超级军网呼，活过来真好啊。。。。。。。
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/04/26 18:25:39
88区的米娜桑，继续蛋疼的生活吧。。。。。。。。。。。。88区的米娜桑，继续蛋疼的生活吧。。。。。。。。。。。。
发个福利。。。。
http://220.170.79.105/plus/view.php?aid=68798
http://220.170.79.105/plus/view.php?aid=68798
其实这几天还是很高兴的说，转个KKTT发现的文章
Spread of Hit to Kill Technologies
The event in China is interesting in light of another recent development: India has announced its ABM program will be expanded to include an anti-satellite program.
While China is migrating its anti-satellite research into the missile defense arena, India is doing the opposite. In both cases, however, the technology is fundamentally the same: the development of kinetic energy interceptors — so called “hit-to-kill” technologies that use a bullet to hit a bullet.
In 2007, I tried to make the argument that we were making a mistake to focus on “anti-satellite” weapons — which is a mission. The real danger was the increasing availability of the specific technology — hit-to-kill — that would inevitably spread for both missile defense and anti-satellite applications:
First, once uncommon hit-to-kill technologies are now at the early stages of spreading around the world. Second, the broad focus on space weapons and ASAT technologies, many of which are quite unrealistic and exotic, distracts from the technological challenge posed by the proliferation of hit-to-kill systems. Third, partial arms control measures, such as a ban on kinetic ASAT testing, may mitigate the most threatening aspects of hit-to-kill technology while avoiding some of the difficulties associated with more comprehensive agreements.
I think that is precisely where we are today: The US has pioneered a technology — and encouraged its spread to allies like Israel, Japan and Taiwan among others. Now China and India are racing to join the club. The result, I think, is going to be a significant increase in the vulnerability of space assets.
Spread of Hit to Kill Technologies
The event in China is interesting in light of another recent development: India has announced its ABM program will be expanded to include an anti-satellite program.
While China is migrating its anti-satellite research into the missile defense arena, India is doing the opposite. In both cases, however, the technology is fundamentally the same: the development of kinetic energy interceptors — so called “hit-to-kill” technologies that use a bullet to hit a bullet.
In 2007, I tried to make the argument that we were making a mistake to focus on “anti-satellite” weapons — which is a mission. The real danger was the increasing availability of the specific technology — hit-to-kill — that would inevitably spread for both missile defense and anti-satellite applications:
First, once uncommon hit-to-kill technologies are now at the early stages of spreading around the world. Second, the broad focus on space weapons and ASAT technologies, many of which are quite unrealistic and exotic, distracts from the technological challenge posed by the proliferation of hit-to-kill systems. Third, partial arms control measures, such as a ban on kinetic ASAT testing, may mitigate the most threatening aspects of hit-to-kill technology while avoiding some of the difficulties associated with more comprehensive agreements.
I think that is precisely where we are today: The US has pioneered a technology — and encouraged its spread to allies like Israel, Japan and Taiwan among others. Now China and India are racing to join the club. The result, I think, is going to be a significant increase in the vulnerability of space assets.
桃阿姨在航空航天港的ID是啥？
感觉那个飞机表情很可爱~
感觉那个飞机表情很可爱~
回家了~~~回家了~~~
LPC2103 发表于 2010-1-14 18:31 
-。-
-。-
哎呀。。。。。勉强看到了点，不过美国国内以前有过这样的观点，即太空军事化不可避免，但当时美国的行为是加速了其军事化，其实是对美国不利的。。。。
damo56030 发表于 2010-1-14 19:28
打开了潘多拉的盒子，是这个意思吗？
打开了潘多拉的盒子，是这个意思吗？
atletico 发表于 2010-1-14 20:22
应该不是，估计是觉得开启太空军事化不是时候，就像造战列舰，如果英国不玩这个，德国估计连跟英国争海权的心都不会有。。。。。。
应该不是，估计是觉得开启太空军事化不是时候，就像造战列舰，如果英国不玩这个，德国估计连跟英国争海权的心都不会有。。。。。。