如果美国在几年后分裂打仗,黑人在最初的军事行动中会不 ...

来源:百度文库 编辑:超级军网 时间:2024/04/29 17:04:47
美国黑鬼说的好:谁能抗拒白种小妞呢!!!

在分裂的最开始,黑鬼会大规模的强奸白种小妞,然后白皮男人开始对黑鬼屠杀,拉丁裔站在白皮一遍,当打手和二等公民。黑鬼在最初的屠杀过后,会不会抱团?会不会请求第三世界援助。


这个帖子的脑洞开的有点大.......美国黑鬼说的好:谁能抗拒白种小妞呢!!!

在分裂的最开始,黑鬼会大规模的强奸白种小妞,然后白皮男人开始对黑鬼屠杀,拉丁裔站在白皮一遍,当打手和二等公民。黑鬼在最初的屠杀过后,会不会抱团?会不会请求第三世界援助。


这个帖子的脑洞开的有点大.......
拉丁裔比黑人危险多了
不会      因为他们不都是 种族主义者
那需要一个契机
第三世界表示介入。。。

嘿嘿,白皮们,第三世界的劳苦大众早看你们不顺眼了。。。


肯定会抱团,但是未必打的过就是了,现在游行示威黑人不是也抱团么。不过拉丁会跟白皮抱团不至于吧,为何不自立门户呢?大草帽的团队作战能力还是不错的

肯定会抱团,但是未必打的过就是了,现在游行示威黑人不是也抱团么。不过拉丁会跟白皮抱团不至于吧,为何不自立门户呢?大草帽的团队作战能力还是不错的
美国到处肢解他国,自己被肢解的可能性还是很大的。
美国不会分裂,最多各自支持自己的球队,发泄不满
黑叔叔 组个篮球队 基本就是团队合作的极限了
黑鬼的智商,和白人开战只有被屠杀的命

sm32999 发表于 2016-5-23 17:34
不会      因为他们不都是 种族主义者


http://www.ltaaa.com/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=216410&extra=page%3D4&mobile=2

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-07-14/thomas-sowell-asks-who-racist

http://www.humanevents.com/2013/07/09/who-is-racist-2/


Thomas Sowell Asks "Who Is Racist?"

托马斯 索维尔问,“谁是种族主义者?”

I am so old that I can remember when most of the people promoting race hate were white.

我是如此的年迈,以至于我还能记得大部分提倡种族主义的人是白人的时候。

Apparently other Americans also recognize that the sources of racism are different today from what they were in the past. According to a recent Rasmussen poll, 31 percent of blacks think that most blacks are racists, while 24 percent of blacks think that most whites are racist.

显然其他美国人也认为,今天种族主义的来源已经不同于以往。根据一份Rasmussen的民意测验,31%的黑人认为大多数黑人是种族主义者,与此同时24%的黑人认为大多数白人是种族主义者。
(注:Rasmussen Report是一个2003年成立的美国传媒和民意测验公司,详见:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rasmussen_Reports)

The difference between these percentages is not great, but it is remarkable nevertheless. After all, generations of blacks fought the white racism from which they suffered for so long. If many blacks themselves now think that most other blacks are racist, that is startling.

这两个百分比之间的差别并不明显,却十分重要。毕竟,一代代的黑人曾与使他们受苦难深重的白人种族主义作斗争。如果许多黑人他们自己现在认为其他的黑人是种族主义者,这就很令人震惊了。


The moral claims advanced by generations of black leaders - claims that eventually touched the conscience of the nation and turned the tide toward civil rights for all - have now been cheapened by today’s generation of black “leaders,” who act as if it is all just a matter of whose ox is gored.

被一代代黑人领袖所提倡的道德观念 - 一些触动了这个国家良知,并将(种族主义的)浪潮推向民权运动的观念 - 现在在已经被当今一代的黑人“领袖”所贬低。他们表现的就好像所有的事情都只事关谁的公牛被角顶了一样。
(注:a matter of whose ox is gored是出自圣经的引用语,意为‘有不同程度利益牵扯的人看同一个事件往往会有不同的看法’,也就是通常所说的‘屁股决定脑袋’。如果有更好的解释请提出,译者会进行修改,拜谢!)

Even in legal cases involving terrible crimes - the O.J. Simpson murder trial or the charges of gang rape against Duke University students - many black “leaders” and their followers have not waited for facts about who was guilty and who was not, but have immediately taken sides, based on who was black and who was white.

甚至在一些牵涉到恶性犯罪的法律案件中 - O.J.辛普森杀妻案或是杜克大学学生被指控轮奸案 - 许多黑人“领袖”和他们的追随者甚至还没有等到谁犯了罪或没有犯罪的事实之前,就立刻基于谁是黑人/谁是白人选择了自己的位置。

Among whites, according to the same Rasmussen poll, 38 percent consider most blacks racist and 10 percent consider most whites racist.

根据Rasmussen民意调查,在白人中,38%认为大多数黑人是种族主义者,10%认为白人是种族主义者。

Broken down by politics, the same poll showed that 49 percent of Republicans consider most blacks racist, as do 36 percent of independents and 29 percent of Democrats.

按政见划分,这份民意测验显示49%的共和党认为大多数黑人是种族主义者,36%的自由政见派和29%的民主党人士同样认为大多数黑人是种族主义者。

Perhaps most disturbing of all, just 29 percent of Americans as a whole think race relations are getting better, while 32 percent think race relations are getting worse. The difference is too close to call, but the fact that it is so close is itself painful — and perhaps a warning sign for where we are heading.

也许最令人不安的是,只有29%的美国人认为从总体来讲,种族间关系在好转,与此同时32%的人认为种族间关系在恶化。两者之间的差别非常接近以至于很难区分,但是两者如此接近这个事实本身就令人痛苦 --这也许也是我们目前行进方向的一个警示。


Is this what so many Americans, both black and white, struggled for, over the decades and generations, to try to put the curse of racism behind us — only to reach a point where retrogression in race relations now seems at least equally likely as progress?

难道这就是如此之多的美国人所奋斗的,不管黑人还是白人,几十年一代代的奋斗,试图将种族主义的魔咒抛在我们身后的奋斗 ---  仅仅实现了一个种族间关系倒退至少和进步一样多的时代?

What went wrong? Perhaps no single factor can be blamed for all the things that went wrong. Insurgent movements of all sorts, in countries around the world, have for centuries soured in the aftermath of their own success. “The revolution betrayed” is a theme that goes back at least as far as 18th century France.

到底是什么出了错?也许我们不能将所有错误归结于一个因素上。世界各国、各式各样的起义运动,已经在几个世纪以来毁坏了它们自己的成功。“革命被背叛了”是一个可以被最早追溯到18世纪法国的主题。

The civil rights movement in 20th century America attracted many people who put everything on the line for the sake of fighting against racial oppression. But the eventual success of that movement attracted opportunists, and even turned some idealists into opportunists.

美国20世纪的民权运动吸引许多人投入一切与种族压迫作斗争。但那项运动最终的胜利却吸引了一些机会主义者,甚至将某些理想主义者转变成了机会主义者。

Over the generations, black leaders have ranged from noble souls to shameless charlatans. After the success of the civil rights insurgency, the latter have come into their own, gaining money, power and fame by promoting racial attitudes and actions that are counterproductive to the interests of those they lead.

一代代以来,黑人领袖既有高尚的灵魂,也有无耻的江湖骗子。民权运动成功以后,后一部分人开始为自己谋划,通过提倡种族主义的态度和行动来获取金钱,力量和名声。而这些往往与他们所引领的人的利益所违背。

None of this is unique to blacks or to the United States. In various countries and times, leaders of groups that lagged behind, economically and educationally, have taught their followers to blame all their problems on other people — and to hate those other people.

所有这些都不仅限于黑人或美国。在许多国家,许多时代,一个经济上、教育上落后的团体的领袖们往往教导他们的追随者将所有他们的问题归咎到其他人身上 --- 然后去仇恨那些人。


This was the history of anti-Semitic movements in Eastern Europe between the two World Wars, anti-Ibo movements in Nigeria in the 1960s, and anti-Tamil movements that turned Sri Lanka from a peaceful nation into a scene of lethal mob violence and then decades-long civil war, both marked by unspeakable atrocities.

这是在两次世界大战中,东欧反犹主义行为的历史,也是60年代尼日利亚反伊博人行为的历史,更是斯里兰卡反泰米尔人行为的历史 -- 后者最终将这个和平的国家拖入了暴徒暴力和几十年之久的内战中,两者都以不可言说的暴行而臭名昭著。
(注:反伊博人,全称1966 anti-Igbo pogrom,是一系列针对伊博人和尼日利亚南部居民的大屠杀,具体参见:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1966_anti-Igbo_pogrom;反泰米尔人则是长期以来在斯里兰卡的种族主义暴乱,参见:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riots_in_Sri_Lanka。反犹主义相信不用过多解释。)

Groups that rose from poverty to prosperity seldom did so by having racial or ethnic leaders. While most Americans can easily name a number of black leaders, current or past, how many can name Asian American ethnic leaders or Jewish ethnic leaders?

能够从贫穷走向富饶的团体很少有所谓种族或民族领袖。在大多数美国人可以轻易想起一系列黑人领袖的名字时,有多少人能够想起一个亚裔民族领袖或犹太人民族领袖?

The time is long overdue to stop looking for progress through racial or ethnic leaders. Such leaders have too many incentives to promote polarizing attitudes and actions that are counterproductive for minorities and disastrous for the country.

通过民族或种族领袖来寻求进步的时间已经太长了。这样的领袖有太多的动机去提倡极端化的态度和行为,而这些往往与少数民族的利益相反,并对国家产生灾难性的后果。

------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------

读者评论:


wiredone BostonMary  6 days ago

What a difference a profession makes. When the OJ verdict came out in an office I was in at the time (lawyers) the black guys couldn't believe that he WASN'T convicted and the majority of older (over 60) white personnel in the office thought that he had been railroaded by the racist Detective and was not guilty.
In regards to the so called black voter intimidation case, you need to check out "the facts of the case" not what you saw on that entertainment network called "Fox News". Murdocks description not mine.
职业可以造成这么多不同!当OJ的判决出来的时候,我在一间律师的办公室。黑人都不敢相信他没有被判刑,而大多数老一点的白人工作人员认为他被种族主义探员所摧残了,他是无罪的。
至于所谓的黑人投票者恐吓案,你需要看看案件的事实,而是不是一个名叫“福克斯新闻”的娱乐台。这可是默多克说的,不是我说的。

Edm68  6 days ago
Can't we just draft Thomas Sowell as the next GOP candidate for President? And get back to winning.
难道我们不能把托马斯 索维尔选为下一个共和党总统候选人么?这样就能赢了

hMike  6 days ago
There is a big difference now. 50 years ago, black leaders were fighting for equal rights. Now they promote racism as that is the way gain power and money. The fact that they tolerate dem leaders always holding blacks to lower standards, because the dem leaders truly believe blacks to be inferior, is just sickening.
现在有一个很大的不同。50年前,黑人领袖为平等权利作斗争。现在,他们提倡种族主义因为他们觉得那是获得权利和金钱的方式。他们容忍那些真的认为黑人下等而将黑人拖回低水平的民主党议员是一个事实。而这个事实真病态。

(注:托马斯 索维尔是美国著名经济学家,目前被一些人认为是芝加哥学派的代表人物。如果对罗永浩有所了解的话,应该听罗永浩推荐过他的《种族主义简史》。详见:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Sowell  

sm32999 发表于 2016-5-23 17:34
不会      因为他们不都是 种族主义者


http://www.ltaaa.com/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=216410&extra=page%3D4&mobile=2

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-07-14/thomas-sowell-asks-who-racist

http://www.humanevents.com/2013/07/09/who-is-racist-2/


Thomas Sowell Asks "Who Is Racist?"

托马斯 索维尔问,“谁是种族主义者?”

I am so old that I can remember when most of the people promoting race hate were white.

我是如此的年迈,以至于我还能记得大部分提倡种族主义的人是白人的时候。

Apparently other Americans also recognize that the sources of racism are different today from what they were in the past. According to a recent Rasmussen poll, 31 percent of blacks think that most blacks are racists, while 24 percent of blacks think that most whites are racist.

显然其他美国人也认为,今天种族主义的来源已经不同于以往。根据一份Rasmussen的民意测验,31%的黑人认为大多数黑人是种族主义者,与此同时24%的黑人认为大多数白人是种族主义者。
(注:Rasmussen Report是一个2003年成立的美国传媒和民意测验公司,详见:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rasmussen_Reports)

The difference between these percentages is not great, but it is remarkable nevertheless. After all, generations of blacks fought the white racism from which they suffered for so long. If many blacks themselves now think that most other blacks are racist, that is startling.

这两个百分比之间的差别并不明显,却十分重要。毕竟,一代代的黑人曾与使他们受苦难深重的白人种族主义作斗争。如果许多黑人他们自己现在认为其他的黑人是种族主义者,这就很令人震惊了。


The moral claims advanced by generations of black leaders - claims that eventually touched the conscience of the nation and turned the tide toward civil rights for all - have now been cheapened by today’s generation of black “leaders,” who act as if it is all just a matter of whose ox is gored.

被一代代黑人领袖所提倡的道德观念 - 一些触动了这个国家良知,并将(种族主义的)浪潮推向民权运动的观念 - 现在在已经被当今一代的黑人“领袖”所贬低。他们表现的就好像所有的事情都只事关谁的公牛被角顶了一样。
(注:a matter of whose ox is gored是出自圣经的引用语,意为‘有不同程度利益牵扯的人看同一个事件往往会有不同的看法’,也就是通常所说的‘屁股决定脑袋’。如果有更好的解释请提出,译者会进行修改,拜谢!)

Even in legal cases involving terrible crimes - the O.J. Simpson murder trial or the charges of gang rape against Duke University students - many black “leaders” and their followers have not waited for facts about who was guilty and who was not, but have immediately taken sides, based on who was black and who was white.

甚至在一些牵涉到恶性犯罪的法律案件中 - O.J.辛普森杀妻案或是杜克大学学生被指控轮奸案 - 许多黑人“领袖”和他们的追随者甚至还没有等到谁犯了罪或没有犯罪的事实之前,就立刻基于谁是黑人/谁是白人选择了自己的位置。

Among whites, according to the same Rasmussen poll, 38 percent consider most blacks racist and 10 percent consider most whites racist.

根据Rasmussen民意调查,在白人中,38%认为大多数黑人是种族主义者,10%认为白人是种族主义者。

Broken down by politics, the same poll showed that 49 percent of Republicans consider most blacks racist, as do 36 percent of independents and 29 percent of Democrats.

按政见划分,这份民意测验显示49%的共和党认为大多数黑人是种族主义者,36%的自由政见派和29%的民主党人士同样认为大多数黑人是种族主义者。

Perhaps most disturbing of all, just 29 percent of Americans as a whole think race relations are getting better, while 32 percent think race relations are getting worse. The difference is too close to call, but the fact that it is so close is itself painful — and perhaps a warning sign for where we are heading.

也许最令人不安的是,只有29%的美国人认为从总体来讲,种族间关系在好转,与此同时32%的人认为种族间关系在恶化。两者之间的差别非常接近以至于很难区分,但是两者如此接近这个事实本身就令人痛苦 --这也许也是我们目前行进方向的一个警示。


Is this what so many Americans, both black and white, struggled for, over the decades and generations, to try to put the curse of racism behind us — only to reach a point where retrogression in race relations now seems at least equally likely as progress?

难道这就是如此之多的美国人所奋斗的,不管黑人还是白人,几十年一代代的奋斗,试图将种族主义的魔咒抛在我们身后的奋斗 ---  仅仅实现了一个种族间关系倒退至少和进步一样多的时代?

What went wrong? Perhaps no single factor can be blamed for all the things that went wrong. Insurgent movements of all sorts, in countries around the world, have for centuries soured in the aftermath of their own success. “The revolution betrayed” is a theme that goes back at least as far as 18th century France.

到底是什么出了错?也许我们不能将所有错误归结于一个因素上。世界各国、各式各样的起义运动,已经在几个世纪以来毁坏了它们自己的成功。“革命被背叛了”是一个可以被最早追溯到18世纪法国的主题。

The civil rights movement in 20th century America attracted many people who put everything on the line for the sake of fighting against racial oppression. But the eventual success of that movement attracted opportunists, and even turned some idealists into opportunists.

美国20世纪的民权运动吸引许多人投入一切与种族压迫作斗争。但那项运动最终的胜利却吸引了一些机会主义者,甚至将某些理想主义者转变成了机会主义者。

Over the generations, black leaders have ranged from noble souls to shameless charlatans. After the success of the civil rights insurgency, the latter have come into their own, gaining money, power and fame by promoting racial attitudes and actions that are counterproductive to the interests of those they lead.

一代代以来,黑人领袖既有高尚的灵魂,也有无耻的江湖骗子。民权运动成功以后,后一部分人开始为自己谋划,通过提倡种族主义的态度和行动来获取金钱,力量和名声。而这些往往与他们所引领的人的利益所违背。

None of this is unique to blacks or to the United States. In various countries and times, leaders of groups that lagged behind, economically and educationally, have taught their followers to blame all their problems on other people — and to hate those other people.

所有这些都不仅限于黑人或美国。在许多国家,许多时代,一个经济上、教育上落后的团体的领袖们往往教导他们的追随者将所有他们的问题归咎到其他人身上 --- 然后去仇恨那些人。


This was the history of anti-Semitic movements in Eastern Europe between the two World Wars, anti-Ibo movements in Nigeria in the 1960s, and anti-Tamil movements that turned Sri Lanka from a peaceful nation into a scene of lethal mob violence and then decades-long civil war, both marked by unspeakable atrocities.

这是在两次世界大战中,东欧反犹主义行为的历史,也是60年代尼日利亚反伊博人行为的历史,更是斯里兰卡反泰米尔人行为的历史 -- 后者最终将这个和平的国家拖入了暴徒暴力和几十年之久的内战中,两者都以不可言说的暴行而臭名昭著。
(注:反伊博人,全称1966 anti-Igbo pogrom,是一系列针对伊博人和尼日利亚南部居民的大屠杀,具体参见:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1966_anti-Igbo_pogrom;反泰米尔人则是长期以来在斯里兰卡的种族主义暴乱,参见:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riots_in_Sri_Lanka。反犹主义相信不用过多解释。)

Groups that rose from poverty to prosperity seldom did so by having racial or ethnic leaders. While most Americans can easily name a number of black leaders, current or past, how many can name Asian American ethnic leaders or Jewish ethnic leaders?

能够从贫穷走向富饶的团体很少有所谓种族或民族领袖。在大多数美国人可以轻易想起一系列黑人领袖的名字时,有多少人能够想起一个亚裔民族领袖或犹太人民族领袖?

The time is long overdue to stop looking for progress through racial or ethnic leaders. Such leaders have too many incentives to promote polarizing attitudes and actions that are counterproductive for minorities and disastrous for the country.

通过民族或种族领袖来寻求进步的时间已经太长了。这样的领袖有太多的动机去提倡极端化的态度和行为,而这些往往与少数民族的利益相反,并对国家产生灾难性的后果。

------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------

读者评论:


wiredone BostonMary  6 days ago

What a difference a profession makes. When the OJ verdict came out in an office I was in at the time (lawyers) the black guys couldn't believe that he WASN'T convicted and the majority of older (over 60) white personnel in the office thought that he had been railroaded by the racist Detective and was not guilty.
In regards to the so called black voter intimidation case, you need to check out "the facts of the case" not what you saw on that entertainment network called "Fox News". Murdocks description not mine.
职业可以造成这么多不同!当OJ的判决出来的时候,我在一间律师的办公室。黑人都不敢相信他没有被判刑,而大多数老一点的白人工作人员认为他被种族主义探员所摧残了,他是无罪的。
至于所谓的黑人投票者恐吓案,你需要看看案件的事实,而是不是一个名叫“福克斯新闻”的娱乐台。这可是默多克说的,不是我说的。

Edm68  6 days ago
Can't we just draft Thomas Sowell as the next GOP candidate for President? And get back to winning.
难道我们不能把托马斯 索维尔选为下一个共和党总统候选人么?这样就能赢了

hMike  6 days ago
There is a big difference now. 50 years ago, black leaders were fighting for equal rights. Now they promote racism as that is the way gain power and money. The fact that they tolerate dem leaders always holding blacks to lower standards, because the dem leaders truly believe blacks to be inferior, is just sickening.
现在有一个很大的不同。50年前,黑人领袖为平等权利作斗争。现在,他们提倡种族主义因为他们觉得那是获得权利和金钱的方式。他们容忍那些真的认为黑人下等而将黑人拖回低水平的民主党议员是一个事实。而这个事实真病态。

(注:托马斯 索维尔是美国著名经济学家,目前被一些人认为是芝加哥学派的代表人物。如果对罗永浩有所了解的话,应该听罗永浩推荐过他的《种族主义简史》。详见:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Sowell  
美国的种族主义非常严重,人种社区分开,白种人社区是高档社区。这样的政策造成的社会问题非常严重,天黑基本上就属于“不敢出门”的状态。
美帝分裂步骤应该是:

1经济几乎崩溃
2拉丁裔黑道横行,军警匪勾结,富裕亚裔逃离。
3黑人参与利益争夺,黑人与拉丁裔谋求独立
4经济彻底崩溃,犹太人给美帝最后致命一击。
唐鸢 发表于 2016-5-23 21:11
美帝分裂步骤应该是:

1经济几乎崩溃
呼叫第三世界外援。

拉丁裔中也就古巴战斗力强点,因为古巴至少有思想指导。。。

黑鬼呼叫黑非洲,黑非洲也就坦桑尼亚战斗力强点。。。。

华裔被屠杀的命运,心向大陆的,大陆可以保护,自诩高等华人,香蕉人的早点死掉,看着都恶心 。

穆斯林呼叫中东支援,中东也就伊朗和土鸡好点。。。

白皮的战斗力对付其他的渣渣等于碾压。。。
外援进来后,被白皮碾压的各个人种,开始慢慢的确立根据地,慢慢的收拢人才,开始合纵连横。

战国在北美大陆上演了。

黑人打架贼NB,打战就呵呵了
到时一定要强租或者强买关岛中途岛等。上次牛牛退位世界换老大时就是这样,美帝应该懂规矩。
但是,然并卵。

白皮一看各个人种有根据地后,为求最快结束战争,战术核弹洗地,对各有色人种进行屠杀。

世界各国谴责并制裁。。。

其中跳的最欢的是老欧洲和俄罗斯,机会来了,欧洲和俄罗斯开始对美国本土白人势力拉拢和分化,为求最大限度的 分裂美国。

牛牛一门心思要恢复19世纪时在美洲的荣光。。。。欧洲各个国家都要在美国确立势力范围。。。。

中国则忙着接受美国的海外军事基地。。。

1394 发表于 2016-5-23 19:49
黑叔叔 组个篮球队 基本就是团队合作的极限了
还得有个白人教练。
我和超大的战友们,要组成 超大战友北美观光旅行投资贸易团,走到战火硝烟的四分五裂的北美大陆,感受一下洋大人的感觉。

咳咳。。。谁能抗拒白种小妞呢。。。超大战友北美观光旅行投资贸易团 里传出了声音。。。

超大战友北美观光旅行投资贸易团 里的骚年们,终于松了口气,感谢着这个发出真实声音的人说出了大家心底的呐喊。。。。

诸位脑洞好大


与其担心美国的黑人,不如担心中国的黑人好了。

中国的黑鬼越来越多了,而且非洲黑人大多携带有艾滋病毒,真是亡国灭种必备。

欧美的黑人问题就是我们的前车之鉴。

http://www.guancha.cn/sports/2016_05_24_361460.shtml

与其担心美国的黑人,不如担心中国的黑人好了。

中国的黑鬼越来越多了,而且非洲黑人大多携带有艾滋病毒,真是亡国灭种必备。

欧美的黑人问题就是我们的前车之鉴。

http://www.guancha.cn/sports/2016_05_24_361460.shtml

牛牛牛与喜羊羊 发表于 2016-5-24 09:50
但是,然并卵。

白皮一看各个人种有根据地后,为求最快结束战争,战术核弹洗地,对各有色人种进行屠杀。 ...


美帝一完,毛子要是还活着肯定先顾着向欧洲扩张顾不上大老远的美帝。当然,前提是毛子还活着,不过根据唐某那个2050帖子预测,毛子和鬼子那时已经千古了。《闲扯一下2050年天朝的敌人和小弟
http://lt.cjdby.net/forum.php?mo ... =1701812&extra=
牛牛牛与喜羊羊 发表于 2016-5-24 09:50
但是,然并卵。

白皮一看各个人种有根据地后,为求最快结束战争,战术核弹洗地,对各有色人种进行屠杀。 ...


美帝一完,毛子要是还活着肯定先顾着向欧洲扩张顾不上大老远的美帝。当然,前提是毛子还活着,不过根据唐某那个2050帖子预测,毛子和鬼子那时已经千古了。《闲扯一下2050年天朝的敌人和小弟
》http://lt.cjdby.net/forum.php?mo ... =1701812&extra=
美帝一完,毛子要是还活着肯定先顾着向欧洲扩张顾不上大老远的美帝。当然,前提是毛子还活着,不过根据唐 ...
那个时候不知道还有没有类似于美国的能够干涉所有地方的超级大国

jialiang1949 发表于 2016-5-24 10:15
那个时候不知道还有没有类似于美国的能够干涉所有地方的超级大国


中国当然有潜力,不过共党学西方只学到白皮一神教装圣母的一方面(马列就是一神教工业版无神版)没学到西方的冒险和贪婪,估计不行。其实本来中国原本不缺这精神比如秦皇汉武,可惜后世腐儒抹杀,还有鞑子奴化,已经淡薄了。当老大,起码素质有一些比如翻脸比翻书快,比如双重标准,比如己所不欲偏施于人。
jialiang1949 发表于 2016-5-24 10:15
那个时候不知道还有没有类似于美国的能够干涉所有地方的超级大国


中国当然有潜力,不过共党学西方只学到白皮一神教装圣母的一方面(马列就是一神教工业版无神版)没学到西方的冒险和贪婪,估计不行。其实本来中国原本不缺这精神比如秦皇汉武,可惜后世腐儒抹杀,还有鞑子奴化,已经淡薄了。当老大,起码素质有一些比如翻脸比翻书快,比如双重标准,比如己所不欲偏施于人。
其实拉丁裔也是美人遍地,超大战友北美观光旅行投资贸易团里的骚年,从白皮战区转战到拉丁裔根据地后,迫不及待的发出了呐喊。。。

我作为 超大战友北美观光旅行投资贸易团的 团长,认为很有必要给大家开个会,统一一下思想。

开会内容如下:

大家放松放松我是没意见的,但有些骚年非要带几个白种小妞回去,这就不好了嘛。。。,这造成的国际影响是小事,最主要的是对家庭造成的影响,这更意味着第二批 超大战友北美观光旅行投资贸易团 能不能成行。

好嘛,你这带回去几个不要紧,第二批,第三批。。。,他们因为家里人的不放心,不放行,而不能领略北美这块神奇大陆上的性福,对他们也是不公平的。。。,咱这第一批以后还是要来嘛,你这领回去了,家里人一看,管的也严了,想来也不好来了,所以从长远性福考虑,还是把她们留这吧。。。

咳咳,最后强调一点,超大战友北美观光旅行投资贸易团 要在这光撒种,争取多留种子,我们的目标是在这里成立超大这个国家。。。
中国当然有潜力,不过共党学西方只学到白皮一神教装圣母的一方面(马列就是一神教工业版无神版)没学到 ...
没有那是最好的,大家各凭本事,最怕出现干涉形大国,不惜扶持落后来对付先进
黑人组织纪律性差劲,所以没有什么战斗力。要不以美国的黑人人口数量怎么会被欺压那么久啊
不管是白屠黑,还是黑屠白,夹在中间的香蕉人都要倒霉
不管是白屠黑,还是黑屠白,夹在中间的香蕉人都要倒霉

放心,唐某说过,掌握美帝钱袋子的犹太人会给美帝最后致命一击,他要像天牛一样爬到下一个大树寄主身上直到内部吃空。犹太人知道黑鬼和拉丁裔废材,一定会目光投向中国,所以犹太人会掏钱收买黑鬼白皮保护华裔作为爬上中国大树的投名状。
黑人欺软怕硬
唐鸢 发表于 2016-5-24 10:33
放心,唐某说过,掌握美帝钱袋子的犹太人会给美帝最后致命一击,他要像天牛一样爬到下一个大树寄主身上 ...
真到那一天黑白都信不过,该派驻美派遣军,到时我保举你做派遣军俱乐部(慰安所)所长

牛牛牛与喜羊羊 发表于 2016-5-24 09:35
呼叫第三世界外援。

拉丁裔中也就古巴战斗力强点,因为古巴至少有思想指导。。。


如果美帝真的分裂,也是其他几个大国去分一杯羹,你说的那些小国,是没什么机会的,美帝那么多的核弹,大国不会容忍其他小国去瓜分的,尤其是MSL,否则,离全球核战不远了
牛牛牛与喜羊羊 发表于 2016-5-24 09:35
呼叫第三世界外援。

拉丁裔中也就古巴战斗力强点,因为古巴至少有思想指导。。。


如果美帝真的分裂,也是其他几个大国去分一杯羹,你说的那些小国,是没什么机会的,美帝那么多的核弹,大国不会容忍其他小国去瓜分的,尤其是MSL,否则,离全球核战不远了
黑蜀黍会按老家非洲大陆上的祖先那样,按照部落分成几千上万个团体先内战一通再说
牛牛牛与喜羊羊 发表于 2016-5-24 09:39
外援进来后,被白皮碾压的各个人种,开始慢慢的确立根据地,慢慢的收拢人才,开始合纵连横。

战国在北美 ...
外援里面就墨西哥可以散步过来, 黑非洲 还有绿皮猪难道要瞬移到美国? 小破船半路不说被导弹干沉,遇到风暴也是说翻就翻。   
如果美帝真要分裂,估计也是资本主义走到尽头的时候,毕竟美帝是当代资本主义社会的旗杆,旗杆倒下时,资本主义社会纷纷瓦解,那时,必有一种更先进的社会制度去代替,那种社会制度是什么,叫什么,我现在不敢YY,你们YY一下吧
楼主开这个脑洞吧,我来依据现实延伸下,美国内部真正能称王称霸的,加州为首算一个,德州为首算一个,东北与五大湖区算一个。好了大剧场开演
这已经不是种族主义者了,这是纳粹。
美帝分裂步骤应该是:

1经济几乎崩溃

犹太还最后一击?到时候犹太不被挫骨扬灰就不错。
pardor 发表于 2016-5-24 18:08
犹太还最后一击?到时候犹太不被挫骨扬灰就不错。
汉斯将欧洲的犹太人挫骨扬灰了么?洗淋浴的都是二三流的甚至三流的,最蠢笨的,当还风平浪静时一流的早嗅到风声早跑了,犹太人就是这样让敌人对自己自然选择,类似的自然选择在历史上多了去了。

现在美帝也是风平浪静,可一流的犹太人已经在布局了,比如传媒大亨默多克讨了姿色平庸的华人老婆还费劲力气生下混血娃,你可以说是为了中国市场,那就肤浅了。现在不少华尔街犹太大佬鼓励子女学中文,也不仅仅为了中国市场。即使将来挫骨扬灰,也是最蠢笨的,不过又一次自然选择罢了。还有犹太人控制的媒体二战后没怎么大肆宣扬上海收留犹太人的中犹友谊等当事人死的差不多了,几十年后现在却大肆鼓吹起来了。没有两把刷子,犹太人能在世界上混几千年而且高局财富金字塔顶端?