洛马CEO谈肥电

来源:百度文库 编辑:超级军网 时间:2024/04/29 07:34:44


简单的说下, 记者问试飞, 他表示相对顺利, 记者问生产, 他说正在加速生产. 记者问成本, 他表示正在努力降低/ 记者问试飞进展, 他说超支210亿美元延迟8年 将会在这个月发布2B软件 谈到加拿大和澳大利亚的订单, 他说相信这两个国家都很聪明, 知道自己需要什么 肥电能给他们带来独特的功能, 相信他们能做出明智的选择. 对于加拿大, 他希望肥电能在招标中占据上风. 对于澳洲, 他表示澳洲没有说不要肥电. 他们买肥电只是时间问题 以下是原文 Face-To-Face With Lockheed Martin’s New CEO 31 Dec 2012 By Anthony L. Velocci, Jr. , Joseph C. Anselmo Source: Aviation Week&Space Technology http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.asp ... ml&p=1"...The F-35 is recapitalizing a lot of other fighter programs, but it also brings unique capabilities for the U.S. and our international partners. It will be a big element for us, both domestically and internationally. On the subject of the F-35, it is about $21 billion over budget and as much as eight years behind schedule. It is the largest and probably the most complex development program ever. The flight-test program is going extremely well. We are ramping up production, and we're knocking down the inevitable technical challenges, including the software. Those are all things that are not insurmountable. We are also driving down the cost of the program as we move down the learning curve. Where are you on the F-35 software? We're well along on the software development and testing in labs and flights. We're moving through the various blocks of software updates. We delivered the latest version several months late. However, we have worked with the Joint Program Office to re-baseline the Block 2B schedule and are now on track to deliver the next software release in January. We're making good progress. There are reports that Canada and Australia, two of the staunchest F-35 partners, are starting to have second thoughts because of the cost and delays. What do you say to those nations to keep them on board? Canada and Australia are very smart, savvy buyers. They're going to constantly look at, 'Where are my requirements and what do I need?' I think the F-35 certainly brings them unique capabilities. As I've said, we're progressing well and bringing the cost down. So frankly I think it's the best choice for them as they move forward. So you're confident they can be kept on board? Yes. This is a capability that they need. As the Canadians go through their evaluation process, I expect the F-35 will prevail. And Australia hasn't said it's not going to buy the F-35—it is a timing issue for them...."Other stuff NOT about F-35 at the jump. www.f-16.net

简单的说下, 记者问试飞, 他表示相对顺利, 记者问生产, 他说正在加速生产. 记者问成本, 他表示正在努力降低/ 记者问试飞进展, 他说超支210亿美元延迟8年 将会在这个月发布2B软件 谈到加拿大和澳大利亚的订单, 他说相信这两个国家都很聪明, 知道自己需要什么 肥电能给他们带来独特的功能, 相信他们能做出明智的选择. 对于加拿大, 他希望肥电能在招标中占据上风. 对于澳洲, 他表示澳洲没有说不要肥电. 他们买肥电只是时间问题 以下是原文 Face-To-Face With Lockheed Martin’s New CEO 31 Dec 2012 By Anthony L. Velocci, Jr. , Joseph C. Anselmo Source: Aviation Week&Space Technology http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.asp ... ml&p=1"...The F-35 is recapitalizing a lot of other fighter programs, but it also brings unique capabilities for the U.S. and our international partners. It will be a big element for us, both domestically and internationally. On the subject of the F-35, it is about $21 billion over budget and as much as eight years behind schedule. It is the largest and probably the most complex development program ever. The flight-test program is going extremely well. We are ramping up production, and we're knocking down the inevitable technical challenges, including the software. Those are all things that are not insurmountable. We are also driving down the cost of the program as we move down the learning curve. Where are you on the F-35 software? We're well along on the software development and testing in labs and flights. We're moving through the various blocks of software updates. We delivered the latest version several months late. However, we have worked with the Joint Program Office to re-baseline the Block 2B schedule and are now on track to deliver the next software release in January. We're making good progress. There are reports that Canada and Australia, two of the staunchest F-35 partners, are starting to have second thoughts because of the cost and delays. What do you say to those nations to keep them on board? Canada and Australia are very smart, savvy buyers. They're going to constantly look at, 'Where are my requirements and what do I need?' I think the F-35 certainly brings them unique capabilities. As I've said, we're progressing well and bringing the cost down. So frankly I think it's the best choice for them as they move forward. So you're confident they can be kept on board? Yes. This is a capability that they need. As the Canadians go through their evaluation process, I expect the F-35 will prevail. And Australia hasn't said it's not going to buy the F-35—it is a timing issue for them...."Other stuff NOT about F-35 at the jump. www.f-16.net
真是什么飞机用什么软件啊
block 2b
二楼一贯代表超大水平啊
等于什么也没说,洛马CEO退休了可以来中国发改委或者铁道部当个新闻发言人什么的。。。
是项目超支210亿美元,延误8年,lz太不认真了。
Bearcat 发表于 2013-1-10 09:06
是项目超支210亿美元,延误8年,lz太不认真了。
:D第一眼就看到了这一句
是项目超支210亿美元,延误8年,lz太不认真了。
我马上改。。
接下来软件问题比较关键了
接下来软件问题比较关键了
2B就是实战软件了
超支也就算了反正MD的钱印多少都可以,延期8年......
话说TG的丝带姬整个试飞定型都不用8年的吧
无敌鸣哥 发表于 2013-1-10 08:17
真是什么飞机用什么软件啊
一针见血!!

大小企鹅 发表于 2013-1-10 13:18
超支也就算了反正MD的钱印多少都可以,延期8年......
话说TG的丝带姬整个试飞定型都不用8年的吧


你想什么呢,歼十从98年年初到03年年末试飞结束一共是6年,歼20试飞8年都是乐观的。
F-22试飞了8年半,F-35按B型的服役时间试飞9年,客观规律在这摆着。

F-22最早预期的IOC时间是1995年,最终拖延到了2005年年末;延期了整整10年。F-35虽然延期了8年,但其研发总耗时仍然和台风、歼十相当。
大小企鹅 发表于 2013-1-10 13:18
超支也就算了反正MD的钱印多少都可以,延期8年......
话说TG的丝带姬整个试飞定型都不用8年的吧


你想什么呢,歼十从98年年初到03年年末试飞结束一共是6年,歼20试飞8年都是乐观的。
F-22试飞了8年半,F-35按B型的服役时间试飞9年,客观规律在这摆着。

F-22最早预期的IOC时间是1995年,最终拖延到了2005年年末;延期了整整10年。F-35虽然延期了8年,但其研发总耗时仍然和台风、歼十相当。
偶系膜拜二楼滴
你想什么呢,歼十从98年年初到03年年末试飞结束一共是6年,歼20试飞8年都是乐观的。  F-22试飞了8年半, ...
B型2008年首飞'2012年服役'前后4年'2014年IOC'前后6年。A型2006年首飞'2013年服役'前后7年'2016年IOC'前后10年。C型2010年首飞'2016年服役'前后6年'2019年IOC'前后9年
蛤蟆值夜班 发表于 2013-1-10 14:42
B型2008年首飞'2012年服役'前后4年'2014年IOC'前后6年。A型2006年首飞'2013年服役'前后7年'2016年IOC'前后 ...
美国人以IOC为服役标准。
肥电永远是骗回帖的良药,而LZ深谙此道
肥电永远是骗回帖的良药,而LZ深谙此道
就跟NBA的科比一样
美国人以IOC为服役标准。
真按这个标准阵风到06年'台风到07年才能服役
真按这个标准阵风到06年'台风到07年才能服役
那歼10呢?06年?
那歼10呢?06年?
歼10我不大清楚'台风03年服役的时候只能打格斗弹'07年功能才基本到位'阵风06年才具备较为完整的对地能力
肥电延期情况对比三代机还真不算多
蛤蟆值夜班 发表于 2013-1-10 16:21
歼10我不大清楚'台风03年服役的时候只能打格斗弹'07年功能才基本到位'阵风06年才具备较为完整的对地能力
06年是阵风F2标准。F1标准是具备空战能力的,好像是01年。
witman007 发表于 2013-1-10 21:56
06年是阵风F2标准。F1标准是具备空战能力的,好像是01年。
所以说按照肥电的标准,  阵风06年才算是服役
感觉说跟没说一样!
蛤蟆值夜班 发表于 2013-1-10 22:20
所以说按照肥电的标准,  阵风06年才算是服役
那你还不如说阵风还没服役。因为阵风还有个F3标准。
那你还不如说阵风还没服役。因为阵风还有个F3标准。
F3加的是侦查和核打击'算是升级版