西方炒朝鲜导弹运输车来自中国 美媒:未违反制裁决议

来源:百度文库 编辑:超级军网 时间:2024/04/30 01:08:55
据4月23日出版的《环球时报》报道,美国《纽约时报》21日引述不具名“美国政府高级官员”的话称,美国政府相信中国一家企业“在不知情的情况下”向朝鲜出售了被用做导弹运输车的车架和其他零件,这不违反联合国制裁决议,但表明“中国在执行禁运方面做得不好”。

    西方媒体连日来热炒“朝鲜导弹车来自中国”,并以此指责中国违反联合国制裁朝鲜的有关决议。该美国官员称,这一消息曝光对北京来说是一件“难堪”的事,白宫将利用这个“插曲”向中国施加更大压力,要求北京“更好地执行针对朝鲜的弹道导弹及核武器技术禁运措施”。

    据报道,由于“外交上的微妙性”,这名官员不愿意透露自己的姓名。《纽约时报》称,军事分析人士仔细研究了朝鲜导弹运输车的照片后认为,朝鲜对这辆车的原始状况进行了改装,包括自行安装了导弹发射平台,还可能增加了电子设备。该官员称,美方认为中国企业只向朝鲜出售了这台运输车的车架,而不是整车,并且这桩生意也可能出于民用目的,比如将其作为采矿设备出口。因此,白宫“并不认为这一出售行为明显违反了联合国的制裁决议”。路透社称,朝鲜可能以民用目的从中国企业购买了车体,再利用皮包公司购得其他零部件,最终自己组装完成了在阅兵式上出现的导弹运输车。

http://mil.chinaiiss.com/html/20124/23/a4c260.html据4月23日出版的《环球时报》报道,美国《纽约时报》21日引述不具名“美国政府高级官员”的话称,美国政府相信中国一家企业“在不知情的情况下”向朝鲜出售了被用做导弹运输车的车架和其他零件,这不违反联合国制裁决议,但表明“中国在执行禁运方面做得不好”。

    西方媒体连日来热炒“朝鲜导弹车来自中国”,并以此指责中国违反联合国制裁朝鲜的有关决议。该美国官员称,这一消息曝光对北京来说是一件“难堪”的事,白宫将利用这个“插曲”向中国施加更大压力,要求北京“更好地执行针对朝鲜的弹道导弹及核武器技术禁运措施”。

    据报道,由于“外交上的微妙性”,这名官员不愿意透露自己的姓名。《纽约时报》称,军事分析人士仔细研究了朝鲜导弹运输车的照片后认为,朝鲜对这辆车的原始状况进行了改装,包括自行安装了导弹发射平台,还可能增加了电子设备。该官员称,美方认为中国企业只向朝鲜出售了这台运输车的车架,而不是整车,并且这桩生意也可能出于民用目的,比如将其作为采矿设备出口。因此,白宫“并不认为这一出售行为明显违反了联合国的制裁决议”。路透社称,朝鲜可能以民用目的从中国企业购买了车体,再利用皮包公司购得其他零部件,最终自己组装完成了在阅兵式上出现的导弹运输车。

http://mil.chinaiiss.com/html/20124/23/a4c260.html
奥黑看到导弹车花动机部件产地时, 脸比平时黑了不少
别有用心
观海同志心说:这是D ang的考验,天大压力我也得顶下去!
这种流氓相互洗地的事情最欢乐了
卡上校的核中文材料,呵呵
话说,昨日在飞机上看了个《淮海商报》新商界,上边说,50(或者60、80年代)tg的一架轰炸机迷路了,把国军乐得要开火,结果,来了几架美帝飞机护航,直接给护送到大陆去了,把国军给气的。。。。。。大流氓呀
连借口和说辞美帝都替TG想好了。。。。
中美是大国,在朝鲜半岛有关问题上保持一致将有利于半岛的和平与稳定。
花旗佬帮着洗地鸟!!!也给自己一个台阶下!!!
美国人最近怎么了?狒狒出事不帮,连这事都不做文章?
奇怪。。。
作为补救,中美应该下一步定个办法防止类似事件发生。比如为了防止类似军用威胁的车辆器材以矿山民用用的名义流入朝鲜,应该由美帝出钱,采购TG生产的专用矿山车辆供给朝鲜。。。。


一个黑社会老大给了一个街头混混一把玩具枪让他一边玩去,一群富有“正义感”的记者赶忙跳起来大呼小叫说这老大扩散武力,强烈要求报警抓进去,老大笑而不语,而另一个黑社会老大赶忙出来打圆场,说人家只是给了那小子一堆零件而已,玩具枪是那小子自己拼出来的,关人家老大什么事呢?
美国不敢承认,如果大国都不再遵守美国主导的规则的话,会直接破坏美国规则的合法性地位。一堆小国将跟中国的风。
这种车有用作采矿的吗?求照片~~
美帝掩护兔子
这些遮羞布挑翻了对中国没有什么损失。在西方宣传中,中国本来就是邪恶朝鲜的最坚定盟友。中国的形象就那样了。大家心知肚明。反华的还是反华,挺华的还是挺华,不会有任何改变。
但这些美国主导的规则,反而会被打破。让更多国家有样学样。中国在世界上并不是没有影响力的。
话说,昨日在飞机上看了个《淮海商报》新商界,上边说,50(或者60、80年代)tg的一架轰炸机迷路了,把国军 ...
求详情啊
陆地天空海洋 发表于 2012-4-23 15:12
美国人最近怎么了?狒狒出事不帮,连这事都不做文章?
奇怪。。。
前一阵跳得太欢后的技术性疲软?休整一番,顺便忙活自己的大选?


哎,这两货越看越像吵吵好好的基友了。
cxvdfeggg1 发表于 2012-4-23 15:13
一个黑社会老大给了一个街头混混一把玩具枪让他一边玩去,一群富有“正义 ...
說的對
不過这句“另一个黑社会老大赶忙出来打圆场”俺認爲應該是“另一个帶著警徽穿著警服的黑社会老大赶忙出来打圆场”
heavenstar_x 发表于 2012-4-23 14:28
这种流氓相互洗地的事情最欢乐了
参考卡大佐的投名状事件?
美国不敢承认,如果大国都不再遵守美国主导的规则的话,会直接破坏美国规则的合法性地位。一堆小国将跟中国 ...
一堆小国?呵呵,哪个小国敢?哪个小国有能力?
套一句话:你想咋?你敢咋?你能咋?(请用陕西话说)
什么协议法规在利益面前都是屎
还是大国淡定啊

那些小屁国家少见多怪
都不用我们自己解释了


http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/2 ... s-concern.html?_r=1
--------------------------------------

Suspected Sale by China Stirs Concern at White House

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration says it believes that a Chinese manufacturer sold North Korea the chassis and other parts for a missile-transport vehicle displayed in a military parade this week, a senior official said Friday, raising new concerns about China’s ability to enforce a ban on military sales to North Korea.

Describing the sale as an “embarrassment” for Beijing, the official said the White House would use the episode to tighten pressure on the Chinese government to better enforce United Nations sanctions forbidding the sale of weapons or technology to North Korea that would aid its ballistic missile and nuclear programs.

The evidence of Chinese military aid comes at a time of renewed tension on the Korean Peninsula — days after the failed launching of a long-range missile by the North Koreans and amid evidence that the government is preparing to test a nuclear bomb, which could be hastened by the humiliating failure of the launching.

"We think this is poor Chinese performance in sanctions implementation, and not willful proliferation,” said the official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the issue’s diplomatic delicacy. “The Chinese system is so sprawling and poorly organized that they are not good at enforcing sanctions.”
The vehicle, a heavy-duty truck with eight axles that can transport and serve as a launching pad for rockets, raises jitters for another reason: it suggests that North Korea is making progress in its effort to produce mobile long-range ballistic missiles — something that has long worried American officials because it would make it harder for the United States or other countries to deter North Korea’s nuclear threat.

During the parade in Pyongyang, the North’s capital, six trucks hauled what appeared to be a new type of intercontinental ballistic missile. Arms control experts said the missiles might have been mock-ups rather than functioning weapons.

Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta, testifying on Thursday before the House Armed Services Committee, said that American intelligence had not determined exactly what North Korea’s capabilities were. But he said, “I think the bottom line is if they, in fact, have a mobile capability to be able to have ICBMs deployed in that manner, that that increases the threat coming from North Korea.”

Mr. Panetta added, “I’m sure there’s been some help coming from China,” though he declined to offer details at the hearing.

The administration says it does not believe that the sale constitutes a clear violation of United Nations sanctions, the official said, because the Chinese manufacturer, suspected to be Hubei Sanjiang, sold only a chassis, not a complete vehicle. It might have been sold ostensibly for civilian purposes, like for use in mining. The firm most likely also sold the parts to a North Korean “cut out,” a term that refers to a front company set up to mask the ultimate buyer.

A spokesman for the Chinese Embassy in Washington, Geng Shuang, denied that China had violated United Nations sanctions and said it was enforcing the ban. “We have our own export-control regime, which has been strictly implemented by all agencies and ministries of the Chinese government,” he said.

Analysts who have studied photographs said it appeared that the North Koreans had modified the original vehicle by installing a launching stand for the missiles. They might also have added electronics.

“Maybe the Chinese thought they could get away with it by saying they were for agriculture or lumbering purposes,” said Joel S. Wit, the editor of 38 North, a Web site on North Korea sponsored by Johns Hopkins University.

However elaborate the efforts to disguise the sale, analysts said, it vividly demonstrates China’s continuing trouble in enforcing sanctions. The Chinese government, experts say, has little control over companies that have dealings with North Korea, particularly those with ties to the People’s Liberation Army of China.

It’s so huge, there’s so much corruption and state-owned companies have lots of autonomy,” said Michael J. Green, a China policy adviser in the George W. Bush administration. “The Chinese are incapable of being transparent with us on this system because they don’t understand it themselves.”

But Mr. Green, who is now at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, also faulted the Obama administration as not putting enough emphasis on enforcing sanctions. After a “strong start,” he said the United States shifted its focus to diplomacy, which allowed Chinese officials to block pressure on enforcement.

Until now, the administration official said, the United States has conveyed concerns about sanctions enforcement through its embassy in Beijing or the State Department. Now, though, the White House may get involved.

At a conference in South Korea last month, President Obama urged China’s president, Hu Jintao, to use his country’s influence with North Korea to curb its behavior. American officials said they believed that Mr. Hu conveyed China’s opposition to a missile launching, even if it did not prevent it. But analysts say that China continues to pull its punches because it fears destabilizing the North Korean government.


http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/2 ... s-concern.html?_r=1
--------------------------------------

Suspected Sale by China Stirs Concern at White House

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration says it believes that a Chinese manufacturer sold North Korea the chassis and other parts for a missile-transport vehicle displayed in a military parade this week, a senior official said Friday, raising new concerns about China’s ability to enforce a ban on military sales to North Korea.

Describing the sale as an “embarrassment” for Beijing, the official said the White House would use the episode to tighten pressure on the Chinese government to better enforce United Nations sanctions forbidding the sale of weapons or technology to North Korea that would aid its ballistic missile and nuclear programs.

The evidence of Chinese military aid comes at a time of renewed tension on the Korean Peninsula — days after the failed launching of a long-range missile by the North Koreans and amid evidence that the government is preparing to test a nuclear bomb, which could be hastened by the humiliating failure of the launching.

"We think this is poor Chinese performance in sanctions implementation, and not willful proliferation,” said the official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the issue’s diplomatic delicacy. “The Chinese system is so sprawling and poorly organized that they are not good at enforcing sanctions.”
The vehicle, a heavy-duty truck with eight axles that can transport and serve as a launching pad for rockets, raises jitters for another reason: it suggests that North Korea is making progress in its effort to produce mobile long-range ballistic missiles — something that has long worried American officials because it would make it harder for the United States or other countries to deter North Korea’s nuclear threat.

During the parade in Pyongyang, the North’s capital, six trucks hauled what appeared to be a new type of intercontinental ballistic missile. Arms control experts said the missiles might have been mock-ups rather than functioning weapons.

Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta, testifying on Thursday before the House Armed Services Committee, said that American intelligence had not determined exactly what North Korea’s capabilities were. But he said, “I think the bottom line is if they, in fact, have a mobile capability to be able to have ICBMs deployed in that manner, that that increases the threat coming from North Korea.”

Mr. Panetta added, “I’m sure there’s been some help coming from China,” though he declined to offer details at the hearing.

The administration says it does not believe that the sale constitutes a clear violation of United Nations sanctions, the official said, because the Chinese manufacturer, suspected to be Hubei Sanjiang, sold only a chassis, not a complete vehicle. It might have been sold ostensibly for civilian purposes, like for use in mining. The firm most likely also sold the parts to a North Korean “cut out,” a term that refers to a front company set up to mask the ultimate buyer.

A spokesman for the Chinese Embassy in Washington, Geng Shuang, denied that China had violated United Nations sanctions and said it was enforcing the ban. “We have our own export-control regime, which has been strictly implemented by all agencies and ministries of the Chinese government,” he said.

Analysts who have studied photographs said it appeared that the North Koreans had modified the original vehicle by installing a launching stand for the missiles. They might also have added electronics.

“Maybe the Chinese thought they could get away with it by saying they were for agriculture or lumbering purposes,” said Joel S. Wit, the editor of 38 North, a Web site on North Korea sponsored by Johns Hopkins University.

However elaborate the efforts to disguise the sale, analysts said, it vividly demonstrates China’s continuing trouble in enforcing sanctions. The Chinese government, experts say, has little control over companies that have dealings with North Korea, particularly those with ties to the People’s Liberation Army of China.

It’s so huge, there’s so much corruption and state-owned companies have lots of autonomy,” said Michael J. Green, a China policy adviser in the George W. Bush administration. “The Chinese are incapable of being transparent with us on this system because they don’t understand it themselves.”

But Mr. Green, who is now at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, also faulted the Obama administration as not putting enough emphasis on enforcing sanctions. After a “strong start,” he said the United States shifted its focus to diplomacy, which allowed Chinese officials to block pressure on enforcement.

Until now, the administration official said, the United States has conveyed concerns about sanctions enforcement through its embassy in Beijing or the State Department. Now, though, the White House may get involved.

At a conference in South Korea last month, President Obama urged China’s president, Hu Jintao, to use his country’s influence with North Korea to curb its behavior. American officials said they believed that Mr. Hu conveyed China’s opposition to a missile launching, even if it did not prevent it. But analysts say that China continues to pull its punches because it fears destabilizing the North Korean government.
colombia 发表于 2012-4-23 15:16
求详情啊
在飞机上看别人的报纸,看完就扔了,刚才查了下,不知道那个报纸叫什么名字了。。。。。
superloong 发表于 2012-4-23 15:16
这些遮羞布挑翻了对中国没有什么损失。在西方宣传中,中国本来就是邪恶朝鲜的最坚定盟友。中国的形象就那样 ...
就是这个理!中国就是卖了,你美国能怎么滴?美国为了防止别的国家学中国坏规矩,只能给自己找个遮羞布
兔子表示 我只卖了车架 真的只卖了车架

白头鹰 我卖得发动机跟变速箱行了吧....
一堆狒狒:OOXXOOOOXXXXOOO
兔子:不解释
鹰:生意,都是生意啊
其他:死兔子,下次有生意的时候要照顾我,打折包邮哦,亲。

纤鸟 发表于 2012-4-23 14:20
奥黑看到导弹车花动机部件产地时, 脸比平时黑了不少

很奇怪朝鲜人能接受美国产品。
fanderfei 发表于 2012-4-23 15:14
这种车有用作采矿的吗?求照片~~
你们信不信?反正MD信了:D
呀咩嗲……哦吔 发表于 2012-4-23 17:18
很奇怪朝鲜人能接受美国产品。
求之不得,却之不恭
呀咩嗲……哦吔 发表于 2012-4-23 17:18
很奇怪朝鲜人能接受美国产品。
用得好为啥不用
其实美爹发现了 那车的发动机是  卡特皮勒之后  美爹汗颜了
要不说是大流氓的层次高,洗地这么及时
fanderfei 发表于 2012-4-23 15:14
这种车有用作采矿的吗?求照片~~
勘探设备, 运钻机的。
好基友没话说   
大流氓和小痞子是有本质区别的
别说几辆车子
当年卡大佐离心机那挡子破事
各家还不是抢着为兔子擦屁股~
不知道逆贼们听到美爹如此华丽的洗地 作何感想~
流氓之间很有爱啊,呵呵.
Death Veda 对skywalk说加入我们的dark force吧。我们一起建立新的帝国