史上最强的标准-6舰空导弹要落户韩国？

没听说过～～:o :L

切[:a4:] ，米帝算个啥鸟[:a11:] ！？人家棒子素只稀饭天顶星技术滴:D

看来韩国连SM-3和SM-4、5都没看上眼哪!;P

据说是标准2的弹体换上AIM-120的主动引导头

　[法国《航宇防务》2004年9月6日报道]美海军已经授予雷声公司价值4.4亿美元的合同，研制和生产新型"标准-6"(SM-6)增程主动导弹(ERAM)。研制SM-6的目的是满足美海军对增程防空战导弹(ER-AAW)的需求。

　　雷声导弹系统公司总裁路易斯·弗朗西丝科尼称，"SM-6不仅确保美海军能够击败不断发展的和非对称的空中威胁，它的内在品质还为未来的发展提供了很高的效费比基础，满足未来的任务需求"。雷声公司将负责设计、研制、制造、组装、集成、试验和交付SM-6导弹飞行和非飞行部件，研制工作预计将在2011年12月完成。
最初，基本的SM-6项目提供的ER-AAW导弹能够打击固定翼和旋翼飞机、无人机以及岸上发射的反舰巡航导弹。装备未来的一体化火控(系统)后，SM-6将充分利用"标准"导弹的动能，为海军水面舰艇部队打击超视距AAW威胁提供更强的能力。

　　"标准-6"导弹将采用雷声公司"标准-2"(SM-2)Block IV导弹的弹体、寻的器以及来自该公司系列产品的制导技术。雷声公司的"标准-2" Block IV导弹是即将开始生产的最新型SM-2导弹，安装先进的主动雷达制导(系统)后具备的空前性能，使它成为一种高可靠性的轻型低成本导弹。

　　雷声海军武器系统公司副总裁爱德华·米斯诺称，"通过在广泛部署的、经过舰艇验证的SM-2导弹弹体上采用经过作战验证的'先进中程空空导弹'(AMRAAM)的技术，雷声公司为海军提供了风险最低的、高效的、经济可承受的ER-AAX解决方案"。

　　早在2003年1月，美海军就声称要授予雷声公司一份合同，研制新型增程主动导弹。（来源：中国国防科技信息中心）

这个SM-6基本上是采用AIM-120技术的标准SM2BLOCKIV增程型，它的400公里射程要彻底发挥，必须与预警机链接，利用预警机为它指示最大400公里距离上的低空目标，然后它俯冲而下，利用主动导引头攻击目标。

这个家伙对低空飞行的反舰导弹，尤其是非隐身的亚音速反舰导弹威胁很大，即使是超音速反舰导弹，也因为其提供了长的拦截距离而使得拦截方具备了更多拦截的机会，而且对于SS-N-19这样的导弹来说，本身雷达反射截面积就很大，发现距离大，拦截距离就更大。SS-N-19最大射程550公里，假设导弹从潜艇上发射，E-2D预警机适当前出就能在导弹发射的同时发现导弹，就算此时空中力量无法赶到相应位置发射AIM-120拦截，标准SM-6也能迅速补上，从距离舰艇400公里开始拦截，有很多次机会。女王异常崇拜的SS-N-24也差不多，虽然速度接近5马赫，但是低空速度也上不去，照样被拦截。

对抗这个玩意，必须更换思路，陆基弹道导弹+隐身亚音速巡航导弹当主力，空射弹道导弹+增程滑翔鱼雷做第二轮，但是在第二轮空袭前，必须想办法消灭美军预警机！

　　标准６美国自己还没装备

协同作战那点钱 那点技术

韩国还是不行的！

很奇怪,为什么世综大王不用标准3,真的是像传言一样,目的和海自不同,不针对tg?所以用无反短程弹道导弹能力的标准2?不想棒子好大喜功的风格~

为什么不用标准3?有反短程弹道导弹能力不是更好?对朝鲜的飞毛腿,大浦洞不是更有效~似乎棒子面临的反舰导弹威胁并不大~

北棒用不着浪费弹道导弹攻击南棒 身管火炮足以 北棒的导弹是给美日准备地

典型的无知记者的无知报道。

其实就 是标准2 的主动导引版 不是一般的贵

难道是传说中的弹道导弹防空？

SM-6是美国海军未来舰队防空、反巡航导弹的主力，
换上AIM-120的主动寻标头以及改良后的软件和讯号
处理硬件，加装矢量推力控制系统以大幅提高运动性能
，不仅摆脱了照射雷达的限制，最重要的是引进CEC，
能由E-2D或其他友舰传输火控资料，遂行超水平线
（对发射舰而言）攻击。SM-6还将装备GPS，在水平线
外没有友军平台提供火控资料时，由卫星提供的定位
资料来更新惯性导航参数，飞至水平线以外再开启
主动寻标器进行追踪。

SM-6可说包含了先前被打入冷宫的SM-2 Block 4A低空层反弹道
导弹（NAD）的功能，使用推力转向技术从横向拦截发射阶段
的弹道导弹，并拦截低空飞行的巡航导弹。现阶段SM-6应该仍会
使用与现役SM-2 Block 4相同的MK-72助推器加上MK-104双推力火箭
，射程估计370km左右，并沿用与SM-2 Block 3B相同的MK-125 Mod1
高爆破片战斗部。

SM-6预定在2009年进入低量生产，2011年正式战备部署。

顺带简介一下：

SM-4：陆攻标准导弹（LASM），原本是美国海军一个暂时计画，将一批
库存标准改装成陆攻导弹，因应新一代陆攻导弹与陆攻舰炮成军前的
空窗，结果评估后由於射程平平、威力不足而取消。

SM-5：1990年代一种全新标准计画，采用主动雷达导引，具超地平线
拦截陆攻巡航导弹的能力，后来此计画遭搁置，目前相关技术项目都
合并到SM6以内。

泡菜原本是SM-2 Block 4A NAD的唯一忠实支持者，
因为泡菜邻近北韩，很有机会在升空阶段就把北韩
的弹道导弹打下来，所以NAD比SM-3更符合其任务需求。
泡菜反而不太想加入SM-3，因为如此一来等於加入美日
弹道导弹防御同盟，负担更多政治效应，尤其是对中国，
而这与泡菜的目标和利益并不完全吻合。

所以泡菜现在想买延续SM-2 Block 4A的SM-6，是
合情合理的。

棒子是不是还要引进SM的技术:D

CCTV七刚报道过

今天的参考消息已经证实老

标准-3是美国日本联合研制的，虽然日本没出多少技术，但出了不少钱啊，(*^__^*) 嘻嘻……，日本不大会同意向棒子出售的。而且标准-6后期型应当具备拦截末端弹道导弹的能力吧。

原帖由 liobunshi 于 2008-1-21 15:51 发表
很奇怪,为什么世综大王不用标准3,真的是像传言一样,目的和海自不同,不针对tg?所以用无反短程弹道导弹能力的标准2?不想棒子好大喜功的风格~

泡菜拿到标三 高层拦截谁？
北方火箭炮和身管火炮 顶多加上飞毛腿改就基本覆盖泡菜国
标三又定位在高层拦截 本地区有能用射到如此高度的导弹攻击泡菜国的国家就中俄
泡菜国还没到准备和这样级别的对手打全面战的程度

SM-6 Extended Range Active Missile (ERAM)
In response to the evolving threat and an expanding mission, Raytheon and the U.S. Navy are developing the next generation of Extended Range Anti-air Warfare Missile (ERAM). This weapon will take advantage of the proven capabilities of the Standard Missile airframe and semi-active guidance technology, merged with the advanced seeker technology of Raytheon’s AMRAAM Air-to-Air missile. The combination of these two technologies will provide the Navy with the ability to engage challenging targets, at extended ranges, well into the future.

The Extended Range Active Missile (ERAM), tentatively designated SM-6, will add an extended range, overland cruise missile defense capability. The Navy's recommended strategy, based on a market analysis, is to pursue a sole-source acquisition through Raytheon Missile Systems. This low-risk approach relying on Non-Developmental Items will support an FY 2010 IOC. This approach will utilize the existing production active seeker from AMRAAM Phase III, utilize the existing production airframe from the Standard Missile-2 Block IV, leverage multi-service investments in future technology growth path, and leverage existing production infrastructures and workforces.

A robust extended range (ER) anti-air missile with engage-on-remote capability is key to providing flexible firepower throughout the battle space using a variety of targeting platforms. To that end, we are developing the Extended Range Active Missile (ERAM), which uses an SM-2 Block IV propulsion stack with an active Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM) seeker to provide enhanced capabilities. ERAM is an active missile that can use the full kinematic capability of the missile to greatly expand the battlespace. ERAM will leverage the significant investment made by the Defense Department in the AMRAAM seeker.

ERAM is the evolution of the Extended Range Standard Missile airframe and propulsion stack into an active seeker TAMD interceptor with the ability to engage on remote tracks not held on the firing ship’s radar or covered by the firing ship’s fire control illuminators.

After surveying the market to determine sources for existing and potential new technologies to aid in the development of an extended range anti-air missile with active seeker capability, NAVSEA is proposing to award a sole-source development contract to Raytheon Missile Systems. This next generation Standard Missile would satisfy both the extended range and active seeker requirements. Raytheon is currently the sole producer of surface-to-air Missiles for the US Navy, including the Standard Missile 2 Block IIIB (a medium-range missile) and Block IV (an extended-range missile).

Raytheon is the only source that could provide this new ship-launched anti-air warfare (AAW) missile by FY10. The new missile is currently being referred to as the Extended-Range Active Missile, or ERAM.

The name comes from the fact that it incorporates the active-radar seeker of an AMRAAM air-to-air missile, into the extended-range airframe of the Standard Missile Block IV. This approach leverages both the Navy's previous investment in the Standard Missile line, and the Joint Air Force-Navy investment in AMRAAM radar technology. The fact that both ERAM and AMRAAM will use the same hardware and software for the seeker, is expected to also result in lowered production cost for the missile.

The ERAM will replace the Block IV in the Navy's AAW role. The Block IV was never bought in large quantities because it was to be replaced by the Block IVA, a dual-mission AAW and Theater Ballistic Missile (TBM) interceptor. The Block IVA was cancelled in December 2001 along with the rest of the Navy Area Defense program.

The pending ERAM procurement decision does not address the Navy’s need for a TBM system, as the requirements for such a system are still undefined.

The ERAM will be fired by the AEGIS Combat System, like previous versions of Standard Missile, but is also expected to be compatible with the next-generation DD(X) Fire Control System. The ERAM addresses the Navy's need for a long-range interceptor against aircraft and cruise missiles, which dates back to the 1980's.

The AMRAAM seeker will give the missile much improved capability against modern day threats. Having active radar in the missile may also allow engagements at very-long ranges, beyond the ship’s horizon by using networked fire control data such as that provided by the Navy's Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC).

RIM-161 SM-3 (AEGIS Ballistic Missile Defense)
Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) is being developed as part of the US Navy’s sea-based ballistic missile defense system and will provide theater-wide defense against medium and long range ballistic missiles. In 1992, the Terrier LEAP (Lightweight Exo-Atmospheric Projectile) demonstration program culminated in four flight tests and demonstrated the feasibility of theater-wide ballistic missile defense. This program evolved into today’s SM-3 development program which is based on the SM-2 Block IV airframe and propulsion stack, but incorporates a Third Stage Rocket Motor, a GPS/INS Guidance Section and the SM-3 Kinetic Warhead.

The United States Navy and the Missile Defense Agency are developing Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) as part of the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System that will provide allied forces and U.S. protection from short to intermediate range ballistic missiles. The SM-3 Kinetic Warhead (KW) is designed to intercept an incoming ballistic missile outside the earth’s atmosphere. SM-3 is under development by Raytheon at its Missile Systems business unit in Tucson, Arizona.

Configuration
The Aegis BMDS builds upon the Strategic Defense Initiative Organization/Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (SDIO/ BMDO) investment in Lightweight ExoAtmospheric Projectile (LEAP) technology and the Navy’s Aegis weapon system including Standard Missile and MK41 Vertical Launching System currently deployed on many U.S. Navy and international surface combatants.

The SM-3 KW is a highly modular, compact, space tested kinetic warhead designed to defend against short to intermediate range ballistic missile attacks. Raytheon has engineered two prior generations of LEAP designs starting in 1985 under contracts with SDIO and BMDO. This third generation LEAP design integrates the teamed experience of Raytheon and Boeing in KW designs and Alliant Techsystems’ expertise in Solid Divert and Attitude Control. The SM-3 KW design features a large aperture wide field of view long wave infrared seeker that provides acquisition ranges greater than 300 km against typical ballistic missile threats. Seeker pointing and intercept guidance are supported by a production IFOG Inertial Measurement Unit and wooden round simplicity of the SDACS propulsion providing over 2 miles of terminal divert capability. The KW includes a fully encrypted data downlink capability for full engineering evaluation of KW performance and to support rapid kill assessment.

The SM-3 evolves from the proven SM-2 Block IV design. SM-3 uses the same booster and dual thrust rocket motor as the Block IV missile for the first and second stages and the same steering control section and midcourse missile guidance for maneuvering in the atmosphere. To support the extended range of an exo-atmospheric intercept, additional missile thrust is provided in a new third stage for the SM-3 missile, containing a dual pulse rocket motor for the early exo-atmospheric phase of flight and a Lightweight Exo-Atmospheric Projectile (LEAP) Kinetic Warhead (KW) for the intercept phase. Upon second stage separation, the first pulse burn of the Third Stage Rocket Motor (TSRM) provides the axial thrust to maintain the missile’s trajectory into the exo-atmosphere. Upon entering the exo-atmosphere, the third stage coasts. The TSRM’s attitude control system maneuvers the third stage to eject the nosecone, exposing the KW’s Infrared (IR) seeker. If the third stage requires a course correction for an intercept, the rocket motor begins the second pulse burn. Upon completion of the second pulse burn, the IR seeker is calibrated and the KW ejects. The KW possesses its own attitude control system and guidance commands are acted upon by a solid divert propulsion system. The IR seeker acquires the target. Tracking information is continuously transmitted to the guidance assembly which controls the divert propulsion system.

Discrimination algorithms enable defense systems to compare objects in a target scene to determine which to intercept. Increasingly complex threats with separated target elements, countermeasures, and debris, require advanced signal processing and discrimination algorithms to identify object features needed to provide robust target selection. SM-3 has flown and demonstrated fundamental discrimination capability for unitary threats.

Computer program design upgrades are in work to expand the current selection accuracy and add capability against more stressing unitary and separating target scenes using target features observed by the Aegis radar system and the KW LWIR seeker to optimize selection confidence. Leveraging off discrimination architecture used across Raytheon’s missile programs, SM-3 continues to evolve an integrated discrimination design for insertion with the current seeker design and each of the sensing and signal processor upgrades available to counter advancing threats.

Raytheon is working closely with the Navy to ensure that SM-3, based on legacy Standard tactical missile designs, stands ready to provide immediate emergency Aegis BMD capability against preponderant threats. The SM-3 Block I KW configuration features a single color LWIR seeker, a solid DACS propulsion, target identification and discrimination, and lethal intercept accuracy.

In 2004 the Pentagon decided to embark on the development in fiscal 2007 of an enhanced version of the Standard Missile 3 interceptor.

Flight Test Program
The Aegis BMD flight test program has achieved four successful intercepts in five attempts. These flight tests have demonstrated the capability to intercept short-range, simple unitary targets in both descent and ascent phases of flight, and in the case of FM-6, have shown the capability to destroy the target warhead.

The AEGIS LEAP Intercept (ALI) program has demonstrated the design capabilities of the SM-3 KW with a series of ground and flight tests. ALI culminated in two successful ballistic missile intercepts on the first two engagement missions. Flight Mission Two (FM-2) flown on 25 January 2002 and Flight Mission Three (FM-3) on 13 June 2002 were completely successful allowing the program to proceed into testbed development.

Aegis BMD testbed initiated a series of increasingly complex missions to evaluate SM-3 design capability while the program prepares for potential emergency tactical availability. The first mission of this test series, Flight Mission Four (FM-4), was flown on 21 November 2002 resulting in a third successful intercept for the program. This mission demonstrated the ship’s crew and system response times necessary to track, engage, and intercept a ballistic missile target early in flight during its ascent phase (prior to apogee). FM-4 also provided a key verification of SM-3’s capability to accurately hit the target at a predefined point for lethality which, for this test, was forward of the target center. The KW impacted within centimeters of the aimpoint, completely destroying the target avionics section.

In FY03, two intercept attempts of a unitary target in its ascent phase were conducted. In the first test, the Aegis BMD element successfully intercepted the target. Using a newly designed divert system onboard the SM-3 missile, the Aegis BMD failed to intercept the target in the second FY03 test. The cause of the failed intercept has been attributed to a malfunction in a divert valve in the attitude control system onboard the kinetic warhead. Testing continued based on the consistent performance of the sustained pulse mode, while mitigation options were evaluated.

In FY03, the operational robustness of the Aegis BMD Block 2004 test program was enhanced by increased operational realism in the test strategy. Efforts to add operational realism as part of the developmental test strategy provide significant risk reduction in advance of operational testing and potential deployment of the element. The planned growth in flight test realism is consistent with the maturity of the system. Although the Block 2004 flight test plan include many operationally realistic aspects, some important operational scenarios remain untested by the end of the Block 2004 test program. These include multiple simultaneous engagements and separating targets. Development and integration of critical technologies pertaining to threat discrimination (e.g., AWS discrimination logic, radar and infrared seeker upgrades) and missile propulsion (e.g., kinetic warhead divert system, SM-3 booster propulsion) could improve operational capability as they are introduced in Block 2004 and subsequent upgrades.

On 18 June 2003. A developmental Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) is launched from the U.S. Navy cruiser, USS Lake Erie (CG-70), in a Missile Defense Agency test, Wednesday, near Kauai, Hawaii. The test was the latest in a series aimed at developing a sea-based defense against short to medium range ballistic missile threats.

On 11 December 2003 Flight Mission-6 (FM-6) involved the detection and tracking of an Aries medium-range target missile launched from the Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF), Kauai, Hawaii at 8:10am HST (1:10pm EST). Approximately two minutes after target launch, a developmental Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) was launched from the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense cruiser the USS LAKE ERIE (CG 70). Approximately two minutes later the SM-3 successfully intercepted the target missile with Òhit to killÓ technology, using only the force of the direct collision to destroy the target. This was the fourth successful intercept for Aegis BMD and SM-3.

Raytheon's next hit-to-kill success with the sea-based STANDARD Missile-3 occurred on 11 December 2003. Between January 2002 and late 2004, the Aegis BMD system had successfully intercepted targets in space four times with SM-3. In all the flight tests, the SM-3 was launched from a US Navy cruiser under increasingly realistic, operational conditions.

On 24 February 2005 the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) Weapon System and Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) destroyed a ballistic missile outside the earth's atmosphere during an Aegis BMD Program flight test over the Pacific Ocean. The Feb. 24 mission -- the fifth successful intercept for SM-3 -- was the first firing of the Aegis BMD "Emergency Deployment" capability using operational versions of the SM-3 Block I missile and Aegis BMD Weapon System. This was also the first test to exercise SM-3's third stage rocket motor (TSRM) single-pulse mode. The TSRM has two pulses, which can be ignited independently, providing expansion of the ballistic missile engagement battlespace. The SM-3 was launched from the Aegis BMD cruiser USS Lake Erie (CG 70) and hit a target missile that had been launched from the U.S. Navy's Pacific Missile Range Facility on Kauai, Hawaii.

On 17 November 2005 a test involved for the first time a "separating" target, meaning that the target warhead separated from its booster rocket requiring the interceptor to distinguish between the body of the missile and the actual warhead. The interceptor missile was launched from the Pearl Harbor-based Aegis cruiser USS Lake Erie (CG 70). The target was intercepted more than 100 miles in space above the Pacific Ocean and 375 miles northwest of Kauai.

A Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) was launched on March 8, 2006 from the USS Lake Erie (CG 70) in a Missile Defense Agency and Japan Defense Agency joint test in the Pacific. The cooperative test demonstrated the SM-3 with a Japan-designed advanced nosecone. The flight test, a milestone in a joint cooperative research project, is an example of the ongoing coordination between the U.S. and Japan on missile defense efforts.

Deployment
To fulfill the sea-based portion of the initial missile defense capabilities, the MDA is developing Aegis BMD in close coordination with the Navy and Naval Sea Systems Command. Aegis BMD Block 2004 consists of two major contributions to BMDS. The first contribution is Aegis DDG-51 Class Destroyers equipped for Long Range Surveillance and Track (LRS&T). LRS&T provides a capability to detect and track LRBMs and to report the track data to the BMDS. This capability assists in the sharing of tracking data to cue other BMDS sensors and provides fire control support to engagement elements. LRS&T is the first Aegis BMD delivery and is part of the Initial Defensive Operations (IDO), which went on alert in 2004.

The second contribution is Aegis CG-47 Class Cruisers equipped with the LRS&T capability, but also armed with the new SM-3, capable of intercepting short and medium range ballistic missile threats in the midcourse phase of flight. By 2005, full Aegis BMD Block 2004 functionality will be implemented in the first set of Aegis Cruisers. In the future, Aegis BMD capability will evolve to defeat longer range ballistic missiles.

Raytheon delivered five SM-3 operational rounds to the Missile Defense Agency in 2004. The program is transitioning to production, with Kinetic Warhead seeker and final integration occurring in Raytheon's state-of-the-art Kill Vehicle manufacturing facility, alongside the Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicle. Final assembly and test occur in Camden, AK. As part of the initial deployment of the BMDS, five Pacific Fleet Aegis Destroyers had operational LRS&T upgrades installed by the end of 2004. There will be a total of 15 LRS&T Aegis Destroyers and 3 Aegis BMD engagement Cruisers by the end of CY 06.

In October 2004 Raytheon Company began delivering STANDARD Missile-3 (SM-3) initial deployment rounds to the Missile Defense Agency. SM-3 is a key element of the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System and builds on the existing fleet of Aegis cruisers and destroyers. This is a critical milestone for Raytheon and for the country. These deployment rounds move the US Navy one step closer to providing a sea-based defense against short- to intermediate-range ballistic missile threats. The delivery of SM-3 supports the administration's commitment to provide a sea-based missile defense capability.

Aegis BMD went to sea on 30 September 2004, able to track an ICBM and to communicate that information to the Ballistic Missile Defense System. The Navy added firepower to Aegis BMD with the SM-3 missile. It is able to participate in the defense of not only the US, but of allies, friends and deployed troops against short-medium range ballistic missiles around the globe. Because naval forces are inherently mobile and capable of multiple missions, Aegis BMD will provide a broad array of options to operational commanders responding to a wide variety of dynamic world situations.

Japan Maritime Self Defense Force Deployment
The potential for allied cooperation in development and procurement of a BMD system is real. In December 2003, through a formal Cabinet Decision, the Government of Japan became the first ally to decide to proceed with the acquisition of a multi-layered BMD system, basing its initial capability on upgrades of its Aegis Destroyers and acquisition of the SM-3 missile. The two nations began the research program in 1999 for a system to launch interceptors from Aegis destroyers. Japan has spent 15.6 billion yen up to fiscal 2003. The AEGIS Weapon System and Standard missiles will be used on JMSDF ships and will provide, in concert with JSDF PAC-3 Patriot missiles, the initial ballistic missile defense for mainland Japan. Japan already has the upgraded AEGIS Weapon System and SM-3 Block IA Standard missiles in its inventory and will have no difficulty absorbing the additional upgraded Weapon System and missiles.

The first Aegis BMD installation in the Japan Maritime Self Defense Force was scheduled for the fall of 2007. In addition, Japan will upgrade their Patriot units with PAC-3 missiles and improved ground support equipment. The US has worked closely with Japan since 1999 to design and develop advanced components for the SM-3 missile. This project would culminate in flight tests of SM-3 variant missiles in 2005 and 2006.

On 5 May 2004, the Defense Security Cooperation Agency notified Congress of a possible Foreign Military Sale to Japan of SM-3 Block 1A Standard Missiles as well as associated equipment and services. The total value, if all options are exercised, could be as high as $725 million.

On 29 June 2005, the Defense Security Cooperation Agency notified Congress of a possible Foreign Military Sale to Japan of nine SM-3 Block IA Standard missiles with MK 21 Mod 2 canisters, as well as associated equipment and services. The total value, if all options are exercised, could be as high as $387 million. The Government of Japan has requested a possible sale of nine SM-3 Block IA Standard missiles with MK 21 Mod 2 canisters, Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) upgrades to one AEGIS Weapon System, AEGIS BMD Vertical Launch System ORDALTs, containers, spare and repair parts, publications, documentation, supply support, U.S. Government and contractor technical assistance and other related elements of logistics support. The estimated cost is $387 million.

原帖由 kski 于 2008-1-21 15:03 发表
看来韩国连SM-3和SM-4、5都没看上眼哪!;P

SM-4是对地的啊。;P

南朝鲜用标准6，可要有一整套系统来支持啊！

没有CEC协同作战系统和预警机标准-6打不了这么远，也就是说棒子有航空母舰的话才能在远洋发挥标准-6的威力

原帖由 MIG31A 于 2008-1-22 18:46 发表
南朝鲜用标准6，可要有一整套系统来支持啊！

标准6，好像才标准3哦

看来南朝鲜用标准-6，可要从老美那里引进大批设备，不然标6就是个摆设！

只问一个问题：SM6这东西对F-22何如？主动引导头锁定距离多少？

NND，又是棒子，恶心的民族

原帖由 其折军 于 2008-1-22 19:07 发表
标准6，好像才标准3哦

:D :D
     这个就有点苏27的味道鸟...

晴天一声霹雳，冒出一个“SM-6”来！晕了！:L

哪家杂志敢介绍，肯定很火，大作者们赶快写啊，俺给你们推荐到杂志社去啊。

原帖由 东太平洋总兵 于 2008-1-22 22:14 发表
晴天一声霹雳，冒出一个“SM-6”来！晕了！:L

SM-6，很黄很暴力．

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/sm-6.htm

SM-6 Extended Range Active Missile (ERAM)

In response to the evolving threat and an expanding mission, Raytheon and the U.S. Navy are developing the next generation of Extended Range Anti-air Warfare Missile (ERAM). This weapon will take advantage of the proven capabilities of the Standard Missile airframe and semi-active guidance technology, merged with the advanced seeker technology of Raytheon’s AMRAAM Air-to-Air missile. The combination of these two technologies will provide the Navy with the ability to engage challenging targets, at extended ranges, well into the future.

The Extended Range Active Missile (ERAM), tentatively designated SM-6, will add an extended range, overland cruise missile defense capability. The Navy's recommended strategy, based on a market analysis, is to pursue a sole-source acquisition through Raytheon Missile Systems. This low-risk approach relying on Non-Developmental Items will support an FY 2010 IOC. This approach will utilize the existing production active seeker from AMRAAM Phase III, utilize the existing production airframe from the Standard Missile-2 Block IV, leverage multi-service investments in future technology growth path, and leverage existing production infrastructures and workforces.

A robust extended range (ER) anti-air missile with engage-on-remote capability is key to providing flexible firepower throughout the battle space using a variety of targeting platforms. To that end, we are developing the Extended Range Active Missile (ERAM), which uses an SM-2 Block IV propulsion stack with an active Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM) seeker to provide enhanced capabilities. ERAM is an active missile that can use the full kinematic capability of the missile to greatly expand the battlespace. ERAM will leverage the significant investment made by the Defense Department in the AMRAAM seeker.

ERAM is the evolution of the Extended Range Standard Missile airframe and propulsion stack into an active seeker TAMD interceptor with the ability to engage on remote tracks not held on the firing ship’s radar or covered by the firing ship’s fire control illuminators.

After surveying the market to determine sources for existing and potential new technologies to aid in the development of an extended range anti-air missile with active seeker capability, NAVSEA is proposing to award a sole-source development contract to Raytheon Missile Systems. This next generation Standard Missile would satisfy both the extended range and active seeker requirements. Raytheon is currently the sole producer of surface-to-air Missiles for the US Navy, including the Standard Missile 2 Block IIIB (a medium-range missile) and Block IV (an extended-range missile).

Raytheon is the only source that could provide this new ship-launched anti-air warfare (AAW) missile by FY10. The new missile is currently being referred to as the Extended-Range Active Missile, or ERAM.

The name comes from the fact that it incorporates the active-radar seeker of an AMRAAM air-to-air missile, into the extended-range airframe of the Standard Missile Block IV. This approach leverages both the Navy's previous investment in the Standard Missile line, and the Joint Air Force-Navy investment in AMRAAM radar technology. The fact that both ERAM and AMRAAM will use the same hardware and software for the seeker, is expected to also result in lowered production cost for the missile.

The ERAM will replace the Block IV in the Navy's AAW role. The Block IV was never bought in large quantities because it was to be replaced by the Block IVA, a dual-mission AAW and Theater Ballistic Missile (TBM) interceptor. The Block IVA was cancelled in December 2001 along with the rest of the Navy Area Defense program.

The pending ERAM procurement decision does not address the Navy’s need for a TBM system, as the requirements for such a system are still undefined.

The ERAM will be fired by the AEGIS Combat System, like previous versions of Standard Missile, but is also expected to be compatible with the next-generation DD(X) Fire Control System. The ERAM addresses the Navy's need for a long-range interceptor against aircraft and cruise missiles, which dates back to the 1980's.

The AMRAAM seeker will give the missile much improved capability against modern day threats. Having active radar in the missile may also allow engagements at very-long ranges, beyond the ship’s horizon by using networked fire control data such as that provided by the Navy's Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC).

http://www.worldmissiles.com/news/dec04.pdf

Standard Missile-6 (SM-6) Moves Ahead

The Extended Range Active Missile (ERAM) or SM-6 is the next
step in Anti-ship Cruise Missile (ASCM) defense for the US Navy.
The desire for navies around the world to acquire a surface-tosurface
missile capacity has been one primary goal of nearly every
developing navy since the inception of the ASCM. Nearly every
country with a coastline has some form of a navy with more than
half possessing vessels capable of launching ASCMs. As the
number of nations with ASCM capabilities increases so does the
need for more capable surface launched air defense missiles.
Raytheon Missile Systems will provide this capability with ERAM.
SM-6 is the Navy’s next generation naval air defense missile following
over 30 years of defense provided first by the Standard Missile-1
and then SM-2.

In January 2004, the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA)
announced it was planning to award a contract, as a sole-source
acquisition, to Raytheon Missile Systems to develop and produce
the ERAM for an in-service date of 2010. Then, on 3 September
2004, Raytheon was awarded a US$440M contract for the SM-6
with 80% of the work being done at the Tucson plant and the
remainder in Arkansas and Massachusetts.

Funding for the project has been addressed in the
RDT&E budget until 2009 at which point the funding will
likely fall under the procurement budget as the missile enters service.
Additional milestones to be met will consist of a critical design review
in fiscal year 2006 with flight-testingexpected to start in 2008.

ERAM, designated “Talon” (a continuation of the Standard Missile,
Tarter, Terrier, Talos series), is, based on
the target set, expected to utilize the high-performance airframe
of the SM-2 Block IVA (although reporting
states Block IV) and the seeker head from the
Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM)
Phase III missile (AIM 120-C7). The addition of the
active seeker from the AMRAAM will allow for the
missile to engage remote targets (not held on the firing
ship’s radars) or targets that are beyond the fire
control illuminator’s radar horizon over both water and land.
Missile guidance laws are generally based on one of
several forms of proportional navigation (PN). While
PN laws are robust, analytically tractable, and
computationally simple, they are only optimal in a narrow
operating regime. Consequently, they may not optimize
engagement range, time to intercept, or endgame kinetic energy.
The advent of miniaturized high-speed computers has made it
possible to compute optimal trajectories for missiles using
command mid-course guidance as well as autonomous onboard
guidance. A missile’s kinematic boundary can be described as
the maximum theoretical range at which it can intercept a target
assuming no noise in its sensors. ERAM is capable of utilizing
the full kinematic capability of the missile to greatly expand the
boundaries of the battlespace.

In addition to the employment of the AMRAAM
seeker, there will be software enhancements to
the signal processor as well as changes to the
guidance system and autopilot functions that will
accommodate a semi-active mode of operation.
This semi-active mode will give the missile the
ability to counter the full spectrum of airborne
threats posed to the fleet, which include not only
ASCMs but also, helicopters, low/slow flying
aircraft, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and
theater ballistic missiles while reducing the chance
of engaging the wrong target.
Although the overall performance of the missile
remains classified, it can be assumed the missile
will have approximately the same range as the
SM-2 Block IV of 200+ NM if equipped with the
same propulsion stack consisting of the Mk 104
dual-thrust rocket motor (boost-sustainer) and the
Mk 72 solid fuel booster. SM-6 is known to be
utilizing the latest blast-fragmentation warhead
similar to the Mk125 Mod 1 that is currently part
of the SM-2 Block IIIB.
ERAM will be compatible with the existing Aegis
Weapon System and launchable from the Mk 41
Vertical Launching System (VLS). This
compatibility will provide the navies of Japan,
South Korea, Spain, and Norway with a long-range
option when SM-6 is approved for export.
Likewise, Germany and the Netherlands will have
an upgrade path from SM-2 Block IIIA. However,
ERAM will likely find its first installation aboard the
DD(X) and its new Mk 57 Peripheral VLS although
not specifically called for in the current
requirements. The 2010 in-service date coincides
with the completion of the first DD(X) that is
scheduled to commission in 2011 where as the
CG(X) (which calls for a missile with SM-6’s
capabilities) will not commission prior to 2020.
According to the Navy, the US$2M missile is
“necessary…without it, we have to rely on a
weapon that can only be deployed when the
enemy is within radar range of a ship.”
The enhanced capabilities of ERAM will allow for
a fleet air-defense capability that will last well into
the 21st century.

http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/app4/eram.html

In September 2004, Raytheon finally received a development contract for a 7-year SDD (System Development & Demonstration) phase of the SM-6. As of mid-2005, the first ERAM flight test was planned for late 2007, with LRIP (Low-Rate Initial Production) beginning in 2009 and IOC (Initial Operational Capability) achieved by 2010. No specific data on the SM-6's performance envelope has been published, but since the airframe and propulsion system are identical to the RIM-156A, the specifications are presumably very similar. Raytheon also claims that SM-6 can act as a sea-based terminal ballistic missile defense system.
Specifications

Note: Data given by several sources show slight variations. Figures given below may therefore be inaccurate!

Data for SM-6 ERAM (performance data based on RIM-156A):
Length (incl. booster)        6.55 m (21 ft 6 in)
Finspan        1.57 m (61.8 in)
Diameter        0.34 m (13.5 in); booster: 0.53 m (21 in)
Weight        1500 kg (3300 lb)
Speed        Mach 3.5
Ceiling        33000 m (110000 ft)
Range        240 km (130 nm)
Propulsion        United Techologies MK 72 solid-fueled rocket booster
Atlantic Research Corp. MK 104 dual-thrust solid-fueled rocket sustainer
Warhead        MK 125 blast-fragmentation

这个东西可以象前辈们一样用来客串反舰吗？

原帖由 雪千寻 于 2008-1-23 09:13 发表
这个东西可以象前辈们一样用来客串反舰吗？

除了SM-3这个反弹道导弹专用货色外，其他配备高爆战斗部的
型号都可以。

很好，很强大……
什么时候应该请韩方用这个和北面的炮塔教徒们友好地较量一下……;P