那些驳环球的人们，别急着给李显龙擦PG，看看新加坡外交 ...

环球那文章本来就是根据日媒报道写的，用意就是揭露日媒的欺骗性，包括卖凯恩对钓鱼岛的发言，明知日媒有假，有断章取义，但我们就是要按日媒的报道把事情搞热，事情一热，美国就会认识到日本人的小动作是多讨厌。这次也是如此

下面是新加坡外交部中英对照原文。
就算环球的文章不是转日媒报道，也没什么问题，

英文：(And certainly， if they are taking a long-term approach， they will make this calculation that whether it is the Senkakus， whether it is the South China Sea， what you gain on the Senkakus or the South China Sea， but you lose in terms of your broader reputation and standing in the world， you have to make that calculation very carefully. So I will be very careful about saying， ‘let us make a friendship amongst all the countries which are frightened of China’. I do not think that is a constructive and helpful approach。)

中文：当然，如果出于长期考量，他们也会发现无论是钓鱼岛问题还是南海问题，如果要采取硬取方法，必将丢掉世界地位和名誉。因此需万分小心。那样就会成为“让我们与害怕中国的国家联合起来”，而这并非为建设性的有益之举。



环球那文章本来就是根据日媒报道写的，用意就是揭露日媒的欺骗性，包括卖凯恩对钓鱼岛的发言，明知日媒有假，有断章取义，但我们就是要按日媒的报道把事情搞热，事情一热，美国就会认识到日本人的小动作是多讨厌。这次也是如此

下面是新加坡外交部中英对照原文。
就算环球的文章不是转日媒报道，也没什么问题，

英文：(And certainly， if they are taking a long-term approach， they will make this calculation that whether it is the Senkakus， whether it is the South China Sea， what you gain on the Senkakus or the South China Sea， but you lose in terms of your broader reputation and standing in the world， you have to make that calculation very carefully. So I will be very careful about saying， ‘let us make a friendship amongst all the countries which are frightened of China’. I do not think that is a constructive and helpful approach。)

中文：当然，如果出于长期考量，他们也会发现无论是钓鱼岛问题还是南海问题，如果要采取硬取方法，必将丢掉世界地位和名誉。因此需万分小心。那样就会成为“让我们与害怕中国的国家联合起来”，而这并非为建设性的有益之举。