米国人热评脚盆在广岛原子弹爆炸纪念日放出其战后最大航 ...

Jim M 9 hours ago
If this is their idea of a destroyer I would hate to see what their idea of an aircraft carrier would be.

Gary 15 hours ago
And if Japan buys some F-35B's she'll have seaborne fixed wing airpower.
如果日本再买些F-35B日本人就会变成有固定翼战斗机的海军强国。

Karl 12 hours ago
"because of constitutional restrictions that limit it's military forces to a defensive role." The best defense is a good offense. Countries need a military just strong enough to make other countries think twice before starting a war.

Spookinthe70's 11 hours ago
I was in the navy for four years and spent time on several carriers. Call it a "destroyer" if you want (I was on a couple of them, too) but I know an aircraft carrier when I see one.
我在海军的几艘航母上服役过四年。我还能看出”驱逐舰“和航母的区别。

adrhwrIX 10 hours ago
I think mommy destroyer cheated on daddy destroyer with a aircraft carrier.
我想这是驱逐舰妈妈给驱逐舰爸爸戴绿帽子，结果生出只航空母舰。

Jim M 9 hours ago
If this is their idea of a destroyer I would hate to see what their idea of an aircraft carrier would be.

Gary 15 hours ago
And if Japan buys some F-35B's she'll have seaborne fixed wing airpower.
如果日本再买些F-35B日本人就会变成有固定翼战斗机的海军强国。

Karl 12 hours ago
"because of constitutional restrictions that limit it's military forces to a defensive role." The best defense is a good offense. Countries need a military just strong enough to make other countries think twice before starting a war.

Spookinthe70's 11 hours ago
I was in the navy for four years and spent time on several carriers. Call it a "destroyer" if you want (I was on a couple of them, too) but I know an aircraft carrier when I see one.
我在海军的几艘航母上服役过四年。我还能看出”驱逐舰“和航母的区别。

adrhwrIX 10 hours ago
I think mommy destroyer cheated on daddy destroyer with a aircraft carrier.
我想这是驱逐舰妈妈给驱逐舰爸爸戴绿帽子，结果生出只航空母舰。

==============
TOM 12 hours ago
If War Breaks out do we still have to pay China back?
如果开战了，我们还要还中国钱吗？


silvershado 13 hours ago

China only owns 8% of our debt.
中国只是拥有我们8%的债权。

Commenter 13 hours ago
When germany got stupid, Americans froze all their assets.... so I would say no; we would charge them for the inconvenience, and I'm sure that would about equal what we owe.

Lucky Lee 12 hours ago
I can't remember if China ever paid us the U.S. back for kicking Japan off of mainland China or not.
我不记得中国曾经还给我们帮他们把日本赶出中国大陆的钱。

silvershado 12 hours ago
Lucky- Memories of the Rape of Nanking still linger.
南京大屠杀的记忆尤新。

desert 11 hours ago
Uh-Oh, here comes a good exuse for the US to start a major war.
噗，终于有开战的理由了。

Serge 11 hours ago
If we win - debt canceled and they will pay reparations. If they win - we will pay reparations for the next 100 years and give away half of our territory. It's winner takes all situation.
如果我们打赢，他们要支付战争赔款。如果他们打赢，我们要支付给他们一百年的战争赔款并割让一半的领土。这是胜者为王。

Michael 11 hours ago
Yes we do, but we can use international currency...which is bombs ;-)
当然还，但是我们还的是国际通用货币——炸弹;-)

Sabastien G 11 hours ago
Nope, but US will still have to pay Japan back. Japan is #2 on the debt list.

alan h 11 hours ago
FED央行的Bernake会用美元钞票淹没赤色中国，使其窒息。

Bernake will cover all of Red China in dollar bills so deep they will suffocate.

mike l 10 hours ago
just you

DENNIS RB 10 hours ago
Yeh: China gets a couple of bucks on the dollar...that's international politics...Read the Holy Bible if you will...Niether a borrower nor a lender be...

Charles 10 hours ago
fahq-um

Reply hidden due to low rating.
Show Reply

JB 10 hours ago
With large bombs, with infrared guided laser targets!
用巨型炸弹还，那种有激光制导的！

Samuel Atoms 10 hours ago
If war breaks it is because we did not pay China back.

Wayne 10 hours ago
If China loses the war, who do we borrow money from?????????????????

False_pleasure_and_pain 10 hours ago
They already own part of our territory. We gave them a bunch of the federal govt owned land

Spirit 10 hours ago
Hell #$%$ no, maybe it would shake your #$%$ to make stuff again, they are so fat that it is time you got off them. I like America, but it is sad to see how you are going downhill, too much wealth has made you lazy.

Commenter 9 hours ago
This country is too poor to get in any battles. China is not gonna loan us money to support Japan !
我们这个国家太穷了，打不起仗。中国不会借钱给我们去帮助日本！

Commenter 9 hours ago
@ Charles: we dont have enough bombs to destroy China? Really? We have enough firepower in our submarines alone to detstroy half the world. You would only be hitting strategic points not the whole country.

Commenter 9 hours ago
Clearly, this is an attempt by America to get two of its largest debt holders to wipe each other out so we can skip out of paying our tab.
很清楚这是美国试图让两个最大的债权人自相残杀以便赖账。

Mr. Nutcase 9 hours ago
I cant se us ever going to war with China. We are to good a customer for all the #$%$ they make.

Commenter 9 hours ago
If use war to not pay China back, that would make them the new Jew!
如果我们利用战争来赖中国人的账，中国人就会变成新的犹太人！

Commenter 9 hours ago
China doesn't have to fight us, they can just foreclose.

Commenter 9 hours ago
Sadly, ff course, Obama would insist on that.

Commenter 9 hours ago
That's not how National debt works. We'll never pay them back, and they don't want us to either. It's simply buying power at stake.

Commenter 8 hours ago
yeah we'll tape some hundreds to the bomb and tell them to keep the change.

Commenter 8 hours ago
yes and taxes will increase 60%

Commenter 8 hours ago
Yes. In blood.

Commenter 8 hours ago
If war breaks out, China's gonna pay the japs back!

Commenter 8 hours ago
we will destroy them then rebuild it better off the tax payers back.

Commenter 8 hours ago
Yes, in TNT.
会的，用TNT还。

Commenter 8 hours ago
No but they will stop lending us more which will be an even bigger problem for us.

Commenter 8 hours ago
You don't know your country's history, do you?
Everything the USA has is and has been stolen stolen.

Commenter 8 hours ago
This warship looks modular. All they have to do is cut off the flat front, extend the new bow (where the new catapult will be), and weld it to the rest of the ship. Walla! Warplane ready!

Commenter 8 hours ago
Lol, hell no...

Commenter 8 hours ago
I'd think not, unless we loose..
So heavy on the nu ke rs!

Yak 8 hours ago
No way. The US government is saving those money for illegal immigrants.
绝不还钱。美国ZF还需要这笔钱来支付非法移民们的开销。

Commenter 7 hours ago
I think we should default on China and start making our toys over here . That way our children will get to play with their toys instead of throwing them away as soon as they try to use them. They break within minutes sometimes.

Commenter 7 hours ago
We do not owe China any money; the U.S. is current in all its debt obligations. But China has for many decades owed Americans $1 Trillion in defaulted bond obligations You can Google it. China does not pay its lawful debts.

Commenter 7 hours ago
If they start it!

Commenter 7 hours ago
haha, hey Tom, that's why China wants to stay on good terms with us. We owe them so much, and continue to buy from them so much, that they want our business, no matter how much we don't like them.

Commenter 7 hours ago
I would think that would depend on who wins.

Commenter 7 hours ago
We never did owe China money that's just a hoax just to get more money from the American public! Never listen to Liberal media backed by our own Government! Most of the #$%$ that comes out of their mouths is a lie!

Commenter 7 hours ago
I cant make this big .. YES

Commenter 7 hours ago
if war breaks out, the only thing that will be left to pay for anything will be the ashes we leave behind in our extinction

Commenter 7 hours ago
I dare say they might just come over and collect what is owed.

Commenter 7 hours ago
If a war breaks out between china and us china will be gone and so will the debt!
如果中美开战，中国会消失，债也会消失。

Coventry 7 hours ago
When we have to repay China is the day Obama and Bernanke get together , start printing more dollars and then sit down to watch the greatest Depression this World has ever seen. And then you'll see the broadest smile you've ever seen on the Obama face. Because then , he will have repaid Soros for all he contracted to do.

Commenter 6 hours ago
Not if we win.
如果我们打赢了就不用还了。

Commenter 6 hours ago
depends on who wins
那要看谁赢了。

Commenter 6 hours ago
Technically, we'd still have o pay'em back, but, assuming we won the war, that'd be no problem. That doesn't mean we should go to war against them, but, if we did, we ding-dang well better win.

Commenter 5 hours ago
Haha... Funny.
We are not paying China one cent.
USA is a straight Gangsta/Hustler/Boss.
I doubt we will ever pay them back.
哈哈。。。太可笑了。美国是黑老大，我怀疑我们真的会还给他们钱。

Commenter 5 hours ago
If China loses (just picture it) can we just flat out NOT pay them back?

Commenter 5 hours ago
yes of course

Commenter 5 hours ago
I think china will flat the #$%$ in few seconds .if they fight ,not like WW 2.

Commenter 4 hours ago
NO

Commenter 4 hours ago
You pansies talking like we would let China beat us! If , If, If Grow some! Why don't you little girls start getting up out of your chairs and start doing something other than blogging. Yeah China has a lot of people. We still are the strongest and most developed Nation out there. If we work together, there is nothing we cannot do. China is still a 3rd world country, but they are coming up. We have put them on the map. The thing is we need to quit buying "things" from them and this will stop them. They are so intertwined with our everyday life because we have allowed it , this will be hard to stop. We have allowed them to come here and buy land, Oil reserves, Companies, Food Companies. It continues. We can do what they do and kick them out and say it is ours! On our land!

Commenter 3 hours ago
Damn Commenter, just by reading your comments I can tell you're an angry person. Not succeeding much in life eh?

Commenter 3 hours ago
The dirtiest people in the world are those that borrow and never wanted return back.

Commenter 3 hours ago
Then we have a lot of dirty people in the US! They expect free things and will not give anything in return. The working man that works for a living is out numbered by the majority that vote for a way of living (free things) Obama promises!

Commenter 2 hours ago
I'd say no, unless we loose.
不会还，除非我们打输了。

Commenter 2 hours ago
@Charles, One Ohio Class Missile Sub (BOOMER) can wipe out China's Population Center to dust. Thats a Fact considering One Sub carries 24 Nuclear Missiles that had yet to be intercepted spells doom to China.
@Charles, 一艘俄亥俄级潜艇就可以把中国的核心人口炸成灰。事实上一艘潜艇携带有24枚洲际核导弹，就是没被拦截掉的几枚就够扫平中国了。

Commenter 2 hours ago
If war broke out between the USA China and Japan. Debt would be the least of your worries. Russia would likely get involved and side with China. Europe would fracture so would the middle east. India would likely get drug into the conflict likely siding with the USA and Japan. A global war of that scale would make world war 2 seem like a hiccup.

It would be insanely bloody. How ever if it looked like war was going to break out. China and its allies could dump their bonds on the USA before it starts and literally purchase large amounts of resorces (oil, food, metal, coal). Sending the USA into a serious economic crisis.

Right now the one thing we have going for us is technology. If china and russia close that gap we will no longer be relevant.
如果中美日间开战，还债是最小的问题。。。和这场全球战争相比第二次世界大战只不过是儿童的游戏。。。幸好我们有科技优势，中俄如果能在这方面赶上，我们就辫子翘翘了。

Commenter 2 hours ago
why do you think they are building these ships and turning communist? not for us! round 2

Commenter 2 hours ago
Of course what do you think?, you must paid 1.3 TRILLIONS to China. Your #$%$**ng country is in bankrupt, was defeated in Iraq, is now defeated in Afghanistan and before 2016 will go to hell, hahahahahaha.

Commenter 2 hours ago
Come on people! Educate yourselves. Our national debt isn't all held by China. We owe several countries billions of dollars. While China holds approximately 8-10 percent of our debt, the U.S. government actually owes a hell of a lot more money to the good old US of A. Our Social Security Trust fund and the U.S. Treasury hold the largest percentage of the nations debt, not to mention the commercial banks and other entities in the country. With that being said, paying back China is more than possible in the near future, its the debt owed to the other countries and U.S. entities combined that is the problem. But hey, what do I know.

Commenter 1 hour ago
Yeah, I like that cooment, I thought the same too, I asu,e we'll be debt free..

==============

GEEZER MAN 11 hours ago
China take note. as history shows, Japan can be a formidable enemy.
中国小心了，从历史上看日本是个劲敌。

Arnold 12 hours ago
It's obvious that Japan designed this ship to be able to carry a variety of aircraft as needed, by making relatively small mods to the ship. Add in the drive by Abe to change Japan's constitution to allow it to build bigger, more aggressive military forces, and you have the possibility of a real dust-up between Japan and China in the not too distant future. The question for the U.S. is: how will we respond to that situation?
很明显日本设计这种比较小的模块型舰艇的初衷就是携带多种飞机。加上安倍晋三着力推动修改和平宪法打造更强大的军队，中日之间极有可能在不久的将来爆发真正的冲突。我们美国该如何对待这场争斗呢？

John Q. Public 15 hours ago
The Chinese are building aircraft carriers, soon to be on the shelves at a Walmart near you.
中国人在造航母，不久这些航母将上你们附近的沃尔玛超市的货架。

michaelb 9 hours ago
they can call it a tuna boat ,but it will still be an aircraft CARRIER!
他们就是称之为金枪鱼船还是改变不了这是航空母舰的事实。

W 13 hours ago
How large a crew does this ship employ? What armament does it have? Is it nuclear powered? What is the cruising range? Does it have the capability of being converted to use as an aircraft carrier? Etc. This article falls very short on info.

Dan 12 hours ago
Of course it bears resemblance to a conventional carrier ... it's brand new, it is a conventional carrier!
这个好像是艘常规动力的航母。。。这就是一艘常规动力的航母！

R U Serious 14 hours ago
Hey, Lets party like it's 1945.
嘿嘿，让我们开派对吧——就像1945年那样子。

Stefan 12 hours ago
If I had neighbors like Japan's neighbors I would be working on building several more of these.
如果我有像日本那样的邻居我会多造几艘这种轮船。

Paul 11 hours ago
Whoa, we can't have Japan fighting with China. We might have to make everything ourselves. We haven't done that since WWII. How will we ever survive?
哇，我们决不能让日本和中国打起来，要不然我们又得自己干活了。我们从二战后就没干过这些粗活，这可叫我们肿么活呀？

lilly 10 hours ago
guess who's getting back in the war games?!

Rudy 12 hours ago
I can't believe they are calling this thing a Destroyer. It sounds more like one of the US Navy's Amphibious Assault Ships without the stern gate. And with 14 helicopters, how many subs do they expect to prosecute simultaneously?
我难以置信他么称之为驱逐舰。看上去就像美国海军的两栖攻击舰嚒，就是没有船坞罢了。还有他们要携带14架直升机干嘛？他们打算究竟要同时追踪多少艘潜艇？

Delta RVN 12 hours ago
Can this be bad? Japan is trying to help keep China in check..we certainly lack the national resolve to do anything with our primary creditors.
这算坏消息吗？日本在试图协助围堵中国。。。看来我们自己对我们最大的几个债权人没有解决的好办法。

lpip215 12 hours ago

Japan prepares for war with Red China. Tensions between the US and Russia are once again building. Great Britain is concerned about tensions between the US and Russia. Muslims are building up resistance numbers within the United States, preparing for Jihad. (It's already happening all over Europe and Middle Eastern European countries.) Wake Up America.
日本在准备和赤色中国开战。美国和俄罗斯关系由开始紧张。英国也开始担忧美俄间的紧张关系。MSL开始在美国境内建立圣战游击队反抗力量（欧洲和中东已经开打了）。美国醒醒吧。

adrhwrIX 10 hours ago
I think mommy destroyer cheated on daddy destroyer with a aircraft carrier.
我说这尼玛好似是一个女人买了艘航母却骗她老公说是买了一艘驱逐舰。

S 12 hours ago
Notice the red white and blue banners on the ship.
More
Expand Replies (3) Reply
[Phillip]
Phillip 12 hours ago
6
60

I am glad to see one of our allies putting forth an effort on defense. It seems as if our some of European allies have decided to let the US pick the cost of their defense. If Japan wants to expand their Navy further I would favor selling them a couple of carriers so they could protect their oil supplies. The Persian Gulf is a lot more important to Japan (and to Europe too) than to the US. Let them pick up the cost of defending the Gulf.
我很高兴我们的一个盟友出钱出力搞军备，不像欧洲佬只会让我们美国出钱搞军备。如果日本还想再扩军的话我认为可以卖给他们几艘航母去保护他们的石油航道。波斯海湾对日本（和欧洲）的重要性超出美国。让他们去负担海湾防务的费用吧。

Uncle Bob 10 hours ago
Who knows, maybe they will start building them for the U.S.. For some reason, we cant seem to build anything for ourselves anymore.
谁知道呢，也许他们将来会替美国造军舰。我们已经啥都不会造了。

MFWIC 10 hours ago
Why is it that I feel like this destroyer is more advanced than China's aircraft carrier?
为啥我脚得这驱逐舰比中国的航空母舰还先进捏？

a realist 11 hours ago
If we were facing another world war like ww-ll we would surely lost with the president and congress that we have now.

Early Warning 10 hours ago
I am glad to see Japan step it up a notch. It is letting countries such as China & North Korea that they are ready to fight back.
很高兴日本突入这个缺口来对付中国、朝鲜之类的国家。

Joseph 12 hours ago
Why build a destroyer that looks like a carrier? The answer is the F-35Bs.
为啥把个驱逐舰造得像航母？答案是F-35B。

Wayne 8 hours ago
A 820 foot flight deck for only 14 helicopters? Those 14 helicopters much be humungous to require 820 feet of flight deck. I think someone wasn't paying attention when the true mission of this so called Helicopter Destroyer was officially announced.

Greg 14 hours ago
If I were Japan, I would rebuild my military. China certainly is and the US is not going to protect Japan.

slim pickens 10 hours ago
i thought Japan wasnt supposed to have an after ww2?


abe 10 hours ago

There's no Muslims in Japan. They are very smart.
日本没有MSL，他们很聪明。

SUITS 9 hours ago
Time to let Japan defend themselves again. Imagine our savings if we only built "defensive" weapons and let the rest of the world police itself.
是时候让日本自己去保护自己了。想象一下如果我们只制造自卫武器而让世界上的其他国家自己当警察的话，我们会省多少钱啊。

Jarhead 10 hours ago
Never heard of a carrier "destroyer" If it carries just helicopters, and not fix winged aircraft, it would be designated in the U.S. Navy as an LPH (Landing Platform Helicopter) used for vertical assault by Marines...Yahoo should do a better job of researching its articles

katspur 10 hours ago
Where are all the protester's with the Self Defense Law.

Nelson 11 hours ago
0
12

They need to cruise this bad boy along the African coast and catch some pirates.
More
Reply
[lee f]
lee f 4 hours ago
0
6

That looks a great deal more like a carrier than a destroyer.
More
Expand Replies (1) Reply
[Retired_LC]
Retired_LC 12 hours ago
15
85

No need to be worried, if they start something during Obama's reign he will send Kerry over and....oh God we're in trouble.....
表担心，如果他们在奥巴马的任期内开打的话奥巴马会派克里国务卿过去。。。哦上帝我们有麻烦了。。。

Tony D 7 hours ago
Beautiful new ship. Probably still has that new carrier smell.... uh, new destroyer smell.
好漂亮的新舰。也许透着股新航母的气味。。。哦不，是新驱逐舰的气味。

Robert S 11 hours ago
A few F-35 fighters and they will have an aircraft carrier
上几架F-35这东东就会变成航母。

Ben 9 hours ago
Good for them-- unlike Europe, Saudi, and every other nation we defend at least they are trying to provide for their OWN defense............keep in mind our nation is now 17 trillion in debt ..........due in part for trying to defend the whole world...............
More
Reply
[slomofo]
slomofo 12 hours ago
0
8

Harriers would also be a nice compliment! And they are getting cheap (compared to an F35b)
More
Expand Replies (1) Reply
[David]
David 12 hours ago
1
12

At 820 ft in length it'll surely be the largest destroyer in the world. The old Spruance class DDs were considered to be giants at 563' and 7800 tons displacement. The Arleigh Burkes are shorter, but wider and heavier than the Spruances. Reminds one of the 30's, when the Germans built "cruisers" that turned out to be pocket battleships. It would be mighty easy to convert this "destroyer" to either a fixed-wing or VSTOL carrier.
More
Reply
[carebear]
carebear 10 hours ago
2
13

love the rising sun flag on it too !!!

Fun9run 7 hours ago
Is it nuclear powered?

Eric Day 9 hours ago
The Japanese love building their sporty compacts. Not shown is the pink STi logo on the back.

I would definitely say it's more of a deployment ship than destroyer.. ospreys, helicopters, amphibious vehicles. Lot's of fun stuff you can launch of that little guy. I bet it's much quicker than a traditional carrier as well.
看看那些短小精悍的日本跑车就知道日本人擅长螺丝壳里做道场。这艘小军舰能干很多驱逐舰以外的活。。。鱼鹰、直升机、两栖战车，非常好玩。我敢打赌这小家伙比传统的航母开得更快。

Richard 8 hours ago
From a submariners perspective there are only two types of ships.................Submarines, and Targets
在潜艇兵看来只有两个舰种.......潜艇和靶子。

thru-the-fog 4 hours ago
A Flat Top Destroyer...?!?

lol
More
Expand Replies (1) Reply


joe47+ 11 hours ago
Hope they build more. China is big danger and bully in neighborhood.
希望他们再多造些，他的邻居中国很大很危险。

robert 8 hours ago
A destroyer.....I guess I better go get my eyes checked, I'd swear I'm looking at an aircraft carrier....??? Oh wait, that can't be because if I recall correctly when Japan surrendered unconditionally, part of that agreement was they were not allowed to have OFFENSIVE weaponry...???

And just because it doesn't have catapults or a ski jump doesn't mean it can't launch aircraft, anyone ever heard of vertical take-off aircraft...???? A wolf in sheeps clothing is still a wolf!!!!!
More

驱逐舰。。。。我瞎了我的狗眼，我对天起誓我看到的是艘航母。。。？？？等等，当然不可能是航母，日本是无条件投降的，投降条约上写明不得拥有攻击性武器。。。???
但是没有弹射器和跳跃甲板不等于不能放飞飞机，大家听说过垂直起降飞机吧。。。？？？披着羊皮的狼还是一只狼！！！！

FORCE 10 hours ago
its a helicopter carrier.............big deal.....................
More
Expand Replies (1) Reply
[Cato]
Cato 11 hours ago
1
8

Deck is long enough to launch any number of fixed wing aircraft. "Destroyer"- who are they kidding?
More
Reply
[onlyhuman]
onlyhuman 8 hours ago
0
3

I can see this launching drone fighters. I will go well with their secret robot army.
More
Expand Replies (1) Reply
[John]
John 10 hours ago
0
2

The superstructure(conning tower) is a little pagoda-ish.
More
Reply
[paul]
paul 12 hours ago
0
5

Made in Japan vs. the aircraft carrier from China with the ski slope flat / not flat top 1/2 made in Ukraine and welded together. Stalemate.
More
Reply
[Ed]
Ed 12 hours ago
0
9

Don't forget, if Japan gets invated, guess who protects them, US.
More
Expand Replies (1) Reply
[Dave]
Dave 3 hours ago
0
0

Impressive...
More
Reply
[richard]
richard 5 hours ago
0
3

Forget zombies I see world war three on the horizon.
More
Reply
[johns]
johns 10 hours ago
0
3

Google "Chinese Aircraft Carrier" and see nice photo of their new carrier coming out of home port in DaLim China
More
Expand Replies (2) Reply
[JOE PRO]
JOE PRO 11 hours ago
0
5

The best defense is a strong offense.
More
Reply
[InReality01]
InReality01 12 hours ago
0
5

Nations should put things in place to protect themselves.

We need more of our U.S. allies to build their own military forces up so we don't have to spend our money protecting them. We took on protecting Europe and many other nations after World War I & II because they were so destroyed physically and economically. Well, they are all better now and they need to go out on their own.

Good for Japan and hopefully good for the U.S.
More
Expand Replies (1) Reply
[JesseJE]
JesseJE 6 hours ago
1
8

Japan, show the world that you are still a player. The Chinese need to pay attention. They shouldn't have free sailing.
More
Reply
[Kirk H]
Kirk H 11 hours ago
2
12

Good for them. They could use a good ship with modern technology.
More
Reply
[perfectlybaked]
perfectlybaked 9 hours ago
1
4

I haven't seen that imperial flag for a VERY long time.

I also didn't know Japan had the money these days.
More
Expand Replies (2) Reply
[odinsthunder]
odinsthunder 1 hour ago
0
0

China is going to find a rapidly building military structure in the area surrounding N Korea because of a fear of that country's nuclear potential and it's nut case government. South Korea will begin doing the same thing and both countries may elect to begin Nuclear weapons programs if they don't already have a clandestine program.... They both have a robust economy and could afford it.
More
Expand Replies (1) Reply
[ChrisB]
ChrisB 6 hours ago
0
4

The Japanese have been quietly building up there military. They essentially have 2 working aircraft carriers, this one being unveiled and 1 more being built. China has one rust bucket and is building one now. The Japanese Hyuga is basically an aircraft carrier. The Japanese have been calling these helicopter destroyers for years and it has been under the radar of the press. That is why Japan is not only interested in the Osprey, but the F-35 VSTOL version. Japan has built aircraft carriers right under the noses of the world and the press has not said anything. I would bet the Chinese know what the Hyuga class is capable of.
More
Reply
[The AntiProgressive]
The AntiProgressive 8 hours ago
0
4

You go Japan, that is one sleek looking boat. Listen the fundis in the Mid-East would kill you too if they had their way. It starting to feel like gear up time. How about 20 more of these babies?
More
Reply
[EmmettTill'sRottenCorpse]
EmmettTill'sRottenCorpse 18 hours ago
61
202

YOU GOT TO HAND IT TO JAPANESE CULTURE ....


they don't sell themselves out. They don't allow themselves to mass import in the next generation, even tho they are not creating many new babies themselves. They keep their culture intact, thru thick and thin.

Compare that to the USA. Here, we import in the next mass wave of uneducated, dirt poor immigrants to supply cheap labor and to generate business demand for basicinternal businesses. Of course, we don't give a #$%$ about our exisiting culture, we'll wipe away the European base culture we have and replace it with third world, uneducated, ignorant people.
More
Expand Replies (56) Reply
[lillian]
lillian 10 hours ago
0
2

The war planes of the future will be smaller, requiring less runway length. The US military has already put in their first purchase orders for these pilotless drones. I think they are to be in use by 2015. So, yes, a smaller aircraft carrier.
More
Expand Replies (1) Reply
[Victor]
Victor 7 hours ago
1
2

I can't blame Japan one bit. If china keeps doing what they are doing. China keeps said peace talk but there are more action on the east sea than Weiner bid for Mayor of NY.
More
Reply
[Wags]
Wags 12 hours ago
4
12

Maybe now the Japanese can pay for their own defense instead of US taxpayers. What do we have, 30,000 troops guarding Japan?
More
Expand Replies (5) Reply
[PhoenixJack]
PhoenixJack 12 hours ago
1
9

The Japs did it again. Just goes to show what people can do when that work together. We here in the USA could never pull that off in such a short time and for what it cost them.
More
Expand Replies (2) Reply
[“Weretoast“]
“Weretoast“ 4 hours ago
0
1

SO THATS WHERE ALL OUR SCRAP METAL WENT............!
More
Reply
[Viddy]
Viddy 4 hours ago
0
5

I just hope it does not bomb Pearl harbor!
More
Reply
[sollyboy]
sollyboy 4 hours ago
0
4

It's really a new category of ships trying to fit in to old names. They should call it an: ACCIDENT.

A ir
C raft
C arrier
I ntending
D estruction of
E nemies
N ot
T rusted.
More
Expand Replies (1) Reply
[Tom]
Tom 7 hours ago
1
2

I have a feeling it wouldn't be too big a deal to convert this carrier over to catapults for launching aircraft.
More
Expand Replies (4) Reply
[Phoenix]
Phoenix 7 hours ago
0
3

Japan has order f-35 wonder how many of those will go on this carrier.......
More
Expand Replies (1) Reply
[Tina Z]
Tina Z 8 hours ago
2
5

I`m guessing the surrender in WW2 forbid Japan to ever have an aircraft carrier again? Seems like a rather devious way to simply ignore the treaty.
More
Expand Replies (4) Reply
[Loudelk99]
Loudelk99 11 hours ago
1
3

It can be used to launch VTOL fighters. Its an aircraft carrier.
More
Expand Replies (2) Reply
[Dave]
Dave 9 hours ago
0
1

Any country that buys and refurbishes an old russian aircraft carriier is light years
behind the US and Its allies at sea!
More
Reply
[Ian]
Ian 9 hours ago
2
5

Japan needs at least four more of these or similar types, so two or more can be at sea all the time on patrol with support vessels. The ranges will be limited, for I doubt they have nuclear reactors in their ships. As a note here, Japan wouldn't have built this ship if it hadn't felt pressured to do so. China has itself to blame about this.
More
Expand Replies (2) Reply
[Jimbo]
Jimbo 10 hours ago
0
2

Its a destroyer, a very big destroyer, disguised as an aircraft carrier. Can be used as a carrier since the F-35 joint strike fighter has vertical take off & landing ability. No catapults and arresting gear needed as our ships do for the Hornet.
More
Reply
[Sonny]
Sonny 12 hours ago
0
4

Thats a big boat !!!!
More
Reply
[Ken]
Ken 18 hours ago
39
121

Another example of the present world paralleling the world in the 1930s.
More
Expand Replies (19) Reply
[D]
D 7 hours ago
1
4

Japan has always been upfront with the world hasn't she? After the humiliating defeat in WWII she is now ready to start the payback. Or at least to deter China from giving Japan payback for the rape and pillage handed out to China.
More
Expand Replies (1) Reply
[Keyser Soze]
Keyser Soze 10 hours ago
3
8

Whichever nation adopts the "hoodie" as their uniform will be the good guys.

GEEZER MAN 11 hours ago
China take note. as history shows, Japan can be a formidable enemy.
中国小心了，从历史上看日本是个劲敌。

Arnold 12 hours ago
It's obvious that Japan designed this ship to be able to carry a variety of aircraft as needed, by making relatively small mods to the ship. Add in the drive by Abe to change Japan's constitution to allow it to build bigger, more aggressive military forces, and you have the possibility of a real dust-up between Japan and China in the not too distant future. The question for the U.S. is: how will we respond to that situation?
很明显日本设计这种比较小的模块型舰艇的初衷就是携带多种飞机。加上安倍晋三着力推动修改和平宪法打造更强大的军队，中日之间极有可能在不久的将来爆发真正的冲突。我们美国该如何对待这场争斗呢？

John Q. Public 15 hours ago
The Chinese are building aircraft carriers, soon to be on the shelves at a Walmart near you.
中国人在造航母，不久这些航母将上你们附近的沃尔玛超市的货架。

michaelb 9 hours ago
they can call it a tuna boat ,but it will still be an aircraft CARRIER!
他们就是称之为金枪鱼船还是改变不了这是航空母舰的事实。

W 13 hours ago
How large a crew does this ship employ? What armament does it have? Is it nuclear powered? What is the cruising range? Does it have the capability of being converted to use as an aircraft carrier? Etc. This article falls very short on info.

Dan 12 hours ago
Of course it bears resemblance to a conventional carrier ... it's brand new, it is a conventional carrier!
这个好像是艘常规动力的航母。。。这就是一艘常规动力的航母！

R U Serious 14 hours ago
Hey, Lets party like it's 1945.
嘿嘿，让我们开派对吧——就像1945年那样子。

Stefan 12 hours ago
If I had neighbors like Japan's neighbors I would be working on building several more of these.
如果我有像日本那样的邻居我会多造几艘这种轮船。

Paul 11 hours ago
Whoa, we can't have Japan fighting with China. We might have to make everything ourselves. We haven't done that since WWII. How will we ever survive?
哇，我们决不能让日本和中国打起来，要不然我们又得自己干活了。我们从二战后就没干过这些粗活，这可叫我们肿么活呀？

lilly 10 hours ago
guess who's getting back in the war games?!

Rudy 12 hours ago
I can't believe they are calling this thing a Destroyer. It sounds more like one of the US Navy's Amphibious Assault Ships without the stern gate. And with 14 helicopters, how many subs do they expect to prosecute simultaneously?
我难以置信他么称之为驱逐舰。看上去就像美国海军的两栖攻击舰嚒，就是没有船坞罢了。还有他们要携带14架直升机干嘛？他们打算究竟要同时追踪多少艘潜艇？

Delta RVN 12 hours ago
Can this be bad? Japan is trying to help keep China in check..we certainly lack the national resolve to do anything with our primary creditors.
这算坏消息吗？日本在试图协助围堵中国。。。看来我们自己对我们最大的几个债权人没有解决的好办法。

lpip215 12 hours ago

Japan prepares for war with Red China. Tensions between the US and Russia are once again building. Great Britain is concerned about tensions between the US and Russia. Muslims are building up resistance numbers within the United States, preparing for Jihad. (It's already happening all over Europe and Middle Eastern European countries.) Wake Up America.
日本在准备和赤色中国开战。美国和俄罗斯关系由开始紧张。英国也开始担忧美俄间的紧张关系。MSL开始在美国境内建立圣战游击队反抗力量（欧洲和中东已经开打了）。美国醒醒吧。

adrhwrIX 10 hours ago
I think mommy destroyer cheated on daddy destroyer with a aircraft carrier.
我说这尼玛好似是一个女人买了艘航母却骗她老公说是买了一艘驱逐舰。

S 12 hours ago
Notice the red white and blue banners on the ship.
More
Expand Replies (3) Reply
[Phillip]
Phillip 12 hours ago
6
60

I am glad to see one of our allies putting forth an effort on defense. It seems as if our some of European allies have decided to let the US pick the cost of their defense. If Japan wants to expand their Navy further I would favor selling them a couple of carriers so they could protect their oil supplies. The Persian Gulf is a lot more important to Japan (and to Europe too) than to the US. Let them pick up the cost of defending the Gulf.
我很高兴我们的一个盟友出钱出力搞军备，不像欧洲佬只会让我们美国出钱搞军备。如果日本还想再扩军的话我认为可以卖给他们几艘航母去保护他们的石油航道。波斯海湾对日本（和欧洲）的重要性超出美国。让他们去负担海湾防务的费用吧。

Uncle Bob 10 hours ago
Who knows, maybe they will start building them for the U.S.. For some reason, we cant seem to build anything for ourselves anymore.
谁知道呢，也许他们将来会替美国造军舰。我们已经啥都不会造了。

MFWIC 10 hours ago
Why is it that I feel like this destroyer is more advanced than China's aircraft carrier?
为啥我脚得这驱逐舰比中国的航空母舰还先进捏？

a realist 11 hours ago
If we were facing another world war like ww-ll we would surely lost with the president and congress that we have now.

Early Warning 10 hours ago
I am glad to see Japan step it up a notch. It is letting countries such as China & North Korea that they are ready to fight back.
很高兴日本突入这个缺口来对付中国、朝鲜之类的国家。

Joseph 12 hours ago
Why build a destroyer that looks like a carrier? The answer is the F-35Bs.
为啥把个驱逐舰造得像航母？答案是F-35B。

Wayne 8 hours ago
A 820 foot flight deck for only 14 helicopters? Those 14 helicopters much be humungous to require 820 feet of flight deck. I think someone wasn't paying attention when the true mission of this so called Helicopter Destroyer was officially announced.

Greg 14 hours ago
If I were Japan, I would rebuild my military. China certainly is and the US is not going to protect Japan.

slim pickens 10 hours ago
i thought Japan wasnt supposed to have an after ww2?


abe 10 hours ago

There's no Muslims in Japan. They are very smart.
日本没有MSL，他们很聪明。

SUITS 9 hours ago
Time to let Japan defend themselves again. Imagine our savings if we only built "defensive" weapons and let the rest of the world police itself.
是时候让日本自己去保护自己了。想象一下如果我们只制造自卫武器而让世界上的其他国家自己当警察的话，我们会省多少钱啊。

Jarhead 10 hours ago
Never heard of a carrier "destroyer" If it carries just helicopters, and not fix winged aircraft, it would be designated in the U.S. Navy as an LPH (Landing Platform Helicopter) used for vertical assault by Marines...Yahoo should do a better job of researching its articles

katspur 10 hours ago
Where are all the protester's with the Self Defense Law.

Nelson 11 hours ago
0
12

They need to cruise this bad boy along the African coast and catch some pirates.
More
Reply
[lee f]
lee f 4 hours ago
0
6

That looks a great deal more like a carrier than a destroyer.
More
Expand Replies (1) Reply
[Retired_LC]
Retired_LC 12 hours ago
15
85

No need to be worried, if they start something during Obama's reign he will send Kerry over and....oh God we're in trouble.....
表担心，如果他们在奥巴马的任期内开打的话奥巴马会派克里国务卿过去。。。哦上帝我们有麻烦了。。。

Tony D 7 hours ago
Beautiful new ship. Probably still has that new carrier smell.... uh, new destroyer smell.
好漂亮的新舰。也许透着股新航母的气味。。。哦不，是新驱逐舰的气味。

Robert S 11 hours ago
A few F-35 fighters and they will have an aircraft carrier
上几架F-35这东东就会变成航母。

Ben 9 hours ago
Good for them-- unlike Europe, Saudi, and every other nation we defend at least they are trying to provide for their OWN defense............keep in mind our nation is now 17 trillion in debt ..........due in part for trying to defend the whole world...............
More
Reply
[slomofo]
slomofo 12 hours ago
0
8

Harriers would also be a nice compliment! And they are getting cheap (compared to an F35b)
More
Expand Replies (1) Reply
[David]
David 12 hours ago
1
12

At 820 ft in length it'll surely be the largest destroyer in the world. The old Spruance class DDs were considered to be giants at 563' and 7800 tons displacement. The Arleigh Burkes are shorter, but wider and heavier than the Spruances. Reminds one of the 30's, when the Germans built "cruisers" that turned out to be pocket battleships. It would be mighty easy to convert this "destroyer" to either a fixed-wing or VSTOL carrier.
More
Reply
[carebear]
carebear 10 hours ago
2
13

love the rising sun flag on it too !!!

Fun9run 7 hours ago
Is it nuclear powered?

Eric Day 9 hours ago
The Japanese love building their sporty compacts. Not shown is the pink STi logo on the back.

I would definitely say it's more of a deployment ship than destroyer.. ospreys, helicopters, amphibious vehicles. Lot's of fun stuff you can launch of that little guy. I bet it's much quicker than a traditional carrier as well.
看看那些短小精悍的日本跑车就知道日本人擅长螺丝壳里做道场。这艘小军舰能干很多驱逐舰以外的活。。。鱼鹰、直升机、两栖战车，非常好玩。我敢打赌这小家伙比传统的航母开得更快。

Richard 8 hours ago
From a submariners perspective there are only two types of ships.................Submarines, and Targets
在潜艇兵看来只有两个舰种.......潜艇和靶子。

thru-the-fog 4 hours ago
A Flat Top Destroyer...?!?

lol
More
Expand Replies (1) Reply


joe47+ 11 hours ago
Hope they build more. China is big danger and bully in neighborhood.
希望他们再多造些，他的邻居中国很大很危险。

robert 8 hours ago
A destroyer.....I guess I better go get my eyes checked, I'd swear I'm looking at an aircraft carrier....??? Oh wait, that can't be because if I recall correctly when Japan surrendered unconditionally, part of that agreement was they were not allowed to have OFFENSIVE weaponry...???

And just because it doesn't have catapults or a ski jump doesn't mean it can't launch aircraft, anyone ever heard of vertical take-off aircraft...???? A wolf in sheeps clothing is still a wolf!!!!!
More

驱逐舰。。。。我瞎了我的狗眼，我对天起誓我看到的是艘航母。。。？？？等等，当然不可能是航母，日本是无条件投降的，投降条约上写明不得拥有攻击性武器。。。???
但是没有弹射器和跳跃甲板不等于不能放飞飞机，大家听说过垂直起降飞机吧。。。？？？披着羊皮的狼还是一只狼！！！！

FORCE 10 hours ago
its a helicopter carrier.............big deal.....................
More
Expand Replies (1) Reply
[Cato]
Cato 11 hours ago
1
8

Deck is long enough to launch any number of fixed wing aircraft. "Destroyer"- who are they kidding?
More
Reply
[onlyhuman]
onlyhuman 8 hours ago
0
3

I can see this launching drone fighters. I will go well with their secret robot army.
More
Expand Replies (1) Reply
[John]
John 10 hours ago
0
2

The superstructure(conning tower) is a little pagoda-ish.
More
Reply
[paul]
paul 12 hours ago
0
5

Made in Japan vs. the aircraft carrier from China with the ski slope flat / not flat top 1/2 made in Ukraine and welded together. Stalemate.
More
Reply
[Ed]
Ed 12 hours ago
0
9

Don't forget, if Japan gets invated, guess who protects them, US.
More
Expand Replies (1) Reply
[Dave]
Dave 3 hours ago
0
0

Impressive...
More
Reply
[richard]
richard 5 hours ago
0
3

Forget zombies I see world war three on the horizon.
More
Reply
[johns]
johns 10 hours ago
0
3

Google "Chinese Aircraft Carrier" and see nice photo of their new carrier coming out of home port in DaLim China
More
Expand Replies (2) Reply
[JOE PRO]
JOE PRO 11 hours ago
0
5

The best defense is a strong offense.
More
Reply
[InReality01]
InReality01 12 hours ago
0
5

Nations should put things in place to protect themselves.

We need more of our U.S. allies to build their own military forces up so we don't have to spend our money protecting them. We took on protecting Europe and many other nations after World War I & II because they were so destroyed physically and economically. Well, they are all better now and they need to go out on their own.

Good for Japan and hopefully good for the U.S.
More
Expand Replies (1) Reply
[JesseJE]
JesseJE 6 hours ago
1
8

Japan, show the world that you are still a player. The Chinese need to pay attention. They shouldn't have free sailing.
More
Reply
[Kirk H]
Kirk H 11 hours ago
2
12

Good for them. They could use a good ship with modern technology.
More
Reply
[perfectlybaked]
perfectlybaked 9 hours ago
1
4

I haven't seen that imperial flag for a VERY long time.

I also didn't know Japan had the money these days.
More
Expand Replies (2) Reply
[odinsthunder]
odinsthunder 1 hour ago
0
0

China is going to find a rapidly building military structure in the area surrounding N Korea because of a fear of that country's nuclear potential and it's nut case government. South Korea will begin doing the same thing and both countries may elect to begin Nuclear weapons programs if they don't already have a clandestine program.... They both have a robust economy and could afford it.
More
Expand Replies (1) Reply
[ChrisB]
ChrisB 6 hours ago
0
4

The Japanese have been quietly building up there military. They essentially have 2 working aircraft carriers, this one being unveiled and 1 more being built. China has one rust bucket and is building one now. The Japanese Hyuga is basically an aircraft carrier. The Japanese have been calling these helicopter destroyers for years and it has been under the radar of the press. That is why Japan is not only interested in the Osprey, but the F-35 VSTOL version. Japan has built aircraft carriers right under the noses of the world and the press has not said anything. I would bet the Chinese know what the Hyuga class is capable of.
More
Reply
[The AntiProgressive]
The AntiProgressive 8 hours ago
0
4

You go Japan, that is one sleek looking boat. Listen the fundis in the Mid-East would kill you too if they had their way. It starting to feel like gear up time. How about 20 more of these babies?
More
Reply
[EmmettTill'sRottenCorpse]
EmmettTill'sRottenCorpse 18 hours ago
61
202

YOU GOT TO HAND IT TO JAPANESE CULTURE ....


they don't sell themselves out. They don't allow themselves to mass import in the next generation, even tho they are not creating many new babies themselves. They keep their culture intact, thru thick and thin.

Compare that to the USA. Here, we import in the next mass wave of uneducated, dirt poor immigrants to supply cheap labor and to generate business demand for basicinternal businesses. Of course, we don't give a #$%$ about our exisiting culture, we'll wipe away the European base culture we have and replace it with third world, uneducated, ignorant people.
More
Expand Replies (56) Reply
[lillian]
lillian 10 hours ago
0
2

The war planes of the future will be smaller, requiring less runway length. The US military has already put in their first purchase orders for these pilotless drones. I think they are to be in use by 2015. So, yes, a smaller aircraft carrier.
More
Expand Replies (1) Reply
[Victor]
Victor 7 hours ago
1
2

I can't blame Japan one bit. If china keeps doing what they are doing. China keeps said peace talk but there are more action on the east sea than Weiner bid for Mayor of NY.
More
Reply
[Wags]
Wags 12 hours ago
4
12

Maybe now the Japanese can pay for their own defense instead of US taxpayers. What do we have, 30,000 troops guarding Japan?
More
Expand Replies (5) Reply
[PhoenixJack]
PhoenixJack 12 hours ago
1
9

The Japs did it again. Just goes to show what people can do when that work together. We here in the USA could never pull that off in such a short time and for what it cost them.
More
Expand Replies (2) Reply
[“Weretoast“]
“Weretoast“ 4 hours ago
0
1

SO THATS WHERE ALL OUR SCRAP METAL WENT............!
More
Reply
[Viddy]
Viddy 4 hours ago
0
5

I just hope it does not bomb Pearl harbor!
More
Reply
[sollyboy]
sollyboy 4 hours ago
0
4

It's really a new category of ships trying to fit in to old names. They should call it an: ACCIDENT.

A ir
C raft
C arrier
I ntending
D estruction of
E nemies
N ot
T rusted.
More
Expand Replies (1) Reply
[Tom]
Tom 7 hours ago
1
2

I have a feeling it wouldn't be too big a deal to convert this carrier over to catapults for launching aircraft.
More
Expand Replies (4) Reply
[Phoenix]
Phoenix 7 hours ago
0
3

Japan has order f-35 wonder how many of those will go on this carrier.......
More
Expand Replies (1) Reply
[Tina Z]
Tina Z 8 hours ago
2
5

I`m guessing the surrender in WW2 forbid Japan to ever have an aircraft carrier again? Seems like a rather devious way to simply ignore the treaty.
More
Expand Replies (4) Reply
[Loudelk99]
Loudelk99 11 hours ago
1
3

It can be used to launch VTOL fighters. Its an aircraft carrier.
More
Expand Replies (2) Reply
[Dave]
Dave 9 hours ago
0
1

Any country that buys and refurbishes an old russian aircraft carriier is light years
behind the US and Its allies at sea!
More
Reply
[Ian]
Ian 9 hours ago
2
5

Japan needs at least four more of these or similar types, so two or more can be at sea all the time on patrol with support vessels. The ranges will be limited, for I doubt they have nuclear reactors in their ships. As a note here, Japan wouldn't have built this ship if it hadn't felt pressured to do so. China has itself to blame about this.
More
Expand Replies (2) Reply
[Jimbo]
Jimbo 10 hours ago
0
2

Its a destroyer, a very big destroyer, disguised as an aircraft carrier. Can be used as a carrier since the F-35 joint strike fighter has vertical take off & landing ability. No catapults and arresting gear needed as our ships do for the Hornet.
More
Reply
[Sonny]
Sonny 12 hours ago
0
4

Thats a big boat !!!!
More
Reply
[Ken]
Ken 18 hours ago
39
121

Another example of the present world paralleling the world in the 1930s.
More
Expand Replies (19) Reply
[D]
D 7 hours ago
1
4

Japan has always been upfront with the world hasn't she? After the humiliating defeat in WWII she is now ready to start the payback. Or at least to deter China from giving Japan payback for the rape and pillage handed out to China.
More
Expand Replies (1) Reply
[Keyser Soze]
Keyser Soze 10 hours ago
3
8

Whichever nation adopts the "hoodie" as their uniform will be the good guys.

真正备战的美国人不会在网上叫嚣的……

Commenter 9 hours ago
This country is too poor to get in any battles. China is not gonna loan us money to support Japan !
我们这个国家太穷了，打不起仗。中国不会借钱给我们去帮助日本！

Commenter 9 hours ago
@ Charles: we dont have enough bombs to destroy China? Really? We have enough firepower in our submarines alone to detstroy half the world. You would only be hitting strategic points not the whole country.

Commenter 9 hours ago
Clearly, this is an attempt by America to get two of its largest debt holders to wipe each other out so we can skip out of paying our tab.
很清楚这是美国试图让两个最大的债权人自相残杀以便赖账。

这尼玛赖皮啊        md可以去死啦

在一起 发表于 2013-8-7 20:32
这尼玛赖皮啊        md可以去死啦

不能低估美国草根的智慧。。。

ocean_hercules 发表于 2013-8-7 20:37
不能低估美国草根的智慧。。。
   是啊咱们必须清醒时刻的

呵呵，赖账已经是米帝全国上下的共识了
大海刚去谈婚论嫁，美债就当是嫁妆了

MD一门心思想赖账啊

这么说，我们爆兵是为了暴力讨债

就为了不还债，赶着去亡国，美国妓女以为是冷兵器时代谁力气大就谁赢，让中国亡国也不怕自己先亡国

请问这是超大英语六级考试的试题么？

这世界流氓就想着扔核弹，当谁没有吗

这就是现实，人家为了赖账就想杀你全家，所以对美分一定要打击到底，人家是想要我们全部死绝。

I just hope it does not bomb Pearl harbor!

美国人都不懂经济，就这智商。。。赖账不还？宣布国家破产，然后各种分裂么？

美国人都不懂经济，就这智商。。。赖账不还？宣布国家破产，然后各种分裂么？

天朝，
一切以防止美帝赖账为准备

美国白痴可能比中国还多

early, this is an attempt by America to get two of its largest debt holders to wipe each other out so we can skip out of paying our tab.
很清楚这是美国试图让两个最大的债权人自相残杀以便赖账。

稍微有点智商的人都知道美国还不起债

就这帮美国愤青的智商，我深刻怀疑他们能有几个在地图上找到中国。

楼主敢不敢再懒点，翻了几句就没有了

一分利 发表于 2013-8-7 20:58
美国人都不懂经济，就这智商。。。赖账不还？宣布国家破产，然后各种分裂么？
你这想法独特.......。金融赖帐，美元体系跨塌，和国家宣布破产基本没什么两样了。
但这帖子说的是开战后赖帐，到时候帐目可以规划到战争赔款，不仅可以赖掉，还可以敲诈中国一笔，也不影响美圆体系。而战争期间可以不偿付敌对国家借款（前提美国胜利或者占绝对优势情况下和谈）。毕竟按美日安保法，美国出兵帮日本有依据，不会对其他债权国形成太大压力。

supermanaz 发表于 2013-8-7 21:08
稍微有点智商的人都知道美国还不起债
所以靠量宽金融在赖帐了。多印钞票还钱，钞票的购买力下降。谁买美债，储存美圆谁亏。
又靠打压国际黄金价格来确保美圆体系，让美圆还是国际储备和基础货币。

城市迷彩 发表于 2013-8-7 21:11
就这帮美国愤青的智商，我深刻怀疑他们能有几个在地图上找到中国。
准确的叫法是无赖，天天想着怎么赖帐。至于拥有过分爱国热情的愤青，他们还不配。

hseelez 发表于 2013-8-7 21:07
美国白痴可能比中国还多
不去原论坛看 看不出国家意识水平，一般只翻译或者转载里面一些和贴主类同的回复。（原文贴主，不指这里转载的）。在任何国家，都有不理性的声音，区别只是多和少而已。想看狂妄无知的可以去看日韩论坛回帖，想看滑稽的可以参考三哥家论坛回帖。

想赖帐，我们会秋后算帐。

呼唤英语老师！快把生肉弄熟！

nightlike 发表于 2013-8-7 21:20
你这想法独特.......。金融赖帐，美元体系跨塌，和国家宣布破产基本没什么两样了。
但这帖子说的是开战 ...
战争不是玩游戏，中国的体积这么大，老美不需要战争动员么？

作为债权国，尤其是被迫成为老美的债权国所有事情都要躲留心眼，开战前必然是各种金融原子弹，资本外逃。然后各种伤敌1000自损800，接着勒紧裤腰带全民瘦身上去拼，拼赢了有赔款，拼输了国家分裂，最有可能是打成僵局。老美动TG的念头早就有了，最合适的时候都没动，现在扯这个已经没啥用了。

sonandme 发表于 2013-8-7 21:02
天朝，
一切以防止美帝赖账为准备
大规模战争不可能产生，核战争那是纯YY了。双方都有能力毁灭对方。美国的战争承受力远小于我国。（除非真相信中国只有10-20枚可以打到美国的导弹）
但小规模冲突冲突完全可以发生，到时候美国以战争赔偿的借口来赖帐还真说不定，这国家无赖是有名的。
先阶段又不想和美国彻底翻脸（一直在开矿，才开始爆兵），所以只能继续买美国国债。这真蛋疼啊。只
能期望早点建立区域性人民币结算体系和减少美国国债了。

Z舰 发表于 2013-8-7 21:15
楼主敢不敢再懒点，翻了几句就没有了
是啊  台懒了 后面的没法看

zyphint 发表于 2013-8-7 20:56
这就是现实，人家为了赖账就想杀你全家，所以对美分一定要打击到底，人家是想要我们全部死绝。
美分会说 别人赖帐，灭了你  让中国变美国的一个洲太好了。这样整个美国都是你的了，我们赚到了。
或者说看美国多伟大，为了人民的利益赖帐较尽脑汁。他们才是民主，人民利益放在第一。我们呢？
只会把人民创造的财富无条件援助给他国。然后换来领导人的私利或者名声。这才是腐败
总结，消灭MD前 必须把美分先消灭干净。攘外还真必先安内。

软妍抽 发表于 2013-8-7 20:56
这世界流氓就想着扔核弹，当谁没有吗
人家专业机构考证过，兔子只有10-20枚可以打到美国的导弹，按其拦截率，最多只会中1-2枚。（别当人家专家不是专家，世界专家都一个样）

这脚盆船入水，标题和内容有直接联系吗

ocean_hercules 发表于 2013-8-7 20:37
不能低估美国草根的智慧。。。
智慧在民间，但必须要说，有条真理世界是统一的，那就是呆逼种死不光（愚蠢的人还是占人口基数的大部分）
这么多条回复大多是无脑的

zyphint 发表于 2013-8-7 20:56
这就是现实，人家为了赖账就想杀你全家，所以对美分一定要打击到底，人家是想要我们全部死绝。
借钱给人结果引来杀生之祸可是自古以来中外就有的常事哈。

nightlike 发表于 2013-8-7 21:22
所以靠量宽金融在赖帐了。多印钞票还钱，钞票的购买力下降。谁买美债，储存美圆谁亏。
又靠打压国际黄金 ...
你有一个误区，美债和美元是不一样的。美国选择赖账，就是所有人都不还钱（或者是暂时都不还债并保证债权利息）

对于md的无耻要有清醒认识。起码要先保持同归于尽的能力，以阻止md的无赖行径。