阿三中将认为印度经济世界第二,反映印度国内消息闭塞, ...

来源:百度文库 编辑:超级军网 时间:2024/04/29 16:55:45


据环球网记者报道,据美国国家公共广播电台6月20日报道,中国近年来在向外界展示经济和军事肌肉,这让亚洲另一个迅速发展的大国印度感到不安,两国因此“较上劲”。

    报道称,中国为在中东和非洲寻求能源和资源而进入印度洋。中国在印度邻国建造商业港口的行为让印度的一些防务分析师感到“不安”。

    长期关注印度军事发展的人花费很多时间思量中国的军事新动作和战略目标。印度已退役的海军中将库马尔 辛格日前称:“不管我们已经成为全球第二大,或可能成为第一大经济体,抑或是当今世界上发展最快的经济体,中国军方要让我们处于不平衡的状态,以便把我们困在南亚。”

    辛格对中国在缅甸、孟加拉国、斯里兰卡和巴基斯坦修建商业港口的努力,即所谓的“珍珠链”战略有特别的兴趣。他说:“中国军方想要做的是找到克服其地缘战略上不足的新方式。其中的一种方式就是建立‘珍珠链’,即在一些国家建造港口和机场。”他担心中国目前为商业目的建造的这些设施有朝一日可能会变成军事基地。

    而在《印度教徒报》军事战略问题专家瓦拉达拉扬(音)看来,“珍珠链”战略可能不存在,而且将印度对华政策置于一个可能不存在的军事战略上没有多少意义。印度和平与冲突研究协会的高级研究员Jabin Jacob也对“珍珠链”理论表示怀疑。




这篇报道显然又是美帝挑拨中印关系,美国国家公共广播电台的报道。但是报道中的采访显然是真的。

我就有点不解了,难道中将库马尔 辛格是中国人,中国不是才成为第二大经济体么,难道在印度国内,宣传的是印度超过日本,娥的神呀。

http://military.china.com/top01/11053250/20110621/16606157.html


介于有同志认为是翻译的问题,我贴出英文报道,翻译没有错,来自npr,请看红字。

npr的链接  http://www.npr.org/2011/06/20/137061379/indians-uneasy-as-china-builds-ports-nearby


This month, NPR is examining the many ways China is expanding its reach in the world — through investments, infrastructure, military power and more.

As China flexes its economic and military muscle, it's bumping elbows with Asia's other big and fast-growing power: India.

China's hunger for energy from the Middle East and resources from Africa brings it into the Indian Ocean. And some defense analysts in India are watching uneasily as China develops commercial ports in some of India's neighbor countries.

To understand India's concerns about China, it helps to remember that the two countries have a history of border disputes, and that they fought a brief but ferocious war over territory in 1962.

Indian Concerns Over 'String Of Pearls'

Long-time members of India's military establishment spend a lot of time thinking about China's new military, and its strategic aims.

Arun Kumar Singh, a retired Indian vice admiral, habitually refers to China's military as "he."

"He wants to keep us in a state of imbalance, because he wants us to be boxed up in South Asia, though we are the second-largest and possibly the largest, or the fastest-growing economy in the world today," Singh says.
As a navy man, Singh is particularly concerned with China's efforts to build commercial ports in countries such as Myanmar, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Pakistan — the so-called "string of pearls" strategy.

"What he is trying to do is trying to find innovative means of overcoming his geostrategic disadvantages. So one of them is 'string of pearls,' where he is building harbors and ports and airports," Singh says.

The thinking goes that China is establishing these facilities for commercial purposes now, but that they might be turned into military bases at some point in the future.

Skepticism Of The Theory


"The 'string of pearls' itself is a term — sounds very Chinese, doesn't it? — but it's a term that the Rand Corporation came up with originally, to describe what was meant to be a strategy of surrounding India with a whole bunch of bases," says Siddharth Varadarajan, who studies military policy as the New Delhi bureau chief for The Hindu newspaper.

He says it doesn't make much sense to base India's policy toward China on speculation about a military strategy that may or may not exist.

Jabin Jacob, a senior research fellow at the Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies in New Delhi, is also skeptical about the string of pearls theory.

He says India's policy planners should be more concerned with the way China is using its military in what are called "military operations other than war," such as anti-piracy patrols off the coast of Somalia.

"How will you deal with a China that is actively crisscrossing the Indian Ocean, and building up relations with other Indian Ocean littoral states where India has traditionally held sway?" he asks.

India needs to involve itself actively with its smaller neighbors and their problems, if it wants to maintain its influence, he says.

Jacob says policymakers also need to remember that China has its reasons for being wary of India's activities in China's neighborhood.

"We have excellent relations with Mongolia and Vietnam, and the Chinese are not unaware of it," Jacob says. "So we want to focus on the string of pearls surrounding India, but you know we have another string, shall we say, garlanding the Chinese, which they are equally paranoid about."

Protecting Vital Sea Routes


Varadarajan, the New Delhi bureau chief, says that a lot of China's current thinking on military policy is really defensive in nature, a way to protect legitimate and vital shipping lanes.

"If India, as a major Indian Ocean power, could reassure the Chinese that India stands for freedom of the seas, and has a vital stake in working with other countries to protect sea lines, that could be one concrete way to build confidence and trust and also greater openness with the Chinese," Varadarajan says.

Jacob has another reminder for foreign policy wonks who may be trying to figure out the strategies of both China and India: Both huge countries are going to be focused on their own internal problems long into the future, he says, and that will drive their foreign policy agendas.


据环球网记者报道,据美国国家公共广播电台6月20日报道,中国近年来在向外界展示经济和军事肌肉,这让亚洲另一个迅速发展的大国印度感到不安,两国因此“较上劲”。

    报道称,中国为在中东和非洲寻求能源和资源而进入印度洋。中国在印度邻国建造商业港口的行为让印度的一些防务分析师感到“不安”。

    长期关注印度军事发展的人花费很多时间思量中国的军事新动作和战略目标。印度已退役的海军中将库马尔 辛格日前称:“不管我们已经成为全球第二大,或可能成为第一大经济体,抑或是当今世界上发展最快的经济体,中国军方要让我们处于不平衡的状态,以便把我们困在南亚。”

    辛格对中国在缅甸、孟加拉国、斯里兰卡和巴基斯坦修建商业港口的努力,即所谓的“珍珠链”战略有特别的兴趣。他说:“中国军方想要做的是找到克服其地缘战略上不足的新方式。其中的一种方式就是建立‘珍珠链’,即在一些国家建造港口和机场。”他担心中国目前为商业目的建造的这些设施有朝一日可能会变成军事基地。

    而在《印度教徒报》军事战略问题专家瓦拉达拉扬(音)看来,“珍珠链”战略可能不存在,而且将印度对华政策置于一个可能不存在的军事战略上没有多少意义。印度和平与冲突研究协会的高级研究员Jabin Jacob也对“珍珠链”理论表示怀疑。




这篇报道显然又是美帝挑拨中印关系,美国国家公共广播电台的报道。但是报道中的采访显然是真的。

我就有点不解了,难道中将库马尔 辛格是中国人,中国不是才成为第二大经济体么,难道在印度国内,宣传的是印度超过日本,娥的神呀。

http://military.china.com/top01/11053250/20110621/16606157.html


介于有同志认为是翻译的问题,我贴出英文报道,翻译没有错,来自npr,请看红字。

npr的链接  http://www.npr.org/2011/06/20/137061379/indians-uneasy-as-china-builds-ports-nearby


This month, NPR is examining the many ways China is expanding its reach in the world — through investments, infrastructure, military power and more.

As China flexes its economic and military muscle, it's bumping elbows with Asia's other big and fast-growing power: India.

China's hunger for energy from the Middle East and resources from Africa brings it into the Indian Ocean. And some defense analysts in India are watching uneasily as China develops commercial ports in some of India's neighbor countries.

To understand India's concerns about China, it helps to remember that the two countries have a history of border disputes, and that they fought a brief but ferocious war over territory in 1962.

Indian Concerns Over 'String Of Pearls'

Long-time members of India's military establishment spend a lot of time thinking about China's new military, and its strategic aims.

Arun Kumar Singh, a retired Indian vice admiral, habitually refers to China's military as "he."

"He wants to keep us in a state of imbalance, because he wants us to be boxed up in South Asia, though we are the second-largest and possibly the largest, or the fastest-growing economy in the world today," Singh says.
As a navy man, Singh is particularly concerned with China's efforts to build commercial ports in countries such as Myanmar, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Pakistan — the so-called "string of pearls" strategy.

"What he is trying to do is trying to find innovative means of overcoming his geostrategic disadvantages. So one of them is 'string of pearls,' where he is building harbors and ports and airports," Singh says.

The thinking goes that China is establishing these facilities for commercial purposes now, but that they might be turned into military bases at some point in the future.

Skepticism Of The Theory


"The 'string of pearls' itself is a term — sounds very Chinese, doesn't it? — but it's a term that the Rand Corporation came up with originally, to describe what was meant to be a strategy of surrounding India with a whole bunch of bases," says Siddharth Varadarajan, who studies military policy as the New Delhi bureau chief for The Hindu newspaper.

He says it doesn't make much sense to base India's policy toward China on speculation about a military strategy that may or may not exist.

Jabin Jacob, a senior research fellow at the Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies in New Delhi, is also skeptical about the string of pearls theory.

He says India's policy planners should be more concerned with the way China is using its military in what are called "military operations other than war," such as anti-piracy patrols off the coast of Somalia.

"How will you deal with a China that is actively crisscrossing the Indian Ocean, and building up relations with other Indian Ocean littoral states where India has traditionally held sway?" he asks.

India needs to involve itself actively with its smaller neighbors and their problems, if it wants to maintain its influence, he says.

Jacob says policymakers also need to remember that China has its reasons for being wary of India's activities in China's neighborhood.

"We have excellent relations with Mongolia and Vietnam, and the Chinese are not unaware of it," Jacob says. "So we want to focus on the string of pearls surrounding India, but you know we have another string, shall we say, garlanding the Chinese, which they are equally paranoid about."

Protecting Vital Sea Routes


Varadarajan, the New Delhi bureau chief, says that a lot of China's current thinking on military policy is really defensive in nature, a way to protect legitimate and vital shipping lanes.

"If India, as a major Indian Ocean power, could reassure the Chinese that India stands for freedom of the seas, and has a vital stake in working with other countries to protect sea lines, that could be one concrete way to build confidence and trust and also greater openness with the Chinese," Varadarajan says.

Jacob has another reminder for foreign policy wonks who may be trying to figure out the strategies of both China and India: Both huge countries are going to be focused on their own internal problems long into the future, he says, and that will drive their foreign policy agendas.
有啥奇怪的,三哥再不努力,上海就要超孟买了
还好阿三没有忘记世界上还有MD
以后得管三哥叫二哥了。。。
饿。..原来可以有无视这条选择的.....那我们也无视md成为第一了...
当时我也没看懂这句鸟语是说的什么意思。
我现在也还是没看懂.
饿。..原来可以有无视这条选择的.....那我们也无视md成为第一了...
宇宙国会怒的
゛风_云ャ囝 发表于 2011-6-21 22:06
饿。..原来可以有无视这条选择的.....那我们也无视md成为第一了...
宇宙第一大国向你发来抗议电!宇宙第一大国才是当之无愧的宇宙第一,至于地球上的第一嘛,就让三哥当好了
说的好像 是TG的事
理解.....不能の.....(╯﹏╰)b
本来就是,棒子第一,A3第二。
干脆,咱不参加排名了!MD老大,棒子和三锅全“二”~~~
印度国内有许多人一直认为他们要领先我们很多。不要吵醒他们的美梦,做人要厚道。
有这样的将军TG赶脚压力不大
哎呀,见过不要脸的,没见过连屁股都不要的人
“不管我们已经成为全球第二大,或可能成为第一大经济体,抑或是当今世界上发展最快的经济体,……”。估计是翻译的问题,看意思是假设印度就算达到全球第2大经济体或者第1,中国也会打压印度。
゛风_云ャ囝 发表于 2011-6-21 22:06
饿。..原来可以有无视这条选择的.....那我们也无视md成为第一了...
要无视了多少才能成为老2啊...
lwm-111111 发表于 2011-6-21 22:19
我现在也还是没看懂.
哈哈哈哈~~~

印度人 果然是比 那啥还脑残~
md被直接忽略了
他的意思其实是将要发生的事,这一点也没错,因为TG会超过MD,而阿三认为他应该会在TG成为第一之后,他再超越MD。这逻辑确实是“将”
翻译问题
他的意思是说,就算今后印度经济取代了中国今的位置(世界第二),甚至取代了美国的位置(第一),中国都会。。。对印度如何如何
一点没说错啊?宇宙大国第一,三哥第二,猴子不是第三嘛。
日本真惨,才被中国超过,那头糊里糊涂的就被印度超过了。
如果三哥能分裂那就太好了!
三锅总是给我兔带来欢笑
yzh6717 发表于 2011-6-21 23:56
“不管我们已经成为全球第二大,或可能成为第一大经济体,抑或是当今世界上发展最快的经济体,……”。估计 ...
请看我新贴出的英文版,不是翻译错误。
jbyyyyyyy 发表于 2011-6-22 00:50
翻译问题
他的意思是说,就算今后印度经济取代了中国今的位置(世界第二),甚至取代了美国的位置(第一) ...
请看我心贴出的英文,不是翻译错误。
全球第一“二”,阿三当之无愧。
sidneyclarence 发表于 2011-6-22 03:20
请看我新贴出的英文版,不是翻译错误。
谢谢提供原文,不是翻译错误。现在只有2种情况:要么外文记者笔误,要么就是这个“退役海军中将”老眼昏花了。
没听说过吗,棒子掌握宇宙,阿三控制地球啊
阿三真是够欢乐
taobao11 发表于 2011-6-22 02:31
日本真惨,才被中国超过,那头糊里糊涂的就被印度超过了。
我对三锅的敬意油然而生,这东西胡说八道的时候总是大义凛然


三哥V5

- 發送自我的 iPhone 大板凳應用

三哥V5

- 發送自我的 iPhone 大板凳應用
MD表示压力很大{:160:
人口一亿的三哥威武啊,拿什么挑战中国? 拿神油?
MD表示压力很大
在印度这个国家,官员说话就当放屁一样不负责任。


though we are the second-largest and possibly the largest, or the fastest-growing economy in the world today," Singh says
=====
严格来说应该是印度人的语法有问题,他们总是活糊涂了,分不清现在时与将来时,也分不清虚拟语气。

估计他想要表达的是:though we WOULD BE  ..............
haozhibof1 发表于 2011-6-21 21:35
有啥奇怪的,三哥再不努力,上海就要超孟买了
别拿上海和孟买放一起,你这是在恶心上海那