超级军网马克思支持中英贸易战争
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/04/28 07:40:32
卡尔．马克思（Karl Marx）30 岁时从德国移民到英国﹐在那里﹐他成为当时的大英帝国的“全球化” 的辩护者﹐支持英国发动对中国的鸦片战争。
英国殖民主义宣传者史密斯辩称，人类的进步是依靠大英帝国的扩张、在全球散布“自由市场”来推动的。
另一种为英国殖民主义所作的类似辩护则是由卡尔．马克思推动的。马克思被称为英帝国主义的反对者，是名不符实的，因为他的著作故意利用人们的不满来煽动、操纵群众。马克思 30 岁时从德国移民到英国，并成为一个被英国首相Palmerston 愚弄的人。
马克思是大英帝国的 “全球化” 的辩护者，这一点，在他为大英帝国对印度的掠夺辩护时，便已十分明显了。马克思以马基维利主义（Mandevillian）来作辩护，即，因为 “资本主义” 优于 “东方的专制政治”，虽然英国殖民主义的行动和意图是邪恶的，英国的殖民主义却使印度受益！
更为明显的是马克思为英国的第一次鸦片战争辩护。在许多关于世界革命可能性的虚张声势中，马克思赞美鸦片战争把中国投入大混乱状态。他声称英国是在推进中国的文明，通过消灭中国的古老文化，打开中国的门户来迎接国际经济。他甚至赞许地报导，英国的政策造成了中国这么多失业人口，这样中国难民才能被用来在全世界做奴隶工。
卡尔．马克思在１８５３七月２２日 纽约每日论坛报的一篇文章中写道：
“无论他们认为是什么社会、宗教、朝代、或国家形态的原因，导致了中国过往十年来的慢性反抗，以及现在聚为一体的强大变革，这个暴动的发生，无疑得益于英国的大炮将一种名叫鸦片的催眠药品强加给中国。在英国的武力面前，满清王朝的权威倒下成为碎片；天朝永恒的迷信破碎了；与文明世界隔绝的野蛮和密封被侵犯了；而开放则达成了，这才有了在加州和澳洲黄金吸引下急速开展的交流活动（指中国奴工被“卖猪仔”到外国采金矿）。与此同时，大英帝国的生命血液 --- 银币，便开始被吸取到英属东印度了。
在当时的英国，主流民众狂热地支持第一次鸦片战争（而对于第二次鸦片战争则有行游表威反对），作为此等种族主义的反映，马克思为英国强迫中国吸毒一事辩护道：
“看来，历史要先让这些人民全部染上毒瘾，然后才能让他们从世袭的愚蠢中醒来。”
马克思甚至辩称，中国人有一种对鸦片的爱好：
“真的，中国人放弃鸦片，比德国人戒掉烟草更难。”
英文原文﹕
Smith, a propagandist for British colonialism, argued that human progress was advanced with the spread of this "free market'' globally, through the expansion of the British Empire.
A similar defense of British colonialism was also advanced by Karl Marx. Marx has an undeserved reputation as an opponent of British imperialism, because his writings were designed to appeal to, and manipulate people, based on their grievances. Marx emigrated from Germany to England at age 30, where he became a dupe of British Prime Minister Lord Palmerston.
Marx's role as an apologist for the British Empire's "globalization'' is explicit in his defense of the British Empire's rape of India. Marx advanced a Mandevillian argument, that, because "capitalism'' is superior to "oriental despotism'', even though the intent and actions of British colonialism were evil, British colonialism benefitted India!
Even more explicit is Marx's defense of Britain's first Opium War. Amidst much bravado about the potential for world revolution, Marx praised the Opium War for throwing China into chaos. He claimed that Britain was advancing civilization in China, by destroying China's old culture, and opening up China to the international economy. He even reported, approvingly, that British policies were causing such unemployment in China, that displaced Chinese workers were being used as slave labor throughout the world.
Karl Marx wrote in a July 22, 1853 article in the New York Daily Tribune:
"Whatever be the social causes, and whatever religious, dynastic, or national shape they may assume, that have brought about the chronic rebellions subsisting in China for about ten years past, and now gathered together in one formidable revolution, the occasion of this outbreak has unquestionably been afforded by the English cannon forcing upon China that soporific drug called opium. Before the British arms the authority of the Manchu dynasty fell to pieces; the superstitious faith in the Eternity of the Celestial Empire broke down; the barbarous and hermetic isolation from the civilized world was infringed; and an opening was made for that intercourse which has since proceeded so rapidly under the golden attractions of California and Australia. At the same time the silver coin of the Empire, its life-blood, began to be drained away to the British East Indies.''
Reflecting the racism which dominated England, where the majority of the population enthusiastically supported the first Opium War (there were popular demonstrations against the second Opium War), Marx defends the British-forced addiction of China:
"It would seem as though history had first to make this whole people drunk before it could rouse them out of their hereditary stupidity.''
Marx even argued that the Chinese had a disposition for opium:
"The Chinese, it is true, are no more likely to renounce the use of opium than are the Germans to forswear tobacco.''
英文摘自：
Adam Smith and Karl Marx: Apologists for the Empire's "Globalization"& Karl Marx Defends British Opium War
http://american_almanac.tripod.com/opium.htm卡尔．马克思（Karl Marx）30 岁时从德国移民到英国﹐在那里﹐他成为当时的大英帝国的“全球化” 的辩护者﹐支持英国发动对中国的鸦片战争。
英国殖民主义宣传者史密斯辩称，人类的进步是依靠大英帝国的扩张、在全球散布“自由市场”来推动的。
另一种为英国殖民主义所作的类似辩护则是由卡尔．马克思推动的。马克思被称为英帝国主义的反对者，是名不符实的，因为他的著作故意利用人们的不满来煽动、操纵群众。马克思 30 岁时从德国移民到英国，并成为一个被英国首相Palmerston 愚弄的人。
马克思是大英帝国的 “全球化” 的辩护者，这一点，在他为大英帝国对印度的掠夺辩护时，便已十分明显了。马克思以马基维利主义（Mandevillian）来作辩护，即，因为 “资本主义” 优于 “东方的专制政治”，虽然英国殖民主义的行动和意图是邪恶的，英国的殖民主义却使印度受益！
更为明显的是马克思为英国的第一次鸦片战争辩护。在许多关于世界革命可能性的虚张声势中，马克思赞美鸦片战争把中国投入大混乱状态。他声称英国是在推进中国的文明，通过消灭中国的古老文化，打开中国的门户来迎接国际经济。他甚至赞许地报导，英国的政策造成了中国这么多失业人口，这样中国难民才能被用来在全世界做奴隶工。
卡尔．马克思在１８５３七月２２日 纽约每日论坛报的一篇文章中写道：
“无论他们认为是什么社会、宗教、朝代、或国家形态的原因，导致了中国过往十年来的慢性反抗，以及现在聚为一体的强大变革，这个暴动的发生，无疑得益于英国的大炮将一种名叫鸦片的催眠药品强加给中国。在英国的武力面前，满清王朝的权威倒下成为碎片；天朝永恒的迷信破碎了；与文明世界隔绝的野蛮和密封被侵犯了；而开放则达成了，这才有了在加州和澳洲黄金吸引下急速开展的交流活动（指中国奴工被“卖猪仔”到外国采金矿）。与此同时，大英帝国的生命血液 --- 银币，便开始被吸取到英属东印度了。
在当时的英国，主流民众狂热地支持第一次鸦片战争（而对于第二次鸦片战争则有行游表威反对），作为此等种族主义的反映，马克思为英国强迫中国吸毒一事辩护道：
“看来，历史要先让这些人民全部染上毒瘾，然后才能让他们从世袭的愚蠢中醒来。”
马克思甚至辩称，中国人有一种对鸦片的爱好：
“真的，中国人放弃鸦片，比德国人戒掉烟草更难。”
英文原文﹕
Smith, a propagandist for British colonialism, argued that human progress was advanced with the spread of this "free market'' globally, through the expansion of the British Empire.
A similar defense of British colonialism was also advanced by Karl Marx. Marx has an undeserved reputation as an opponent of British imperialism, because his writings were designed to appeal to, and manipulate people, based on their grievances. Marx emigrated from Germany to England at age 30, where he became a dupe of British Prime Minister Lord Palmerston.
Marx's role as an apologist for the British Empire's "globalization'' is explicit in his defense of the British Empire's rape of India. Marx advanced a Mandevillian argument, that, because "capitalism'' is superior to "oriental despotism'', even though the intent and actions of British colonialism were evil, British colonialism benefitted India!
Even more explicit is Marx's defense of Britain's first Opium War. Amidst much bravado about the potential for world revolution, Marx praised the Opium War for throwing China into chaos. He claimed that Britain was advancing civilization in China, by destroying China's old culture, and opening up China to the international economy. He even reported, approvingly, that British policies were causing such unemployment in China, that displaced Chinese workers were being used as slave labor throughout the world.
Karl Marx wrote in a July 22, 1853 article in the New York Daily Tribune:
"Whatever be the social causes, and whatever religious, dynastic, or national shape they may assume, that have brought about the chronic rebellions subsisting in China for about ten years past, and now gathered together in one formidable revolution, the occasion of this outbreak has unquestionably been afforded by the English cannon forcing upon China that soporific drug called opium. Before the British arms the authority of the Manchu dynasty fell to pieces; the superstitious faith in the Eternity of the Celestial Empire broke down; the barbarous and hermetic isolation from the civilized world was infringed; and an opening was made for that intercourse which has since proceeded so rapidly under the golden attractions of California and Australia. At the same time the silver coin of the Empire, its life-blood, began to be drained away to the British East Indies.''
Reflecting the racism which dominated England, where the majority of the population enthusiastically supported the first Opium War (there were popular demonstrations against the second Opium War), Marx defends the British-forced addiction of China:
"It would seem as though history had first to make this whole people drunk before it could rouse them out of their hereditary stupidity.''
Marx even argued that the Chinese had a disposition for opium:
"The Chinese, it is true, are no more likely to renounce the use of opium than are the Germans to forswear tobacco.''
英文摘自：
Adam Smith and Karl Marx: Apologists for the Empire's "Globalization"& Karl Marx Defends British Opium War
http://american_almanac.tripod.com/opium.htm
英国殖民主义宣传者史密斯辩称，人类的进步是依靠大英帝国的扩张、在全球散布“自由市场”来推动的。
另一种为英国殖民主义所作的类似辩护则是由卡尔．马克思推动的。马克思被称为英帝国主义的反对者，是名不符实的，因为他的著作故意利用人们的不满来煽动、操纵群众。马克思 30 岁时从德国移民到英国，并成为一个被英国首相Palmerston 愚弄的人。
马克思是大英帝国的 “全球化” 的辩护者，这一点，在他为大英帝国对印度的掠夺辩护时，便已十分明显了。马克思以马基维利主义（Mandevillian）来作辩护，即，因为 “资本主义” 优于 “东方的专制政治”，虽然英国殖民主义的行动和意图是邪恶的，英国的殖民主义却使印度受益！
更为明显的是马克思为英国的第一次鸦片战争辩护。在许多关于世界革命可能性的虚张声势中，马克思赞美鸦片战争把中国投入大混乱状态。他声称英国是在推进中国的文明，通过消灭中国的古老文化，打开中国的门户来迎接国际经济。他甚至赞许地报导，英国的政策造成了中国这么多失业人口，这样中国难民才能被用来在全世界做奴隶工。
卡尔．马克思在１８５３七月２２日 纽约每日论坛报的一篇文章中写道：
“无论他们认为是什么社会、宗教、朝代、或国家形态的原因，导致了中国过往十年来的慢性反抗，以及现在聚为一体的强大变革，这个暴动的发生，无疑得益于英国的大炮将一种名叫鸦片的催眠药品强加给中国。在英国的武力面前，满清王朝的权威倒下成为碎片；天朝永恒的迷信破碎了；与文明世界隔绝的野蛮和密封被侵犯了；而开放则达成了，这才有了在加州和澳洲黄金吸引下急速开展的交流活动（指中国奴工被“卖猪仔”到外国采金矿）。与此同时，大英帝国的生命血液 --- 银币，便开始被吸取到英属东印度了。
在当时的英国，主流民众狂热地支持第一次鸦片战争（而对于第二次鸦片战争则有行游表威反对），作为此等种族主义的反映，马克思为英国强迫中国吸毒一事辩护道：
“看来，历史要先让这些人民全部染上毒瘾，然后才能让他们从世袭的愚蠢中醒来。”
马克思甚至辩称，中国人有一种对鸦片的爱好：
“真的，中国人放弃鸦片，比德国人戒掉烟草更难。”
英文原文﹕
Smith, a propagandist for British colonialism, argued that human progress was advanced with the spread of this "free market'' globally, through the expansion of the British Empire.
A similar defense of British colonialism was also advanced by Karl Marx. Marx has an undeserved reputation as an opponent of British imperialism, because his writings were designed to appeal to, and manipulate people, based on their grievances. Marx emigrated from Germany to England at age 30, where he became a dupe of British Prime Minister Lord Palmerston.
Marx's role as an apologist for the British Empire's "globalization'' is explicit in his defense of the British Empire's rape of India. Marx advanced a Mandevillian argument, that, because "capitalism'' is superior to "oriental despotism'', even though the intent and actions of British colonialism were evil, British colonialism benefitted India!
Even more explicit is Marx's defense of Britain's first Opium War. Amidst much bravado about the potential for world revolution, Marx praised the Opium War for throwing China into chaos. He claimed that Britain was advancing civilization in China, by destroying China's old culture, and opening up China to the international economy. He even reported, approvingly, that British policies were causing such unemployment in China, that displaced Chinese workers were being used as slave labor throughout the world.
Karl Marx wrote in a July 22, 1853 article in the New York Daily Tribune:
"Whatever be the social causes, and whatever religious, dynastic, or national shape they may assume, that have brought about the chronic rebellions subsisting in China for about ten years past, and now gathered together in one formidable revolution, the occasion of this outbreak has unquestionably been afforded by the English cannon forcing upon China that soporific drug called opium. Before the British arms the authority of the Manchu dynasty fell to pieces; the superstitious faith in the Eternity of the Celestial Empire broke down; the barbarous and hermetic isolation from the civilized world was infringed; and an opening was made for that intercourse which has since proceeded so rapidly under the golden attractions of California and Australia. At the same time the silver coin of the Empire, its life-blood, began to be drained away to the British East Indies.''
Reflecting the racism which dominated England, where the majority of the population enthusiastically supported the first Opium War (there were popular demonstrations against the second Opium War), Marx defends the British-forced addiction of China:
"It would seem as though history had first to make this whole people drunk before it could rouse them out of their hereditary stupidity.''
Marx even argued that the Chinese had a disposition for opium:
"The Chinese, it is true, are no more likely to renounce the use of opium than are the Germans to forswear tobacco.''
英文摘自：
Adam Smith and Karl Marx: Apologists for the Empire's "Globalization"& Karl Marx Defends British Opium War
http://american_almanac.tripod.com/opium.htm卡尔．马克思（Karl Marx）30 岁时从德国移民到英国﹐在那里﹐他成为当时的大英帝国的“全球化” 的辩护者﹐支持英国发动对中国的鸦片战争。
英国殖民主义宣传者史密斯辩称，人类的进步是依靠大英帝国的扩张、在全球散布“自由市场”来推动的。
另一种为英国殖民主义所作的类似辩护则是由卡尔．马克思推动的。马克思被称为英帝国主义的反对者，是名不符实的，因为他的著作故意利用人们的不满来煽动、操纵群众。马克思 30 岁时从德国移民到英国，并成为一个被英国首相Palmerston 愚弄的人。
马克思是大英帝国的 “全球化” 的辩护者，这一点，在他为大英帝国对印度的掠夺辩护时，便已十分明显了。马克思以马基维利主义（Mandevillian）来作辩护，即，因为 “资本主义” 优于 “东方的专制政治”，虽然英国殖民主义的行动和意图是邪恶的，英国的殖民主义却使印度受益！
更为明显的是马克思为英国的第一次鸦片战争辩护。在许多关于世界革命可能性的虚张声势中，马克思赞美鸦片战争把中国投入大混乱状态。他声称英国是在推进中国的文明，通过消灭中国的古老文化，打开中国的门户来迎接国际经济。他甚至赞许地报导，英国的政策造成了中国这么多失业人口，这样中国难民才能被用来在全世界做奴隶工。
卡尔．马克思在１８５３七月２２日 纽约每日论坛报的一篇文章中写道：
“无论他们认为是什么社会、宗教、朝代、或国家形态的原因，导致了中国过往十年来的慢性反抗，以及现在聚为一体的强大变革，这个暴动的发生，无疑得益于英国的大炮将一种名叫鸦片的催眠药品强加给中国。在英国的武力面前，满清王朝的权威倒下成为碎片；天朝永恒的迷信破碎了；与文明世界隔绝的野蛮和密封被侵犯了；而开放则达成了，这才有了在加州和澳洲黄金吸引下急速开展的交流活动（指中国奴工被“卖猪仔”到外国采金矿）。与此同时，大英帝国的生命血液 --- 银币，便开始被吸取到英属东印度了。
在当时的英国，主流民众狂热地支持第一次鸦片战争（而对于第二次鸦片战争则有行游表威反对），作为此等种族主义的反映，马克思为英国强迫中国吸毒一事辩护道：
“看来，历史要先让这些人民全部染上毒瘾，然后才能让他们从世袭的愚蠢中醒来。”
马克思甚至辩称，中国人有一种对鸦片的爱好：
“真的，中国人放弃鸦片，比德国人戒掉烟草更难。”
英文原文﹕
Smith, a propagandist for British colonialism, argued that human progress was advanced with the spread of this "free market'' globally, through the expansion of the British Empire.
A similar defense of British colonialism was also advanced by Karl Marx. Marx has an undeserved reputation as an opponent of British imperialism, because his writings were designed to appeal to, and manipulate people, based on their grievances. Marx emigrated from Germany to England at age 30, where he became a dupe of British Prime Minister Lord Palmerston.
Marx's role as an apologist for the British Empire's "globalization'' is explicit in his defense of the British Empire's rape of India. Marx advanced a Mandevillian argument, that, because "capitalism'' is superior to "oriental despotism'', even though the intent and actions of British colonialism were evil, British colonialism benefitted India!
Even more explicit is Marx's defense of Britain's first Opium War. Amidst much bravado about the potential for world revolution, Marx praised the Opium War for throwing China into chaos. He claimed that Britain was advancing civilization in China, by destroying China's old culture, and opening up China to the international economy. He even reported, approvingly, that British policies were causing such unemployment in China, that displaced Chinese workers were being used as slave labor throughout the world.
Karl Marx wrote in a July 22, 1853 article in the New York Daily Tribune:
"Whatever be the social causes, and whatever religious, dynastic, or national shape they may assume, that have brought about the chronic rebellions subsisting in China for about ten years past, and now gathered together in one formidable revolution, the occasion of this outbreak has unquestionably been afforded by the English cannon forcing upon China that soporific drug called opium. Before the British arms the authority of the Manchu dynasty fell to pieces; the superstitious faith in the Eternity of the Celestial Empire broke down; the barbarous and hermetic isolation from the civilized world was infringed; and an opening was made for that intercourse which has since proceeded so rapidly under the golden attractions of California and Australia. At the same time the silver coin of the Empire, its life-blood, began to be drained away to the British East Indies.''
Reflecting the racism which dominated England, where the majority of the population enthusiastically supported the first Opium War (there were popular demonstrations against the second Opium War), Marx defends the British-forced addiction of China:
"It would seem as though history had first to make this whole people drunk before it could rouse them out of their hereditary stupidity.''
Marx even argued that the Chinese had a disposition for opium:
"The Chinese, it is true, are no more likely to renounce the use of opium than are the Germans to forswear tobacco.''
英文摘自：
Adam Smith and Karl Marx: Apologists for the Empire's "Globalization"& Karl Marx Defends British Opium War
http://american_almanac.tripod.com/opium.htm
马克思写的《鸦片贸易史》，好好看看马克思对于鸦片贸易是什么立场：
http://wenku.baidu.com/view/a4bd491cfad6195f312ba64e.html
http://wenku.baidu.com/view/a4bd491cfad6195f312ba64e.html
伟大导师啊
这倒真是颠倒黑白，奥，我说的是楼主，或者是作者。
如果真是贸易战争，这个到没有什么，我说的是双方互提关税这样的。
不过，我们一直称其为鸦片战争，而鸦片是被禁止的，是走私的，这不叫贸易。
而楼主则称为贸易战争，他在误导，试图让人们把鸦片走私当成一种正当的买卖。
看不出马克思赞许英国人的鸦片战争。
“这个暴动的发生，无疑得益于英国的大炮将一种名叫鸦片的催眠药品强加给中国。”。
这是原文，我们知道是某个暴动得益于鸦片战争。
马克思只是陈述了一种看法。
但是楼主却据此称马克思赞美鸦片战争。
马克思的确不喜欢满清的帝王专制，但是，马克思不喜欢就是支持鸦片战争吗？
孙中山也不喜欢，他是不是也支持鸦片战争？
是的，戒除毒瘾比戒烟困难，毫无疑问。马克思陈述的也是事实。
如果真是贸易战争，这个到没有什么，我说的是双方互提关税这样的。
不过，我们一直称其为鸦片战争，而鸦片是被禁止的，是走私的，这不叫贸易。
而楼主则称为贸易战争，他在误导，试图让人们把鸦片走私当成一种正当的买卖。
看不出马克思赞许英国人的鸦片战争。
“这个暴动的发生，无疑得益于英国的大炮将一种名叫鸦片的催眠药品强加给中国。”。
这是原文，我们知道是某个暴动得益于鸦片战争。
马克思只是陈述了一种看法。
但是楼主却据此称马克思赞美鸦片战争。
马克思的确不喜欢满清的帝王专制，但是，马克思不喜欢就是支持鸦片战争吗？
孙中山也不喜欢，他是不是也支持鸦片战争？
是的，戒除毒瘾比戒烟困难，毫无疑问。马克思陈述的也是事实。
这个题目讲到最后，不能不特别指出摆着一副基督教伪善面孔、标榜文明的英国政府本身的一个明显的矛盾口作为帝国政府，它假装同违禁的鸦片贸易毫无关系，甚至还订立禁止这种贸易的条约。可是作为印度政府，它却强迫孟加拉国省种植鸦片，使该省的生产力受到极大的损害；它强迫一部分印度莱特种植罂粟，用贷款的办法引诱另一部分印度莱特也去种植罂粟。它严密地垄断了这种毒品的全部生产，借助大批官方侦探来监视一切：种植罂粟，把罂粟交到指定地点，按照中国吸食者的口味提炼和调制鸦片，把鸦片扛成便于偷愉运的货包，最后运往加尔各答，由政府拍卖，国家官吏把鸦片移交给投机商人，然后又转到走私商人手里，由他们运往中国。英国政府在每箱鸦片上所花的费用约250卢比，而在加尔各答拍卖场上的卖价是每箱1210－1600卢比，可是，这个政府并不满足于这种实际上的共谋行为，它直到现在还公然同那些千着毒害一个帝国的冒险营生的商人和船主们合伙经营，赔赚与共。
断章取义本来就是某些人的特长啊，ＬＺ的表现一点也不意外。
只不过，Ａｄａｍ Ｓｍｉｔｈ这种牛人就直接被翻译成“英国殖民主义宣传者史密斯”，实在让人很无语。
只不过，Ａｄａｍ Ｓｍｉｔｈ这种牛人就直接被翻译成“英国殖民主义宣传者史密斯”，实在让人很无语。
支持下楼主~~楼主辛苦了。
Signature----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Early to bed, early to rise, make a man healthy, wealthy, and wise. ugg boots ugg cardy ugg Tall ugg short UGG Bailey Button
Signature----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Early to bed, early to rise, make a man healthy, wealthy, and wise. ugg boots ugg cardy ugg Tall ugg short UGG Bailey Button
dzhiqiong 发表于 2010-11-8 00:20 
偷梁换柱混淆概念不一直是某些人的最爱么
偷梁换柱混淆概念不一直是某些人的最爱么
回复 4# dzhiqiong
这个是外头一些乱七八糟的网站登的文章的一部分，号称什么撒旦魔化什么的，可以自己翻墙看看。扯的太过分了，他们都不敢登。
这个是外头一些乱七八糟的网站登的文章的一部分，号称什么撒旦魔化什么的，可以自己翻墙看看。扯的太过分了，他们都不敢登。