超级军网雷神MOKV重出江湖，MKV多重拦截器又借尸还魂了
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/05/01 02:04:26
The U.S. Missile Defense Agency (MDA) and Raytheon have completed the first Program Planning Review on the future Multi-Object Kill Vehicle (MOKV) concept, a key step toward defining critical aspects of its design. This milestone ensures that the development plan is aligned with the MDA’s expectations, and on track for an upcoming Concept Review in December.
Each MOKV will steer itself to a target and destroy it. Multiple MOKVs will be loaded on a launch missile such as the Ground-Based Interceptor (GBI). Each interceptor will be equipped with an advanced sensor, as well as divert, attitude-control and communications technologies, to enable each MOKV to home in on an individual target. Based on illustrations released by the company, each interceptor missile will carry a single bus mounting six MOKVs, each utilising its own sensor and diverting thrusters, thus enabling a single interceptor to engage multiple targets – whether real warheads or decoys – with a high probability of success.
The design work on Raytheon’s MOKV concept is being conducted as part of Raytheon’s Advanced Missile Systems product line, which already has an impressive arsenal of missile-interception systems, some already operational and others, such as the MOKV, still in various stages of development.
The Ground-Based Interceptor (GBI) missile, a three-stage GBI solid rocket booster, currently carries a single Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicle (EKV), capable of intercepting a single ballistic missile target. In case a threat missile is identified, the EKV can be launched into space. Once outside of the Earth’s atmosphere, operating at the edge of space at hypersonic speeds, the EKV’s job will begin.
The EKV will seek out the target using multi-color sensors, a cutting-edge on-board computer, and a rocket motor used only for steering in space. It will hone in on its target with pinpoint precision and destroy it by the sheer kinetic forces resulting from the impact.
This is the third generation of EKV that Raytheon is developing for the GBI. The first prototype was launched in 1998. The program evolved with several variants, undergoing 10 test flights that suffered quite a few failures until two successful flights, in 2013 and 2014, paved the way for further development and optimization. Currently being upgraded with the CE-II KEV variant, the fleet of GBIs is fully operational at Ft. Greely, Alaska.
Since the original GBI and EKV vehicles suffered a large number of failures, the GBI/EKV system was considered unreliable. As a result, the Army has chosen to employ a ‘less-than-optimal shot doctrine,’ allocating more interceptors to each target missile, thus diminishing the number of attacking missiles it could intercept with the fleet of 44 GBIs planned to be on alert by 2017.
The version currently under development is CE-II Block 1, designed to incorporate many improvements implementing lessons learned from past test failures. The first flight test of this missile is expected in 2016. If successful, it will be followed by operational deployment beginning the following year (installed on the next 10 GBI interceptors scheduled for delivery by the end of 2017).
The reliability problems encountered with the EKV have lead the MDA to seek an alternative in the Redesigned Kill Vehicle (RKV – sometime referred to as EKV CE-III), a modified design that leverages mature, proven components to simplify design and improve reliability. The RKV will also have improved target acquisition and discrimination capabilities and will provide for on-demand communications between the RKV and the Ground-Based Midcourse Defense (GMD) fire control system. The development of this kill vehicle is slated to begin in 2016, and the MDA plans to award the RKV production contract by 2018, leading to initial deployment in 2020.
Under the more ambitious Common Kill Vehicle (CKV) program, the MDA is seeking to develop new technologies that will improve its exoatmospheric intercept capabilities. The agency had planned to develop a Multi-Kill Vehicle (MKV) as early as 2004, but abandoned the program in 2009 in favor of ‘ascent-phase-intercept’ capabilities considered with forward deployed weapons such as the AEGIS-BMD.
MOKV, considered as part of that CKV, will therefore revive this plan, with a delay of more than a decade. The definition phase of an operational MOKV concept was launched in August 2015. If successful, by 2030 it could be introduced as a follow-on for the current EKV, enabling a single interceptor to destroy several objects in space. Considered as part of a planned upgrade under the MDA’s CKV program, MOKV will be able to enhance US missile-defense architecture without increasing the number of deployed interceptors, or even reducing the interceptor inventory required to defeat an evolving and more capable threat.
Raytheon has also developed a different ‘hit-to-kill’ vehicle for several Standard-Missile 3 interceptors. These missiles are part of the U.S. Navy defensive shield, designed to destroy short- to intermediate-range ballistic missile threats.
The design work on Raytheon’s MOKV concept is being conducted as part of Raytheon’s Advanced Missile Systems product line, which is responsible for the production of the EKV and the Standard Missile 3, as well as the development of the RKV.
The U.S. Missile Defense Agency (MDA) and Raytheon have completed the first Program Planning Review on the future Multi-Object Kill Vehicle (MOKV) concept, a key step toward defining critical aspects of its design. This milestone ensures that the development plan is aligned with the MDA’s expectations, and on track for an upcoming Concept Review in December.
Each MOKV will steer itself to a target and destroy it. Multiple MOKVs will be loaded on a launch missile such as the Ground-Based Interceptor (GBI). Each interceptor will be equipped with an advanced sensor, as well as divert, attitude-control and communications technologies, to enable each MOKV to home in on an individual target. Based on illustrations released by the company, each interceptor missile will carry a single bus mounting six MOKVs, each utilising its own sensor and diverting thrusters, thus enabling a single interceptor to engage multiple targets – whether real warheads or decoys – with a high probability of success.
The design work on Raytheon’s MOKV concept is being conducted as part of Raytheon’s Advanced Missile Systems product line, which already has an impressive arsenal of missile-interception systems, some already operational and others, such as the MOKV, still in various stages of development.
The Ground-Based Interceptor (GBI) missile, a three-stage GBI solid rocket booster, currently carries a single Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicle (EKV), capable of intercepting a single ballistic missile target. In case a threat missile is identified, the EKV can be launched into space. Once outside of the Earth’s atmosphere, operating at the edge of space at hypersonic speeds, the EKV’s job will begin.
The EKV will seek out the target using multi-color sensors, a cutting-edge on-board computer, and a rocket motor used only for steering in space. It will hone in on its target with pinpoint precision and destroy it by the sheer kinetic forces resulting from the impact.
This is the third generation of EKV that Raytheon is developing for the GBI. The first prototype was launched in 1998. The program evolved with several variants, undergoing 10 test flights that suffered quite a few failures until two successful flights, in 2013 and 2014, paved the way for further development and optimization. Currently being upgraded with the CE-II KEV variant, the fleet of GBIs is fully operational at Ft. Greely, Alaska.
Since the original GBI and EKV vehicles suffered a large number of failures, the GBI/EKV system was considered unreliable. As a result, the Army has chosen to employ a ‘less-than-optimal shot doctrine,’ allocating more interceptors to each target missile, thus diminishing the number of attacking missiles it could intercept with the fleet of 44 GBIs planned to be on alert by 2017.
The version currently under development is CE-II Block 1, designed to incorporate many improvements implementing lessons learned from past test failures. The first flight test of this missile is expected in 2016. If successful, it will be followed by operational deployment beginning the following year (installed on the next 10 GBI interceptors scheduled for delivery by the end of 2017).
The reliability problems encountered with the EKV have lead the MDA to seek an alternative in the Redesigned Kill Vehicle (RKV – sometime referred to as EKV CE-III), a modified design that leverages mature, proven components to simplify design and improve reliability. The RKV will also have improved target acquisition and discrimination capabilities and will provide for on-demand communications between the RKV and the Ground-Based Midcourse Defense (GMD) fire control system. The development of this kill vehicle is slated to begin in 2016, and the MDA plans to award the RKV production contract by 2018, leading to initial deployment in 2020.
Under the more ambitious Common Kill Vehicle (CKV) program, the MDA is seeking to develop new technologies that will improve its exoatmospheric intercept capabilities. The agency had planned to develop a Multi-Kill Vehicle (MKV) as early as 2004, but abandoned the program in 2009 in favor of ‘ascent-phase-intercept’ capabilities considered with forward deployed weapons such as the AEGIS-BMD.
MOKV, considered as part of that CKV, will therefore revive this plan, with a delay of more than a decade. The definition phase of an operational MOKV concept was launched in August 2015. If successful, by 2030 it could be introduced as a follow-on for the current EKV, enabling a single interceptor to destroy several objects in space. Considered as part of a planned upgrade under the MDA’s CKV program, MOKV will be able to enhance US missile-defense architecture without increasing the number of deployed interceptors, or even reducing the interceptor inventory required to defeat an evolving and more capable threat.
Raytheon has also developed a different ‘hit-to-kill’ vehicle for several Standard-Missile 3 interceptors. These missiles are part of the U.S. Navy defensive shield, designed to destroy short- to intermediate-range ballistic missile threats.
The design work on Raytheon’s MOKV concept is being conducted as part of Raytheon’s Advanced Missile Systems product line, which is responsible for the production of the EKV and the Standard Missile 3, as well as the development of the RKV.
Each MOKV will steer itself to a target and destroy it. Multiple MOKVs will be loaded on a launch missile such as the Ground-Based Interceptor (GBI). Each interceptor will be equipped with an advanced sensor, as well as divert, attitude-control and communications technologies, to enable each MOKV to home in on an individual target. Based on illustrations released by the company, each interceptor missile will carry a single bus mounting six MOKVs, each utilising its own sensor and diverting thrusters, thus enabling a single interceptor to engage multiple targets – whether real warheads or decoys – with a high probability of success.
The design work on Raytheon’s MOKV concept is being conducted as part of Raytheon’s Advanced Missile Systems product line, which already has an impressive arsenal of missile-interception systems, some already operational and others, such as the MOKV, still in various stages of development.
The Ground-Based Interceptor (GBI) missile, a three-stage GBI solid rocket booster, currently carries a single Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicle (EKV), capable of intercepting a single ballistic missile target. In case a threat missile is identified, the EKV can be launched into space. Once outside of the Earth’s atmosphere, operating at the edge of space at hypersonic speeds, the EKV’s job will begin.
The EKV will seek out the target using multi-color sensors, a cutting-edge on-board computer, and a rocket motor used only for steering in space. It will hone in on its target with pinpoint precision and destroy it by the sheer kinetic forces resulting from the impact.
This is the third generation of EKV that Raytheon is developing for the GBI. The first prototype was launched in 1998. The program evolved with several variants, undergoing 10 test flights that suffered quite a few failures until two successful flights, in 2013 and 2014, paved the way for further development and optimization. Currently being upgraded with the CE-II KEV variant, the fleet of GBIs is fully operational at Ft. Greely, Alaska.
Since the original GBI and EKV vehicles suffered a large number of failures, the GBI/EKV system was considered unreliable. As a result, the Army has chosen to employ a ‘less-than-optimal shot doctrine,’ allocating more interceptors to each target missile, thus diminishing the number of attacking missiles it could intercept with the fleet of 44 GBIs planned to be on alert by 2017.
The version currently under development is CE-II Block 1, designed to incorporate many improvements implementing lessons learned from past test failures. The first flight test of this missile is expected in 2016. If successful, it will be followed by operational deployment beginning the following year (installed on the next 10 GBI interceptors scheduled for delivery by the end of 2017).
The reliability problems encountered with the EKV have lead the MDA to seek an alternative in the Redesigned Kill Vehicle (RKV – sometime referred to as EKV CE-III), a modified design that leverages mature, proven components to simplify design and improve reliability. The RKV will also have improved target acquisition and discrimination capabilities and will provide for on-demand communications between the RKV and the Ground-Based Midcourse Defense (GMD) fire control system. The development of this kill vehicle is slated to begin in 2016, and the MDA plans to award the RKV production contract by 2018, leading to initial deployment in 2020.
Under the more ambitious Common Kill Vehicle (CKV) program, the MDA is seeking to develop new technologies that will improve its exoatmospheric intercept capabilities. The agency had planned to develop a Multi-Kill Vehicle (MKV) as early as 2004, but abandoned the program in 2009 in favor of ‘ascent-phase-intercept’ capabilities considered with forward deployed weapons such as the AEGIS-BMD.
MOKV, considered as part of that CKV, will therefore revive this plan, with a delay of more than a decade. The definition phase of an operational MOKV concept was launched in August 2015. If successful, by 2030 it could be introduced as a follow-on for the current EKV, enabling a single interceptor to destroy several objects in space. Considered as part of a planned upgrade under the MDA’s CKV program, MOKV will be able to enhance US missile-defense architecture without increasing the number of deployed interceptors, or even reducing the interceptor inventory required to defeat an evolving and more capable threat.
Raytheon has also developed a different ‘hit-to-kill’ vehicle for several Standard-Missile 3 interceptors. These missiles are part of the U.S. Navy defensive shield, designed to destroy short- to intermediate-range ballistic missile threats.
The design work on Raytheon’s MOKV concept is being conducted as part of Raytheon’s Advanced Missile Systems product line, which is responsible for the production of the EKV and the Standard Missile 3, as well as the development of the RKV.
The U.S. Missile Defense Agency (MDA) and Raytheon have completed the first Program Planning Review on the future Multi-Object Kill Vehicle (MOKV) concept, a key step toward defining critical aspects of its design. This milestone ensures that the development plan is aligned with the MDA’s expectations, and on track for an upcoming Concept Review in December.
Each MOKV will steer itself to a target and destroy it. Multiple MOKVs will be loaded on a launch missile such as the Ground-Based Interceptor (GBI). Each interceptor will be equipped with an advanced sensor, as well as divert, attitude-control and communications technologies, to enable each MOKV to home in on an individual target. Based on illustrations released by the company, each interceptor missile will carry a single bus mounting six MOKVs, each utilising its own sensor and diverting thrusters, thus enabling a single interceptor to engage multiple targets – whether real warheads or decoys – with a high probability of success.
288541.jpg (73.25 KB, 下载次数: 25)
下载附件 保存到相册
MOKV_725.jpg (172.71 KB, 下载次数: 24)
下载附件 保存到相册
The design work on Raytheon’s MOKV concept is being conducted as part of Raytheon’s Advanced Missile Systems product line, which already has an impressive arsenal of missile-interception systems, some already operational and others, such as the MOKV, still in various stages of development.
The Ground-Based Interceptor (GBI) missile, a three-stage GBI solid rocket booster, currently carries a single Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicle (EKV), capable of intercepting a single ballistic missile target. In case a threat missile is identified, the EKV can be launched into space. Once outside of the Earth’s atmosphere, operating at the edge of space at hypersonic speeds, the EKV’s job will begin.
The EKV will seek out the target using multi-color sensors, a cutting-edge on-board computer, and a rocket motor used only for steering in space. It will hone in on its target with pinpoint precision and destroy it by the sheer kinetic forces resulting from the impact.
EKV_725.jpg (42.35 KB, 下载次数: 24)
下载附件 保存到相册
RKV_725.jpg (57.36 KB, 下载次数: 24)
下载附件 保存到相册
This is the third generation of EKV that Raytheon is developing for the GBI. The first prototype was launched in 1998. The program evolved with several variants, undergoing 10 test flights that suffered quite a few failures until two successful flights, in 2013 and 2014, paved the way for further development and optimization. Currently being upgraded with the CE-II KEV variant, the fleet of GBIs is fully operational at Ft. Greely, Alaska.
Since the original GBI and EKV vehicles suffered a large number of failures, the GBI/EKV system was considered unreliable. As a result, the Army has chosen to employ a ‘less-than-optimal shot doctrine,’ allocating more interceptors to each target missile, thus diminishing the number of attacking missiles it could intercept with the fleet of 44 GBIs planned to be on alert by 2017.
The version currently under development is CE-II Block 1, designed to incorporate many improvements implementing lessons learned from past test failures. The first flight test of this missile is expected in 2016. If successful, it will be followed by operational deployment beginning the following year (installed on the next 10 GBI interceptors scheduled for delivery by the end of 2017).
The reliability problems encountered with the EKV have lead the MDA to seek an alternative in the Redesigned Kill Vehicle (RKV – sometime referred to as EKV CE-III), a modified design that leverages mature, proven components to simplify design and improve reliability. The RKV will also have improved target acquisition and discrimination capabilities and will provide for on-demand communications between the RKV and the Ground-Based Midcourse Defense (GMD) fire control system. The development of this kill vehicle is slated to begin in 2016, and the MDA plans to award the RKV production contract by 2018, leading to initial deployment in 2020.
Under the more ambitious Common Kill Vehicle (CKV) program, the MDA is seeking to develop new technologies that will improve its exoatmospheric intercept capabilities. The agency had planned to develop a Multi-Kill Vehicle (MKV) as early as 2004, but abandoned the program in 2009 in favor of ‘ascent-phase-intercept’ capabilities considered with forward deployed weapons such as the AEGIS-BMD.
MOKV, considered as part of that CKV, will therefore revive this plan, with a delay of more than a decade. The definition phase of an operational MOKV concept was launched in August 2015. If successful, by 2030 it could be introduced as a follow-on for the current EKV, enabling a single interceptor to destroy several objects in space. Considered as part of a planned upgrade under the MDA’s CKV program, MOKV will be able to enhance US missile-defense architecture without increasing the number of deployed interceptors, or even reducing the interceptor inventory required to defeat an evolving and more capable threat.
Raytheon has also developed a different ‘hit-to-kill’ vehicle for several Standard-Missile 3 interceptors. These missiles are part of the U.S. Navy defensive shield, designed to destroy short- to intermediate-range ballistic missile threats.
The design work on Raytheon’s MOKV concept is being conducted as part of Raytheon’s Advanced Missile Systems product line, which is responsible for the production of the EKV and the Standard Missile 3, as well as the development of the RKV.
标题很奇怪，雷神自己又没有停这个项目，哪来的借尸还魂？
听说美国东海岸要建GBI拦截站了，阿拉斯加，西海岸，夏威夷已经有了，包括关岛，天网快形成了
一枚GBI拦截弹能携带六个MOKV拦截器，同时对付六个核弹头。
KENG 发表于 2016-2-11 23:05
听说美国东海岸要建GBI拦截站了，阿拉斯加，西海岸，夏威夷已经有了，包括关岛，天网快形成了
现在状况，阿拉斯加州部署30枚GBI拦截弹，加州部署14枚GBI拦截弹。计划在纽约州部署十多枚GBI拦截弹。
听说美国东海岸要建GBI拦截站了，阿拉斯加，西海岸，夏威夷已经有了，包括关岛，天网快形成了
现在状况，阿拉斯加州部署30枚GBI拦截弹，加州部署14枚GBI拦截弹。计划在纽约州部署十多枚GBI拦截弹。
这东西主要就是防白羊和动物吧？六个拦截器和白羊的分导不搭配啊？求科普
giraffetwo 发表于 2016-2-11 23:32
一枚GBI拦截弹能携带六个MOKV拦截器，同时对付六个核弹头。
这东西的最大价值就不是这个 如果仍然搞中段拦截，识别真假弹头的困局仍然存在，所以实际面对的目标就不是个位数
giraffetwo 发表于 2016-2-11 23:32
一枚GBI拦截弹能携带六个MOKV拦截器，同时对付六个核弹头。
这东西的最大价值就不是这个 如果仍然搞中段拦截，识别真假弹头的困局仍然存在，所以实际面对的目标就不是个位数
这东西美国人是要靠前部署，最终想在对手弹头分离前实施拦截，搞多个拦截器的目的是覆盖目标所有可能的机动弹道，目标不是分导后的弹头
feiguin2 发表于 2016-2-12 00:02
这东西美国人是要靠前部署，最终想在对手弹头分离前实施拦截，搞多个拦截器的目的是覆盖目标所有可能的机动 ...
美军短期目标是拥有400枚GBI
这东西美国人是要靠前部署，最终想在对手弹头分离前实施拦截，搞多个拦截器的目的是覆盖目标所有可能的机动 ...
美军短期目标是拥有400枚GBI
KENG 发表于 2016-2-12 00:08
美军短期目标是拥有400枚GBI
拦截能力不是但看你总共部署了多少枚，而是看看你在对手实施打击的时候这一段时间内的有效拦截能力
短期是多短？如果按很多人的想法，美国的拦截弹是瞄准中国来的，gbi的拦截效率又如此“高“，而中国的icbm数量仅仅几十枚，每年新生产能力仅1-2枚（这是这个楼里有人发过的原话），根本用不着什么短期400枚的gbi枚的布署量----如果再加上美国先发制人，这个保有量就更不需要了
混乱且毫无逻辑的信息，其中一定有不真实的成分
KENG 发表于 2016-2-12 00:08
美军短期目标是拥有400枚GBI
拦截能力不是但看你总共部署了多少枚，而是看看你在对手实施打击的时候这一段时间内的有效拦截能力
短期是多短？如果按很多人的想法，美国的拦截弹是瞄准中国来的，gbi的拦截效率又如此“高“，而中国的icbm数量仅仅几十枚，每年新生产能力仅1-2枚（这是这个楼里有人发过的原话），根本用不着什么短期400枚的gbi枚的布署量----如果再加上美国先发制人，这个保有量就更不需要了
混乱且毫无逻辑的信息，其中一定有不真实的成分
如果弹头在中段拦截前爆了，emp会不会把地面雷达烧掉?以前不是做过实验，一个大当量氢弹可以影响半个北半球吗
多重拦截器复活意味着中段诱饵识别很不靠谱，目前能将诱饵和弹头一网打尽的除了这方案就是核战斗部了。
火箭军早该多生产多弹头洲际了，年产50枚起步。
侧面说明对弹头伪装成诱饵的方式目前并没有有效的识别手段~~~~~~~~~~
Cloud_liang 发表于 2016-2-11 23:47
这东西主要就是防白羊和动物吧？六个拦截器和白羊的分导不搭配啊？求科普
动物是什么？
这东西主要就是防白羊和动物吧？六个拦截器和白羊的分导不搭配啊？求科普
动物是什么？
giraffetwo 发表于 2016-2-11 23:35
现在状况，阿拉斯加州部署30枚GBI拦截弹，加州部署14枚GBI拦截弹。计划在纽约州部署十多枚GBI拦截弹。
...
东岸是要部署在缅因吧，纽约位置不够好
现在状况，阿拉斯加州部署30枚GBI拦截弹，加州部署14枚GBI拦截弹。计划在纽约州部署十多枚GBI拦截弹。
...
东岸是要部署在缅因吧，纽约位置不够好
美国道长 发表于 2016-2-12 04:00
如果弹头在中段拦截前爆了，emp会不会把地面雷达烧掉?以前不是做过实验，一个大当量氢弹可以影响半个北半球 ...
或者爆一个弹头把一大群拦截器全烧掉，让其他弹头通关也行。
弹头很重容易做EMP加固，拦截器要机动性很难加固。
如果弹头在中段拦截前爆了，emp会不会把地面雷达烧掉?以前不是做过实验，一个大当量氢弹可以影响半个北半球 ...
或者爆一个弹头把一大群拦截器全烧掉，让其他弹头通关也行。
弹头很重容易做EMP加固，拦截器要机动性很难加固。
giraffetwo 发表于 2016-2-11 23:35
现在状况，阿拉斯加州部署30枚GBI拦截弹，加州部署14枚GBI拦截弹。计划在纽约州部署十多枚GBI拦截弹。
...
我说你们都扯什么呢，44枚GBI标准配置，格里利堡40+范登堡4
东海岸基地到底建不建还难说，如果建的话，规模上限是60个GBI发射井
giraffetwo 发表于 2016-2-11 23:35
现在状况，阿拉斯加州部署30枚GBI拦截弹，加州部署14枚GBI拦截弹。计划在纽约州部署十多枚GBI拦截弹。
...
我说你们都扯什么呢，44枚GBI标准配置，格里利堡40+范登堡4
东海岸基地到底建不建还难说，如果建的话，规模上限是60个GBI发射井
zhutou6 发表于 2016-2-12 11:50
东岸是要部署在缅因吧，纽约位置不够好
四个候选阵地位置：
• Fort Custer Training Center (FCTC)
– Michigan Army National Guard,
Augusta, Michigan; 密歇根
• Camp Ravenna Joint Military
Training Center (CRJMTC) –
Ohio Army National Guard,
Portage and Trumbull
Counties, Ohio; 俄亥俄
• Fort Drum (FTD),
Fort Drum, New York; 纽约
• Center for Security Forces
Detachment Kittery Survival,
Evasion, Resistance, and
Escape Facility (SERE East),
Redington Township, ME 缅因
东岸是要部署在缅因吧，纽约位置不够好
四个候选阵地位置：
• Fort Custer Training Center (FCTC)
– Michigan Army National Guard,
Augusta, Michigan; 密歇根
• Camp Ravenna Joint Military
Training Center (CRJMTC) –
Ohio Army National Guard,
Portage and Trumbull
Counties, Ohio; 俄亥俄
• Fort Drum (FTD),
Fort Drum, New York; 纽约
• Center for Security Forces
Detachment Kittery Survival,
Evasion, Resistance, and
Escape Facility (SERE East),
Redington Township, ME 缅因
这东西美国人是要靠前部署，最终想在对手弹头分离前实施拦截，搞多个拦截器的目的是覆盖目标所有可能的机动 ...
从这里延伸的一个问题是
可不可以通过错开拦截器的释放时间从而实现多次拦截
这样可以极大幅度的提高拦截率呢
从这里延伸的一个问题是
可不可以通过错开拦截器的释放时间从而实现多次拦截
这样可以极大幅度的提高拦截率呢
直捣国会山白宫 发表于 2016-2-12 09:26
火箭军早该多生产多弹头洲际了，年产50枚起步。
pighead~o~说了,DF2X的变种有一款是小洲际
美帝还说过(2010)：中国中程弹道导弹的生产量是每年20~40枚
MOKV刚开始设计，2年后才能定案，等部署的时候，都2030年了
此外GBI的规格和DF2X是一样的...美帝部署400发不是问题。
同级别的DF2X，看起来数量是往500~1000的储备数量，估计一个导弹旅规模和DF15差不多，或约54~108个发射装置.现在中导的导弹旅，西方评估是8~10个已经建成的（美帝2010年评估到2015年，中国DF21C/D级别的导弹总数大约110~210枚，按中导导弹旅一个连1辆发射车算的，DF15是一个连3辆发射车算）。
二炮升级为火箭军之后，看起来还会扩编。
火箭军早该多生产多弹头洲际了，年产50枚起步。
pighead~o~说了,DF2X的变种有一款是小洲际
美帝还说过(2010)：中国中程弹道导弹的生产量是每年20~40枚
MOKV刚开始设计，2年后才能定案，等部署的时候，都2030年了
此外GBI的规格和DF2X是一样的...美帝部署400发不是问题。
同级别的DF2X，看起来数量是往500~1000的储备数量，估计一个导弹旅规模和DF15差不多，或约54~108个发射装置.现在中导的导弹旅，西方评估是8~10个已经建成的（美帝2010年评估到2015年，中国DF21C/D级别的导弹总数大约110~210枚，按中导导弹旅一个连1辆发射车算的，DF15是一个连3辆发射车算）。
二炮升级为火箭军之后，看起来还会扩编。
直捣国会山白宫 发表于 2016-2-12 09:26
火箭军早该多生产多弹头洲际了，年产50枚起步。
此外，小洲际有多弹头设计...
火箭军早该多生产多弹头洲际了，年产50枚起步。
此外，小洲际有多弹头设计...
ps 小洲际现在应该还不存在，现在的极限射程不超过8K km
小洲际我看要等科工10年试验成功的那个（或之后试验成功的某个二级固体导弹）
真正部署服役之后才会真正成型（应该离批量部署还差2~4年火候）
以前讨论时说过，中国二级弹道导弹的第二级关机数据有3个档次
1 档 3000~3900m/s+（DF21A，1988~1997，前面那个是估的首射年份）
2 档 4500~4700m/s （DF2X，2000~2010）
3 档 5500~5800m/s （DF2XX，2010~）
第三档的部署了，逆天级别的小洲际就打遍天下了----秒杀那个无能的侏儒
ps 小洲际现在应该还不存在，现在的极限射程不超过8K km
小洲际我看要等科工10年试验成功的那个（或之后试验成功的某个二级固体导弹）
真正部署服役之后才会真正成型（应该离批量部署还差2~4年火候）
以前讨论时说过，中国二级弹道导弹的第二级关机数据有3个档次
1 档 3000~3900m/s+（DF21A，1988~1997，前面那个是估的首射年份）
2 档 4500~4700m/s （DF2X，2000~2010）
3 档 5500~5800m/s （DF2XX，2010~）
第三档的部署了，逆天级别的小洲际就打遍天下了----秒杀那个无能的侏儒
Cloud_liang 发表于 2016-2-11 23:47
这东西主要就是防白羊和动物吧？六个拦截器和白羊的分导不搭配啊？求科普
白杨/白杨M全是单弹头才能打到美国本土48州，若改成三弹头，射程暴跌，只能打欧洲或天朝，白杨M为俄国主力ICBM。
最新的亚尔斯ICBM，升级了助推火箭，核弹头当量减小重量减轻，三弹头射程也能打到美国本土，计划替代所有白杨系列。
俄国正在研制新一代液体重型ICBM，可携带4~8个核弹头，与亚尔斯共存。
俄国下一代SLBM圆锤，三核弹头，配装八艘北风之神核潜艇，每艘携带16枚圆锤。
这东西主要就是防白羊和动物吧？六个拦截器和白羊的分导不搭配啊？求科普
白杨/白杨M全是单弹头才能打到美国本土48州，若改成三弹头，射程暴跌，只能打欧洲或天朝，白杨M为俄国主力ICBM。
最新的亚尔斯ICBM，升级了助推火箭，核弹头当量减小重量减轻，三弹头射程也能打到美国本土，计划替代所有白杨系列。
俄国正在研制新一代液体重型ICBM，可携带4~8个核弹头，与亚尔斯共存。
俄国下一代SLBM圆锤，三核弹头，配装八艘北风之神核潜艇，每艘携带16枚圆锤。
美国道长 发表于 2016-2-12 04:00
如果弹头在中段拦截前爆了，emp会不会把地面雷达烧掉?以前不是做过实验，一个大当量氢弹可以影响半个北半球 ...
前苏联引爆过五千万吨当量的核弹，怎么没对当时各国造成影响
距离拉斯维加斯一百多公里的核武器试验场，曾引爆过数百枚核弹，怎么没对拉斯维加斯造成影响
谣言重复无数遍仍然是谣言，流言终结者真需要做一期戳破“核冬天”“核弹EMP”等谎言。
核弹产生的EMP影响范围不超过五公里，而且有个物理学名词“法拉第笼”。。。。
如果弹头在中段拦截前爆了，emp会不会把地面雷达烧掉?以前不是做过实验，一个大当量氢弹可以影响半个北半球 ...
前苏联引爆过五千万吨当量的核弹，怎么没对当时各国造成影响
距离拉斯维加斯一百多公里的核武器试验场，曾引爆过数百枚核弹，怎么没对拉斯维加斯造成影响
谣言重复无数遍仍然是谣言，流言终结者真需要做一期戳破“核冬天”“核弹EMP”等谎言。
核弹产生的EMP影响范围不超过五公里，而且有个物理学名词“法拉第笼”。。。。
pighead~o~ 发表于 2016-2-12 11:31
侧面说明对弹头伪装成诱饵的方式目前并没有有效的识别手段~~~~~~~~~~
弹道导弹的假弹头由拦截器上热成像传感器识别真伪。
俄国下一代洲际核导弹：
亚尔斯ICBM，三核弹头
新型液体重型ICBM，4~8个核弹头
圆锤SLBM，三核弹头
侧面说明对弹头伪装成诱饵的方式目前并没有有效的识别手段~~~~~~~~~~
弹道导弹的假弹头由拦截器上热成像传感器识别真伪。
俄国下一代洲际核导弹：
亚尔斯ICBM，三核弹头
新型液体重型ICBM，4~8个核弹头
圆锤SLBM，三核弹头
突防的手段也在进步，而且相对防守，进攻更容易。
giraffetwo 发表于 2016-2-12 23:15
前苏联引爆过五千万吨当量的核弹，怎么没对当时各国造成影响
距离拉斯维加斯一百多公里的核武器 ...
如果记得没错的话，在太空引爆才有那么大范围emp，好像是英国的试验。有几个核爆纪录片都有说过这事。
giraffetwo 发表于 2016-2-12 23:15
前苏联引爆过五千万吨当量的核弹，怎么没对当时各国造成影响
距离拉斯维加斯一百多公里的核武器 ...
如果记得没错的话，在太空引爆才有那么大范围emp，好像是英国的试验。有几个核爆纪录片都有说过这事。
ps 小洲际现在应该还不存在，现在的极限射程不超过8K km
小洲际我看要等科工10年试验成功的那个（或之后试 ...
小洲际不就是东风27么，8000公里，加一个滑翔弹头增程到10000以上。两级固体再加多弹头打10000以上是天顶科技吗？
小洲际我看要等科工10年试验成功的那个（或之后试 ...
小洲际不就是东风27么，8000公里，加一个滑翔弹头增程到10000以上。两级固体再加多弹头打10000以上是天顶科技吗？
或者爆一个弹头把一大群拦截器全烧掉，让其他弹头通关也行。
弹头很重容易做EMP加固，拦截器要机动性很 ...
中子弹的中子流据说能引发弹头内部热效应，破坏弹头内部电子原件使弹头无法引爆。
弹头很重容易做EMP加固，拦截器要机动性很 ...
中子弹的中子流据说能引发弹头内部热效应，破坏弹头内部电子原件使弹头无法引爆。
@peishen
giraffetwo 发表于 2016-2-12 23:21
弹道导弹的假弹头由拦截器上热成像传感器识别真伪。
俄国下一代洲际核导弹：
对假弹头的识别，你比美国人自信多了。。。
弹道导弹的假弹头由拦截器上热成像传感器识别真伪。
俄国下一代洲际核导弹：
对假弹头的识别，你比美国人自信多了。。。
美国道长 发表于 2016-2-13 03:47
中子弹的中子流据说能引发弹头内部热效应，破坏弹头内部电子原件使弹头无法引爆。
既然目的是对付敌方拦截器,肯定自己要做好准备了.当量和辐射都要合适.
中子弹的中子流据说能引发弹头内部热效应，破坏弹头内部电子原件使弹头无法引爆。
既然目的是对付敌方拦截器,肯定自己要做好准备了.当量和辐射都要合适.
好嘛，多目标拦截器也杀过来了，东风41带着6个真的分导弹头也可能一次被拦截掉，兔子只能载具带水漂弹，或者载具带超燃冲压扛着弹头变轨，GBI放早点点MOKV就追不上了
但是弄这都是钱啊，拼刺刀前还要先把子弹打完美帝真是赌得够大了，即使弄死弄伤兔子，他自己也跑不了，起码不可能再是蓝星NO1了。
但是弄这都是钱啊，拼刺刀前还要先把子弹打完美帝真是赌得够大了，即使弄死弄伤兔子，他自己也跑不了，起码不可能再是蓝星NO1了。7147hhs 发表于 2016-2-13 05:57
好嘛，多目标拦截器也杀过来了，东风41带着6个真的分导弹头也可能一次被拦截掉，兔子只能载具带水漂弹，或 ...
按你这么说，中国也别发展反导系统了
好嘛，多目标拦截器也杀过来了，东风41带着6个真的分导弹头也可能一次被拦截掉，兔子只能载具带水漂弹，或 ...
按你这么说，中国也别发展反导系统了
小洲际不就是东风27么，8000公里，加一个滑翔弹头增程到10000以上。两级固体再加多弹头打10000以上是天顶 ...
你忘了有上面级，真正全弹道就不是10000了，是12000以上了
滑翔弹头起滑速度6000m/s的话，滑翔段最大射程就是7000～11000km（4500m/s起滑最大是4000km多，美帝cav级别从7000m/s起滑，最大射程18000km），也就是大弹道加滑翔极限打击能力是14000～16000的，全滑翔极限打击能力在11000km
载荷为500～700kg，可以是一个400kg单弹头，2个160kg的分导，或3个120 kg的集束。这个弹头如果是反舰，可以全球灭美帝海军，如果反导，可以装6～10枚ekv打从100～38000km（单拦截器）高的导弹或卫星
你忘了有上面级，真正全弹道就不是10000了，是12000以上了
滑翔弹头起滑速度6000m/s的话，滑翔段最大射程就是7000～11000km（4500m/s起滑最大是4000km多，美帝cav级别从7000m/s起滑，最大射程18000km），也就是大弹道加滑翔极限打击能力是14000～16000的，全滑翔极限打击能力在11000km
载荷为500～700kg，可以是一个400kg单弹头，2个160kg的分导，或3个120 kg的集束。这个弹头如果是反舰，可以全球灭美帝海军，如果反导，可以装6～10枚ekv打从100～38000km（单拦截器）高的导弹或卫星
好嘛，多目标拦截器也杀过来了，东风41带着6个真的分导弹头也可能一次被拦截掉，兔子只能载具带水漂弹，或 ...
重型洲际都有假弹头，撒旦不是说有40个假弹头么？够消耗掉8枚gbi
重型洲际都有假弹头，撒旦不是说有40个假弹头么？够消耗掉8枚gbi
按你这么说，中国也别发展反导系统了
中国现在发展反导主要针对三锅的布朗弹
中国现在发展反导主要针对三锅的布朗弹
好嘛，多目标拦截器也杀过来了，东风41带着6个真的分导弹头也可能一次被拦截掉，兔子只能载具带水漂弹，或 ...
水漂蛋超燃是高度100km以内，这个高度下只有thaad可以用，其他弹头都无法工作，下来就气化了
水漂蛋超燃是高度100km以内，这个高度下只有thaad可以用，其他弹头都无法工作，下来就气化了
你忘了有上面级，真正全弹道就不是10000了，是12000以上了
滑翔弹头起滑速度6000m/s的话，滑翔段最大射 ...
全球反舰弹难道不是东风31D?怎么2字头的也来凑热闹?如果2字头的这么厉害，还发展3字头和4字头的干什么。
滑翔弹头起滑速度6000m/s的话，滑翔段最大射 ...
全球反舰弹难道不是东风31D?怎么2字头的也来凑热闹?如果2字头的这么厉害，还发展3字头和4字头的干什么。