菲佣威武，菲佣的带路党更威武——10L惊现will大神。。 ...

h t t p://w w w.a c f u n.tv/v/ac335989

菲律宾媒体《马尼拉标准今日报》文章：黄岩岛属于中国 (2012.4.28)

The Scarborough Shoal does belong to China which discovered it and drew it in a map as early as 1279 during the Yuan Dynasty.  Chinese fishermen, from both the Mainland and Taiwan, have since used it.  As a matter of fact, Guo Shoujing, (the Chinese astronomer, engineer and mathematician who worked under the Mongol ruler, Kublai Khan) performed surveying of the South China Sea, and the surveying point was the Scarborough Shoal which is considered part of the Zhongsha Islands (renamed Huangyan Island in 1983).
中国人在1279年就发现了斯卡伯勒并将其画入了地图。作为中沙群岛的一部分，郭守敬的南海测量点就是斯卡伯勒。

By contrast, the “old maps” being relied upon by our Department of Foreign Affairs in its spurious claim on the same territory were drawn up only in 1820, or 541 years after China’s.  I am surprised that Senator Edgardo Angara—supposedly a renowned lawyer—can claim that a map drawn 5 centuries and 4 decades after, takes precedence over the much earlier map of China.
咱们外交部所依据的地图绘于1820年，比中国人晚了541年。参议员Edgardo Angara就是个神仙，他说5个世纪零40年以后的地图比更早的地图有效力。

But I am all the more astonished that Fr. Joaquin Bernas, in his April 22 article in another newspaper,  being one of the main framers of the 1987 Constitution, uses the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea as his basis to defend the Philippine claim.  This, despite and after acknowledging the fact that, indeed, “the Scarborough Shoal is OUTSIDE THE LIMITS set by the Treaty of Paris for Philippine territory.”  What kind of double-speak is that?
1987年宪法的主要起草者Fr.Joaquin Bernas更把我雷的不轻，他把1982年的联合国海洋法公约当作向土鳖要地的依据。实际上呢，斯卡伯勒在巴黎条约上是被排除在菲律宾领土之外的。他这不是上下两张嘴吗？

So, what exactly was the territory we declared independence from the US in 1946?  Why is it that NONE of our constitutions, past and present, from 1899, 1935, 1943, 1973, 1986 and 1987, include either the Spratlys or the Scarborough Shoal within our declared national territory?  Where, or from whom, did we, all of a sudden, acquire title to these? Out of thin air?
那咱1946年从美国独立出来的时候都有些啥家底呢？为啥子咱们每一部宪法，1899年滴，1935年滴，1943年滴，1973年滴，1986滴和1987年滴都木有把斯普拉特利群岛和斯卡伯勒浅滩划进来呢？难道他们是从石头里蹦出来给咱菲律宾的？

In the late 1970s, China organized many scientific expeditions in the Shoal and around that area.  In fact, in 1980, a stone marker reading “South China Sea Scientific Expedition” was installed by China on the South Rock.  This Chinese marker was removed, without authority, by the Philippines in 1997.
70年代的时候，土鳖忽悠了很多科学家去斯卡伯勒浅滩及周边海域考察。1980年，土鳖还在那边那块礁石上树了个碑，写着‘南海科考’。1997年咱菲律宾的渔民背着官府偷偷地把碑给偷走了。

All official maps published by the Philippines until the 1990s excluded both the Spratlys and Scarborough Shoal from its territorial boundaries.  Our own Republic Act No. 3046, passed by our Congress and approved in 1961, stopped us from our claim.  Yet, we had the temerity to amend this law on March 10, 2009, after 48 long years, to unilaterally include the disputed territories.
直到90年代，咱菲律宾所有官府出版的地图上都不包括斯普拉特利和斯卡伯勒浅谈。1961年通过的咱们大菲律宾共和国法令第3046号那是块大绊脚石。但是，48年以后，2009年3月10号，咱就是把它给改了。怎么滴吧。

But what takes the cake is the fact that China holds three international treaties in support of its claim over the territories in question—namely, the 1898 Treaty of Paris between the US and Spain, the 1900 Treaty of Washington between Spain and the US, and the 1930 Treaty between Great Britain and the US, all limiting Philippine territorial limits to the 118th degree meridian of longitude east of Greenwich.
但是，世间就怕但是俩字。因为背后有仨条约，土鳖狂的很呐。1898年的美西巴黎条约，1900年的美西华盛顿公约，还有1930年的英美条约，这些帝国主义国家都把咱滴国土限制在了东经118度。

On the other hand, the basis of the Philippine claim is restricted to proximity, relying solely on the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.  As far as I know, a mere “convention” cannot overturn or supersede a treaty or an agreement reached between colonial powers.  And even if it were considered a “law”, it cannot be made to take effect retroactively.
说一千，道一万，咱菲律宾能拿的出手的就只有1982年滴联合国海洋公约。可是这玩意儿还是挡不住帝国主义国家们的背后勾当。就算有人把它当盘菜，你也不能说没吃到肚子里以前咱就已经饱了。

Whom are we fooling?
那到底是谁在忽悠谁呢？

Mr. Arches is from San Juan City.  He is a retired investment and merchant banker, a retired Certified Public Accountant, and a retired economist who loves to dabble in history and political science, among many other interests.
作者：Mr.Arches 退休滴黑心投资家和银行家，有牌滴会计，退休的经济学家，对历史和政治很感兴趣。

Everyman is Manila Standard Today’s new column for citizens’ commentary on pressing issues in the Philippines and in the world. Anybody who feels he or she has something of value to add to the discussion on the pertinent issue is encouraged to contribute.
每个人 是马尼拉标准今日报新推出的专栏，谁都能上来喷两句。我们的口号是：来喷吧，只要你乐意！

h t t p://w w w.a c f u n.tv/v/ac335989

菲律宾媒体《马尼拉标准今日报》文章：黄岩岛属于中国 (2012.4.28)

The Scarborough Shoal does belong to China which discovered it and drew it in a map as early as 1279 during the Yuan Dynasty.  Chinese fishermen, from both the Mainland and Taiwan, have since used it.  As a matter of fact, Guo Shoujing, (the Chinese astronomer, engineer and mathematician who worked under the Mongol ruler, Kublai Khan) performed surveying of the South China Sea, and the surveying point was the Scarborough Shoal which is considered part of the Zhongsha Islands (renamed Huangyan Island in 1983).
中国人在1279年就发现了斯卡伯勒并将其画入了地图。作为中沙群岛的一部分，郭守敬的南海测量点就是斯卡伯勒。

By contrast, the “old maps” being relied upon by our Department of Foreign Affairs in its spurious claim on the same territory were drawn up only in 1820, or 541 years after China’s.  I am surprised that Senator Edgardo Angara—supposedly a renowned lawyer—can claim that a map drawn 5 centuries and 4 decades after, takes precedence over the much earlier map of China.
咱们外交部所依据的地图绘于1820年，比中国人晚了541年。参议员Edgardo Angara就是个神仙，他说5个世纪零40年以后的地图比更早的地图有效力。

But I am all the more astonished that Fr. Joaquin Bernas, in his April 22 article in another newspaper,  being one of the main framers of the 1987 Constitution, uses the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea as his basis to defend the Philippine claim.  This, despite and after acknowledging the fact that, indeed, “the Scarborough Shoal is OUTSIDE THE LIMITS set by the Treaty of Paris for Philippine territory.”  What kind of double-speak is that?
1987年宪法的主要起草者Fr.Joaquin Bernas更把我雷的不轻，他把1982年的联合国海洋法公约当作向土鳖要地的依据。实际上呢，斯卡伯勒在巴黎条约上是被排除在菲律宾领土之外的。他这不是上下两张嘴吗？

So, what exactly was the territory we declared independence from the US in 1946?  Why is it that NONE of our constitutions, past and present, from 1899, 1935, 1943, 1973, 1986 and 1987, include either the Spratlys or the Scarborough Shoal within our declared national territory?  Where, or from whom, did we, all of a sudden, acquire title to these? Out of thin air?
那咱1946年从美国独立出来的时候都有些啥家底呢？为啥子咱们每一部宪法，1899年滴，1935年滴，1943年滴，1973年滴，1986滴和1987年滴都木有把斯普拉特利群岛和斯卡伯勒浅滩划进来呢？难道他们是从石头里蹦出来给咱菲律宾的？

In the late 1970s, China organized many scientific expeditions in the Shoal and around that area.  In fact, in 1980, a stone marker reading “South China Sea Scientific Expedition” was installed by China on the South Rock.  This Chinese marker was removed, without authority, by the Philippines in 1997.
70年代的时候，土鳖忽悠了很多科学家去斯卡伯勒浅滩及周边海域考察。1980年，土鳖还在那边那块礁石上树了个碑，写着‘南海科考’。1997年咱菲律宾的渔民背着官府偷偷地把碑给偷走了。

All official maps published by the Philippines until the 1990s excluded both the Spratlys and Scarborough Shoal from its territorial boundaries.  Our own Republic Act No. 3046, passed by our Congress and approved in 1961, stopped us from our claim.  Yet, we had the temerity to amend this law on March 10, 2009, after 48 long years, to unilaterally include the disputed territories.
直到90年代，咱菲律宾所有官府出版的地图上都不包括斯普拉特利和斯卡伯勒浅谈。1961年通过的咱们大菲律宾共和国法令第3046号那是块大绊脚石。但是，48年以后，2009年3月10号，咱就是把它给改了。怎么滴吧。

But what takes the cake is the fact that China holds three international treaties in support of its claim over the territories in question—namely, the 1898 Treaty of Paris between the US and Spain, the 1900 Treaty of Washington between Spain and the US, and the 1930 Treaty between Great Britain and the US, all limiting Philippine territorial limits to the 118th degree meridian of longitude east of Greenwich.
但是，世间就怕但是俩字。因为背后有仨条约，土鳖狂的很呐。1898年的美西巴黎条约，1900年的美西华盛顿公约，还有1930年的英美条约，这些帝国主义国家都把咱滴国土限制在了东经118度。

On the other hand, the basis of the Philippine claim is restricted to proximity, relying solely on the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.  As far as I know, a mere “convention” cannot overturn or supersede a treaty or an agreement reached between colonial powers.  And even if it were considered a “law”, it cannot be made to take effect retroactively.
说一千，道一万，咱菲律宾能拿的出手的就只有1982年滴联合国海洋公约。可是这玩意儿还是挡不住帝国主义国家们的背后勾当。就算有人把它当盘菜，你也不能说没吃到肚子里以前咱就已经饱了。

Whom are we fooling?
那到底是谁在忽悠谁呢？

Mr. Arches is from San Juan City.  He is a retired investment and merchant banker, a retired Certified Public Accountant, and a retired economist who loves to dabble in history and political science, among many other interests.
作者：Mr.Arches 退休滴黑心投资家和银行家，有牌滴会计，退休的经济学家，对历史和政治很感兴趣。

Everyman is Manila Standard Today’s new column for citizens’ commentary on pressing issues in the Philippines and in the world. Anybody who feels he or she has something of value to add to the discussion on the pertinent issue is encouraged to contribute.
每个人 是马尼拉标准今日报新推出的专栏，谁都能上来喷两句。我们的口号是：来喷吧，只要你乐意！