美军关岛的三个主要防御弹道导弹能力

狗大户，灭狗窝真不易

。。。lz这种帖子很有特色。。   绘声绘色。。


虽然说在cd md的导弹拦截系统都是烧火棍

。。。lz这种帖子很有特色。。   绘声绘色。。


虽然说在cd md的导弹拦截系统都是烧火棍

为了测试md的拦截能力，土鳖愿意免费赠送党费一枚

chikeshin 发表于 2013-3-30 01:53
为了测试md的拦截能力，土鳖愿意免费赠送党费一枚
这样吧，送两枚，第一枚载电磁脉冲弹头；让那些个监控的雷达吃个饱
间隔2分钟后，第二枚才是真正打击的弹头。

你的nnemp是通过什么技术实现的？

大小企鹅 发表于 2013-3-30 02:05
这样吧，送两枚，第一枚载电磁脉冲弹头；让那些个监控的雷达吃个饱
间隔2分钟后，第二枚才是真正打击的弹 ...
你的emp是通过什么技术实现的？

氢弹？
还是nnemp？

如果是nnemp， 这个又是什么技术实现的？ 不用跟我扯什么保密，这真是诺奖级别的新技术啊

无害小白 发表于 2013-3-30 02:10
你的emp是通过什么技术实现的？

氢弹？

你去看看卫士-2还有神鹰400的EMP弹头再来扯
非核EMP不是没有，只是影响范围小而已

大小企鹅 发表于 2013-3-30 02:05
这样吧，送两枚，第一枚载电磁脉冲弹头；让那些个监控的雷达吃个饱
间隔2分钟后，第二枚才是真正打击的弹 ...
你根本不了解电磁脉冲战斗部是不合适用弹道导弹装载的

这个根本性问题早已在美军测试过

任何靠爆炸的战斗部也不能产生闪电的能量更没有持续性和可控性

关于电磁脉冲战斗部只能使用飞航式系统将高能良转换发送

风雪飘 发表于 2013-3-30 02:18
你根本不了解电磁脉冲战斗部是不合适用弹道导弹装载的

这个根本性问题早已在美军测试过
这么说你很了解？
你还是去兔吧爬爬楼吧，关于EMP专门有帖子介绍的
别在这里装神弄鬼了。

First of all, the emp weapons have never been used in real conflict.

If you want to generate a strong enough emp which could destroy some electronic devices, you need a big enough nuclear bomb, and explode it in high enough attitude.

There actually exist some nnemp technologies, but the power and range of nnemp are severely limited,Mostly within 1 feet.

The nnemp with massive damage will not be applicable for long times. Generating massive power with non nuclear way such as chemical reaction or high performence battery(yes, batteries mostly also are some chemical reaction)  in short period actually is a high technology and still been researching. A lot of scientists are focus on this site.

大小企鹅 发表于 2013-3-30 02:14
你去看看卫士-2还有神鹰400的EMP弹头再来扯
非核EMP不是没有，只是影响范围小而已

First of all, the emp weapons have never been used in real conflict.

If you want to generate a strong enough emp which could destroy some electronic devices, you need a big enough nuclear bomb, and explode it in high enough attitude.

There actually exist some nnemp technologies, but the power and range of nnemp are severely limited,Mostly within 1 feet.

The nnemp with massive damage will not be applicable for long times. Generating massive power with non nuclear way such as chemical reaction or high performence battery(yes, batteries mostly also are some chemical reaction)  in short period actually is a high technology and still been researching. A lot of scientists are focus on this site.

2013-3-30 02:30 上传

电磁脉冲要系统发射基点

要靠爆炸能量产生现阶段还没战斗部能形成类似闪电的强大能量还要持续性则更没可能

风雪飘 发表于 2013-3-30 02:31
你连基本常识也也没有

关于电磁武器也就是闪电武器,在白沙试验场美国作了多次测试
哦，原来EMP就是闪电武器啊;P
你继续哦，大神:D

2013-3-30 02:32 上传

携带电子作战吊仓使用也可以是因为能量产生电磁压制信号有限

所以要机动系统不断向目标区实施机动发射电磁干扰信号,这要发射源

靠爆炸产生强大能量达到闪电级别也可可以产生电磁压制,但由于扩散得快能量迅速衰弱而且空阔范围即使闪电一样的爆炸也未必能对目标实施破坏

所以电磁武器现阶段还是已能量转换的发射源对目标区目标进行压制和摧毁

无害小白 发表于 2013-3-30 02:26
First of all, the emp weapons have never been used in real conflict.

If you want to generate  ...
怎么中文说不流利了？接着装啊
你如果连啥叫攻击范围都弄不懂，还来军网混什么？
核弹产生的EMP有效半径几十上百公里，对付一个小岛上的雷达站不是杀鸡用牛刀吗？
你美爹前阵子刚刚试验了一种EMP，可以让一幢大楼里的电脑全部瘫痪，按你说的Mostly within 1
feet， 你爹的大楼都是火柴盒大小吗？:D

2013-3-30 02:38 上传

新一代航母我们将实现一些高能量武器

电磁炮的能量非常强大,现阶段还没有靠爆炸产生这样的战斗部

Here is not a good place to teach or learn.

Most of people here do not have the basic background knowledge to talk about these kind of professional problems.

But here actually not an academic bbs, so it's not a problem. You can adjust your mind to just want to see what funny things going on here.

You can try to teach them, but whether they agree or not with you are not your problem, and you should not worry about that. Some one who wants to learn will learn from your comments naturally.

Don't be angry, just try to be peace and calm.

风雪飘 发表于 2013-3-30 02:31
你连基本常识也也没有

关于电磁武器也就是闪电武器,在白沙试验场美国作了多次测试

Here is not a good place to teach or learn.

Most of people here do not have the basic background knowledge to talk about these kind of professional problems.

But here actually not an academic bbs, so it's not a problem. You can adjust your mind to just want to see what funny things going on here.

You can try to teach them, but whether they agree or not with you are not your problem, and you should not worry about that. Some one who wants to learn will learn from your comments naturally.

Don't be angry, just try to be peace and calm.

核弹产生的有限电磁干扰只要作防护就可以突破

轰炸机就可以进入核爆心进行测试并发送和接收信号

整个高能弹展示资料都看过

只不过是飞航式系统发射高能信号瘫痪目标

这也不是大范围高爆电磁脉冲战斗部,只是飞到那个位置干扰那个位置的类型弹体不不引爆的

只是发送高能脉冲瘫痪所在位置目标

这款导弹也要在一定制空权范围才能用

对远程目标不能瘫痪,要多套巡航使用

大小企鹅 发表于 2013-3-30 02:38
怎么中文说不流利了？接着装啊
你如果连啥叫攻击范围都弄不懂，还来军网混什么？
核弹产生的EMP ...

核弹产生的有限电磁干扰只要作防护就可以突破

轰炸机就可以进入核爆心进行测试并发送和接收信号

整个高能弹展示资料都看过

只不过是飞航式系统发射高能信号瘫痪目标

这也不是大范围高爆电磁脉冲战斗部,只是飞到那个位置干扰那个位置的类型弹体不不引爆的

只是发送高能脉冲瘫痪所在位置目标

这款导弹也要在一定制空权范围才能用

对远程目标不能瘫痪,要多套巡航使用

风雪飘 发表于 2013-3-30 02:39
哈哈哈,你不要来这些YY的,这儿一大群军盲

产生闪电而非闪电武器,EMP是各基于概念
又开始扯电磁炮了是不是？
我劝你还是先去学学中文在来这边混吧，
机翻的中文让人看了想吐

怎么中文说不流利了？接着装啊
你如果连啥叫攻击范围都弄不懂，还来军网混什么？
核弹产生的EMP ...
I don't know there was an experimental like what you said.

But the things you said is kind of easy. I just need to shut down the power of the building and that's it. You can do that by yourself if you really want.

风雪飘 发表于 2013-3-30 02:40
核弹产生的有限电磁干扰只要作防护就可以突破

轰炸机就可以进入核爆心进行测试并发送和接收信号
你连核爆的那个阶段才会形成EMP都不清楚，就敢来装大神:D
产生电磁脉冲的阶段，你让轰炸机进爆心看看

无害小白 发表于 2013-3-30 02:44
I don't know there was an experimental like what you said.

But the things you said is kind of e ...
你连你爹做过什么你都不知道，还敢来这边吹，真佩服你的勇气啊;P
原来你爹是通过关掉大楼电源来达到摧毁电脑设备的

哦，原来EMP就是闪电武器啊
你继续哦，大神

Actually the emp weapons you described, is running with the same theory as how a light destroy an electronic device.

The propose is make the current overflow the maximum range that the electronic could afford. Maybe you know the current could be generate by induction, actually the generator using the same way to generate the power. If you can generate a strong enough electronic wave, and when this wave go through something like a coil in the electronic devices, the current generate by this coil could destroy some elements in this circuit. That's how emp working.

But sadly, even the emp effect of a nuclear bomb, is still a minor effection.

无害小白 发表于 2013-3-30 02:44
I don't know there was an experimental like what you said.

But the things you said is kind of e ...
求您了，就您这个英文水平，咱还是来中文吧。

无害小白 发表于 2013-3-30 02:54
Actually the emp weapons you described, is running with the same theory as how a light destroy a ...
你真是人如其名啊，让度娘来告诉你吧。

EMP-（electromagnetic pulses）电磁脉冲由核爆炸和非核电磁脉冲弹（高功率微波弹）爆炸而产生。核爆炸产生的电磁脉冲称为核电磁脉冲，任何在地面以上爆炸的核武器都会产生电磁脉冲，能量大约占核爆炸总能量的百万分之一，频率从几百赫到几兆赫。非核电磁脉冲弹则利用炸药爆炸或化学燃料燃烧产生的能量，通过微波器件转换成高功率微波辐射能，能发射峰值功率在吉瓦以上、频率为1吉赫～300吉赫的脉冲微波束，在裸露的导电体（例如裸露的电线、印刷电路板的印制线）上急剧产生数千伏的瞬变电压，对大量电子设备造成无法挽回的损坏。

你真是人如其名啊，让度娘来告诉你吧。

EMP-（electromagnetic pulses）电磁脉冲由核爆炸和非核电磁脉 ...
That's exactly what I said.

The problem is generating a electronic wave as strong as you want with non nuclear ways is still a mission impossible.

哈哈哈哈！那个“无害小白”的ID连续几个帖子都没能说得过大家，现在终于被逼得开始打满屏英语来逃避了？真是太好笑了，哈哈哈哈！

无害小白 发表于 2013-3-30 03:02
That's exactly what I said.

The problem is generating a electronic wave as strong as you want  ...
你也太高估你的智商了吧
非核EMP弹各国都研制多年了，谁还不知道谁？你去和美爹说无效吧
你才要好好被科普一下，EMP产生的并不是炸弹样的冲击波，而是锥形微波束，只要把目标纳入这个微波束内即可，以现在的导弹精度，飞行末端测距并引爆，是轻而易举的事情。

大小企鹅 发表于 2013-3-30 03:15
你也太高估你的智商了吧
非核EMP弹各国都研制多年了，谁还不知道谁？你去和美爹说无效吧
你才要好好被科 ...
你说的专业词汇我全部看过

你只能是那种想YY的军盲

就算美国也不能实现直接爆炸产生电磁压制的战斗部,采用的是能量基点释放完成

你说的火箭弹装电磁弹你干脆说107火箭炮发射电磁战斗部呵呵

哈哈哈哈！那个“无害小白”的ID连续几个帖子都没能说得过大家，现在终于被逼得开始打满屏英语来逃避了？真 ...
I cannot type Chinese on this computer

风雪飘 发表于 2013-3-30 03:20
你说的专业词汇我全部看过

你只能是那种想YY的军盲
嗯，嗯，
你美爹不能实现的事情，我们就不能实现了是不是？
你美爹的娘娘身上发射格斗弹还需要开着弹仓呢，我们的丝带姬呢？
107火怎么了？
人家阿富汗的农民用107火揍你美爹照样妥妥的

Yes, I'm researching things kind of close to this topic. Eventually, my propose is not destroy anything.

I said the problem is generate the electronic wave with the power like that.

And a specific amplitude electronic wave will only work on a very narrative range of circuit.

大小企鹅 发表于 2013-3-30 03:15
你也太高估你的智商了吧
非核EMP弹各国都研制多年了，谁还不知道谁？你去和美爹说无效吧
你才要好好被科 ...

Yes, I'm researching things kind of close to this topic. Eventually, my propose is not destroy anything.

I said the problem is generate the electronic wave with the power like that.

And a specific amplitude electronic wave will only work on a very narrative range of circuit.

无害小白 发表于 2013-3-30 03:26
Yes, I'm researching things kind of close to this topic. Eventually, my propose is not destroy a ...
第一，要让目标的电路产生破坏只需要微秒级别瞬间感应电位差就可以了，所需要的实际能量其实微乎其微，关键是场强的变化
第二，波束并不想你想想的这么窄
第三，你自己都是需要被科普的人，就别再CD装大神了，OK？

第一，要让目标的电路产生破坏只需要微秒级别瞬间感应电位差就可以了，所需要的实际能量其实微乎其微，关 ...
Do you know how to calculate the power delivered to a load?

大小企鹅 发表于 2013-3-30 03:31
第一，要让目标的电路产生破坏只需要微秒级别瞬间感应电位差就可以了，所需要的实际能量其实微乎其微，关 ...
索尔导弹直接用百万吨当量在外层空间强电流层引爆

也未能使美军直接观测系统受到信号破坏

不是表述核爆没有电磁干扰只是请调核爆并不合适电磁武器要求

无害小白 发表于 2013-3-30 03:37
Do you know how to calculate the power delivered to a load?
告诉你又有意义吗？你自己百度下不就可以了？

告诉你又有意义吗？你自己百度下不就可以了？
I just want to know about whether you get any background knowledge in this field.

风雪飘 发表于 2013-3-30 03:38
索尔导弹直接用百万吨当量在外层空间强电流层引爆

也未能使美军直接观测系统受到信号破坏
嗯，嗯
所以EMP都是废物，美爹这么多年的投入都是投着玩儿的

无害小白 发表于 2013-3-30 03:43
I just want to know about whether you get any background knowledge in this field.
可惜你连我都不如啊;P

告诉你又有意义吗？你自己百度下不就可以了？
I'm not talking about neither any difficult situation, nor anything about the alternative current circuit. Just the easiest expression for my question, can you express that?