搞禁飞区。但是盖茨说搞禁飞区的第一步就是通过空袭来摧毁利比亚防空设施，所以你们看着办。（这么快就把这个底子给交出来，说明盖茨很可能不是极力推崇动手的）
希拉里是第一个提出军队可能需要动手的人
美国人民更喜感，前几天看CNN，一个个提起上校那都是义愤填膺。看那个阵势绝对可以让他们组成义勇军远征上校。结果一碰到说要动手的新闻...全都怂了...:D
Kamenwati Is there a conflict anywhere in the world that we don't feel compelled to stick our nose into?
7 hours ago | Like (45) | Report abuse
rescue I really think we need to sit this one out. Let another country handle it. Nobody would be grateful and it would just cost more money we don't have.
7 hours ago | Like (19) | Report abuse Thanks for posting. Would you like to edit your profile?
Cleveland123
Here's a thought. You want a military solution? Fine. The United Nations and NATO have many other countries that are NOT the United States. Let them pony up on this one. Better still, let one of the Arab states that have bunches of our military hardware deal with it. We the People do not want ... more
Here's a thought. You want a military solution? Fine. The United Nations and NATO have many other countries that are NOT the United States. Let them pony up on this one. Better still, let one of the Arab states that have bunches of our military hardware deal with it. We the People do not want it, do not need it, and do not care in incur the debt for it.
Here's a message for our would-be Freedom Fighters in Washington: We're already really unhappy with you. Next year is an election year. You might want to weigh that into your thinking. Or better still, just think. less
7 hours ago | Like (20) | Report abuse
rescue I really think we need to sit this one out. Let another country handle it. Nobody would be grateful and it would just cost more money we don't have.
7 hours ago | Like (19) | Report abuse
MHerr How many countries do we have to intervene in? We're already in Iraq and Afghanistan in wars that we can't afford. I notice that we're not in Darfur, but then they don't have oil fields.
8 hours ago | Like (19) | Report abuse
patinseattle UncleBenji volunteers his money and his life to go over there..such big words!
7 hours ago | Like (4) | Report abuse
我估计现在美国决心还是不够，虽然说这种行动可以对国会先斩后奏，但是还有联合国一关。类似这种人道主义行动老美没有足够政治动机在联合国没有核准的情况下直接单干。老美没有提到联合国方面的工作说明现在也只是说一说，表示一下而已。据说有些议员大叫要搞禁飞区。但是盖茨说搞禁飞区的第一步就是通过空袭来摧毁利比亚防空设施，所以你们看着办。（这么快就把这个底子给交出来，说明盖茨很可能不是极力推崇动手的）
希拉里是第一个提出军队可能需要动手的人
美国人民更喜感，前几天看CNN，一个个提起上校那都是义愤填膺。看那个阵势绝对可以让他们组成义勇军远征上校。结果一碰到说要动手的新闻...全都怂了...:D
Kamenwati Is there a conflict anywhere in the world that we don't feel compelled to stick our nose into?
7 hours ago | Like (45) | Report abuse
rescue I really think we need to sit this one out. Let another country handle it. Nobody would be grateful and it would just cost more money we don't have.
7 hours ago | Like (19) | Report abuse Thanks for posting. Would you like to edit your profile?
Cleveland123
Here's a thought. You want a military solution? Fine. The United Nations and NATO have many other countries that are NOT the United States. Let them pony up on this one. Better still, let one of the Arab states that have bunches of our military hardware deal with it. We the People do not want ... more
Here's a thought. You want a military solution? Fine. The United Nations and NATO have many other countries that are NOT the United States. Let them pony up on this one. Better still, let one of the Arab states that have bunches of our military hardware deal with it. We the People do not want it, do not need it, and do not care in incur the debt for it.
Here's a message for our would-be Freedom Fighters in Washington: We're already really unhappy with you. Next year is an election year. You might want to weigh that into your thinking. Or better still, just think. less
7 hours ago | Like (20) | Report abuse
rescue I really think we need to sit this one out. Let another country handle it. Nobody would be grateful and it would just cost more money we don't have.
7 hours ago | Like (19) | Report abuse
MHerr How many countries do we have to intervene in? We're already in Iraq and Afghanistan in wars that we can't afford. I notice that we're not in Darfur, but then they don't have oil fields.
8 hours ago | Like (19) | Report abuse
patinseattle UncleBenji volunteers his money and his life to go over there..such big words!
7 hours ago | Like (4) | Report abuse
我估计现在美国决心还是不够，虽然说这种行动可以对国会先斩后奏，但是还有联合国一关。类似这种人道主义行动老美没有足够政治动机在联合国没有核准的情况下直接单干。老美没有提到联合国方面的工作说明现在也只是说一说，表示一下而已。
希拉里是第一个提出军队可能需要动手的人
美国人民更喜感，前几天看CNN，一个个提起上校那都是义愤填膺。看那个阵势绝对可以让他们组成义勇军远征上校。结果一碰到说要动手的新闻...全都怂了...:D
Kamenwati Is there a conflict anywhere in the world that we don't feel compelled to stick our nose into?
7 hours ago | Like (45) | Report abuse
rescue I really think we need to sit this one out. Let another country handle it. Nobody would be grateful and it would just cost more money we don't have.
7 hours ago | Like (19) | Report abuse Thanks for posting. Would you like to edit your profile?
Cleveland123
Here's a thought. You want a military solution? Fine. The United Nations and NATO have many other countries that are NOT the United States. Let them pony up on this one. Better still, let one of the Arab states that have bunches of our military hardware deal with it. We the People do not want ... more
Here's a thought. You want a military solution? Fine. The United Nations and NATO have many other countries that are NOT the United States. Let them pony up on this one. Better still, let one of the Arab states that have bunches of our military hardware deal with it. We the People do not want it, do not need it, and do not care in incur the debt for it.
Here's a message for our would-be Freedom Fighters in Washington: We're already really unhappy with you. Next year is an election year. You might want to weigh that into your thinking. Or better still, just think. less
7 hours ago | Like (20) | Report abuse
rescue I really think we need to sit this one out. Let another country handle it. Nobody would be grateful and it would just cost more money we don't have.
7 hours ago | Like (19) | Report abuse
MHerr How many countries do we have to intervene in? We're already in Iraq and Afghanistan in wars that we can't afford. I notice that we're not in Darfur, but then they don't have oil fields.
8 hours ago | Like (19) | Report abuse
patinseattle UncleBenji volunteers his money and his life to go over there..such big words!
7 hours ago | Like (4) | Report abuse
我估计现在美国决心还是不够，虽然说这种行动可以对国会先斩后奏，但是还有联合国一关。类似这种人道主义行动老美没有足够政治动机在联合国没有核准的情况下直接单干。老美没有提到联合国方面的工作说明现在也只是说一说，表示一下而已。据说有些议员大叫要搞禁飞区。但是盖茨说搞禁飞区的第一步就是通过空袭来摧毁利比亚防空设施，所以你们看着办。（这么快就把这个底子给交出来，说明盖茨很可能不是极力推崇动手的）
希拉里是第一个提出军队可能需要动手的人
美国人民更喜感，前几天看CNN，一个个提起上校那都是义愤填膺。看那个阵势绝对可以让他们组成义勇军远征上校。结果一碰到说要动手的新闻...全都怂了...:D
Kamenwati Is there a conflict anywhere in the world that we don't feel compelled to stick our nose into?
7 hours ago | Like (45) | Report abuse
rescue I really think we need to sit this one out. Let another country handle it. Nobody would be grateful and it would just cost more money we don't have.
7 hours ago | Like (19) | Report abuse Thanks for posting. Would you like to edit your profile?
Cleveland123
Here's a thought. You want a military solution? Fine. The United Nations and NATO have many other countries that are NOT the United States. Let them pony up on this one. Better still, let one of the Arab states that have bunches of our military hardware deal with it. We the People do not want ... more
Here's a thought. You want a military solution? Fine. The United Nations and NATO have many other countries that are NOT the United States. Let them pony up on this one. Better still, let one of the Arab states that have bunches of our military hardware deal with it. We the People do not want it, do not need it, and do not care in incur the debt for it.
Here's a message for our would-be Freedom Fighters in Washington: We're already really unhappy with you. Next year is an election year. You might want to weigh that into your thinking. Or better still, just think. less
7 hours ago | Like (20) | Report abuse
rescue I really think we need to sit this one out. Let another country handle it. Nobody would be grateful and it would just cost more money we don't have.
7 hours ago | Like (19) | Report abuse
MHerr How many countries do we have to intervene in? We're already in Iraq and Afghanistan in wars that we can't afford. I notice that we're not in Darfur, but then they don't have oil fields.
8 hours ago | Like (19) | Report abuse
patinseattle UncleBenji volunteers his money and his life to go over there..such big words!
7 hours ago | Like (4) | Report abuse
我估计现在美国决心还是不够，虽然说这种行动可以对国会先斩后奏，但是还有联合国一关。类似这种人道主义行动老美没有足够政治动机在联合国没有核准的情况下直接单干。老美没有提到联合国方面的工作说明现在也只是说一说，表示一下而已。
陷进去就不好玩了，现在MD钱也不多了
估计上校比md还急，咋还不来空袭呢，老子快挺不住了
关键是钱，美帝再牛也架不住伊拉克阿富汗两大烧钱坑
卡扎非好打倒，但之后万一陷进去了呢？
卡扎非好打倒，但之后万一陷进去了呢？
绝对支持老美继续挖坑
使命召唤 使命召唤
汝儿乃我 发表于 2011-3-3 12:14 
民主国家怎么都这样？外交部长往往比军方更好战，奥尔布赖特就比鲍威尔好战，现在希拉里比盖茨好战。日本也这样，钓鱼岛冲突的时候防卫相要比外务相温和。
民主国家怎么都这样？外交部长往往比军方更好战，奥尔布赖特就比鲍威尔好战，现在希拉里比盖茨好战。日本也这样，钓鱼岛冲突的时候防卫相要比外务相温和。
大秦猛士 发表于 2011-3-3 14:08
更奇怪的是这次牵头要求禁飞的议员是民主党的。外交部不当家不知道柴米贵啊。已经有了阿富汗伊拉克两大摊子，盖茨也不想把事情搞得更大。况且利比亚内部一团乱麻，美国明显情报不足，不知道该支持谁。其实希拉里和盖茨关系很铁，和以前的政府不同。
更奇怪的是这次牵头要求禁飞的议员是民主党的。外交部不当家不知道柴米贵啊。已经有了阿富汗伊拉克两大摊子，盖茨也不想把事情搞得更大。况且利比亚内部一团乱麻，美国明显情报不足，不知道该支持谁。其实希拉里和盖茨关系很铁，和以前的政府不同。
汝儿乃我 发表于 2011-3-3 14:26
这个倒可以理解，民主党偏左，左派更关注正义之类比较虚的东西。共和党是右派，没有实际的利益他们很少有实际行动。
这个倒可以理解，民主党偏左，左派更关注正义之类比较虚的东西。共和党是右派，没有实际的利益他们很少有实际行动。
美国不往坑里跳 对不起我等看客啊
与时俱进
md一开战,cod里面又有一个故事要成真了...
glock 发表于 2011-3-3 13:12
挖一大大的散兵坑，:D
挖一大大的散兵坑，:D
希望美的介入
回复 7# 大秦猛士
因为他们不懂
因为他们不懂
其实我们还是挺支持美国的。
这件事，坚决支持MD!灯塔啊，快去啊！
美国在阿富汗和伊拉克挖的坑不够大，去利比亚继续挖吧。:D
随手把委内瑞拉也入侵了吧。
昨天去趟 星期五餐厅 出来时候俺想 靠 美国人民整天就吃这垃圾饭 还要到处搞侵略 真不容易啊
不要忘记了，美国人素来是打仗打大的，战争是美国人的主要生意业务之一。其他国家一参战，都是千疮百孔的，除了美国人，美国人几乎参加了世界上的所有热门战争，本土上面一颗炸弹都没有落过。
不要忘记了，美国人素来是打仗打大的，战争是美国人的主要生意业务之一。其他国家一参战，都是千疮百孔的，除了美国人，美国人几乎参加了世界上的所有热门战争，本土上面一颗炸弹都没有落过。
回复 21# 远谋
那就让他们打好了。:D
那就让他们打好了。:D
利比亚的利益得失。。。还没能够大到让美国心动加行动
上校不是跟美国打的挺火热的吗？
支持美国动武，打，多打，大打
MD，不要犹豫了！上校现在就是一个满街跳的大青蛙，不吃白不吃啊！