超级军网最有效医疗保健系统 中国香港第1 大马18 中国37 美国46
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/04/29 14:57:48
最有效医疗保健系统 大马排名18
Aug 2013 17:11
（吉隆坡29日讯）马来西亚在最有效医疗保健系统的国家中，全球排名第18位。
《新海峡时报》引述彭博社调查说，马来西亚是基于平均医疗保健费用比较低，人民寿命却比较长缘故，而排名第18位，在法国、泰国及美国之前。
调查显示，我国在众多国家中，人均寿命为74.3岁，而人民平均医疗保健费用更是整个亚洲国家中，排名第3低的国家，即是346美元（约1154令吉）。
调查也显示，在接受这项调查的亚洲国家中，我国排名第6，共获得52.8分；香港（92.6分）踞首，其次是新加坡、日本、澳洲及韩国。有关报告也显示，儘管瑞士排名第9，但人民平均医疗保健费用则是9121美元（约3万259令吉）而冠全球。
这项调查针对48个国家3项基本标准，即是有关国家人民寿命、人民平均用医疗保健费用及人民平均的医疗保健绝对成本（预防和治疗保健服务、生育计划及营养计划等），由世界银行、国际货币基金组织（IMF）及世界卫生组织负责收录调查结果。
http://www.chinapress.com.my/node/452981
马来西亚中国报
最有效医疗保健系统 大马排名18
Aug 2013 17:11
（吉隆坡29日讯）马来西亚在最有效医疗保健系统的国家中，全球排名第18位。
《新海峡时报》引述彭博社调查说，马来西亚是基于平均医疗保健费用比较低，人民寿命却比较长缘故，而排名第18位，在法国、泰国及美国之前。
调查显示，我国在众多国家中，人均寿命为74.3岁，而人民平均医疗保健费用更是整个亚洲国家中，排名第3低的国家，即是346美元（约1154令吉）。
调查也显示，在接受这项调查的亚洲国家中，我国排名第6，共获得52.8分；香港（92.6分）踞首，其次是新加坡、日本、澳洲及韩国。有关报告也显示，儘管瑞士排名第9，但人民平均医疗保健费用则是9121美元（约3万259令吉）而冠全球。
这项调查针对48个国家3项基本标准，即是有关国家人民寿命、人民平均用医疗保健费用及人民平均的医疗保健绝对成本（预防和治疗保健服务、生育计划及营养计划等），由世界银行、国际货币基金组织（IMF）及世界卫生组织负责收录调查结果。
http://www.chinapress.com.my/node/452981
马来西亚中国报
世界上最高效的医疗保健系统
赫芬顿邮报 |卡维塔戴维森| 发布时间： 13年8月29日
在彭博社的研究之中，48个国家在医疗保健的效率，美国排名第46 ，只比塞尔维亚和巴西好。美国排名甚至不如中国，阿尔及利亚和伊朗。
但是，更震撼人心的是花钱的数字：美国居第二医疗保健成本每人均（ 8608美元） ，只被瑞士（ 9121美元）超过。此外，美国医疗成本相对于国内生产总值的17.2 ％ 。
换句话说，世界上最富有的国家花费更多的钱在医疗保健，同时比几乎所有其他国家的回报更少。
那么美国可以从其他国家高效的医疗保健学习些什么？不出所料，高效的医疗护理没有一个固定的成功公式。彭博社的名单上高效的系统有各类型国家和形式。共同的因素是政府的严密控制医疗系统。世界最有效的医疗保健系统前三位是：香港，新加坡和日本。
日本在彭博社的名单上排名第三，採用强制性全民医疗，费用由雇主和雇员所付出的工资税支付。日本並且统一了药物和医疗程序収费率，从而消除了保险和供应商之间的竞争。虽然大多数国家的医院是私人拥有和经营，政府立法，以确保该系统仍然普遍和平等。
排名第二的新加坡的医疗保健体系主要是由个人出资，并经常被保守派喻为个人责任的一盏明灯。但是，该系统实际上是由公共部门的无形之手在推动，强迫储蓄要求毎个人根据年龄都必须缴交百分比的月薪，为支付治疗和医院費支出设立个人基金。此外，政府提供的安全网，以弥补一些个人储蓄不足的开支。私人医疗保健仅在新加坡的体系中扮演一个补助的角色。
尽管有些人认为香港在世界上最自由的经济体系，排名第一的香港的全民医疗系统涉及大量的政府参与，卫生部长称公共医疗是医疗系统的“基石”。90％的住院手续是在公立医院，富人大多采用私人医疗。
所有这一切护理费都没有让人肉疼，据彭博社报道，香港人均医疗保健花费只是国内生产总值的3.8 ％ ，在调查国中并列倒数第三。
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/20 ... care_n_3825477.html
赫芬顿邮报
The Most Efficient Healthcare Systems In The World (INFOGRAPHICS)
The Huffington Post | By Kavitha A. Davidson | Posted: 08/29/13 EDT | Updated: 08/30/13 EDT
It's remarkable how low America places in healthcare efficiency: among the 48 countries included in the Bloomberg study, the U.S. ranks 46th, outpacing just Serbia and Brazil. Once that sinks in, try this one on for size: the U.S. ranks worse than China, Algeria, and Iran.
But the sheer numbers are really what's humbling about this list: the U.S. ranks second in healthcare cost per capita ($8,608), only to be outspent by Switzerland ($9,121) -- which, for the record, boasts a top-10 healthcare system in terms of efficiency. Furthermore, the U.S. is tops in terms of healthcare cost relative to GDP, with 17.2 percent of the country's wealth spent on medical care for every American.
In other words, the world's richest country spends more of its money on healthcare while getting less than almost every other nation in return.
It's important to note that this data doesn't necessarily reflect the best healthcare in the world; it is simply a measure of overall quality as a function of cost. Bloomberg explains its methodology as such:
Each country was ranked on three criteria: life expectancy (weighted 60%), relative per capita cost of health care (30%); and absolute per capita cost of health care (10%). Countries were scored on each criterion and the scores were weighted and summed to obtain their efficiency scores. Relative cost is health cost per capita as a percentage of GDP per capita. Absolute cost is total health expenditure, which covers preventive and curative health services, family planning, nutrition activities and emergency aid. Included were countries with populations of at least five million, GDP per capita of at least $5,000 and life expectancy of at least 70 years.
So what can the U.S. learn from the many countries that get more bang for their healthcare buck? Unsurprisingly, there is no one formula for success when it comes to efficient medical care. The systems that rank highly on Bloomberg's list are as diverse as the nations to which they belong. The unifying factor seems to be tight government control over a universal system, which may take many shapes and forms -- a fact evident in the top-three most efficient healthcare systems in the world: Hong Kong, Singapore, and Japan.
Ranking third on Bloomberg's list, the Japanese system involves universal healthcare with mandatory participation funded by payroll taxes paid by both employer and employee, or income-based premiums by the self-employed. Long-term care insurance is also required for those older than 40. As Dr. John W. Traphagan notes in The Diplomat, Japan controls costs by setting flat rates for everything from medications to procedures, thus eliminating competition among insurance providers. While most of the country's hospitals are privately owned and operated, the government implements smart regulations to ensure that the system remains universal and egalitarian.
Meanwhile, Singapore's healthcare system is largely funded by individual contributions, and is often hailed by conservatives as a beacon of personal responsibility. But as conservative David Frum notes, the system is actually fueled by the invisible hand of the public sector: individuals are required to contribute a percentage of their monthly salary based on age to a personal fund to pay for treatments and hospital expenditures. In addition, the government provides a safety net to cover expenses for which these personal savings are inadequate. Private healthcare still plays a role in Singapore's system, but takes a backseat to public offerings, which boast the majority of doctors, nurses, and procedures performed.
Despite being considered by some as having the freest economy in the world, Hong Kong's universal healthcare system involves heavy government participation; its own health secretary calls public medicine the "cornerstone" of the system. Public hospitals account for 90 percent of in-patient procedures, while the numerous private options are mostly used by the wealthy.
All this government care isn't taking much of a bite out of the state's bustling economy: According to Bloomberg, Hong Kong spends just 3.8 percent of GDP on healthcare per capita, tied for the third-lowest among nations surveyed and good for the most efficient healthcare system in the world.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/20 ... care_n_3825477.html
赫芬顿邮报
赫芬顿邮报 |卡维塔戴维森| 发布时间： 13年8月29日
在彭博社的研究之中，48个国家在医疗保健的效率，美国排名第46 ，只比塞尔维亚和巴西好。美国排名甚至不如中国，阿尔及利亚和伊朗。
但是，更震撼人心的是花钱的数字：美国居第二医疗保健成本每人均（ 8608美元） ，只被瑞士（ 9121美元）超过。此外，美国医疗成本相对于国内生产总值的17.2 ％ 。
换句话说，世界上最富有的国家花费更多的钱在医疗保健，同时比几乎所有其他国家的回报更少。
那么美国可以从其他国家高效的医疗保健学习些什么？不出所料，高效的医疗护理没有一个固定的成功公式。彭博社的名单上高效的系统有各类型国家和形式。共同的因素是政府的严密控制医疗系统。世界最有效的医疗保健系统前三位是：香港，新加坡和日本。
日本在彭博社的名单上排名第三，採用强制性全民医疗，费用由雇主和雇员所付出的工资税支付。日本並且统一了药物和医疗程序収费率，从而消除了保险和供应商之间的竞争。虽然大多数国家的医院是私人拥有和经营，政府立法，以确保该系统仍然普遍和平等。
排名第二的新加坡的医疗保健体系主要是由个人出资，并经常被保守派喻为个人责任的一盏明灯。但是，该系统实际上是由公共部门的无形之手在推动，强迫储蓄要求毎个人根据年龄都必须缴交百分比的月薪，为支付治疗和医院費支出设立个人基金。此外，政府提供的安全网，以弥补一些个人储蓄不足的开支。私人医疗保健仅在新加坡的体系中扮演一个补助的角色。
尽管有些人认为香港在世界上最自由的经济体系，排名第一的香港的全民医疗系统涉及大量的政府参与，卫生部长称公共医疗是医疗系统的“基石”。90％的住院手续是在公立医院，富人大多采用私人医疗。
所有这一切护理费都没有让人肉疼，据彭博社报道，香港人均医疗保健花费只是国内生产总值的3.8 ％ ，在调查国中并列倒数第三。
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/20 ... care_n_3825477.html
赫芬顿邮报
The Most Efficient Healthcare Systems In The World (INFOGRAPHICS)
The Huffington Post | By Kavitha A. Davidson | Posted: 08/29/13 EDT | Updated: 08/30/13 EDT
It's remarkable how low America places in healthcare efficiency: among the 48 countries included in the Bloomberg study, the U.S. ranks 46th, outpacing just Serbia and Brazil. Once that sinks in, try this one on for size: the U.S. ranks worse than China, Algeria, and Iran.
But the sheer numbers are really what's humbling about this list: the U.S. ranks second in healthcare cost per capita ($8,608), only to be outspent by Switzerland ($9,121) -- which, for the record, boasts a top-10 healthcare system in terms of efficiency. Furthermore, the U.S. is tops in terms of healthcare cost relative to GDP, with 17.2 percent of the country's wealth spent on medical care for every American.
In other words, the world's richest country spends more of its money on healthcare while getting less than almost every other nation in return.
It's important to note that this data doesn't necessarily reflect the best healthcare in the world; it is simply a measure of overall quality as a function of cost. Bloomberg explains its methodology as such:
Each country was ranked on three criteria: life expectancy (weighted 60%), relative per capita cost of health care (30%); and absolute per capita cost of health care (10%). Countries were scored on each criterion and the scores were weighted and summed to obtain their efficiency scores. Relative cost is health cost per capita as a percentage of GDP per capita. Absolute cost is total health expenditure, which covers preventive and curative health services, family planning, nutrition activities and emergency aid. Included were countries with populations of at least five million, GDP per capita of at least $5,000 and life expectancy of at least 70 years.
So what can the U.S. learn from the many countries that get more bang for their healthcare buck? Unsurprisingly, there is no one formula for success when it comes to efficient medical care. The systems that rank highly on Bloomberg's list are as diverse as the nations to which they belong. The unifying factor seems to be tight government control over a universal system, which may take many shapes and forms -- a fact evident in the top-three most efficient healthcare systems in the world: Hong Kong, Singapore, and Japan.
Ranking third on Bloomberg's list, the Japanese system involves universal healthcare with mandatory participation funded by payroll taxes paid by both employer and employee, or income-based premiums by the self-employed. Long-term care insurance is also required for those older than 40. As Dr. John W. Traphagan notes in The Diplomat, Japan controls costs by setting flat rates for everything from medications to procedures, thus eliminating competition among insurance providers. While most of the country's hospitals are privately owned and operated, the government implements smart regulations to ensure that the system remains universal and egalitarian.
Meanwhile, Singapore's healthcare system is largely funded by individual contributions, and is often hailed by conservatives as a beacon of personal responsibility. But as conservative David Frum notes, the system is actually fueled by the invisible hand of the public sector: individuals are required to contribute a percentage of their monthly salary based on age to a personal fund to pay for treatments and hospital expenditures. In addition, the government provides a safety net to cover expenses for which these personal savings are inadequate. Private healthcare still plays a role in Singapore's system, but takes a backseat to public offerings, which boast the majority of doctors, nurses, and procedures performed.
Despite being considered by some as having the freest economy in the world, Hong Kong's universal healthcare system involves heavy government participation; its own health secretary calls public medicine the "cornerstone" of the system. Public hospitals account for 90 percent of in-patient procedures, while the numerous private options are mostly used by the wealthy.
All this government care isn't taking much of a bite out of the state's bustling economy: According to Bloomberg, Hong Kong spends just 3.8 percent of GDP on healthcare per capita, tied for the third-lowest among nations surveyed and good for the most efficient healthcare system in the world.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/20 ... care_n_3825477.html
赫芬顿邮报
世界上最高效的医疗保健系统排名:
1中国香港
2新加坡
3日本
4以色列
5西班牙
6意大利
7澳大利亚
8韩国
9瑞士
10瑞典
11利比亚
12阿拉伯联合酋长国
13智利
14英国
15墨西哥
16奥地利
17加拿大
18马来西亚
19法国
20厄瓜多尔
21波兰
22泰国
23芬兰
24捷克共和国
25荷兰
26委内瑞拉
27葡萄牙
28古巴
29沙特阿拉伯
30德国
30希腊
32阿根廷
33罗马尼亚
34比利时
35秘鲁
36斯洛伐克
37中国
38丹麦
38匈牙利
40阿尔及利亚
41保加利亚
42哥伦比亚
43多米尼加
44土耳其
45伊朗
46美国
47塞尔维亚
48巴西
http://www.bloomberg.com/visual- ... alth-care-countries
.
1中国香港
2新加坡
3日本
4以色列
5西班牙
6意大利
7澳大利亚
8韩国
9瑞士
10瑞典
11利比亚
12阿拉伯联合酋长国
13智利
14英国
15墨西哥
16奥地利
17加拿大
18马来西亚
19法国
20厄瓜多尔
21波兰
22泰国
23芬兰
24捷克共和国
25荷兰
26委内瑞拉
27葡萄牙
28古巴
29沙特阿拉伯
30德国
30希腊
32阿根廷
33罗马尼亚
34比利时
35秘鲁
36斯洛伐克
37中国
38丹麦
38匈牙利
40阿尔及利亚
41保加利亚
42哥伦比亚
43多米尼加
44土耳其
45伊朗
46美国
47塞尔维亚
48巴西
http://www.bloomberg.com/visual- ... alth-care-countries
.
考虑到投入产出比，中国的医疗体系的效率恐怕是全世界最高的之一。
考虑到投入产出比，中国的医疗体系的效率恐怕是全世界最高的之一。
不用之一了，就是最高的。世界上还有哪个国家的医生有中国这么听话这么老实？
不用之一了，就是最高的。世界上还有哪个国家的医生有中国这么听话这么老实？
温相十年俺就觉得只有这医保可以算是个亮点，得了不少人心
虽然说是温相快下来了才搞得。。。
虽然说是温相快下来了才搞得。。。
美爹你肿末了啊肿末了
没有俄罗斯，毛子如果参加调查 ，排名应该也不会低吧。利比亚现在这个状况还能排第11位，有点难以置信
没有俄罗斯，毛子如果参加调查 ，排名应该也不会低吧。利比亚现在这个状况还能排第11位，有点难以置信
中国的医疗体系的效率恐怕是全世界最高的！无论投入还是产出，当人均不能比了。谁有中国的人口，谁都头疼。
上次听别人讲古巴的医疗体系相当好啊
香港变成灯塔了？
duanjichenggong 发表于 2013-8-31 13:42
中国的医疗体系的效率恐怕是全世界最高的！无论投入还是产出，当人均不能比了。谁有中国的人口，谁都头疼。
美国有一个最头疼的大型医疗设备病院等待诊断的排队，
在中国前一个人还没系上裤子，后一个患者就把裤子撸下了。效率高。在中国根本不是问题。
这事儿麻烦，讽美国就得顶香港，踩香港就得捞美国，不好办。
中国的医疗体系的效率恐怕是全世界最高的！无论投入还是产出，当人均不能比了。谁有中国的人口，谁都头疼。
美国有一个最头疼的大型医疗设备病院等待诊断的排队，
在中国前一个人还没系上裤子，后一个患者就把裤子撸下了。效率高。在中国根本不是问题。
这事儿麻烦，讽美国就得顶香港，踩香港就得捞美国，不好办。
不用之一了，就是最高的。世界上还有哪个国家的医生有中国这么听话这么老实？
作为医生，出来大哭三声！！！
作为医生，出来大哭三声！！！