超级军网德国大学屏蔽中国网站（技术性问题）
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/04/28 03:46:17
]]
人家那是习惯性的诬蔑,比如某些同志一 出事情就扯真理部
另外CNN发布其对西藏报道的相关说明： http://edition.cnn.com/2008/US/03/28/tibet.statement/
CNN statement on Tibet coverage
(CNN) -- CNN has been singled out for criticism for our coverage of events in Tibet through an anti-CNN.com Web site and elsewhere. We have provided comprehensive coverage of all sides of this story, but two specific allegations relate to pro-Tibetan bias. We would like to take this chance to respond to them:
Allegation 1: CNN intentionally cropped an image in order to remove Tibetan protesters throwing stones at Chinese trucks.
CNN refutes all allegations by bloggers that it distorts its coverage of the events in Tibet to portray either side in a more favorable light. We have consistently and repeatedly shown all sides of this story. The one image in question was used wholly appropriately in the specific editorial context and there could be no confusion regarding what it was showing, not least because it was captioned: "Tibetans throw stones at army vehicles on a street in the capital Lhasa." The picture gallery included in Tibet stories includes the image. (See the gallery)
We have also published images showing violence by Tibetans against the Chinese. A March 18 story shows Tibetan youths attacking a Chinese man. (Read the story)
Additionally, we have published video from the Chinese media apparently showing Tibetans attacking Chinese interests in Lhasa. (Watch the video) »
Allegation 2: CNN referred to Tibet as a "country."
CNN's policy is to refer to Tibet as "Tibet Autonomous Region of China." In our dozens of stories on the topic to date, we are aware of only two instances where it was incorrectly referenced as a country.
CNN's reputation is based on reporting global news accurately and impartially, while our coverage through the use of words, images or video always reflects a wide range of opinions and points of view on every story. E-mail to a friend
CNN statement on Tibet coverage
(CNN) -- CNN has been singled out for criticism for our coverage of events in Tibet through an anti-CNN.com Web site and elsewhere. We have provided comprehensive coverage of all sides of this story, but two specific allegations relate to pro-Tibetan bias. We would like to take this chance to respond to them:
Allegation 1: CNN intentionally cropped an image in order to remove Tibetan protesters throwing stones at Chinese trucks.
CNN refutes all allegations by bloggers that it distorts its coverage of the events in Tibet to portray either side in a more favorable light. We have consistently and repeatedly shown all sides of this story. The one image in question was used wholly appropriately in the specific editorial context and there could be no confusion regarding what it was showing, not least because it was captioned: "Tibetans throw stones at army vehicles on a street in the capital Lhasa." The picture gallery included in Tibet stories includes the image. (See the gallery)
We have also published images showing violence by Tibetans against the Chinese. A March 18 story shows Tibetan youths attacking a Chinese man. (Read the story)
Additionally, we have published video from the Chinese media apparently showing Tibetans attacking Chinese interests in Lhasa. (Watch the video) »
Allegation 2: CNN referred to Tibet as a "country."
CNN's policy is to refer to Tibet as "Tibet Autonomous Region of China." In our dozens of stories on the topic to date, we are aware of only two instances where it was incorrectly referenced as a country.
CNN's reputation is based on reporting global news accurately and impartially, while our coverage through the use of words, images or video always reflects a wide range of opinions and points of view on every story. E-mail to a friend
:D :D 我们禁止访问自己网站，这个不合逻辑吧
德国的根服务器又不归我们管
:L
:L
哟,伟大的日耳曼人也会搞WALL啊
“也有少部分人认为是TG的网络长城禁止海外的IP地址访问中国。”
这些人白痴吧，如果是中国禁止海外IP访问，那你回家怎么能访了呢，然道你在德国上学，每天放学再飞回中国？
这些人白痴吧，如果是中国禁止海外IP访问，那你回家怎么能访了呢，然道你在德国上学，每天放学再飞回中国？
我前几天上新浪CD就有问题，开水区那叫一个快，开茶馆就立马断线;P ;P ;P 猫腻啊猫腻。。
Allegation 2: CNN referred to Tibet as a "country."
CNN's policy is to refer to Tibet as "Tibet Autonomous Region of China." In our dozens of stories on the topic to date, we are aware of only two instances where it was incorrectly referenced as a country。
CNN's reputation is based on reporting global news accurately and impartially, while our coverage through the use of words, images or video always reflects a wide range of opinions and points of view on every story.
这群王八蛋错了还能说自己 的客观公正
CNN's policy is to refer to Tibet as "Tibet Autonomous Region of China." In our dozens of stories on the topic to date, we are aware of only two instances where it was incorrectly referenced as a country。
CNN's reputation is based on reporting global news accurately and impartially, while our coverage through the use of words, images or video always reflects a wide range of opinions and points of view on every story.
这群王八蛋错了还能说自己 的客观公正
原帖由 fengxiang 于 2008-3-29 13:12 发表
:D :D 我们禁止访问自己网站，这个不合逻辑吧
不动脑筋哪有逻辑,谁能分得清海外IP是什么人?从境外登陆中国网站,当然包含某些阴暗目的,真理部要防止反华分子对国内网站搞破坏.
现在真理部形式大好
搞限制?吃多了吧
搞限制?吃多了吧
又出来了....你怎么知道是真理部封的IP?
原帖由 bigcall 于 2008-3-29 13:27 发表
不动脑筋哪有逻辑,谁能分得清海外IP是什么人?从境外登陆中国网站,当然包含某些阴暗目的,真理部要防止反华分子对国内网站搞破坏.
我就在英国,也照样在这里发帖和你说话
他可是怨妇哟
怨妇？我看他就欠被西方猴子干屁眼
原帖由 jbyyy 于 2008-3-29 13:14 发表
“也有少部分人认为是TG的网络长城禁止海外的IP地址访问中国。”
这些人白痴吧，如果是中国禁止海外IP访问，那你回家怎么能访了呢，然道你在德国上学，每天放学再飞回中国？
你这解释还是不能分辨出这两种可能性吧.
德国学校屏蔽了相关网站,可以向校方质询,不会说德语可以找翻译.
中国是否屏蔽特定的海外IP,谅你查不出什么名堂,一概否认就是了.
原帖由 squallgzy 于 2008-3-29 13:30 发表
我就在英国,也照样在这里发帖和你说话
人家没有怀疑中国屏蔽所有境外IP,你想反证什么?
原帖由 bigcall 于 2008-3-29 13:37 发表
你这解释还是不能分辨出这两种可能性吧.
德国学校屏蔽了相关网站,可以向校方质询,不会说德语可以找翻译.
中国是否屏蔽特定的海外IP,谅你查不出什么名堂,一概否认就是了.
哟,那屏蔽的都是德国的,还恰恰都是大学,这个技术难度不知道美国能不能搞定?
原帖由 枕戈待旦 于 2008-3-29 13:28 发表
又出来了....你怎么知道是真理部封的IP?
根据本文,推测其中的可能原因,连怀疑都不允许?你也没有证据否认真理部涉嫌此事,对不?
原帖由 bigcall 于 2008-3-29 13:39 发表
人家没有怀疑中国屏蔽所有境外IP,你想反证什么?
是你说"不动脑筋哪有逻辑,谁能分得清海外IP是什么人?从境外登陆中国网站,当然包含某些阴暗目的,真理部要防止反华分子对国内网站搞破坏."
难道英国不是海外IP?你说话怎么比放屁还不负责任
原帖由 bigcall 于 2008-3-29 13:41 发表
根据本文,推测其中的可能原因,连怀疑都不允许?你也没有证据否认真理部涉嫌此事,对不?
我怀疑你是一只狗，怀疑么，另外我还怀疑你有艾滋病，只是怀疑啊
原帖由 squallgzy 于 2008-3-29 13:41 发表
哟,那屏蔽的都是德国的,还恰恰都是大学,这个技术难度不知道美国能不能搞定?
这也成了高技术,网警太遭塌公款了.
原帖由 bigcall 于 2008-3-29 13:41 发表
根据本文,推测其中的可能原因,连怀疑都不允许?你也没有证据否认真理部涉嫌此事,对不?
TG没证明无罪那就是有罪,汉斯没证明有罪就是无罪,你是法盲?
原帖由 bigcall 于 2008-3-29 13:44 发表
这也成了高技术,网警太遭塌公款了.
原来是电脑白痴,连IP地址如何分配的都不知道,简直是鸡同鸭讲
对于这种人你就别和他辩论，直接板砖干倒最好
原帖由 niuniu再现 于 2008-3-29 13:43 发表
我怀疑你是一只狗，怀疑么，另外我还怀疑你有艾滋病，只是怀疑啊
我还怀疑你是只阉狗,有意思吗?
按照你的逻辑，我完全有权利怀疑你是一只有艾滋病的狗，并且把我的怀疑告诉大家，当然，我只是怀疑啊
你的推测很厉害嘛...最高人民法院怎么不请你做院长?肖扬同志如果知道有你这样的推理人才,真是要羞愧死了
原帖由 squallgzy 于 2008-3-29 13:46 发表
原来是电脑白痴,连IP地址如何分配的都不知道,简直是鸡同鸭讲
地址分配能阻止屏蔽IP,英国学的高见?去英国的"留学垃圾"还真不少,希望你比他们学得更好,扭转中国社会的"偏见"
世界上有上亿台计算机,IP地址却数量有限,所以大量的计算机用户只能通过动态分配的方式共享IP地址,大型网站一般都有自己的独立IP,很好屏蔽,但是如果屏蔽个人用户的话却不可避免的要"误伤"到别人,如果TG真的屏蔽德国的IP,还全部都得是大学的,那只能证明TG已经天顶星了
谁主张,谁举证,为什么要我证明真理部没有涉及,应该你拿证据证明你刚才说的"XXXX"才对啊
原帖由 bigcall 于 2008-3-29 13:51 发表
地址分配能阻止屏蔽IP,英国学的高见?去英国的"留学垃圾"还真不少,希望你比他们学得更好,扭转中国社会的"偏见"
对,我不过是个国内大学的公派留学垃圾,你狠,aritocracy这个词都没听说过,还在那里高谈"希腊民主",讲给外国人听他们自己都得笑掉大牙
就是么，Bigcall,你说你不是狗，那把你自己的照片贴上来，并且在自己脸上用圆珠笔写上个大大的bigcall
原帖由 枕戈待旦 于 2008-3-29 13:51 发表
谁主张,谁举证,为什么要我证明真理部没有涉及,应该你拿证据证明你刚才说的"XXXX"才对啊
有前科还不让怀疑,旧账还没交代清楚?对政府的公共行为,民众有天然的置疑权,政府有公开澄清事实的义务,还要教你?
原帖由 bigcall 于 2008-3-29 13:56 发表
有前科还不让怀疑,旧账还没交代清楚?对政府的公共行为,民众有天然的置疑权,政府有公开澄清事实的义务,还要教你?
德国也有前科啊,，德国对互联网和其它通讯手段的管制很严，为此在去年4月份有人组织了抗议活动,不过德国政府依然没有松动。为什么你只盯着TG
]]
还旧帐,什么旧帐啊,是不是封了你的浏览的色情网站啊
]]
白痴年年有，最近特别多。
原帖由 squallgzy 于 2008-3-29 13:53 发表
对,我不过是个国内大学的公派留学垃圾,你狠,aritocracy这个词都没听说过,还在那里高谈"希腊民主",讲给外国人听他们自己都得笑掉大牙
"公派"大人,失敬了.大批滞留国外成为"XX籍华人"的,正式你们这样的"公派"大员率先垂范的,过些日子花完了公款,改成"自费"身份就能在英国继续呆下去了,跳到美国机会还更多,那时可别再提你是"公费".
共党大员连外文词都不识几个,也高谈"民主共和XX主义",岂不都该羞愤自杀.那些听从这些白痴的愚民,岂不连自杀的资格都没有?