纽约时报表达的对钓鱼岛的态度

来源:百度文库 编辑:超级军网 时间:2024/04/28 17:58:46
独立发一下贴

有人发文说纽约时报评论批驳假烟联大发言,NYT的一贯风格来说,我不太相信。而且Newyork Times网站是上我没有看到的,倒是看到这篇:

ww w.nytimes.com/2012/09/29/world/asia/china-alters-its-strategy-in-dispute-with-japan.html

“Notions of punishing Tokyo economically for buying the islands, whose status was left unclear after World War II, are unrealistic, said Hu Shuli, editor in chief of Caixin Media and one of China’s chief economic journalists. So many Chinese workers are employed at Japanese-owned companies, she said, that any escalation of tensions leading to a boycott of Japanese goods could lead to huge job losses.

This would be disastrous in an already shaky Chinese economy, Ms. Hu wrote in the Chinese magazine Century Weekly.

At a time when overall foreign investment in China is shrinking, Japan’s investment in China rose by 16 percent last year, Ms. Hu noted. The Japan External Trade Organization reported $12.6 billion of Japanese investment in China last year, compared with $14.7 billion in the United States.

Not just China, but all of Asia, could face a serious economic downturn if Japanese investments in China were threatened, said Piao Guangji, a researcher at the China Academy of Social Sciences.”

简单翻译:某“经济学家”说,因为倭国“购买”二战后归属不明的岛就经济制裁倭国是不可能的,因为倭寇在大陆开了很多工厂,制裁就会导致大量失业。现在西方在华投资正在减少,只有倭国的投资在增加(言下之意就是没了倭寇我们怎么活啊)。之后某“社科院烟酒员”说,假如倭国在华投资被威胁,不仅中国,整个亚洲经济都要滑坡……

总之,这才是NYT一贯的论调,说NYT批驳假烟,不管你们信不信,我是不信的
独立发一下贴

有人发文说纽约时报评论批驳假烟联大发言,NYT的一贯风格来说,我不太相信。而且Newyork Times网站是上我没有看到的,倒是看到这篇:

ww w.nytimes.com/2012/09/29/world/asia/china-alters-its-strategy-in-dispute-with-japan.html

“Notions of punishing Tokyo economically for buying the islands, whose status was left unclear after World War II, are unrealistic, said Hu Shuli, editor in chief of Caixin Media and one of China’s chief economic journalists. So many Chinese workers are employed at Japanese-owned companies, she said, that any escalation of tensions leading to a boycott of Japanese goods could lead to huge job losses.

This would be disastrous in an already shaky Chinese economy, Ms. Hu wrote in the Chinese magazine Century Weekly.

At a time when overall foreign investment in China is shrinking, Japan’s investment in China rose by 16 percent last year, Ms. Hu noted. The Japan External Trade Organization reported $12.6 billion of Japanese investment in China last year, compared with $14.7 billion in the United States.

Not just China, but all of Asia, could face a serious economic downturn if Japanese investments in China were threatened, said Piao Guangji, a researcher at the China Academy of Social Sciences.”

简单翻译:某“经济学家”说,因为倭国“购买”二战后归属不明的岛就经济制裁倭国是不可能的,因为倭寇在大陆开了很多工厂,制裁就会导致大量失业。现在西方在华投资正在减少,只有倭国的投资在增加(言下之意就是没了倭寇我们怎么活啊)。之后某“社科院烟酒员”说,假如倭国在华投资被威胁,不仅中国,整个亚洲经济都要滑坡……

总之,这才是NYT一贯的论调,说NYT批驳假烟,不管你们信不信,我是不信的
嘉宾观点不代表本台意见
文章观点不代表本报意见
不是经济学家说,是胡舒立说,财新的主编
foolhorse 发表于 2012-9-29 13:46
不是经济学家说,是胡舒立说,财新的主编
说这话的人和说的话可能并没问题,但是NYT给一转述(比如掐头去尾),这话的味道就很成问题了
强权战胜公理 一直是这样 这叫新闻强权战胜新闻公理
笔杆子掌握在别人手中,真理掌握在自己拳头中
纽约时报看过多次,也是戴着有色眼镜看中国的