超级军网紐約時報：美國會警告歐盟勿取消中國軍售禁令
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/05/02 06:24:45
（中央社記者林琳紐約二日專電）紐約時報以顯著的篇幅報導，美國兩黨資深國會議員週二與布希總統會商歐盟擬取消對中國軍售禁令的問題，國會議員鄭重警告，如果歐盟執意這麼做，美國將以嚴格限制對歐洲公司的科技轉移作為懲罰。
國會議員的聲明更顯示美國對於精密軍事科技可能因歐洲取消軍售禁令而流入中國的憂心。布希總統及國務卿萊斯在與歐洲政要會晤時已提出對這項問題的嚴重關切。
報導指出，布希總統在上週訪歐期間曾兩度提出這項問題。根據美國最新的情報評估，北京武器發展精進，已更具有武力犯台的能力，甚至可抵擋美國針對其攻擊行動的反擊。
雖然布希總統及萊斯都談到出售重武器的問題，美國國防部官員表示，美國最擔憂的是這些武器所應用的高科技，包括雷達及戰地通訊系統。這些科技可大幅提昇中國的武力。報導指出，美國國防部的官員甚至討論到這些科技會助長中國威嚇台灣的能力，萬一台灣積極走向獨立，中國將進攻台灣。
報導指出，國防部官員提出這方面的情報評估，一方面是基於擔憂中國武力的發展會影響到美國的安全利益，同時也是希望國會正視軍事預算問題，布希新的預算建議將大部份追加預算撥給地面部隊及對伊拉克的戰爭，而反制中國武力威脅的問題，卻是海軍及空軍的任務。對於中國已快速發展成為太平洋地區的軍事強權，而美國卻將注意力集中在中東，美國政府內某些人士深感憂心。
美國最新的情報指出，自從布希擔任總統以來，中國大幅增建軍備，包括建造了二十三艘可以跨海運輸坦克、武裝車輛及部隊的兩棲戰艦，以及十三艘潛艇。情報官員指出，中國建立的兩棲進攻船艦武力已和美國海軍二００二年以來的船艦建置相當。他指出，中國向國外購買及本身發展製造的船艦及戰機已大幅提昇其整體作戰能力，如果能在雷達及通訊科技上改進，這些船艦和戰機將快速強化其進攻及對抗美國反制行動的能力。940302（中央社記者林琳紐約二日專電）紐約時報以顯著的篇幅報導，美國兩黨資深國會議員週二與布希總統會商歐盟擬取消對中國軍售禁令的問題，國會議員鄭重警告，如果歐盟執意這麼做，美國將以嚴格限制對歐洲公司的科技轉移作為懲罰。
國會議員的聲明更顯示美國對於精密軍事科技可能因歐洲取消軍售禁令而流入中國的憂心。布希總統及國務卿萊斯在與歐洲政要會晤時已提出對這項問題的嚴重關切。
報導指出，布希總統在上週訪歐期間曾兩度提出這項問題。根據美國最新的情報評估，北京武器發展精進，已更具有武力犯台的能力，甚至可抵擋美國針對其攻擊行動的反擊。
雖然布希總統及萊斯都談到出售重武器的問題，美國國防部官員表示，美國最擔憂的是這些武器所應用的高科技，包括雷達及戰地通訊系統。這些科技可大幅提昇中國的武力。報導指出，美國國防部的官員甚至討論到這些科技會助長中國威嚇台灣的能力，萬一台灣積極走向獨立，中國將進攻台灣。
報導指出，國防部官員提出這方面的情報評估，一方面是基於擔憂中國武力的發展會影響到美國的安全利益，同時也是希望國會正視軍事預算問題，布希新的預算建議將大部份追加預算撥給地面部隊及對伊拉克的戰爭，而反制中國武力威脅的問題，卻是海軍及空軍的任務。對於中國已快速發展成為太平洋地區的軍事強權，而美國卻將注意力集中在中東，美國政府內某些人士深感憂心。
美國最新的情報指出，自從布希擔任總統以來，中國大幅增建軍備，包括建造了二十三艘可以跨海運輸坦克、武裝車輛及部隊的兩棲戰艦，以及十三艘潛艇。情報官員指出，中國建立的兩棲進攻船艦武力已和美國海軍二００二年以來的船艦建置相當。他指出，中國向國外購買及本身發展製造的船艦及戰機已大幅提昇其整體作戰能力，如果能在雷達及通訊科技上改進，這些船艦和戰機將快速強化其進攻及對抗美國反制行動的能力。940302
國會議員的聲明更顯示美國對於精密軍事科技可能因歐洲取消軍售禁令而流入中國的憂心。布希總統及國務卿萊斯在與歐洲政要會晤時已提出對這項問題的嚴重關切。
報導指出，布希總統在上週訪歐期間曾兩度提出這項問題。根據美國最新的情報評估，北京武器發展精進，已更具有武力犯台的能力，甚至可抵擋美國針對其攻擊行動的反擊。
雖然布希總統及萊斯都談到出售重武器的問題，美國國防部官員表示，美國最擔憂的是這些武器所應用的高科技，包括雷達及戰地通訊系統。這些科技可大幅提昇中國的武力。報導指出，美國國防部的官員甚至討論到這些科技會助長中國威嚇台灣的能力，萬一台灣積極走向獨立，中國將進攻台灣。
報導指出，國防部官員提出這方面的情報評估，一方面是基於擔憂中國武力的發展會影響到美國的安全利益，同時也是希望國會正視軍事預算問題，布希新的預算建議將大部份追加預算撥給地面部隊及對伊拉克的戰爭，而反制中國武力威脅的問題，卻是海軍及空軍的任務。對於中國已快速發展成為太平洋地區的軍事強權，而美國卻將注意力集中在中東，美國政府內某些人士深感憂心。
美國最新的情報指出，自從布希擔任總統以來，中國大幅增建軍備，包括建造了二十三艘可以跨海運輸坦克、武裝車輛及部隊的兩棲戰艦，以及十三艘潛艇。情報官員指出，中國建立的兩棲進攻船艦武力已和美國海軍二００二年以來的船艦建置相當。他指出，中國向國外購買及本身發展製造的船艦及戰機已大幅提昇其整體作戰能力，如果能在雷達及通訊科技上改進，這些船艦和戰機將快速強化其進攻及對抗美國反制行動的能力。940302（中央社記者林琳紐約二日專電）紐約時報以顯著的篇幅報導，美國兩黨資深國會議員週二與布希總統會商歐盟擬取消對中國軍售禁令的問題，國會議員鄭重警告，如果歐盟執意這麼做，美國將以嚴格限制對歐洲公司的科技轉移作為懲罰。
國會議員的聲明更顯示美國對於精密軍事科技可能因歐洲取消軍售禁令而流入中國的憂心。布希總統及國務卿萊斯在與歐洲政要會晤時已提出對這項問題的嚴重關切。
報導指出，布希總統在上週訪歐期間曾兩度提出這項問題。根據美國最新的情報評估，北京武器發展精進，已更具有武力犯台的能力，甚至可抵擋美國針對其攻擊行動的反擊。
雖然布希總統及萊斯都談到出售重武器的問題，美國國防部官員表示，美國最擔憂的是這些武器所應用的高科技，包括雷達及戰地通訊系統。這些科技可大幅提昇中國的武力。報導指出，美國國防部的官員甚至討論到這些科技會助長中國威嚇台灣的能力，萬一台灣積極走向獨立，中國將進攻台灣。
報導指出，國防部官員提出這方面的情報評估，一方面是基於擔憂中國武力的發展會影響到美國的安全利益，同時也是希望國會正視軍事預算問題，布希新的預算建議將大部份追加預算撥給地面部隊及對伊拉克的戰爭，而反制中國武力威脅的問題，卻是海軍及空軍的任務。對於中國已快速發展成為太平洋地區的軍事強權，而美國卻將注意力集中在中東，美國政府內某些人士深感憂心。
美國最新的情報指出，自從布希擔任總統以來，中國大幅增建軍備，包括建造了二十三艘可以跨海運輸坦克、武裝車輛及部隊的兩棲戰艦，以及十三艘潛艇。情報官員指出，中國建立的兩棲進攻船艦武力已和美國海軍二００二年以來的船艦建置相當。他指出，中國向國外購買及本身發展製造的船艦及戰機已大幅提昇其整體作戰能力，如果能在雷達及通訊科技上改進，這些船艦和戰機將快速強化其進攻及對抗美國反制行動的能力。940302
<P>呵呵！</P><P>等一下找一找原文来参考一下。</P><P>我们这招离间美欧的妙计正在不断发酵，美国人越傲慢和粗鲁的阻拦越增加欧洲对他的反感。</P><P>臭虫布什加上无视生非的国会议员，美国想不遭人恨都难！</P>
<P>U.S. Lawmakers Warn Europe on Arms Sales to China</P><P>By THOM SHANKER and DAVID E. SANGER
Published: March 2, 2005</P><P>WASHINGTON, March 1 - Senior members of Congress from both parties emerged from a meeting with President Bush on Tuesday warning Europe that if it lifts its ban on arms sales to China, the United States may retaliate with severe restrictions on technology sales to European companies. </P><P>The warning came after Mr. Bush, on his trip to Europe last week, twice cautioned the Europeans not to lift the restrictions, in place for 15 years. His insistence was based, at least in part, on a new American intelligence assessment that Beijing is rapidly becoming better equipped to carry out a sophisticated invasion of Taiwan and to counter any effort by the United States to react to such an attack, administration officials and intelligence analysts say.</P><P>After the White House meeting on Tuesday, Senator Richard G. Lugar, the Indiana Republican who is chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, said that if the ban is lifted - as European leaders have said they plan to do in coming months - Congress could react with "a prohibition on a great number of technical skills and materials, or products, being available to Europeans." The ranking Democrat on the committee, Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr. of Delaware, called a lifting of the ban "a nonstarter with Congress."</P><P>Their statements reinforce warnings that Mr. Bush and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice made in meetings with Europeans over the past several weeks that the weapons sales would amount to a transfer of even more sophisticated military technology to China. But European officials say that the concerns are overstated, and that they are considering a compromise proposal that would keep advanced technologies from being exported. </P><P>Although Mr. Bush and Ms. Rice have spoken publicly about the sale of heavy weapons, Pentagon officials say the biggest concern is the technology that goes with it, including radar and battlefield communication systems that could take China's rapid military buildup to a new level. And to make their case, the officials have begun to discuss how such technology would give China an increased ability to intimidate Taiwan with the threat of invasion if it moves too aggressively toward independence. </P><P>The motivations for the officials to discuss this intelligence in interviews over the past two weeks are varied, and certainly include concerns about how the Chinese buildup could affect American security interests. But the discussion also comes as Congress takes up Mr. Bush's new spending proposals, which devote a majority of supplemental funding to land forces and the war in Iraq, while missions related to perceived threats from China fall mainly to the Navy and the Air Force.</P><P>In addition, some administration hawks are concerned about China's rapid growth as a military power in the Pacific at a time that American attention is focused on the Middle East. </P><P>The new intelligence reports indicate that since Mr. Bush came to office, China has raced ahead with one of the most ambitious military buildups in the world - including building 23 new amphibious assault ships that could ferry tanks, armored vehicles and troops across the 100 miles to Taiwan, and 13 new attack submarines.</P><P>"Their amphibious assault shipbuilding alone equals the entire U.S. Navy shipbuilding since 2002," one intelligence official said.</P><P>The official said Chinese military purchases abroad and domestic production of ships and warplanes "definitely represents a significant increase in overall capacity." At the same time, any advances in radar and communications ability would improve how rapidly and effectively those ships and planes could support an invasion or counter American moves in the region.</P><P>Military experts in European capitals and in Washington say they do not dispute the American intelligence reports on the growth in quality and quantity of Chinese arms. But European political leaders argue that the sanctions were placed to punish China because of its killing of pro-democracy demonstrators in Tiananmen Square 16 years ago, not because of its military power. </P><P>Now that a new generation of leaders has taken over in Beijing, they say, the specific cause of the sanctions is removed.</P><P>In contrast, Japan has sided with the United States in asserting a growing Chinese threat to Taiwan, publicly inserting those concerns for the first time into a joint security statement issued in recent days.</P><P>The latest intelligence reports give the fullest sense to date of what China has actually fielded in the past several years, and how, as the new director of central intelligence, Porter J. Goss, recently told Congress, the weaponry could "tilt the balance of power in the Taiwan Strait."</P><P>The United States has deliberately left vague whether or how it would defend Taiwan in the event of invasion. The last time a crisis erupted in the region, President Clinton put a carrier near the Taiwan Strait - but not inside it - as a caution to Beijing. </P><P>That event prompted a rethinking of military strategy in Beijing, China experts say. One intelligence official noted that China's military expansion has tried to fill gaps that have been identified in a range of Pentagon reports and public American intelligence estimates.</P><P>The intelligence official said: "What the Chinese have systematically done is look at what other people have said about them, and said, 'Fine. I don't have a credible amphibious capability. Well, I'm going to build one. I don't have a credible surface force that can provide adequate air cover and surface-to-surface strike capability against incoming fleets. Fine, I'll build that. Submarines worry you? Fine, I'll buy them or I'll build them.' "</P><P>"It's a modernization across the force," the official added.</P><P>China's growing submarine fleet, which includes new nuclear- and conventional-powered vessels, helps China patch a major vulnerability: an inability until now to control the Taiwan Strait. This larger submarine fleet, even if less effective than its American counterpart, would vastly complicate any effort by Washington to intervene. Past calculations of how quickly the American aircraft carrier fleet could safely move into the area are even now being rewritten to include new estimates of the patrolling range of the new Chinese submarine fleet. </P><P>In a written statement on "Current and Projected National Security Threats to the United States" submitted to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence earlier this month, Vice Adm. Lowell E. Jacoby, the director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, discussed an even broader nature of the Pentagon's concern. </P><P>"In addition to key Taiwanese military and civilian facilities," Admiral Jacoby said, "Chinese missiles will be capable of targeting U.S. and allied military installations in the region to either deter outside intervention in a Taiwan crisis or attack those installations if deterrent efforts fail."</P><P>Admiral Jacoby, in unclassified testimony, predicted that by 2015, the number of Chinese nuclear warheads "capable of targeting the continental United States will increase severalfold."</P><P>For now, though, China's capabilities are not considered a threat to the United States mainland; China still lacks an oceangoing navy that could rival America's presence in the Pacific, while America has no lack of nuclear missiles that can strike China from land or from submarines.</P><P>Experts also say it is clear that China will be able to proceed with its modernization plans with or without European weapons, though its progress may be slower. China has purchased destroyers, as well as many other weapons, from Russia, its main supplier. At the same time, it is modernizing its fleet of warships, built at a rapidly growing chain of domestic shipyards that is financing its own expansion by taking an increasing share of commercial shipbuilding contracts in Asia, according to United States government assessments. </P>
Published: March 2, 2005</P><P>WASHINGTON, March 1 - Senior members of Congress from both parties emerged from a meeting with President Bush on Tuesday warning Europe that if it lifts its ban on arms sales to China, the United States may retaliate with severe restrictions on technology sales to European companies. </P><P>The warning came after Mr. Bush, on his trip to Europe last week, twice cautioned the Europeans not to lift the restrictions, in place for 15 years. His insistence was based, at least in part, on a new American intelligence assessment that Beijing is rapidly becoming better equipped to carry out a sophisticated invasion of Taiwan and to counter any effort by the United States to react to such an attack, administration officials and intelligence analysts say.</P><P>After the White House meeting on Tuesday, Senator Richard G. Lugar, the Indiana Republican who is chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, said that if the ban is lifted - as European leaders have said they plan to do in coming months - Congress could react with "a prohibition on a great number of technical skills and materials, or products, being available to Europeans." The ranking Democrat on the committee, Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr. of Delaware, called a lifting of the ban "a nonstarter with Congress."</P><P>Their statements reinforce warnings that Mr. Bush and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice made in meetings with Europeans over the past several weeks that the weapons sales would amount to a transfer of even more sophisticated military technology to China. But European officials say that the concerns are overstated, and that they are considering a compromise proposal that would keep advanced technologies from being exported. </P><P>Although Mr. Bush and Ms. Rice have spoken publicly about the sale of heavy weapons, Pentagon officials say the biggest concern is the technology that goes with it, including radar and battlefield communication systems that could take China's rapid military buildup to a new level. And to make their case, the officials have begun to discuss how such technology would give China an increased ability to intimidate Taiwan with the threat of invasion if it moves too aggressively toward independence. </P><P>The motivations for the officials to discuss this intelligence in interviews over the past two weeks are varied, and certainly include concerns about how the Chinese buildup could affect American security interests. But the discussion also comes as Congress takes up Mr. Bush's new spending proposals, which devote a majority of supplemental funding to land forces and the war in Iraq, while missions related to perceived threats from China fall mainly to the Navy and the Air Force.</P><P>In addition, some administration hawks are concerned about China's rapid growth as a military power in the Pacific at a time that American attention is focused on the Middle East. </P><P>The new intelligence reports indicate that since Mr. Bush came to office, China has raced ahead with one of the most ambitious military buildups in the world - including building 23 new amphibious assault ships that could ferry tanks, armored vehicles and troops across the 100 miles to Taiwan, and 13 new attack submarines.</P><P>"Their amphibious assault shipbuilding alone equals the entire U.S. Navy shipbuilding since 2002," one intelligence official said.</P><P>The official said Chinese military purchases abroad and domestic production of ships and warplanes "definitely represents a significant increase in overall capacity." At the same time, any advances in radar and communications ability would improve how rapidly and effectively those ships and planes could support an invasion or counter American moves in the region.</P><P>Military experts in European capitals and in Washington say they do not dispute the American intelligence reports on the growth in quality and quantity of Chinese arms. But European political leaders argue that the sanctions were placed to punish China because of its killing of pro-democracy demonstrators in Tiananmen Square 16 years ago, not because of its military power. </P><P>Now that a new generation of leaders has taken over in Beijing, they say, the specific cause of the sanctions is removed.</P><P>In contrast, Japan has sided with the United States in asserting a growing Chinese threat to Taiwan, publicly inserting those concerns for the first time into a joint security statement issued in recent days.</P><P>The latest intelligence reports give the fullest sense to date of what China has actually fielded in the past several years, and how, as the new director of central intelligence, Porter J. Goss, recently told Congress, the weaponry could "tilt the balance of power in the Taiwan Strait."</P><P>The United States has deliberately left vague whether or how it would defend Taiwan in the event of invasion. The last time a crisis erupted in the region, President Clinton put a carrier near the Taiwan Strait - but not inside it - as a caution to Beijing. </P><P>That event prompted a rethinking of military strategy in Beijing, China experts say. One intelligence official noted that China's military expansion has tried to fill gaps that have been identified in a range of Pentagon reports and public American intelligence estimates.</P><P>The intelligence official said: "What the Chinese have systematically done is look at what other people have said about them, and said, 'Fine. I don't have a credible amphibious capability. Well, I'm going to build one. I don't have a credible surface force that can provide adequate air cover and surface-to-surface strike capability against incoming fleets. Fine, I'll build that. Submarines worry you? Fine, I'll buy them or I'll build them.' "</P><P>"It's a modernization across the force," the official added.</P><P>China's growing submarine fleet, which includes new nuclear- and conventional-powered vessels, helps China patch a major vulnerability: an inability until now to control the Taiwan Strait. This larger submarine fleet, even if less effective than its American counterpart, would vastly complicate any effort by Washington to intervene. Past calculations of how quickly the American aircraft carrier fleet could safely move into the area are even now being rewritten to include new estimates of the patrolling range of the new Chinese submarine fleet. </P><P>In a written statement on "Current and Projected National Security Threats to the United States" submitted to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence earlier this month, Vice Adm. Lowell E. Jacoby, the director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, discussed an even broader nature of the Pentagon's concern. </P><P>"In addition to key Taiwanese military and civilian facilities," Admiral Jacoby said, "Chinese missiles will be capable of targeting U.S. and allied military installations in the region to either deter outside intervention in a Taiwan crisis or attack those installations if deterrent efforts fail."</P><P>Admiral Jacoby, in unclassified testimony, predicted that by 2015, the number of Chinese nuclear warheads "capable of targeting the continental United States will increase severalfold."</P><P>For now, though, China's capabilities are not considered a threat to the United States mainland; China still lacks an oceangoing navy that could rival America's presence in the Pacific, while America has no lack of nuclear missiles that can strike China from land or from submarines.</P><P>Experts also say it is clear that China will be able to proceed with its modernization plans with or without European weapons, though its progress may be slower. China has purchased destroyers, as well as many other weapons, from Russia, its main supplier. At the same time, it is modernizing its fleet of warships, built at a rapidly growing chain of domestic shipyards that is financing its own expansion by taking an increasing share of commercial shipbuilding contracts in Asia, according to United States government assessments. </P>
不知欧盟会不会被小不死吓住，看看到时美欧谁够硬！
<P>欧盟最后屈不屈服都不是最重要的，最重要的是离间美欧关系，当然，能顺利解除禁运也是好事，但国防应该还是主要依靠自己，指望别人只是权宜之计。</P><P>老早说过，解禁这个事情，是政治意义远大于军事意义，而过程又远重于结果的。</P>
欧洲的军火商们，对着小布和那些美国议员们勇敢地竖起你们的中指！
不想卖给欧洲,卖给其他国家又不放心,那你卖给谁去啊.
<P>嘿嘿</P><P>一石二鸟啊</P><P>既离间了欧美，又让美军火商的利益大受损害</P>
<P>路过。</P><P>。。。 。。。</P>
说心里话,还是希望早点解禁,我们受了不少老毛子的窝囊气!
<P>美国对“军售问题”频频表现失态，一点儿大国的气量都没有！配作超级大国吗？再联系上目前的安抚中国与压制台独的外交计量来看，说明美国在近期与中国发生战争的准备不足，胜负心里没底！它们现在的作法是不惜一切手段来拖延时间，为将来的战争做好各项军事准备，因此中美必有一战。解决台湾问题应越快越好！！！</P>
其实欧盟解除对华军售是美欧间摩擦的结果，它实际上反映了欧洲对单边主义的不满，借军售问题牵质美国。
<P>敌人反对因为他们害怕，也正证明我们的路子走对了！</P><P>高兴的是：涛哥不简单！！！呵呵......</P>
<P>涛哥不高兴,后果很严重.</P><P>整个欧洲都知道!</P>
本来去欧洲是为了弥合美欧关系,无奈老大心理挥之不去,如此"真心和解"究竟有多大诚意.
离间美欧，暂时联俄，打压日本，立足亚太，巩固非洲，介入中东，拓展南美
依靠欧洲,冷淡美国,巩固中东,加强非拉,打击日本.
<P>都是为了自己的利益</P><P>中国也不例外</P>
如果此时攻台，确实美国对它的帮助会及其有限，毕竟美国现在在忙的事还挺多，比如说伊拉克战争。但是伐兵并非上策，伐谋、伐交才上上策。现在应该抓民心，抓国际舆论。让所有外界因素都对我们有利，那才上上策。台湾毕竟是多党制，其实完全可以被我们利用。用反间计，让台湾各政党之间产生矛盾。
强弩之末。
怕了吗[em02][em02][em02]