会被封吗？Robert S. Rodvik：美国几十年的对中战争

-------------译者：wszpwsren-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

fter decades of covert actions meant to overthrow the communist government of China, in 1989 the CIA launched the first of its so-called "colour" revolutions, which, being unsuccessful, did not achieve a designation of its own, those appellations coming later, in Eastern Europe and Georgia. This action took place in Beijing, where the CIA had trained a coterie of "students" to unseat the government.龙腾网 ht    tp://ww        w.ltaaa.com
经过数十年打算推翻中国共产主义政府的隐秘活动以后，1989，美国中情局发动第一次所谓的“颜色”革命，但失败了，所以没有获得相应的名称，而后来发生在东欧和格鲁吉亚的革命才被称为“颜色革命”。

VOLTAIRE NETWORK | VANCOUVER (CANADA) | 13 JANUARY 2013

福特尔网络| 温哥华（加拿大）| 2013年1月13日

-------------译者：fs0andy-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

Forget the title. All titles are created by someone other than the writer and often have little connection to the content of the story. In this case the story was extremely indispensable to truth, and this AP story was a real eye-opener, so far as truth is concerned. The article starts like this:

忘掉标题吧，所有的标题都不是由作者写的，和文章的内容通常也没多大关联。然而，在这个例子中，要想知道真相，这篇文章的内容是不可或缺的。美联社的这篇文章就真相而言真是令人大开眼界。文章是这样开始的：

"The CIA STATION chief in China left the country two days before Chinese troops attacked demonstrators in the capital Beijing in 1989, after predicting the military would not act, U.S. officials said...The Central Intelligence Agency had sources among protestors, as well as within China’s intelligence services with which it enjoyed a close relationship since the 1970s, said the officials, who spoke this week on condition of anonymity."

中国军队在首都北京打击游行示威者，美国中央情报局驻中国的局长于两天前离开，官员表示之前估计中方军队不会采取行动。。。中央情报局有来自示威者以及中国情报部门的情报源，并且从1970年开始就与中国情报部门有着密切的联系，一个不愿透露名字的官员说道。

Much more than "sources" however, were the methods being implemented to cause overthrow of the country’s communist leadership, continuing a decades long histor

中情局不仅有这些情报来源，而且还采用了各种方法来推翻GCD的领导，几十年来未曾停止




Is this what a peaceful protestor looks like...?Jeff Widener / Associated Press / June 3, 1989

这像是和平抗议者的样子吗？Jeff Widener /美国联合通讯社/1989-6-3

-------------译者：a5905828-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

The article continues:

文章继续写道：

"For months before the June 3 attack on the demonstrators, the CIA had been helping student activists form the anti-government movement, providing typewriters, facsimile machines and other equipment to help them spread their message, said one official. (Emphasis added) The CIA declined all comment."

“早在6月3日对示威者的进攻的几个月前，CIA就开始帮助学生政治骨干们组织一些反政府的行动，并向他们提供包括了打字机，传真机在内的许多装备以传播他们的理念。一位官员如是说（额外强调到。）而CIA拒绝发表看法

-------------译者：a5905828-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

The Washington Post indicates what it thinks of such a statement, telling us that it had been made by China’s "rubber-stamp parliament." Naturally we all accept that anything printed by the Post originating from China surely must be delusional, while anything originating from Washington must be beyond doubt. The Post article continues with this statement from the Chinese parliamentary source:

“华盛顿邮报暗示了它对这个声明的看法，并告诉大家这份声明是由中国的“橡皮图章型议会”（译者注：即全国人民代表大会常务委员会）发出的。我们自然都会认为《华盛顿邮报》所发表的来自中国的文章都是虚假的，而其发布的来自华盛顿的文章肯定都是真实的。邮报的文章继续引用了这份来自“中国国会“的材料：

"The United States ’played an inglorious role’ in the 1989 protests by ’directly master-minding schemes and giving money and goods to support those making the disturbance’ the statement said...America also spread ’horrifying rumours by using their media to cheat and hoodwink the international community’ it said.

‘美国不仅在作为整个计划的直接策划者以及暴乱分子的物资和金钱提供者在1989年的示威中扮演了不光彩的角色’声明声称到‘还通过它的媒体散布了骇人听闻的谣言去欺骗和蛊惑国际社会’“

The Post article seems to deplore any and every bit of information emanating from China, closing by saying,

这篇邮报的文章看上去就像是要谴责中国方面的所有说法，并以下面的话结尾。

"The government has continued unrelenting criticism of the United States for the May 7 bombing of the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade, which it said was intended to destabilize China". [3]

“中国政府继续批评美国轰炸大使馆的行为，中国政府认为这是美国有意为之，是为了动摇中国。”

-------------译者：zhou_5049-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

Imagine that. The Chinese protesting merely because the US bombed its embassy and killed a number of its agents. Imagine a reversal of the situation with China bombing a US embassy somewhere in the world. How long do you think before the B2 bombers would be launched.

想象一下。美国炸了它的大使馆并且杀了许多中国特工，中国人仅仅只是抗议了一下。再想像一下，如果是另一个完全相反的情况——中国炸掉了美国在世界上某个地方的大使馆。那你觉得离出动B2轰炸机需要多久呢？

Among its participants was Professor Timothy Brook, professor of Chinese History at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, BC. Professor Brook might as well have worked for the CIA since he was a stalwart promoter of China’s despicable (to him) malfeasance in that docudrama. I managed to reach professor Brook by telephone, certify that I was speaking to the right man, and asked if he knew of the CIA’s involvement in the whole woeful affair, and the destruction of a large part of the PLA’s forces. Professor Brook asserted that no such incident took place. I responded by saying I would mail him copies of my material, which I did. That was the last I would hear from the head of UBC’s China department, demonstrating that the disseminators of information in the university system are very often little but propagandists for western imperialism.

参与此记录片拍摄的人员包括有英属哥伦比亚大学温哥华校区的中国历史专家，Timothy Brook教授。
Brook教授可能曾经和CIA合作过，因为在这部记录片中，他是始终坚定不移地认为该事件是“中国(政府)卑鄙的不法行为”。我尝试通过电话与Brook教授取得联系，证实是他本人后，我询问他是否了解CIA曾参与了这件惨绝人寰的事件，以及（在该事件）解放军损失了很大一部分力量。Brook教授则表示这完全是空穴来风。我回复他说我会把我收集的资料邮寄给他一份，但那是我最后一次收到英属哥伦比亚大学的来信了。这也显示出大学系统中信息的传播者实际上非常少，大部分是西方帝国主义的宣传者。

-------------译者：迷了路的人-审核者：寒灯独夜人------------

Bombing China’s Embassy

轰炸中国大使馆



May 7, 1999: the Chinese embassy in Belgrade is bombed ; 3 persons are killed and 20 injured.

1999年6月7号，中国驻南斯拉夫大使馆被轰炸，造成3人死亡20人受伤。



Two injured Chinese men sit in an ambulance outside the Chinese embassy after NATO air strikes.Photo by Reuters

两个在北约空袭中受伤的人在救护车中。Reuters摄

On the night of May 7, 1999, three NATO-launched missiles struck a critical corner of the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade, Yugoslavia which contained the intelligence gathering chamber dedicated to electronic eavesdropping. At first the atrocity was attributed by the US to faulty, outdated maps, which didn’t place the embassy in its proper location. That pathetic offering didn’t convince a single person, least of all the Chinese, who exploded in furious reaction over the 26 wounded and three killed in the deliberate attack. Turns out that the CIA had specifically chosen the target which, they claim, was purely accidental due to the outdated maps. It was a "pure coincidence" said an unnamed Pentagon official.

1999年6月7日晚，三枚北约导弹打中中国驻南大使馆的边界上，南斯拉夫设置收集电子情报的情报机关。首先这种残暴的行为是美国的错误，过时的地图没有正确标记大使馆的位置。这种说法不能让人信服，至少不能让中国人信服，他们对有预谋的进攻造成超过26人受伤3人死亡非常愤怒。据证CIA特别选择了攻击目标而不是他们所说只是由于错误的地图。一位不愿透露姓名的五角大楼官员说这只是一个“纯粹的巧合”。

"The mistake here was the original data base. It was outdated. I believe it was a 1992 map when it should have been an up-to-date map." [5]

“这种错误是由于原始基础数据过时。我相信这是需要数据更新的1992年 的地图。”

-------------译者：迷了路的人-审核者：寒灯独夜人-----------



In Washington, Defense Secretary William Cohen and CIA Director George Tenet  issued a joint statement saying that NATO believed the building housed a Yugoslav military facility, not the Chinese Embassy.

在华盛顿，国防部长 William Cohen和CIA局长George Tenet发表联合声明表示北约以为轰炸的建筑是军工厂而不是中国使馆。
In further explanation of this obviously fraudulent story the reader is offered the following: "Only after the disaster did the C.I.A. turn up in its files two maps that accurately placed the embassy...A final backup also failed when several computerized databases of sites that were off-limits to bombing, including embassies, hospitals and churches, did not have the current location of the Chinese Embassy." [6] And if you believe any of that come see me. I’ve got a bridge to sell.

为了对这一显然是虚假的故事进行进一步解释，他们向读者提供的说法如下：：“灾难发生后，中情局才出现两张精确标记中国大使馆的地图，虽然各家使馆、医院和教堂都在电脑数据库里被标了出来，也在CIA的最终备份里被列为轰炸禁区，但地图里就是没有当时中国大使馆的位置。”这种说法，你真的会相信么...

-------------译者：迷了路的人-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

Commentary took a different track later in the same year, in October 1999, when The Observer of London challenged the official US account under the heading: Nato Bombed Chinese Deliberately. The article states, inter alia, the following info:
"Nato deliberately bombed the Chinese embassy in Belgrade during the war in Kosovo after discovering it was being used to transmit Yugoslav army communications.
According to senior military and intelligence sources in Europe and the US the Chinese embassy was removed from a prohibited targets list after Nato electronic intelligence (Elint) detected it sending army signals to Milosevic’s forces.

同一年的后期，人们的观点又有所不一样了，在1999年10月，《伦敦观察者》发表如下标题文章质疑美国官方解释：北约故意轰炸中国使馆。文章中说：
“科索沃战争期间，在发现贝尔格莱德的中国使馆被用来传输南斯拉夫军队通信信息后北约故意轰炸了它”
根据欧洲和美国的高级军事情和情报部分的说法，在北约电子侦听到中国大使馆向Milosevic武装力量发送信息后，它才被作为攻击目标

-------------译者：迷了路的人-审核者：寒灯独夜人------------

A NATO flight control officer in Naples also confirmed to us that a map of ‘non-targets’: churches, hospitals and embassies, including the Chinese, did exist. On this ‘don’t hit’ map, the Chinese embassy was correctly located at its current site, and not where it had been until 1996 - as claimed by the US and NATO." [7]

一位在那不勒斯的飞行控制人员向我们证实“非攻击目标”地图确实存在教堂、医院、大使馆，包括中国的。在这份“非军事打击”地图上，中国大使馆正确的坐落在它现在的位置上，而不是美国和北约声称的1996年以前的位置。

If, however, the NATO gang does have such a "non-target" list as earlier cited, then why did they bomb so many hospitals, rest homes, churches, schools and other civilian sites? A historic study of NATO-inflicted terror establishes beyond doubt its criminal contempt for civilians wherever its military apparatus is unleashed against the world. On the same day that the Chinese embassy was struck NATO bombers also struck Nis, the third largest city in Yugoslavia, bombing a hospital and an outdoor market filled with civilians, "killing 15 people and wounding 70."

如果是这样，然而，北约群体确实有早期使用的这样一个“非攻击目标”名单，那么为什么他们轰炸如此多的医院，疗养院，教堂，学校和其他一些民用场所？一个关于北约施加的恐怖行动的历史研究表明了毋庸置疑的其对任何北约军事行动所到之处的平民的犯罪行为。在北约轰炸中国驻南联盟大使馆的同一天，他们还轰炸了南斯拉夫第三大城市的一个充斥着平民的医院和户外市场，造成15人死亡70人受伤

-------------译者：迷了路的人-审核者：寒灯独夜人------------



The magnitude of a cluster bomb by the city of Nis, 1999

1999年南联盟城市被狂轰滥炸

Journalists were taken to Nis, an industrial city 195 kilometres southeast of Belgrade, to view the devastation from the cluster-bomb attack, which hit a market and a hospital complex...Buildings were pockmarked from the bombs, which release explosives that then explode again [releasing smaller bomblets that fan out to kill over a wide radius, scattering the explosives indiscriminately and turning the bombing ground into a monstrous killing field]. [8]

新闻工作者被带到贝尔格莱德东南方195公里的一个工业城市去观看轰炸造成的毁坏，一个集市场和医院于一身的建筑被袭击，建筑被炸出缺口，那些被发射的爆炸物再次爆炸【投放的小炸弹发散开对更大半径的区域造成毁坏，散射的爆炸物不加选择的有更加巨大的杀伤区域

After a lengthy study of the embassy bombing, I find theObserver account of why NATO struck the embassy to be lacking in authenticity. Why would the Chinese pass communications from the capital to Yugoslav troops in the field? What would they gain from so doing? I believe there is a more credible explanation.

在对于轰炸使馆更深层次研究后，我发现《观察者》对于北约轰炸大使馆的理由缺乏真实性。为什么中国人从首都传递信息到南斯拉夫人的军队？他们从中得到了什么？我相信这其中有更令人相信的解释

-------------译者：迷了路的人-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

The actual reason for the bombing was meant to cover-up NATO war crimes that were taking place almost daily, and the Chinese listening post located in the corner of the embassy that was bombed were intercepting orders issued by NATO which clearly revealed those crimes. The Chinese needed to be silenced and their operations ended, no matter the fallout. Take, for instance, that refugee column of Kosovo Albanians exiting the region on tractors and horse-carriages. The column that the US and NATO bombed, killing dozens. As the Toronto Globe and Mail reports:
Last Wednesday, Yugoslav authorities said NATO planes had killed more than 60 Kosovo Albanians in an attack on a refugee column. A road strewn with refugee bodies was shown on Serbian television and foreign journalists were escorted to the site to film the carnage.

对中国大使馆的轰炸其实是为了掩盖当时北约军队的日常战争罪行。中国的情报站就位于这座大使馆的角落里，用来截获北约下达的命令，这无疑会使北约的罪行得到暴露。无论有什么后果必须终止中国人的行为并且让其保持沉默，举个例子美国和北约轰炸很多正在逃离该地区的科索沃阿尔巴尼亚人难民并造成死亡。正如《多伦多环球邮报》报道：
上个周三，南斯拉夫官方声称超过60名科索沃阿尔巴尼亚人在北约飞机的空袭中丧生。塞尔维亚电视台的画面上出现了一条躺满难民尸体的道路，外国记者被送去拍摄这个大屠杀场面。

-------------译者：迷了路的人-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

Serb television last night revealed extracts of what it called a taped conversation of a NATO pilot being ordered to attack a civilian convoy in Kosovo last week despite seeing only cars and tractors. It said the conversation was between the pilot and an early warning radar plane [AWACS]. The extract covered the critical moment when the pilot identified the convoy. Asked if there were any tanks in the convoy, he said he could see only cars and tractors. But the other plane responds "This is a military target, a completely legitimate military target. Destroy the target..." [9].
That, I believe, is why the listening post was destroyed. The ability to intercept NATO communications was far more damaging to NATO’s credibility than any other purported reason. AWACS radar planes guide all NATO bombing runs and the ability to record those communications presents a serious predicament to the war criminals busily attacking those non-targets: hospitals, churches, markets, bridges, industry, TV stations, and virtually every target imaginable.

塞尔维亚电视台昨晚公布了北约飞行员接受命令对只有汽车和拖拉机的平民车队进行轰炸的录音谈话内容。是飞行员和预警雷达飞机之间的对话。当被问及车队中有没有坦克时，回答是只有汽车和拖拉机，这充分说明飞行员明确知道那只是一支平民车队。但是另外那架飞机却称”他们是作战部队，一个全副武装有战争能力的军队，摧毁他们。。。”
我相信，这就是中国大使馆的情报中心被摧毁的原因所在了，有能力截获北约的通信这对北约的公信力来说影响是最大的。机载空中警报控制系统(AWACS)引导北约的所有轰炸，有能力截获这些通讯信息对他们是一个极大的威胁，因为这些北约战犯总是袭击非军事目标：医院，教堂，市场，桥梁，工厂，电视台几乎所有的目标。

-------------译者：wszpwsren-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

The Chinese, humbled due to their inability to respond, would pay attention and realize that the US and its satrap partners were giving notice that China was a paper tiger without substance, and that they were on the future chopping block of the imperialist aggressors. This, I believe, is when they began to seriously devote larger portions of the budget to develop their military forces. It was, Chinese analysts decided, a wake-up call whereby they realized the need for a far greater responsiveness, surely understanding that without a more effective military, their economy and sovereignty would suffer an attack that might even include nuclear weapons.
With Obama’s shift to the Pacific, I believe it’s only a matter of time!

因无力而谦卑中国看到了这一点，发现美国及其盟友正在发出信号以显示中国是一个没有实力的纸老虎，未来，帝国主义侵略者将是刀俎，中国将为鱼肉。我相信，正是从这个时候开始中国开始认真发展自己的军事实力。中国分析家认为，警钟已被敲响，中国需要获得一个更加强大的回应能力，他们明白，没有强大有力的军事，他们的经济和主权可能会受到打击，甚至是核威胁。
随着奥巴马的意图转向太平洋，我相信这只是时间问题。

Robert S. Rodvik
-------------译者：wszpwsren-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

fter decades of covert actions meant to overthrow the communist government of China, in 1989 the CIA launched the first of its so-called "colour" revolutions, which, being unsuccessful, did not achieve a designation of its own, those appellations coming later, in Eastern Europe and Georgia. This action took place in Beijing, where the CIA had trained a coterie of "students" to unseat the government.龙腾网 ht    tp://ww        w.ltaaa.com
经过数十年打算推翻中国共产主义政府的隐秘活动以后，1989，美国中情局发动第一次所谓的“颜色”革命，但失败了，所以没有获得相应的名称，而后来发生在东欧和格鲁吉亚的革命才被称为“颜色革命”。

VOLTAIRE NETWORK | VANCOUVER (CANADA) | 13 JANUARY 2013

福特尔网络| 温哥华（加拿大）| 2013年1月13日

-------------译者：fs0andy-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

Forget the title. All titles are created by someone other than the writer and often have little connection to the content of the story. In this case the story was extremely indispensable to truth, and this AP story was a real eye-opener, so far as truth is concerned. The article starts like this:

忘掉标题吧，所有的标题都不是由作者写的，和文章的内容通常也没多大关联。然而，在这个例子中，要想知道真相，这篇文章的内容是不可或缺的。美联社的这篇文章就真相而言真是令人大开眼界。文章是这样开始的：

"The CIA STATION chief in China left the country two days before Chinese troops attacked demonstrators in the capital Beijing in 1989, after predicting the military would not act, U.S. officials said...The Central Intelligence Agency had sources among protestors, as well as within China’s intelligence services with which it enjoyed a close relationship since the 1970s, said the officials, who spoke this week on condition of anonymity."

中国军队在首都北京打击游行示威者，美国中央情报局驻中国的局长于两天前离开，官员表示之前估计中方军队不会采取行动。。。中央情报局有来自示威者以及中国情报部门的情报源，并且从1970年开始就与中国情报部门有着密切的联系，一个不愿透露名字的官员说道。

Much more than "sources" however, were the methods being implemented to cause overthrow of the country’s communist leadership, continuing a decades long histor

中情局不仅有这些情报来源，而且还采用了各种方法来推翻GCD的领导，几十年来未曾停止




Is this what a peaceful protestor looks like...?Jeff Widener / Associated Press / June 3, 1989

这像是和平抗议者的样子吗？Jeff Widener /美国联合通讯社/1989-6-3

-------------译者：a5905828-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

The article continues:

文章继续写道：

"For months before the June 3 attack on the demonstrators, the CIA had been helping student activists form the anti-government movement, providing typewriters, facsimile machines and other equipment to help them spread their message, said one official. (Emphasis added) The CIA declined all comment."

“早在6月3日对示威者的进攻的几个月前，CIA就开始帮助学生政治骨干们组织一些反政府的行动，并向他们提供包括了打字机，传真机在内的许多装备以传播他们的理念。一位官员如是说（额外强调到。）而CIA拒绝发表看法

-------------译者：a5905828-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

The Washington Post indicates what it thinks of such a statement, telling us that it had been made by China’s "rubber-stamp parliament." Naturally we all accept that anything printed by the Post originating from China surely must be delusional, while anything originating from Washington must be beyond doubt. The Post article continues with this statement from the Chinese parliamentary source:

“华盛顿邮报暗示了它对这个声明的看法，并告诉大家这份声明是由中国的“橡皮图章型议会”（译者注：即全国人民代表大会常务委员会）发出的。我们自然都会认为《华盛顿邮报》所发表的来自中国的文章都是虚假的，而其发布的来自华盛顿的文章肯定都是真实的。邮报的文章继续引用了这份来自“中国国会“的材料：

"The United States ’played an inglorious role’ in the 1989 protests by ’directly master-minding schemes and giving money and goods to support those making the disturbance’ the statement said...America also spread ’horrifying rumours by using their media to cheat and hoodwink the international community’ it said.

‘美国不仅在作为整个计划的直接策划者以及暴乱分子的物资和金钱提供者在1989年的示威中扮演了不光彩的角色’声明声称到‘还通过它的媒体散布了骇人听闻的谣言去欺骗和蛊惑国际社会’“

The Post article seems to deplore any and every bit of information emanating from China, closing by saying,

这篇邮报的文章看上去就像是要谴责中国方面的所有说法，并以下面的话结尾。

"The government has continued unrelenting criticism of the United States for the May 7 bombing of the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade, which it said was intended to destabilize China". [3]

“中国政府继续批评美国轰炸大使馆的行为，中国政府认为这是美国有意为之，是为了动摇中国。”

-------------译者：zhou_5049-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

Imagine that. The Chinese protesting merely because the US bombed its embassy and killed a number of its agents. Imagine a reversal of the situation with China bombing a US embassy somewhere in the world. How long do you think before the B2 bombers would be launched.

想象一下。美国炸了它的大使馆并且杀了许多中国特工，中国人仅仅只是抗议了一下。再想像一下，如果是另一个完全相反的情况——中国炸掉了美国在世界上某个地方的大使馆。那你觉得离出动B2轰炸机需要多久呢？

Among its participants was Professor Timothy Brook, professor of Chinese History at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, BC. Professor Brook might as well have worked for the CIA since he was a stalwart promoter of China’s despicable (to him) malfeasance in that docudrama. I managed to reach professor Brook by telephone, certify that I was speaking to the right man, and asked if he knew of the CIA’s involvement in the whole woeful affair, and the destruction of a large part of the PLA’s forces. Professor Brook asserted that no such incident took place. I responded by saying I would mail him copies of my material, which I did. That was the last I would hear from the head of UBC’s China department, demonstrating that the disseminators of information in the university system are very often little but propagandists for western imperialism.

参与此记录片拍摄的人员包括有英属哥伦比亚大学温哥华校区的中国历史专家，Timothy Brook教授。
Brook教授可能曾经和CIA合作过，因为在这部记录片中，他是始终坚定不移地认为该事件是“中国(政府)卑鄙的不法行为”。我尝试通过电话与Brook教授取得联系，证实是他本人后，我询问他是否了解CIA曾参与了这件惨绝人寰的事件，以及（在该事件）解放军损失了很大一部分力量。Brook教授则表示这完全是空穴来风。我回复他说我会把我收集的资料邮寄给他一份，但那是我最后一次收到英属哥伦比亚大学的来信了。这也显示出大学系统中信息的传播者实际上非常少，大部分是西方帝国主义的宣传者。

-------------译者：迷了路的人-审核者：寒灯独夜人------------

Bombing China’s Embassy

轰炸中国大使馆



May 7, 1999: the Chinese embassy in Belgrade is bombed ; 3 persons are killed and 20 injured.

1999年6月7号，中国驻南斯拉夫大使馆被轰炸，造成3人死亡20人受伤。



Two injured Chinese men sit in an ambulance outside the Chinese embassy after NATO air strikes.Photo by Reuters

两个在北约空袭中受伤的人在救护车中。Reuters摄

On the night of May 7, 1999, three NATO-launched missiles struck a critical corner of the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade, Yugoslavia which contained the intelligence gathering chamber dedicated to electronic eavesdropping. At first the atrocity was attributed by the US to faulty, outdated maps, which didn’t place the embassy in its proper location. That pathetic offering didn’t convince a single person, least of all the Chinese, who exploded in furious reaction over the 26 wounded and three killed in the deliberate attack. Turns out that the CIA had specifically chosen the target which, they claim, was purely accidental due to the outdated maps. It was a "pure coincidence" said an unnamed Pentagon official.

1999年6月7日晚，三枚北约导弹打中中国驻南大使馆的边界上，南斯拉夫设置收集电子情报的情报机关。首先这种残暴的行为是美国的错误，过时的地图没有正确标记大使馆的位置。这种说法不能让人信服，至少不能让中国人信服，他们对有预谋的进攻造成超过26人受伤3人死亡非常愤怒。据证CIA特别选择了攻击目标而不是他们所说只是由于错误的地图。一位不愿透露姓名的五角大楼官员说这只是一个“纯粹的巧合”。

"The mistake here was the original data base. It was outdated. I believe it was a 1992 map when it should have been an up-to-date map." [5]

“这种错误是由于原始基础数据过时。我相信这是需要数据更新的1992年 的地图。”

-------------译者：迷了路的人-审核者：寒灯独夜人-----------



In Washington, Defense Secretary William Cohen and CIA Director George Tenet  issued a joint statement saying that NATO believed the building housed a Yugoslav military facility, not the Chinese Embassy.

在华盛顿，国防部长 William Cohen和CIA局长George Tenet发表联合声明表示北约以为轰炸的建筑是军工厂而不是中国使馆。
In further explanation of this obviously fraudulent story the reader is offered the following: "Only after the disaster did the C.I.A. turn up in its files two maps that accurately placed the embassy...A final backup also failed when several computerized databases of sites that were off-limits to bombing, including embassies, hospitals and churches, did not have the current location of the Chinese Embassy." [6] And if you believe any of that come see me. I’ve got a bridge to sell.

为了对这一显然是虚假的故事进行进一步解释，他们向读者提供的说法如下：：“灾难发生后，中情局才出现两张精确标记中国大使馆的地图，虽然各家使馆、医院和教堂都在电脑数据库里被标了出来，也在CIA的最终备份里被列为轰炸禁区，但地图里就是没有当时中国大使馆的位置。”这种说法，你真的会相信么...

-------------译者：迷了路的人-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

Commentary took a different track later in the same year, in October 1999, when The Observer of London challenged the official US account under the heading: Nato Bombed Chinese Deliberately. The article states, inter alia, the following info:
"Nato deliberately bombed the Chinese embassy in Belgrade during the war in Kosovo after discovering it was being used to transmit Yugoslav army communications.
According to senior military and intelligence sources in Europe and the US the Chinese embassy was removed from a prohibited targets list after Nato electronic intelligence (Elint) detected it sending army signals to Milosevic’s forces.

同一年的后期，人们的观点又有所不一样了，在1999年10月，《伦敦观察者》发表如下标题文章质疑美国官方解释：北约故意轰炸中国使馆。文章中说：
“科索沃战争期间，在发现贝尔格莱德的中国使馆被用来传输南斯拉夫军队通信信息后北约故意轰炸了它”
根据欧洲和美国的高级军事情和情报部分的说法，在北约电子侦听到中国大使馆向Milosevic武装力量发送信息后，它才被作为攻击目标

-------------译者：迷了路的人-审核者：寒灯独夜人------------

A NATO flight control officer in Naples also confirmed to us that a map of ‘non-targets’: churches, hospitals and embassies, including the Chinese, did exist. On this ‘don’t hit’ map, the Chinese embassy was correctly located at its current site, and not where it had been until 1996 - as claimed by the US and NATO." [7]

一位在那不勒斯的飞行控制人员向我们证实“非攻击目标”地图确实存在教堂、医院、大使馆，包括中国的。在这份“非军事打击”地图上，中国大使馆正确的坐落在它现在的位置上，而不是美国和北约声称的1996年以前的位置。

If, however, the NATO gang does have such a "non-target" list as earlier cited, then why did they bomb so many hospitals, rest homes, churches, schools and other civilian sites? A historic study of NATO-inflicted terror establishes beyond doubt its criminal contempt for civilians wherever its military apparatus is unleashed against the world. On the same day that the Chinese embassy was struck NATO bombers also struck Nis, the third largest city in Yugoslavia, bombing a hospital and an outdoor market filled with civilians, "killing 15 people and wounding 70."

如果是这样，然而，北约群体确实有早期使用的这样一个“非攻击目标”名单，那么为什么他们轰炸如此多的医院，疗养院，教堂，学校和其他一些民用场所？一个关于北约施加的恐怖行动的历史研究表明了毋庸置疑的其对任何北约军事行动所到之处的平民的犯罪行为。在北约轰炸中国驻南联盟大使馆的同一天，他们还轰炸了南斯拉夫第三大城市的一个充斥着平民的医院和户外市场，造成15人死亡70人受伤

-------------译者：迷了路的人-审核者：寒灯独夜人------------



The magnitude of a cluster bomb by the city of Nis, 1999

1999年南联盟城市被狂轰滥炸

Journalists were taken to Nis, an industrial city 195 kilometres southeast of Belgrade, to view the devastation from the cluster-bomb attack, which hit a market and a hospital complex...Buildings were pockmarked from the bombs, which release explosives that then explode again [releasing smaller bomblets that fan out to kill over a wide radius, scattering the explosives indiscriminately and turning the bombing ground into a monstrous killing field]. [8]

新闻工作者被带到贝尔格莱德东南方195公里的一个工业城市去观看轰炸造成的毁坏，一个集市场和医院于一身的建筑被袭击，建筑被炸出缺口，那些被发射的爆炸物再次爆炸【投放的小炸弹发散开对更大半径的区域造成毁坏，散射的爆炸物不加选择的有更加巨大的杀伤区域

After a lengthy study of the embassy bombing, I find theObserver account of why NATO struck the embassy to be lacking in authenticity. Why would the Chinese pass communications from the capital to Yugoslav troops in the field? What would they gain from so doing? I believe there is a more credible explanation.

在对于轰炸使馆更深层次研究后，我发现《观察者》对于北约轰炸大使馆的理由缺乏真实性。为什么中国人从首都传递信息到南斯拉夫人的军队？他们从中得到了什么？我相信这其中有更令人相信的解释

-------------译者：迷了路的人-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

The actual reason for the bombing was meant to cover-up NATO war crimes that were taking place almost daily, and the Chinese listening post located in the corner of the embassy that was bombed were intercepting orders issued by NATO which clearly revealed those crimes. The Chinese needed to be silenced and their operations ended, no matter the fallout. Take, for instance, that refugee column of Kosovo Albanians exiting the region on tractors and horse-carriages. The column that the US and NATO bombed, killing dozens. As the Toronto Globe and Mail reports:
Last Wednesday, Yugoslav authorities said NATO planes had killed more than 60 Kosovo Albanians in an attack on a refugee column. A road strewn with refugee bodies was shown on Serbian television and foreign journalists were escorted to the site to film the carnage.

对中国大使馆的轰炸其实是为了掩盖当时北约军队的日常战争罪行。中国的情报站就位于这座大使馆的角落里，用来截获北约下达的命令，这无疑会使北约的罪行得到暴露。无论有什么后果必须终止中国人的行为并且让其保持沉默，举个例子美国和北约轰炸很多正在逃离该地区的科索沃阿尔巴尼亚人难民并造成死亡。正如《多伦多环球邮报》报道：
上个周三，南斯拉夫官方声称超过60名科索沃阿尔巴尼亚人在北约飞机的空袭中丧生。塞尔维亚电视台的画面上出现了一条躺满难民尸体的道路，外国记者被送去拍摄这个大屠杀场面。

-------------译者：迷了路的人-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

Serb television last night revealed extracts of what it called a taped conversation of a NATO pilot being ordered to attack a civilian convoy in Kosovo last week despite seeing only cars and tractors. It said the conversation was between the pilot and an early warning radar plane [AWACS]. The extract covered the critical moment when the pilot identified the convoy. Asked if there were any tanks in the convoy, he said he could see only cars and tractors. But the other plane responds "This is a military target, a completely legitimate military target. Destroy the target..." [9].
That, I believe, is why the listening post was destroyed. The ability to intercept NATO communications was far more damaging to NATO’s credibility than any other purported reason. AWACS radar planes guide all NATO bombing runs and the ability to record those communications presents a serious predicament to the war criminals busily attacking those non-targets: hospitals, churches, markets, bridges, industry, TV stations, and virtually every target imaginable.

塞尔维亚电视台昨晚公布了北约飞行员接受命令对只有汽车和拖拉机的平民车队进行轰炸的录音谈话内容。是飞行员和预警雷达飞机之间的对话。当被问及车队中有没有坦克时，回答是只有汽车和拖拉机，这充分说明飞行员明确知道那只是一支平民车队。但是另外那架飞机却称”他们是作战部队，一个全副武装有战争能力的军队，摧毁他们。。。”
我相信，这就是中国大使馆的情报中心被摧毁的原因所在了，有能力截获北约的通信这对北约的公信力来说影响是最大的。机载空中警报控制系统(AWACS)引导北约的所有轰炸，有能力截获这些通讯信息对他们是一个极大的威胁，因为这些北约战犯总是袭击非军事目标：医院，教堂，市场，桥梁，工厂，电视台几乎所有的目标。

-------------译者：wszpwsren-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

The Chinese, humbled due to their inability to respond, would pay attention and realize that the US and its satrap partners were giving notice that China was a paper tiger without substance, and that they were on the future chopping block of the imperialist aggressors. This, I believe, is when they began to seriously devote larger portions of the budget to develop their military forces. It was, Chinese analysts decided, a wake-up call whereby they realized the need for a far greater responsiveness, surely understanding that without a more effective military, their economy and sovereignty would suffer an attack that might even include nuclear weapons.
With Obama’s shift to the Pacific, I believe it’s only a matter of time!

因无力而谦卑中国看到了这一点，发现美国及其盟友正在发出信号以显示中国是一个没有实力的纸老虎，未来，帝国主义侵略者将是刀俎，中国将为鱼肉。我相信，正是从这个时候开始中国开始认真发展自己的军事实力。中国分析家认为，警钟已被敲响，中国需要获得一个更加强大的回应能力，他们明白，没有强大有力的军事，他们的经济和主权可能会受到打击，甚至是核威胁。
随着奥巴马的意图转向太平洋，我相信这只是时间问题。

Robert S. Rodvik