美印联合军演,MD差点被三锅雷死

来源:百度文库 编辑:超级军网 时间:2024/04/29 08:21:44
http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/com ... _5_days_onboard_an/


I am posting questions and answers below. The US Navy officer is anonymous.

I see a lot of disappointments/shock in your comments. Were there any positives? Did they have good food?
Actually, their food was excellent. They also made really good tea, too. I drank nothing but hot milk tea my entire 5 days there because I was afraid of drinking the water (I saw their reverse osmosis units, dear god).

How bad was it?
15+ years old and they looked like nobody had done any maintenance in the last 5+ years. Their ROs were in such poor shape that despite having a greater fresh water production capacity than my ship by several thousand gallons, they were still on water hours.

How do they runs things differently then the USN?
Their engineering practices were abysmal. No undershirts, no steel-toed boots - they wore sandals - no hearing protection in their engineering spaces. No lagging (sound dampening material) in any space. No electrical safety whatsoever. No operational risk management. No concept of safety of navigation. Absolutely did not adhere to rules of the road. They more or less did not have any hard-copy written procedures for any exercise or event, at all. They had no concept of the coded fleet tactical system that US coalition forces and allies utilize (they literally made it up as they went along, and when I tried to interject and explain to them how it worked, they ignored me). When I arrived onboard they thought I was a midshipman and treated me as such. I had to be frank and explain that I was a commissioned officer and that yes, I stood officer on the deck onboard my ship and was a qualified surface warfare officer. They don't entrust their people with any responsibility until they are very senior Lieutenants (O-3s) and junior Lieutenant Commanders (O-4s). At this point in the US Navy there are literally guys commanding ships, and these guys couldn't even be trusted to handle a radio circuit.

How knowledgeable did you find the officers to be?
Well, their captain was driving the ship when it came within 50ft of the stern of a USNS replenishment ship and at any given time there were multiple officers on the bridge screaming at each other. They were generally clueless and had almost zero seamanship skills. I found their enlisted guys to be far more competent than their officers on the bridge.

Why do you think they're so incompetent and have such crappy operations?
Well, coming within 50ft of another ship at sea is never a good sign. But, afterwards, the general consensus/excuse that they came up with during their mini-debrief was "oh well, rough seas, better luck next time" not "holy ******* ****, we parted a tensioned wire cable made of braided steel under hundreds of thousands of pounds of tension".
And wearing sandals during replenishment/helo ops/boat ops/in engineering spaces pretty much says it all. They legitimately didn't understand why I was wearing steel-toed flight deck boots.
Things like these aren't cultural differences, they are golden exhibitions of their sheer lack of common sense and seamanship.

1. Are you breaking any US Navy rules by telling us all this?
2. How did they do in the exercise? Did they get "sunk" five times or what?
3. Were there equivalent Indian Navy personnel on a US Navy ship and do you happen to know their assessment? Were they disappointed by the lack of slaves?
4. Let's say **** hits the fan. India and Pakistan (or any other country. Take your pick) are at war and the ship you were on is sent into action. Would they be an effective fighting force or are they on the bottom of the ocean before the first day of shooting?
Great AMA btw!
1. I'm not breaking any rules in telling you this.
2. It wasn't a wargame-type exercise. It was basically one big five-day photo op.
3. I only have second-hand information about the Indian equivalent that came onboard my ship, but from what I understand he was impressed by the cleanliness of the ship and amazed that we had hot running water all day...
4. Truthfully - bottom of the ocean. I would be surprised if most of their gear worked. The stuff I saw (I got a pretty extensive tour) looked like it fell straight out of the 60s and 70s and I would be genuinely flabbergasted if they got any rounds off. They could barely avoid hitting other ships in the middle of the Pacific, I doubt they'd be popping off any rounds with any amount of accuracy.

I read 'Indian Navy' and I immediately pictured a ridiculously crowded boat, with everyone living(?) in squalor. Is that at all the case?
Actually, yes. Before I came onboard I was told to bring my own roll of toilet paper, if that alludes to the conditions that they live in at all. There was actually toilet paper aboard their ship. It was thinner than one-ply, if that's possible. I might as well have been wiping my *** with my bare hand.

After a particularly wet small boat ride over to their ship, I was dying to get out of my sea water-drenched uniform and into a fresh one (unfortunately, my entire bag was completely soaked to include my shirts, underwear, spare uniform, phone, camera, and my roll of toilet paper)...
I walked into their "officer's head" (their are extremely, extremely hierarchical and classist, even from a military standpoint) and there was a good 2" of ****-water sloshing around back and forth across the deck and an obscure, probably live wire with it's end wrapped in electrical tape non-surreptitiously protruding from the wall.
They have an entire "class" of civilians onboard. I still don't know what to make of them. I think they were some sort of cheap labor, but everybody onboard referred to them as slaves. As in, they used the word "slave". Anyways, the quarters those guys lived in was awful, it was basically a big open space partitioned with a sheet. They slept on a steel deck with a simple blanket and a pillow. Good times.
Their enlisted guys didn't have it much better. Their berthing was infested with rats (a guy from my ship swore up and down that he saw a rat that was no-**** the length of his arm) and another US sailor from another ship came back covered in bed-bug sores. Dude looked like he had ******* chicken pocks.

Awesome AMA so far. I'm former US navy as well, so I can appreciate your shock and dismay at their abysmal practices.
1. What was your single biggest 'are you ******* kidding me' moment?
2. What was your biggest priority when you got back to your ship?
3. At any point did you consider trying to assume OOD for your own safety?
4. Will anyone important listen to your assessment of their battle-readiness?
Thanks in advance!
1. Have you ever seen a US ship do an unrep at sea? When we pull along side and shoot the shotline across (basically a thick piece of yarn for those who don't know) there's a nice soft tennis ball affixed to the end of it so that it'll bounce of the deck and someone can go retrieve it... the Indians shot a spear. A motherfucking spear. Like, a 16" long piece of metal with a point on the end....

2. Biggest priority was showering. I hadn't showered properly in almost 5 days, and all of my uniforms reeked of seawater.

3. I wouldn't dare try and assume the deck like that. Even on a US ship that would be extremely, extremely out of line. On a foreign Navy ship? **** it, I can swim... Honestly though, when they passed under (50 feet from) the replenishment ship, I was generally afraid they were going to collide. 50ft at sea is extremely, extremely close. I had to leave the bridge after that ****, I just couldn't stomach it anymore.

4. And yes, I wrote up a full-debrief afterwards that was read by my CO/XO and presumably ISIC.

On an arbitrary scale from 1-10, 1 being full retard and ten being space marine quality training and efficiency, how would you rate their sailors quality?
3, at best. They had some marginally competent folks, but for every one person who was half-competent, there were 4 other guys just standing around looking clueless.

Why do you think this is? Are those guys not trained? Are their ships "overstaffed"?
I have staff in India and find that there is a tendency to do nothing when they are unsure of something, instead of coming to me and asking for an explanation.
They were great at doing the same things over and over again, but when I simply asked for an outcome and expected them to figure out HOW to do it, they were stumped.
Well, considering how undermanned US ships are at the moment (our CRUDES - crusiers/destroyers) are, on average, missing about 20-30 people give or take - destroyers more so.... I would say that it's a fault in their training, because they have more than enough people running around not doing anything of particular use.
And I agree. These guys were having issues breaking/generating a fairly widely used NATO standard fleet tactical code system that we use among allied nations and I was trying (in vain) to show them how to say what they wanted to say. I literally wrote out word for word what they needed to pass over the rt circuit and they still refused to believe that I was correct...and continued passing incomprehensible gibberish over the airwaves..

NROTC Midshipman here. I didn't know CRUDES were undermanned – why is that? Also, what rank are you? Ship? How do I not suck as an officer?
CRUDES are very undermanned. USS LASTSHIP (flight I DDG) was at 262 when I left. The ships were built for about 315. Cruisers weren't quite as bad, but they're still lacking people as well.
I'm a LTJG. Won't tell you what ship I was on, just know that it's a DDG out of Yoko.
As for how to not suck as an officer? LISTEN TO YOUR CHIEF, YOUR FIRST CLASS, AND YOUR ****-HOT SECOND CLASSES. Always trust your people until they give you a reason not to.

Thanks for the AMA. Did you or any other USNS staff point out these obvious failings to your counterparts? Or was it all just for show and you were basically told to endure.
Oh, the USNS released a full sitrep (situation report) afterwards. And I absolutely told my chain of command about all of this stuff. There is a very specific process that we go through upon returning from any foreign Navy ship. Basically, we sit down and chronicle our entire experience.

Do you think the Indian navy will take any of this advice to heart? DO they actually want to improve? Or will they just brush it off or even be offended that you are insulting their capabilities?
The latter. They pretty much wrote off every piece of advice that I humbly gave them in my time onboard.

Were there sensitive areas onboard the Indian ship you weren't allowed to enter? And vice versa, were the Indian exchange officers allowed to see the US ships in their entirety?
I saw some, but not all of their fire control spaces. I saw their "ops room" - basically their version of the Combat Information Center. However, I would guarantee that I didn't see everything that there was to see.
And no Ally really truly ever sees every space on a US ship. There are spaces on our ships that even 99% of the ships crew isn't allowed to see. And that's all I have to say about that.

What is your opinion about their war capability?
Truthfully, after touring their ship extensively I would be very much surprised if the majority of their armament even successfully fired, let along hit anything.

How much of the poor conditions do you think can be attributed to poor funding/resources as opposed to the service not giving a ****?
90% of it was the service not giving a ****. Their wardroom (where the officers ate/hung out) was EXTREMELY nice, clean, well-decorated, had a fully-stocked bar with and nice oil pantings and other contemporary decor...but the rest of the ship was a complete and utter pigsty.

As a sailor....I'm so sorry sir! How the **** did you end up with such shitty orders though?
I bet a deployment on a big deck is looking mighty fine after this!
It's all good. I enjoyed 7th Fleet and my time on a FDNF DDG taught me a LOT. I'm not a SWO anymore (I lat transferred to IP - part of the IDC community) but I grew a lot as a person, and professionally, out in Yoko... I actually chose to go out there. I'd love to go back for shore duty, but I'd never go back to 7th Fleet for sea duty, ever.

That's a lot of acronyms. Any help for us rookies?
FDNF - Forward Deployed Naval Forces - this is how we refer to the US Navy's 7th Fleet, stationed in Yokosuka, Japan, because they are permanently forward deployed outside of the US.
DDG - The hull code for the kind of ship I was on - an Arleigh Burke class guided missile destroyer.
SWO - Surface Warfare Officer - what I used to be.
IP - Information Professional - what I am now (basically network security/networking management).

How did the Indian officers visiting U.S. ships react?
From what I remember, they sent a Chief Petty Officer (E-7) equivalent over to our ship, an engineering type. From what everybody back on my ship told me (after I got back, of course), they guy walked through our ship and engineering spaces and was amazed at how clean everything was and, ironically, that we had hot running water all day.

How good was the curry?
Pretty much all of their food was really good, but then again, I'm a big fan of Indian cuisine. They were all actually pretty surprised that I readily ate whatever they put in front of me. I ate the **** out of whatever they served my entire time there.

How did you wind up being on board the ship? How were you rescued?
Well, I wasn't stranded or anything, so there wasn't a "rescue" per se. Basically, whenever the US does any sort of multi-naval exercise with other nations, it is pretty common that we exchange a few people from each ship as sort of a naval-cultural exchange. In this case, I was sent from a US Navy destroyer based out of Japan to the INS Delhi - the Indian Navy's flagship as part of an exercise that took place last March.
As for how I got there, we did a fairly massive passenger exchange that consisted of about 5-6 ships pulling up in basically a big circle within about 500 yards of one another and then we all dropped our small boats in the water, exchanges passengers, and that was that. It was a particularly choppy day at sea and most of us were sufficiently soaked.

Holy crap, that was their FLAGSHIP?
They had a 2-star admiral embarked...lol.

I know nada about the Indian navy, but I thought their armed forces were pretty professional. Can you prove your identity?
http://i.imgur.com/AYdIZ.jpg

Describe some of the smells?
The ship generally smelled "old". I dunno if you have every been on a ship - namely a warship - before, but this one smelled like it was ******* from the inside out. Rust, decaying paint, dirty spaces, mechanical fumes...it generally smelled musty, I guess is the best way to describe it. Imagine if you farted in a vacuum and then immediately sealed the door, and then you opened said door 10 years later...that's what their ship smelled like pretty consistently. http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/com ... _5_days_onboard_an/


I am posting questions and answers below. The US Navy officer is anonymous.

I see a lot of disappointments/shock in your comments. Were there any positives? Did they have good food?
Actually, their food was excellent. They also made really good tea, too. I drank nothing but hot milk tea my entire 5 days there because I was afraid of drinking the water (I saw their reverse osmosis units, dear god).

How bad was it?
15+ years old and they looked like nobody had done any maintenance in the last 5+ years. Their ROs were in such poor shape that despite having a greater fresh water production capacity than my ship by several thousand gallons, they were still on water hours.

How do they runs things differently then the USN?
Their engineering practices were abysmal. No undershirts, no steel-toed boots - they wore sandals - no hearing protection in their engineering spaces. No lagging (sound dampening material) in any space. No electrical safety whatsoever. No operational risk management. No concept of safety of navigation. Absolutely did not adhere to rules of the road. They more or less did not have any hard-copy written procedures for any exercise or event, at all. They had no concept of the coded fleet tactical system that US coalition forces and allies utilize (they literally made it up as they went along, and when I tried to interject and explain to them how it worked, they ignored me). When I arrived onboard they thought I was a midshipman and treated me as such. I had to be frank and explain that I was a commissioned officer and that yes, I stood officer on the deck onboard my ship and was a qualified surface warfare officer. They don't entrust their people with any responsibility until they are very senior Lieutenants (O-3s) and junior Lieutenant Commanders (O-4s). At this point in the US Navy there are literally guys commanding ships, and these guys couldn't even be trusted to handle a radio circuit.

How knowledgeable did you find the officers to be?
Well, their captain was driving the ship when it came within 50ft of the stern of a USNS replenishment ship and at any given time there were multiple officers on the bridge screaming at each other. They were generally clueless and had almost zero seamanship skills. I found their enlisted guys to be far more competent than their officers on the bridge.

Why do you think they're so incompetent and have such crappy operations?
Well, coming within 50ft of another ship at sea is never a good sign. But, afterwards, the general consensus/excuse that they came up with during their mini-debrief was "oh well, rough seas, better luck next time" not "holy ******* ****, we parted a tensioned wire cable made of braided steel under hundreds of thousands of pounds of tension".
And wearing sandals during replenishment/helo ops/boat ops/in engineering spaces pretty much says it all. They legitimately didn't understand why I was wearing steel-toed flight deck boots.
Things like these aren't cultural differences, they are golden exhibitions of their sheer lack of common sense and seamanship.

1. Are you breaking any US Navy rules by telling us all this?
2. How did they do in the exercise? Did they get "sunk" five times or what?
3. Were there equivalent Indian Navy personnel on a US Navy ship and do you happen to know their assessment? Were they disappointed by the lack of slaves?
4. Let's say **** hits the fan. India and Pakistan (or any other country. Take your pick) are at war and the ship you were on is sent into action. Would they be an effective fighting force or are they on the bottom of the ocean before the first day of shooting?
Great AMA btw!
1. I'm not breaking any rules in telling you this.
2. It wasn't a wargame-type exercise. It was basically one big five-day photo op.
3. I only have second-hand information about the Indian equivalent that came onboard my ship, but from what I understand he was impressed by the cleanliness of the ship and amazed that we had hot running water all day...
4. Truthfully - bottom of the ocean. I would be surprised if most of their gear worked. The stuff I saw (I got a pretty extensive tour) looked like it fell straight out of the 60s and 70s and I would be genuinely flabbergasted if they got any rounds off. They could barely avoid hitting other ships in the middle of the Pacific, I doubt they'd be popping off any rounds with any amount of accuracy.

I read 'Indian Navy' and I immediately pictured a ridiculously crowded boat, with everyone living(?) in squalor. Is that at all the case?
Actually, yes. Before I came onboard I was told to bring my own roll of toilet paper, if that alludes to the conditions that they live in at all. There was actually toilet paper aboard their ship. It was thinner than one-ply, if that's possible. I might as well have been wiping my *** with my bare hand.

After a particularly wet small boat ride over to their ship, I was dying to get out of my sea water-drenched uniform and into a fresh one (unfortunately, my entire bag was completely soaked to include my shirts, underwear, spare uniform, phone, camera, and my roll of toilet paper)...
I walked into their "officer's head" (their are extremely, extremely hierarchical and classist, even from a military standpoint) and there was a good 2" of ****-water sloshing around back and forth across the deck and an obscure, probably live wire with it's end wrapped in electrical tape non-surreptitiously protruding from the wall.
They have an entire "class" of civilians onboard. I still don't know what to make of them. I think they were some sort of cheap labor, but everybody onboard referred to them as slaves. As in, they used the word "slave". Anyways, the quarters those guys lived in was awful, it was basically a big open space partitioned with a sheet. They slept on a steel deck with a simple blanket and a pillow. Good times.
Their enlisted guys didn't have it much better. Their berthing was infested with rats (a guy from my ship swore up and down that he saw a rat that was no-**** the length of his arm) and another US sailor from another ship came back covered in bed-bug sores. Dude looked like he had ******* chicken pocks.

Awesome AMA so far. I'm former US navy as well, so I can appreciate your shock and dismay at their abysmal practices.
1. What was your single biggest 'are you ******* kidding me' moment?
2. What was your biggest priority when you got back to your ship?
3. At any point did you consider trying to assume OOD for your own safety?
4. Will anyone important listen to your assessment of their battle-readiness?
Thanks in advance!
1. Have you ever seen a US ship do an unrep at sea? When we pull along side and shoot the shotline across (basically a thick piece of yarn for those who don't know) there's a nice soft tennis ball affixed to the end of it so that it'll bounce of the deck and someone can go retrieve it... the Indians shot a spear. A motherfucking spear. Like, a 16" long piece of metal with a point on the end....

2. Biggest priority was showering. I hadn't showered properly in almost 5 days, and all of my uniforms reeked of seawater.

3. I wouldn't dare try and assume the deck like that. Even on a US ship that would be extremely, extremely out of line. On a foreign Navy ship? **** it, I can swim... Honestly though, when they passed under (50 feet from) the replenishment ship, I was generally afraid they were going to collide. 50ft at sea is extremely, extremely close. I had to leave the bridge after that ****, I just couldn't stomach it anymore.

4. And yes, I wrote up a full-debrief afterwards that was read by my CO/XO and presumably ISIC.

On an arbitrary scale from 1-10, 1 being full retard and ten being space marine quality training and efficiency, how would you rate their sailors quality?
3, at best. They had some marginally competent folks, but for every one person who was half-competent, there were 4 other guys just standing around looking clueless.

Why do you think this is? Are those guys not trained? Are their ships "overstaffed"?
I have staff in India and find that there is a tendency to do nothing when they are unsure of something, instead of coming to me and asking for an explanation.
They were great at doing the same things over and over again, but when I simply asked for an outcome and expected them to figure out HOW to do it, they were stumped.
Well, considering how undermanned US ships are at the moment (our CRUDES - crusiers/destroyers) are, on average, missing about 20-30 people give or take - destroyers more so.... I would say that it's a fault in their training, because they have more than enough people running around not doing anything of particular use.
And I agree. These guys were having issues breaking/generating a fairly widely used NATO standard fleet tactical code system that we use among allied nations and I was trying (in vain) to show them how to say what they wanted to say. I literally wrote out word for word what they needed to pass over the rt circuit and they still refused to believe that I was correct...and continued passing incomprehensible gibberish over the airwaves..

NROTC Midshipman here. I didn't know CRUDES were undermanned – why is that? Also, what rank are you? Ship? How do I not suck as an officer?
CRUDES are very undermanned. USS LASTSHIP (flight I DDG) was at 262 when I left. The ships were built for about 315. Cruisers weren't quite as bad, but they're still lacking people as well.
I'm a LTJG. Won't tell you what ship I was on, just know that it's a DDG out of Yoko.
As for how to not suck as an officer? LISTEN TO YOUR CHIEF, YOUR FIRST CLASS, AND YOUR ****-HOT SECOND CLASSES. Always trust your people until they give you a reason not to.

Thanks for the AMA. Did you or any other USNS staff point out these obvious failings to your counterparts? Or was it all just for show and you were basically told to endure.
Oh, the USNS released a full sitrep (situation report) afterwards. And I absolutely told my chain of command about all of this stuff. There is a very specific process that we go through upon returning from any foreign Navy ship. Basically, we sit down and chronicle our entire experience.

Do you think the Indian navy will take any of this advice to heart? DO they actually want to improve? Or will they just brush it off or even be offended that you are insulting their capabilities?
The latter. They pretty much wrote off every piece of advice that I humbly gave them in my time onboard.

Were there sensitive areas onboard the Indian ship you weren't allowed to enter? And vice versa, were the Indian exchange officers allowed to see the US ships in their entirety?
I saw some, but not all of their fire control spaces. I saw their "ops room" - basically their version of the Combat Information Center. However, I would guarantee that I didn't see everything that there was to see.
And no Ally really truly ever sees every space on a US ship. There are spaces on our ships that even 99% of the ships crew isn't allowed to see. And that's all I have to say about that.

What is your opinion about their war capability?
Truthfully, after touring their ship extensively I would be very much surprised if the majority of their armament even successfully fired, let along hit anything.

How much of the poor conditions do you think can be attributed to poor funding/resources as opposed to the service not giving a ****?
90% of it was the service not giving a ****. Their wardroom (where the officers ate/hung out) was EXTREMELY nice, clean, well-decorated, had a fully-stocked bar with and nice oil pantings and other contemporary decor...but the rest of the ship was a complete and utter pigsty.

As a sailor....I'm so sorry sir! How the **** did you end up with such shitty orders though?
I bet a deployment on a big deck is looking mighty fine after this!
It's all good. I enjoyed 7th Fleet and my time on a FDNF DDG taught me a LOT. I'm not a SWO anymore (I lat transferred to IP - part of the IDC community) but I grew a lot as a person, and professionally, out in Yoko... I actually chose to go out there. I'd love to go back for shore duty, but I'd never go back to 7th Fleet for sea duty, ever.

That's a lot of acronyms. Any help for us rookies?
FDNF - Forward Deployed Naval Forces - this is how we refer to the US Navy's 7th Fleet, stationed in Yokosuka, Japan, because they are permanently forward deployed outside of the US.
DDG - The hull code for the kind of ship I was on - an Arleigh Burke class guided missile destroyer.
SWO - Surface Warfare Officer - what I used to be.
IP - Information Professional - what I am now (basically network security/networking management).

How did the Indian officers visiting U.S. ships react?
From what I remember, they sent a Chief Petty Officer (E-7) equivalent over to our ship, an engineering type. From what everybody back on my ship told me (after I got back, of course), they guy walked through our ship and engineering spaces and was amazed at how clean everything was and, ironically, that we had hot running water all day.

How good was the curry?
Pretty much all of their food was really good, but then again, I'm a big fan of Indian cuisine. They were all actually pretty surprised that I readily ate whatever they put in front of me. I ate the **** out of whatever they served my entire time there.

How did you wind up being on board the ship? How were you rescued?
Well, I wasn't stranded or anything, so there wasn't a "rescue" per se. Basically, whenever the US does any sort of multi-naval exercise with other nations, it is pretty common that we exchange a few people from each ship as sort of a naval-cultural exchange. In this case, I was sent from a US Navy destroyer based out of Japan to the INS Delhi - the Indian Navy's flagship as part of an exercise that took place last March.
As for how I got there, we did a fairly massive passenger exchange that consisted of about 5-6 ships pulling up in basically a big circle within about 500 yards of one another and then we all dropped our small boats in the water, exchanges passengers, and that was that. It was a particularly choppy day at sea and most of us were sufficiently soaked.

Holy crap, that was their FLAGSHIP?
They had a 2-star admiral embarked...lol.

I know nada about the Indian navy, but I thought their armed forces were pretty professional. Can you prove your identity?
http://i.imgur.com/AYdIZ.jpg

Describe some of the smells?
The ship generally smelled "old". I dunno if you have every been on a ship - namely a warship - before, but this one smelled like it was ******* from the inside out. Rust, decaying paint, dirty spaces, mechanical fumes...it generally smelled musty, I guess is the best way to describe it. Imagine if you farted in a vacuum and then immediately sealed the door, and then you opened said door 10 years later...that's what their ship smelled like pretty consistently.
英语不太好
楼主能不能翻译一下
晕,全是洋文,看不明白,求翻译
看不懂方言啊
方言不行啊
我张贴的问题和答案在下面。美国海军官员是匿名的。

我看到了很多的失望/冲击您的意见。是否有任何阳性吗?难道他们有良好的食品吗?
其实,他们的食物是很好的。他们还提出了真正的好茶叶。我喝不过热奶茶,我整整5天,因为我怕喝的水(反渗透单位,我看到了亲爱的上帝)。

坏的是如何呢?
15岁以上和他们看上去就像没有人做任何在过去的5年以上的维修。他们的选举主任在这种恶劣的形状,尽管有更大的淡水比我的船数千加仑的生产能力,他们仍然对水小时。

他们如何运行不同的事情,美国海军?
他们的工程实践,深不可测。没有汗衫,没有钢露趾靴 - 他们穿着凉鞋 - 没有在他们的机舱的听力保护。没有落后(声音阻尼材料)在任何空间。没有任何电气安全。没有操作风险管理。没有航行安全的概念。绝对没有遵守交通规则。他们或多或少没有任何运动或事件有任何的硬拷贝书面程序,在所有。他们没有编码舰队的战术体系中,美国联军和盟国利用他们逐字他们走到一起,而当我试图插话,向他们解释它是如何工作的,他们都不理我的概念。当我来到船上,他们认为我是一个海军官校学生,我是这样看待。我必须坦率地解释,我是一个军士,是的,我站在船上我的船甲板军官和一个合格的水面作战人员。他们没有委托任何责任的人,直到他们是非常高级的陆军中尉(O - 3)和初中中将指挥官(O - 4S)。这一点在美国海军字面上家伙指挥船舶,和这些家伙甚至不能信任,处理一个射频电路。

你找到如何懂行的人员?
那么,他们的队长驾驶的船舶,当它来到内50英尺一个USNS补给舰的船尾,在任何给定的时间内有多个人员对对方的尖叫桥。他们普遍无能和航海技能几乎为零。我发现他们的士兵球员要远远超过其上的桥梁的人员主管。

为什么你觉得他们太无能,有这样蹩脚的操作?
那么,在另一艘船50英尺海上从来就不是一个好兆头。但是,后来,普遍的共识/借口,他们想出了在自己的迷你,听取汇报“噢,波涛汹涌的大海,更好的运气,下一次”不“圣******* ****,我们分手一个张拉电线电缆编织钢在数百数千磅的张力“。
和穿着凉鞋在补货/ HELO OPS /船老年退休金计划/机舱说,它几乎所有。他们合法不明白,为什么我穿钢趾飞行甲板靴。
不喜欢这些东西文化的差异,他们是他们缺乏常识和航海纯粹的黄金展览。

1。你打破任何美国海军的规则告诉我们,这一切吗?
2。他们是如何做到在运动吗?他们“沉没”五次或什么?
3。有相当于印度海军人员对美国海军船只和你碰巧知道他们的评估?是他们缺乏的奴隶感到失望?
4。让我们说****点击风扇。印度和巴基斯坦(或任何其他国家。任你选)的战争和您的船舶发送到行动。他们是一个有效的战斗力量,他们或前拍摄的第一天的海洋底部?
大澳玛顺便说一句!
1。我没有违反任何规则,在告诉你这。
2。这不是一个战争游戏式的练习。它基本上是一个大的为期五天的照片OP。
3。我只有我的船,船上约相当于印度的二手信息,但是从我了解船舶的清洁,他留下了深刻的印象,惊奇地发现了热自来水整天的... ...
4。说实话 - 海洋底部。我会感到很惊讶,如果他们的装备大部分工作。我看到的东西(我得到了相当广泛的巡演)看起来像直跌出了20世纪60年代和70年代,我会真正大吃一惊,如果他们有任何四舍五入。他们几乎无法避免撞上其他船只在太平洋中间,我很怀疑他们会出现任何数额的准确性任何轮。

我读“印度海军”,我立刻图为一个可笑的拥挤船,和大家一起生活在肮脏(?)。在所有的情况下?
事实上,是的。在我来之前,船上有人告诉我,把我自己卷的卫生纸,如果暗示,他们住在所有的条件。实际上卫生纸登上他们的船。这是一个层较薄,如果可能的话。我还不如一直抹我赤手我***。

乘坐小船到他们的船后,特别是湿,我渴望得到我的海水湿透制服,并进入一个新的(不幸的是,我的整个包被完全浸湿,包括我的衬衫,内衣,备件统一,手机,摄像头,和我一卷卫生纸)...
我走进他们的“高级人员的头”(他们即使从军事的角度来看,是非常,非常的层次和classist),有好2“****-水,整个甲板上来回左右晃动,一个不起眼的,可能与它的最终火线电工胶带包裹的非暗中从墙上凸出。
他们有一个完整的“类”平民板载。我仍然不知道是什么使它们。我认为他们是一些廉价劳动力,但每个人都板载称为他们的奴隶。如,他们用“奴隶”一词。不管怎么说,那些家伙住在宿舍是可怕的,它基本上是一个大的开放空间与表分区。他们睡在一个钢桥面,用一个简单的毯子和枕头。美好的时光。
他们征召球员没有好得多。他们的停泊感染大鼠(从我的船的家伙发誓向上和向下,他看到一只老鼠,无****他的手臂长度)和另一位美国水兵从另一艘船舶回来覆盖在床的错误疮。多德看上去像他*******鸡pocks。

真棒玛至今。我和前美国海军,因此,我可以理解在他们深不可测的做法你的震惊和沮丧。
1。什么是您的最大单一“你*******开玩笑我”的时刻吗?
2。什么是你最大的优先,当你回你的船?
3。在任何一点,你认为试图为自己的安全承担OOD?
4。任何人都重要,倾听他们的战斗准备的评估?
提前感谢!
1。你已经见过了美国一艘舰船,做一个在海上unrep?当我们沿侧拉和拍摄的shotline跨越(基本上是对于那些不知道的一块厚的纱),是一个不错的软式网球球贴到它的结束,以便它会反弹的甲板上,有人可以去检索它...印度人拍摄矛。一个motherfucking矛。一样,一个16英寸长的一段点结束金属....

2。最大的优先任务是淋浴。我没有铺天盖地正确在近5天时间里,和我所有的制服海水充满了臭气。

3。我不敢尝试,并承担这样的甲板。即使上了美国一艘舰船,这将是非常,非常脱节。在外国军舰? ****它,我可以游...但老实说,当他们通过下(从50英尺)补给舰,我怕他们会碰撞。海上50英尺是非常,非常接近。我不得不离开后,****,桥,我无法胃了。

4。是的,我写了一个全面听取汇报之后,是由我的合作/ XO和大​​概的ISIC读。

在任意规模从1-10,全面延缓和十个空间海军陆战队员的素质培训和效率,如何你会率其水手质量?
3,最好的。他们有一些轻微主管的乡亲,但对于每一个半主管的人,有4只站在四处寻找毫无章法的其他球员。

为什么你会认为这是?那些家伙没有经过培训?他们的船“臃肿”?
我在印度的工作人员,并发现有一种倾向,什么都不做时,他们是不确定的东西,而不是来给我,并要求作出解释,。
他们是伟大的,一遍又一遍地做同样的事情,但是当我问的结果,预计他们找出如何做到这一点,他们被难倒。
那么,考虑如何人员不足美国军舰是:(我们的原油 - crusiers /驱逐舰目前),平均,缺少约20-30人,或采取 - 驱逐舰更....我想说,这是一个故障,在他们的训练,因为他们比周围没有做任何特定用途上运行足够多的人更多。
我同意。这些人有问题,打破/生成一个相当广泛的标准北约舰队战术代码系统,我们盟国之间使用的,我是想向他们展示如何说出他们想说的话(白白)。我从字面上写的字为字,他们需要通过在RT电路,他们仍然拒绝相信我是正确的... ...,并继续通过电波传递难以理解的乱码..

NROTC海军官校学生在这里。我不知道原油是人员不足 - 这是为什么呢?此外,排名是什么?船?我怎么没吸作为官员?
原油是非常人员不足。 262 USS LASTSHIP(飞行我DDG)在我离开的时候。船舶建造约315。巡洋舰没有那么糟糕,但他们仍然缺乏人以及。
我LTJG。不会告诉你我是什么船,只知道它的DDG -出了洋子。
至于如何作为官员不吸呢?听取对你的主要,你的第一类,您****-热点二类。永远信任你的人,直到他们的理由不给你。

感谢您的反垄断法。你或任何其他USNS工作人员点出这些明显的缺陷您同行?还是这一切只是为了显示,基本上是告诉你要忍受。
哦,USNS发布了一个完整的sitrep(形势报告)之后。 ,我绝对告诉我所有关于这个东西的命令链。有一个非常具体的过程中,我们去任何外国军舰回国后通过。基本上,我们坐下来和纪事我们整个的经验。

你认为,印度海军将采取任何这样的建议,以心脏吗?他们实际上是想提高吗?他们将刚刷它甚至被冒犯,你是在侮辱自己的能力呢?
后者。他们几乎写每一个忠告,我谦恭地给我的时间内建。

是否有船上的印度船只的敏感,你不准进入的领域?反之亦然,印度的交流,允许美国军舰在全部人员?
我看到了一些,他们的火力控制的空间,但并非所有。我看到了他们的“老年退休金计划室” - 基本上是他们的作战信息中心的版本。不过,我保证,我没有看到,有看到的一切。
真的没有盟友真正有史以来看到了美国一艘舰船的每一个空间。有我们的船,甚至99%的船员是看不准的空间。这就是我说的。

什么是你对他们的战争能力的意见?
说实话,广泛地参观了他们的船后,我会感到很奇怪如果其装备的大部分甚至成功发射,让我们一起打什么。

恶劣的环境下,你认为有多少可以归因于穷人的资金/资源,而不是不给服务****?
90%是服务,不给一个****.他们的方子(人员吃/红)是非常好的,干净,精心布置,有一个充分的酒吧和很好的石油pantings和其他当代装饰... ...但船的其余部分是一个完整的和完全猪圈。

作为一名水手....我那么对不起,先生!如何****你结束这种低劣的订单虽然?
我敢打赌,一个大甲板上的部署是寻找后,这个伟大的罚款!
这都很好。我喜欢第7舰队和我上FDNF DDG -的时候教了我很多。我不是社会工作主任了(我纬度转移到IP - IDC的社会的一部分),但我长大了很多,作为一个人,和专业,在洋子... ...其实我选择去那里。我很想去岸义务,但我从来没有回去第七舰队海义务,不断。

这是一个很多缩略语。我们新秀的任何帮助吗?
FDNF - 前沿部署海军部队 - 这就是我们指美国海军第七舰队,驻扎在日本横须贺,因为他们是永久地向前部署在美国以外的。
DDG - - 船舶的船体,我是在代码的阿利伯克级导弹驱逐舰 - 。
社会工作主任 - 水面作战主任 - 我用的是什么。
IP - 专业信息 - 我现在的(基本的网络安全/网络管理)。

怎么来访的美国军舰的印度官员的反应?
从我记得,他们派出一个上士(E - 7),相当于交给我们的船,工程类型。从什么上我的船每个人都告诉我,(我回来后,当然),他们的家伙走过我们的船和工程空间和干净的一切是如何惊讶,具有讽刺意味的​​是,我们整天热自来水。

咖喱有多好?
几乎所有他们的食物真的很不错,不过话又说回来,我一个大风扇的印度美食。他们其实很惊讶,我很容易吃不管他们在我的面前。我吃的****了,不管他们担任我的整个时间。

你是怎么在船上吗?你是如何获救的?
好吧,我不是搁浅或任何东西,所以不是“救市”本身。基本上,只要美国没有任何与其他国家海军多行使,这是很常见的,我们每艘船舶从交换海军文化交流排序的几个人。在这种情况下,我被送到美国海军根据日本驱逐舰移民局新德里 - 印度海军的旗舰,作为演习的一部分,去年三月发生。
至于如何我到了那里,我们做了一个相当庞大的旅客交流,约5-6拉基本上是一个大圆圈内约500码彼此的船只组成,那么我们所有的下降我们的小船在水中,交流乘客,那是。在海上,这是一个特别波涛汹涌的一天,我们大多数人充分浸泡。

哇靠,这是他们的旗舰?
他们有一个2星级上将走上... LOL。

我知道印度海军虚无缥缈,但我认为他们的军队是非常专业的。你能证明你的身份吗?



描述的一些气味吗?
船舶普遍闻“老字号”。我不知道,如果你有船舶上的每一个 - 即军舰 - 之前,但是这一次闻到就像是由内而外*******出来。生锈,腐烂的油漆,肮脏的空间,机械烟雾... ...一般闻到一股霉味,我猜是最好的方式来形容它。试想,如果你farted在真空中,然后立即密封门,然后打开门10年后说... ...这就是他们的船喜欢漂亮的一贯闻。
看到我两眼发黑……三锅V5……
第一段翻译:

老印的(咖喱)饭好吃,奶茶好喝。 5天以来全喝热奶茶了。你要问为啥,因为俺不小心看了一下他们的反向渗透过滤(制淡水?)装置。俺亲爱的耶稣基督啊!救我脱离人间苦海吧。
che 发表于 2011-9-12 20:38
我张贴的问题和答案在下面。美国海军官员是匿名的。

我看到了很多的失望/冲击您的意见。是否有任何阳性吗 ...
机翻太可怕了……
额,头大了。。。
看机器翻译比看原文还累。。。。。

美国海军这哥们说人家告诉他上印度军舰参与活动,必需自带草纸,因为印度人基本不用,舰上提供的草纸很差,单层的,还不如直接用手。
下一段,坐小艇登舰的时候,整个衣服和背包都被海水浸透了,包括自带的那卷草纸,悲剧啊。。。。。。
悲催滴MD大兵哥
机翻看着蛋疼。
看不懂洋文啊
这机器翻译,,,实在也太无语了
第一段翻译:   老印的(咖喱)饭好吃,奶茶好喝。 5天以来全喝热奶茶了。你要问为啥,因为俺不小心看了一 ...
非常感谢,继续啊,别停
che大的形象,被机翻给毁了
jjjing 发表于 2011-9-12 21:22
看机器翻译比看原文还累。。。。。

美国海军这哥们说人家告诉他上印度军舰参与活动,必需自带草纸,因为 ...
他会看见每个印度士兵上完厕所都会洗手的....
说实话,成天和老印比,或者嘲笑老印没什么意思。就在楼主贴的同一主题里我看到了这样的东西:

Confirming the Japanese have the cleanest ships in the world. If you ever saw an oil spot on their ship, you can be guaranteed that someone was already on their way to clean it up.

(我)可以证实日本的船是世界上最干劲的。如果你在他们的船上看到一个油污点,那么可以肯定是有人已经在前去清理了。

注:我们在嘲笑印度的时候,想一想日本人(肯定还有大把逊于日本人但是比我们做得更好的)也在同样嘲笑我们。
机器翻译实在蛋疼。
不认识鸟语?!
凤凰竹 发表于 2011-9-12 21:39
这机器翻译,,,实在也太无语了
嗯,机饭比洋文更难看懂
jjjing 发表于 2011-9-12 21:22
看机器翻译比看原文还累。。。。。

美国海军这哥们说人家告诉他上印度军舰参与活动,必需自带草纸,因为 ...
单层的?叠八叠用啊。。。
che 发表于 2011-9-12 20:38
我张贴的问题和答案在下面。美国海军官员是匿名的。

我看到了很多的失望/冲击您的意见。是否有任何阳性吗 ...
机器翻译得太搞笑了。;P
jjjing 发表于 2011-9-12 21:22
看机器翻译比看原文还累。。。。。

美国海军这哥们说人家告诉他上印度军舰参与活动,必需自带草纸,因为 ...
可以理解,三锅一向用手
nsa2000 发表于 2011-9-12 22:19
机器翻译得太搞笑了。
同感啊!一个字——晕!
che 发表于 2011-9-12 20:38
我张贴的问题和答案在下面。美国海军官员是匿名的。

我看到了很多的失望/冲击您的意见。是否有任何阳性吗 ...
我很气愤的求您高抬贵手翻一下,这机翻的我看的头晕脑胀,好歹我小学毕业可是第一名——85年。
好长····啊
太长了。。。。先看康熙。
che 发表于 2011-9-12 20:38
我张贴的问题和答案在下面。美国海军官员是匿名的。

我看到了很多的失望/冲击您的意见。是否有任何阳性吗 ...
che大你不能这样。。。。
alabama2011 发表于 2011-9-12 22:03
说实话,成天和老印比,或者嘲笑老印没什么意思。就在楼主贴的同一主题里我看到了这样的东西:

Confirmi ...
你不嘲笑印度人日本人就不嘲笑你吗?如果不是这样,那我还是继续嘲笑印度人吧。
我不能说中国人做得就完美了,可是中国人在所有的领域都在快速进步,日本人想嘲笑,就嘲笑呗,我不在乎,我知道中国会在一项又一项领域不断超过它。至于印度人,是给世界人民提供笑料的,专业被嘲笑对象,今天啥样明天还啥样
对机翻表示无语。。。
晓卿 发表于 2011-9-12 22:28
我很气愤的求您高抬贵手翻一下,这机翻的我看的头晕脑胀,好歹我小学毕业可是第一名——85年。
您比我大,在CD里面还真难找到,都是些80,90后
you don't bird me,I don't bird you too.
木看完,基本来讲就是垃圾吖垃圾,印度滴海军
6L的字典翻译真蛋疼啊
che大这是故意的吧

alabama2011 发表于 2011-9-12 22:03
说实话,成天和老印比,或者嘲笑老印没什么意思。就在楼主贴的同一主题里我看到了这样的东西:

Confirmi ...



借用您楼下的E文you don't bird me,I don't bird you too.:D
alabama2011 发表于 2011-9-12 22:03
说实话,成天和老印比,或者嘲笑老印没什么意思。就在楼主贴的同一主题里我看到了这样的东西:

Confirmi ...



借用您楼下的E文you don't bird me,I don't bird you too.:D
048工程 发表于 2011-9-12 23:06
you don't bird me,I don't bird you too.
好地道啊,赞
不能嘲笑三锅 棒子岂不是亚历山大