找到今天美国国务院发言人发布会原文了，美帝的确直接向 ...

请看红字部分，美帝“直接”向兔子再次声明钓鱼岛适用日美安保条约这一立场没有改变。但是美帝又反复说“太平洋够大，容得下中美两国”，总体看起来还是比较弱气，不那么强硬。
搞笑的是，记者追问，你对日本的反应也采取同样的观点吗？日本可也派飞机进入了这一空域啊。美帝发言人：额，我的意思是，要避免任何可能引发紧张局势的行动（潜台词：干儿子派飞机也是不行的？）

http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2012/12/202057.htm#CHINA
QUESTION: On the Chinese plane flying over the Senkaku Island airspace, Toria said that she had – she didn’t have anything new to say. And yet to me it seems like quite a bit of escalation, and I think the Japanese Government considered it such as well. Does the State Department really believe that this is nothing new, this air incursion?

MR. VENTRELL: Well, let me just say that we are concerned by the flight of a Chinese Government airplane near the Senkakus. It’s important to avoid actions that raise tensions and to prevent miscalculations that could undermine peace, security, and economic growth in the region. And so we’ve raised our concerns with the Chinese Government directly and made clear that U.S. policy and commitments regarding the Senkakus Islands are longstanding and have not changed.

QUESTION: Are you equally concerned by the Japanese response? I mean, the Japanese also put planes in the area.

MR. VENTRELL: I mean, we think it’s important to avoid any actions that raise tensions.

QUESTION: Have you said that to the Japanese in relation to this specific incident?

MR. VENTRELL: I mean, we’ve been in discussion with the Japanese about the incident, but I don’t have anything further for you.

QUESTION: Can I just follow it?

MR. VENTRELL: Is this still on the Senkakus?

QUESTION: On China.

MR. VENTRELL: Okay. Well, let’s go to him and then – okay.

QUESTION: So now the Chinese are saying that they’re concerned they’re send air force over Senkakus against Japanese air self-defense force protecting the area. Don’t you – do you think it’s too aggressive and very provocative action, you know, air intrusions?

MR. VENTRELL: I think I just said that we’re concerned and we think it’s very important to avoid actions that raise tensions. So we are concerned.

Goyal.

QUESTION: A number of nations say in the region are really worried about Chinese aggression and Chinese presence, Chinese buildup and Chinese threat to the Philippines and Japan and other nations, and also now India is also starting worrying. And White House said other day that they are concerned. This building and the State Department, are you concerned or are you worried or are you – what kind of action are you going to take, or just talking with the Chinese? Because right now, I think just talking will not solve the ongoing rising problem and rising military strength by the Chinese in the region.

MR. VENTRELL: Well, Goyal, I think you’ve heard the Secretary say before that the Pacific is big enough for all of us. We obviously have an extensive relationship with the Chinese where we’re able to work through the whole breadth of the relationship, from the economic to the security. But the Pacific is big enough for all of us.

QUESTION: You think the Chinese are taking this action because of U.S. presence now because since U.S. has announced that the future focus of U.S. and international community will be Asia?

MR. VENTRELL: Well, I wouldn’t speculate on Chinese actions. But clearly, we’ve been clear about why we’re pivoting toward Asia and the actions that we’re taking and the important alliances we have there and the important work that we do with our partners across the region.

请看红字部分，美帝“直接”向兔子再次声明钓鱼岛适用日美安保条约这一立场没有改变。但是美帝又反复说“太平洋够大，容得下中美两国”，总体看起来还是比较弱气，不那么强硬。
搞笑的是，记者追问，你对日本的反应也采取同样的观点吗？日本可也派飞机进入了这一空域啊。美帝发言人：额，我的意思是，要避免任何可能引发紧张局势的行动（潜台词：干儿子派飞机也是不行的？）

http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2012/12/202057.htm#CHINA
QUESTION: On the Chinese plane flying over the Senkaku Island airspace, Toria said that she had – she didn’t have anything new to say. And yet to me it seems like quite a bit of escalation, and I think the Japanese Government considered it such as well. Does the State Department really believe that this is nothing new, this air incursion?

MR. VENTRELL: Well, let me just say that we are concerned by the flight of a Chinese Government airplane near the Senkakus. It’s important to avoid actions that raise tensions and to prevent miscalculations that could undermine peace, security, and economic growth in the region. And so we’ve raised our concerns with the Chinese Government directly and made clear that U.S. policy and commitments regarding the Senkakus Islands are longstanding and have not changed.

QUESTION: Are you equally concerned by the Japanese response? I mean, the Japanese also put planes in the area.

MR. VENTRELL: I mean, we think it’s important to avoid any actions that raise tensions.

QUESTION: Have you said that to the Japanese in relation to this specific incident?

MR. VENTRELL: I mean, we’ve been in discussion with the Japanese about the incident, but I don’t have anything further for you.

QUESTION: Can I just follow it?

MR. VENTRELL: Is this still on the Senkakus?

QUESTION: On China.

MR. VENTRELL: Okay. Well, let’s go to him and then – okay.

QUESTION: So now the Chinese are saying that they’re concerned they’re send air force over Senkakus against Japanese air self-defense force protecting the area. Don’t you – do you think it’s too aggressive and very provocative action, you know, air intrusions?

MR. VENTRELL: I think I just said that we’re concerned and we think it’s very important to avoid actions that raise tensions. So we are concerned.

Goyal.

QUESTION: A number of nations say in the region are really worried about Chinese aggression and Chinese presence, Chinese buildup and Chinese threat to the Philippines and Japan and other nations, and also now India is also starting worrying. And White House said other day that they are concerned. This building and the State Department, are you concerned or are you worried or are you – what kind of action are you going to take, or just talking with the Chinese? Because right now, I think just talking will not solve the ongoing rising problem and rising military strength by the Chinese in the region.

MR. VENTRELL: Well, Goyal, I think you’ve heard the Secretary say before that the Pacific is big enough for all of us. We obviously have an extensive relationship with the Chinese where we’re able to work through the whole breadth of the relationship, from the economic to the security. But the Pacific is big enough for all of us.

QUESTION: You think the Chinese are taking this action because of U.S. presence now because since U.S. has announced that the future focus of U.S. and international community will be Asia?

MR. VENTRELL: Well, I wouldn’t speculate on Chinese actions. But clearly, we’ve been clear about why we’re pivoting toward Asia and the actions that we’re taking and the important alliances we have there and the important work that we do with our partners across the region.