超级军网[求教] FLAK 88mm 二战 时间引信
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/05/01 06:15:18
求教，二战的防空时间引信如何实现？
纯机械的？
原因，看到这篇文章
http://www.cqzg.cn/html/54/286654-3449.html
不过，炮上的关键设备有一部份没有随炮运到，其中有88高射炮的引信定秒机没有到，不能使用时间引信进行对空射击
所以疑惑二战时如何实现？求教，二战的防空时间引信如何实现？
纯机械的？
原因，看到这篇文章
http://www.cqzg.cn/html/54/286654-3449.html
不过，炮上的关键设备有一部份没有随炮运到，其中有88高射炮的引信定秒机没有到，不能使用时间引信进行对空射击
所以疑惑二战时如何实现？
纯机械的？
原因，看到这篇文章
http://www.cqzg.cn/html/54/286654-3449.html
不过，炮上的关键设备有一部份没有随炮运到，其中有88高射炮的引信定秒机没有到，不能使用时间引信进行对空射击
所以疑惑二战时如何实现？求教，二战的防空时间引信如何实现？
纯机械的？
原因，看到这篇文章
http://www.cqzg.cn/html/54/286654-3449.html
不过，炮上的关键设备有一部份没有随炮运到，其中有88高射炮的引信定秒机没有到，不能使用时间引信进行对空射击
所以疑惑二战时如何实现？
原地址
http://www.amazon.com/German-88m ... -Crew/dp/B000BYTCO0
口水哈喇。。。
http://www.amazon.com/German-88m ... -Crew/dp/B000BYTCO0
口水哈喇。。。
还是老美的近炸引信最牛:D
US 的1943才有
http://www.kfxb.com/web/js/js33.htm
而且这东西肯定不便宜，不知道米人舍不舍得给所有防空蛋蛋都装上。
http://www.kfxb.com/web/js/js33.htm
而且这东西肯定不便宜，不知道米人舍不舍得给所有防空蛋蛋都装上。
还有体积问题，在当时的条件下，小口径装不上啊
火药盘，或者机械钟表定时，苏联当时是把一盘蚊香打上天，欧洲人是把一个瑞士钟表打上天:D ;P
先下了本书，终于找到这些单词，然后搜索了一下，就找到解释
Schiffer [Schiffer Military History] The 88mm Flak in the First and Second World Wars.pdf
you can find this book through P2P softwares such as exxxx
http://www.ww2f.com/weapons-wwii ... oes-truly-work.html
They then relied on sheer firepower with heavy use of the dreaded 'box barrages' fired by multiples of up to 40 guns. Automatic fuze setters were used as an 88 could fire 15-20 shells per minute and even the 128mm could manage 12 per minute.
每分钟才15-20发。
Proximity fuses were in fact such a big deal, that the US did not even use them immediately, I'm pretty sure. When they were invented, I believe in late 42, the US did not want to use them for fear of one being captured. They figured the fuses would be more useful to Japan and Germany, both of whom were consistently being attacked by allied aircraft.
关于近炸引信，为了防止德国和日本得到完整地样品，美国在1942年后期宁可不用近炸引信。因为美国空军更强大。
A true proximity fuse or variable time fuse was never developed by Germany despite extensive efforts to do so. Allied planners estimated that German FLAK would be about three times more deadly if they had proximity fused shells
如果有能够提高3倍效率
Schiffer [Schiffer Military History] The 88mm Flak in the First and Second World Wars.pdf
you can find this book through P2P softwares such as exxxx
http://www.ww2f.com/weapons-wwii ... oes-truly-work.html
They then relied on sheer firepower with heavy use of the dreaded 'box barrages' fired by multiples of up to 40 guns. Automatic fuze setters were used as an 88 could fire 15-20 shells per minute and even the 128mm could manage 12 per minute.
每分钟才15-20发。
Proximity fuses were in fact such a big deal, that the US did not even use them immediately, I'm pretty sure. When they were invented, I believe in late 42, the US did not want to use them for fear of one being captured. They figured the fuses would be more useful to Japan and Germany, both of whom were consistently being attacked by allied aircraft.
关于近炸引信，为了防止德国和日本得到完整地样品，美国在1942年后期宁可不用近炸引信。因为美国空军更强大。
A true proximity fuse or variable time fuse was never developed by Germany despite extensive efforts to do so. Allied planners estimated that German FLAK would be about three times more deadly if they had proximity fused shells
如果有能够提高3倍效率
想查引信的资料用英文搜索fuze;P
钟表时间引信
火药盘时间引信。转动几个圈，调节延时火药盘长度就能设定延时时间
钟表时间引信
火药盘时间引信。转动几个圈，调节延时火药盘长度就能设定延时时间
哦，我搜得是fuse，错了个字啊。
谢谢学霸的图。
还是钟表的看起来比火药盘子精细阿，真是舍得烧钱！
不知道tg当年发家的时候，八路如何解决这个问题？
谢谢学霸的图。
还是钟表的看起来比火药盘子精细阿，真是舍得烧钱！
不知道tg当年发家的时候，八路如何解决这个问题？
八路需要打防空炮弹么？;funk
日啊，一颗引信都这么精致
日啊，一颗引信都这么精致