超级军网快讯：好消息，米军要重返阿富汗了
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/04/29 09:21:13
快讯：好消息，米军要重返阿富汗了。《华盛顿时报》说，奥巴马现在突然又改变了离开阿富汗的战略，命令军队要准备明年起重返阿富汗和塔利班作战了。这样的话，中国西部面临的YSL极端分子恐怖袭击的压力将大大减小，对土鳖来说是好消息。
奥巴马的新作战行动命令包括陆军和空军，有效期暂定一年，明年再看局势决定是否延长。奥巴马今年五月份的命令还是从明年起停止美军在阿富汗的一切作战行动。
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/2 ... v=top-news&_r=1
In a Shift, Obama Extends U.S. Role in Afghan Combat
快讯：好消息，米军要重返阿富汗了。《华盛顿时报》说，奥巴马现在突然又改变了离开阿富汗的战略，命令军队要准备明年起重返阿富汗和塔利班作战了。这样的话，中国西部面临的YSL极端分子恐怖袭击的压力将大大减小，对土鳖来说是好消息。
奥巴马的新作战行动命令包括陆军和空军，有效期暂定一年，明年再看局势决定是否延长。奥巴马今年五月份的命令还是从明年起停止美军在阿富汗的一切作战行动。
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/2 ... v=top-news&_r=1
In a Shift, Obama Extends U.S. Role in Afghan Combat
奥巴马的新作战行动命令包括陆军和空军，有效期暂定一年，明年再看局势决定是否延长。奥巴马今年五月份的命令还是从明年起停止美军在阿富汗的一切作战行动。
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/2 ... v=top-news&_r=1
In a Shift, Obama Extends U.S. Role in Afghan Combat
快讯：好消息，米军要重返阿富汗了。《华盛顿时报》说，奥巴马现在突然又改变了离开阿富汗的战略，命令军队要准备明年起重返阿富汗和塔利班作战了。这样的话，中国西部面临的YSL极端分子恐怖袭击的压力将大大减小，对土鳖来说是好消息。
奥巴马的新作战行动命令包括陆军和空军，有效期暂定一年，明年再看局势决定是否延长。奥巴马今年五月份的命令还是从明年起停止美军在阿富汗的一切作战行动。
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/2 ... v=top-news&_r=1
In a Shift, Obama Extends U.S. Role in Afghan Combat
人数估计很少
WASHINGTON — President Obama decided in recent weeks to authorize a more expansive mission for the military in Afghanistan in 2015 than originally planned, a move that ensures American troops will have a direct role in fighting in the war-ravaged country for at least another year.
Mr. Obama’s order allows American forces to carry out missions against the Taliban and other militant groups threatening American troops or the Afghan government, a broader mission than the president described to the public earlier this year, according to several administration, military and congressional officials with knowledge of the decision. The new authorization also allows American jets, bombers and drones to support Afghan troops on combat missions.
In an announcement in the White House Rose Garden in May, Mr. Obama said that the American military would have no combat role in Afghanistan next year, and that the missions for the 9,800 troops remaining in the country would be limited to training Afghan forces and to hunting the “remnants of Al Qaeda.”
The decision to change that mission was the result of a lengthy and heated debate that laid bare the tension inside the Obama administration between two often-competing imperatives: the promise Mr. Obama made to end the war in Afghanistan, versus the demands of the Pentagon that American troops be able to successfully fulfill their remaining missions in the country.
The internal discussion took place against the backdrop of this year’s collapse of Iraqi security forces in the face of the advance of the Islamic State as well as the mistrust between the Pentagon and the White House that still lingers since Mr. Obama’s 2009 decision to “surge” 30,000 American troops to Afghanistan. Some of the president’s civilian advisers say that decision was made only because of excessive Pentagon pressure, and some military officials say it was half-baked and made with an eye to domestic politics.
Mr. Obama’s decision, made during a White House meeting in recent weeks with his senior national security advisers, came over the objection of some of his top civilian aides, who argued that American lives should not be put at risk next year in any operations against the Taliban — and that they should have only a narrow counterterrorism mission against Al Qaeda.
But the military pushed back, and generals both at the Pentagon and in Afghanistan urged Mr. Obama to define the mission more broadly to allow American troops to attack the Taliban, the Haqqani network and other militants if intelligence revealed that the extremists were threatening American forces in the country.
The president’s order under certain circumstances would also authorize American airstrikes to support Afghan military operations in the country and ground troops to occasionally accompany Afghan troops on operations against the Taliban.
“There was a school of thought that wanted the mission to be very limited, focused solely on Al Qaeda,” one American official said.
Continue reading the main story
But, the official said, “the military pretty much got what it wanted.”
On Friday evening, a senior administration official insisted that American forces would not carry out regular patrols or conduct offensive missions against the Taliban next year.
“We will no longer target belligerents solely because they are members of the Taliban,” the official said. “To the extent that Taliban members directly threaten the United States and coalition forces in Afghanistan or provide direct support to Al Qaeda, however, we will take appropriate measures to keep Americans safe.”
In effect, Mr. Obama’s decision largely extends much of the current American military role for another year. Mr. Obama and his aides were forced to make a decision because the 13-year old mission, Operation Enduring Freedom, is set to end on Dec. 31.
The matter of the military’s role in Afghanistan in 2015 has “been a really, really contentious issue for a long time, even more contentious than troop numbers,” said Vikram Singh, who worked on Afghanistan policy both at the State Department and the Pentagon during the Obama administration and is now at the Center for American Progress in Washington.
American officials said that while the debate over the nature of the American military’s role beginning in 2015 has lasted for years, two issues in particular have shifted the debate in recent months.
The first is the advance of Islamic State forces across northern Iraq and the collapse of the Iraqi Army, which has led to criticism of Mr. Obama for a military pullout of Iraq that left Iraqi troops ill-prepared to protect their soil.
Mr. Obama’s order allows American forces to carry out missions against the Taliban and other militant groups threatening American troops or the Afghan government, a broader mission than the president described to the public earlier this year, according to several administration, military and congressional officials with knowledge of the decision. The new authorization also allows American jets, bombers and drones to support Afghan troops on combat missions.
In an announcement in the White House Rose Garden in May, Mr. Obama said that the American military would have no combat role in Afghanistan next year, and that the missions for the 9,800 troops remaining in the country would be limited to training Afghan forces and to hunting the “remnants of Al Qaeda.”
The decision to change that mission was the result of a lengthy and heated debate that laid bare the tension inside the Obama administration between two often-competing imperatives: the promise Mr. Obama made to end the war in Afghanistan, versus the demands of the Pentagon that American troops be able to successfully fulfill their remaining missions in the country.
The internal discussion took place against the backdrop of this year’s collapse of Iraqi security forces in the face of the advance of the Islamic State as well as the mistrust between the Pentagon and the White House that still lingers since Mr. Obama’s 2009 decision to “surge” 30,000 American troops to Afghanistan. Some of the president’s civilian advisers say that decision was made only because of excessive Pentagon pressure, and some military officials say it was half-baked and made with an eye to domestic politics.
Mr. Obama’s decision, made during a White House meeting in recent weeks with his senior national security advisers, came over the objection of some of his top civilian aides, who argued that American lives should not be put at risk next year in any operations against the Taliban — and that they should have only a narrow counterterrorism mission against Al Qaeda.
But the military pushed back, and generals both at the Pentagon and in Afghanistan urged Mr. Obama to define the mission more broadly to allow American troops to attack the Taliban, the Haqqani network and other militants if intelligence revealed that the extremists were threatening American forces in the country.
The president’s order under certain circumstances would also authorize American airstrikes to support Afghan military operations in the country and ground troops to occasionally accompany Afghan troops on operations against the Taliban.
“There was a school of thought that wanted the mission to be very limited, focused solely on Al Qaeda,” one American official said.
Continue reading the main story
But, the official said, “the military pretty much got what it wanted.”
On Friday evening, a senior administration official insisted that American forces would not carry out regular patrols or conduct offensive missions against the Taliban next year.
“We will no longer target belligerents solely because they are members of the Taliban,” the official said. “To the extent that Taliban members directly threaten the United States and coalition forces in Afghanistan or provide direct support to Al Qaeda, however, we will take appropriate measures to keep Americans safe.”
In effect, Mr. Obama’s decision largely extends much of the current American military role for another year. Mr. Obama and his aides were forced to make a decision because the 13-year old mission, Operation Enduring Freedom, is set to end on Dec. 31.
The matter of the military’s role in Afghanistan in 2015 has “been a really, really contentious issue for a long time, even more contentious than troop numbers,” said Vikram Singh, who worked on Afghanistan policy both at the State Department and the Pentagon during the Obama administration and is now at the Center for American Progress in Washington.
American officials said that while the debate over the nature of the American military’s role beginning in 2015 has lasted for years, two issues in particular have shifted the debate in recent months.
The first is the advance of Islamic State forces across northern Iraq and the collapse of the Iraqi Army, which has led to criticism of Mr. Obama for a military pullout of Iraq that left Iraqi troops ill-prepared to protect their soil.
观海是要闹哪样？这消息真实性严重不足
看来这次APEC上，习大大在瀛台给奥观海同志布置的任务得到了不折不扣的执行！
拉倒，王师贩毒养小鬼又不是一天两天了
派军事顾问团吧
明明是派人去培养东突去了，上面几个为何这么乐观
言无疾 发表于 2014-11-22 19:31
派军事顾问团吧
是命令美军直接作战。
派军事顾问团吧
是命令美军直接作战。
延长一年任务而已，让军工集团多赚点利润
渔家公子 发表于 2014-11-22 19:32
是命令美军直接作战。
顶多去一、两百指挥官，把人家打烂了就甩手不管，在小弟们面前不好交带
是命令美军直接作战。
顶多去一、两百指挥官，把人家打烂了就甩手不管，在小弟们面前不好交带
nicklee0085 发表于 2014-11-22 19:32
明明是派人去培养东突去了，上面几个为何这么乐观
赞一个 一堆粉哈美媚美 美国就是专门干坏事的顾问
明明是派人去培养东突去了，上面几个为何这么乐观
赞一个 一堆粉哈美媚美 美国就是专门干坏事的顾问
言无疾 发表于 2014-11-22 19:38
顶多去一、两百指挥官，把人家打烂了就甩手不管，在小弟们面前不好交带
上万人。。。
顶多去一、两百指挥官，把人家打烂了就甩手不管，在小弟们面前不好交带
上万人。。。
少数特种部队而已，不会太多人。不过对阿富汗还是利好，起码塔利班和ISIS不能发展太快了。
还指望王师帮你减轻压力？
东突人员人家会直接判为“不对米国利益构成威胁”而释放的
东突人员人家会直接判为“不对米国利益构成威胁”而释放的
喜闻乐见,kkkk
啊喂，上面几位太乐观了吧，鹰酱什么时候是好人啦
渔家公子 发表于 2014-11-22 19:47
上万人。。。
上万人？还是能做战的部队？就是一个师的特种兵
上万人。。。
上万人？还是能做战的部队？就是一个师的特种兵
是不是最近省了好多油钱，有余粮了
呵呵，美军今日阿富汗的十余年就是新疆局势恶化的十余年，你还希望人家帮你减轻压力？！
瀛台夜宴，观海同志，受教颇深
奥黑就快下台了，就算现在部署兵力重返帝国坟场——一旦大选后白宫易主落到共和党手里，政策的延续性很值得怀疑
媒体说的，观望
不装逼很难么
MD哪里是什么重返阿富汗来反恐，就是它一看见我前脚刚走，兔子就过来了，要回来堵住兔子伸出中亚的口子而已
muskeetor 发表于 2014-11-22 20:32
奥黑就快下台了，就算现在部署兵力重返帝国坟场——一旦大选后白宫易主落到共和党手里，政策的延续性很值得 ...
共和党都是要打仗滴。
奥黑就快下台了，就算现在部署兵力重返帝国坟场——一旦大选后白宫易主落到共和党手里，政策的延续性很值得 ...
共和党都是要打仗滴。
炸药奖能收回吗？
言无疾 发表于 2014-11-22 20:03
上万人？还是能做战的部队？就是一个师的特种兵
那也比你那拍拍脑袋拍出来的一、两百人是数字多一百倍！
上万人？还是能做战的部队？就是一个师的特种兵
那也比你那拍拍脑袋拍出来的一、两百人是数字多一百倍！
啊喂，上面几位太乐观了吧，鹰酱什么时候是好人啦
兔子一直在坐顺风车的说～
兔子一直在坐顺风车的说～
渔家公子 发表于 2014-11-22 20:49
那也比你那拍拍脑袋拍出来的一、两百人是数字多一百倍！
王师命多金贵啊，如果真重返，他也不可能象以前那样拿着m16在荒山野领里和极端组织份子干，那么干他还是干不赢，十年了塔利班还是塔利班，美军就不是当初的美军了。假如真有重返阿富汗，美军一定是以军事顾问、培训教官、政治顾问、控制驾驶无人机的等等，这类型高级人员为主，主要是撑擦控阿富汗局势为目的。这种的高技术人员你想想美帝会派去很多吗？
那也比你那拍拍脑袋拍出来的一、两百人是数字多一百倍！
王师命多金贵啊，如果真重返，他也不可能象以前那样拿着m16在荒山野领里和极端组织份子干，那么干他还是干不赢，十年了塔利班还是塔利班，美军就不是当初的美军了。假如真有重返阿富汗，美军一定是以军事顾问、培训教官、政治顾问、控制驾驶无人机的等等，这类型高级人员为主，主要是撑擦控阿富汗局势为目的。这种的高技术人员你想想美帝会派去很多吗？
甚好，欢迎MD早日回归帝国坟场。没有MD唱黑脸，天朝怎么唱红脸呢？
nicklee0085 发表于 2014-11-22 19:32
明明是派人去培养东突去了，上面几个为何这么乐观
就是这样想损tb
明明是派人去培养东突去了，上面几个为何这么乐观
就是这样想损tb
不会是冲着一路一带来的吧。。。
flyingsky999 发表于 2014-11-22 19:49
少数特种部队而已，不会太多人。不过对阿富汗还是利好，起码塔利班和ISIS不能发展太快了。
9800人的一支部队。
少数特种部队而已，不会太多人。不过对阿富汗还是利好，起码塔利班和ISIS不能发展太快了。
9800人的一支部队。
lioninwinter 发表于 2014-11-22 21:18
不会是冲着一路一带来的吧。。。
还能有啥别的事
不会是冲着一路一带来的吧。。。
还能有啥别的事
这次与上次目标、手段应都不同。
上万人的部队，不是小数目了
《十送王师》唱起
《十送王师》唱起
言无疾 发表于 2014-11-22 21:09
王师命多金贵啊，如果真重返，他也不可能象以前那样拿着m16在荒山野领里和极端组织份子干，那么干他还是 ...
不是你我想不想的问题，媒体上就是这么说的，这个由不得你，除非媒体作假
王师命多金贵啊，如果真重返，他也不可能象以前那样拿着m16在荒山野领里和极端组织份子干，那么干他还是 ...
不是你我想不想的问题，媒体上就是这么说的，这个由不得你，除非媒体作假
你不知道自911米国反恐后新疆的恐怖袭击是几何增长么？！
帮TG打恐怖分子？
人家CIA没直接空投教官到新疆就不错了
帮TG打恐怖分子？
人家CIA没直接空投教官到新疆就不错了
老美这手玩的有意思，人也不多派，仗也不大打，够搅和就成。
那个谁，你想拉大伙坐下来聊天？我踢……椅子。
那个谁，你想拉大伙坐下来聊天？我踢……椅子。