美军大兵为“爱国”拒穿中国靴

来源:百度文库 编辑:超级军网 时间:2024/03/28 21:58:23
今天的参考:

今天的参考:

美军中国靴子.jpg (201.47 KB, 下载次数: 1)

下载附件 保存到相册

2012-6-27 13:13 上传

他发了一连串邮件,问他所属部队的补给品管理员如何能够换一双美国制造的靴子。后者的回答是:“祝你好运。”{:soso_e128:}
光脚上阵吧。祝你好运。
may god bless you。
这仁兄咋不在战场上裸奔呢?
danner的菌版不都是美国制造的么。。。
米国哪个靴子是中国造的????
漏洞明显,且植入广告,赤裸裸啊,赤裸裸。

OEM的东西,鬼知道产地在什么地方......
要是真叫真都不能吃饭了。
先咱的参考消息除了头条还有价值吗
找双泰国,印尼鞋不难吧


中国有一位高官说过:即使我们不去参观陈列有TG韩战逆行的中国人民革命军事博物馆,韩国人也不会买我们的产品;但不管我们再怎样的去参观中国人民革命军事博物馆,美国人照样会买我们的产品。----- 一句让美国人从头凉到脚的话。
每直接或间接地购买100元中国货,你就:
1.为中国厂家增加40元的毛利收入
2.为中国企业增加了20元的扩张资本
3.为中国政府增加了5元的税收收入
4.给中国的所谓PLA增加了10颗子弹
5.给专制政府多印6~8页的洗脑宣传的教科书和文件
6.送给运行中国人民革命军事博物馆的电费。
如果你买中国内裤,将来开上美国街头的中国坦克就是你造的!!
如果你买中国玩具,将来射穿你儿子头颅的子弹就是你造的!!
如果你买中国电视音响,将来就会在战地喇叭中听到美国人被杀的哀鸣!!!
我们没有时间和权力去采取政治行动,我们只能作力所能及的事,拒买中国货是我们对付中国人的最好行动,不但简单而且有效.
请大家继续将文章转出去,制抵中货不是盲目的!!!
是美国人就顶

中国有一位高官说过:即使我们不去参观陈列有TG韩战逆行的中国人民革命军事博物馆,韩国人也不会买我们的产品;但不管我们再怎样的去参观中国人民革命军事博物馆,美国人照样会买我们的产品。----- 一句让美国人从头凉到脚的话。
每直接或间接地购买100元中国货,你就:
1.为中国厂家增加40元的毛利收入
2.为中国企业增加了20元的扩张资本
3.为中国政府增加了5元的税收收入
4.给中国的所谓PLA增加了10颗子弹
5.给专制政府多印6~8页的洗脑宣传的教科书和文件
6.送给运行中国人民革命军事博物馆的电费。
如果你买中国内裤,将来开上美国街头的中国坦克就是你造的!!
如果你买中国玩具,将来射穿你儿子头颅的子弹就是你造的!!
如果你买中国电视音响,将来就会在战地喇叭中听到美国人被杀的哀鸣!!!
我们没有时间和权力去采取政治行动,我们只能作力所能及的事,拒买中国货是我们对付中国人的最好行动,不但简单而且有效.
请大家继续将文章转出去,制抵中货不是盲目的!!!
是美国人就顶
狒→佛 发表于 2012-6-27 14:12
先咱的参考消息除了头条还有价值吗
你是说参考不应该转载此文?此文没有价值?
撒手锏 发表于 2012-6-27 14:27
你是说参考不应该转载此文?此文没有价值?
我从五年前看了两年参考,觉得大多数是扯淡,没啥意思,大概人各有异,我已经准备被你打脸了
现在的参考消息早就不是以前的参考消息了,内容不严谨,甚至从国内外小报甚至网络上普通网民的言论里取材。
狒→佛 发表于 2012-6-27 14:31
我从五年前看了两年参考,觉得大多数是扯淡,没啥意思,大概人各有异,我已经准备被你打脸了
参考参考,报纸名都说了是参考了,翻译引用国内外其他媒体值得关注的新闻罢了,内容扯不扯淡与其报本身无关.
狒→佛 发表于 2012-6-27 14:31
我从五年前看了两年参考,觉得大多数是扯淡,没啥意思,大概人各有异,我已经准备被你打脸了
没啥,你都说了,人各有异嘛。

对我而言,此文有趣,亦即有价值,不然不会转贴。首先反映出美军弟兄们中间很有些爱国死脑筋,就算腐朽的资本主义制度也腐朽不掉;其次反映出美军后勤的一些细节,有意义;最后,反映出TB制造已经蔓延全球,躲无可躲,也有意义。:b
影霜 发表于 2012-6-27 14:24
中国有一位高官说过:即使我们不去参观陈列有TG韩战逆行的中国人民革命军事博物馆,韩国人也不会买我们的产 ...
顶,不顶不是我大美利坚公鸣
狒→佛 发表于 2012-6-27 14:12
先咱的参考消息除了头条还有价值吗


解无聊用的

俺们当兵那会  都看参考解闷。
影霜 发表于 2012-6-27 15:24
中国有一位高官说过:即使我们不去参观陈列有TG韩战逆行的中国人民革命军事博物馆,韩国人也不会买我们的产 ...
兄台这段话很眼熟,好像是个著名的反日帖子吧。:D
以前不是有一张阿富汗的照片,包装箱上印着 US FREEDOM,下面是MADE IN CHINA。
从十年前开始,吾就不看参考消息了...
以后咱们出去的东西,外包装打made in China,单件上打made in U.S.,不就结了
国标菜鸟 发表于 2012-6-27 15:58
以后咱们出去的东西,外包装打made in China,单件上打made in U.S.,不就结了
不不不直接打:"made in U.S (you know)"
等美国不产鞋了,看他穿什么。。。
无敌国足 发表于 2012-6-27 15:09


解无聊用的
当兵的时候出了看参考,还有什么报纸杂志,义务兵能带手机吗

狒→佛 发表于 2012-6-27 16:16
当兵的时候出了看参考,还有什么报纸杂志,义务兵能带手机吗


报纸杂志么  自己是可以订的  我是武警退役的  野战部队不清楚  至少武警是可以自己去外面订购报纸杂志的

手机么。。。只要不出事  躲着点领导  人家也就睁一眼闭一眼了

反正我的手机是从新兵一直用到退伍  到了临退伍1个月  我们老兵都公开使用手机  当然前提是不被更高级别的领导发现  一般连一级领导也就不管了

我记得临退伍3周  晚上点名  我手机就在身上  队列中响了  我们队长也只是笑了一下而已  没别的表示
狒→佛 发表于 2012-6-27 16:16
当兵的时候出了看参考,还有什么报纸杂志,义务兵能带手机吗


报纸杂志么  自己是可以订的  我是武警退役的  野战部队不清楚  至少武警是可以自己去外面订购报纸杂志的

手机么。。。只要不出事  躲着点领导  人家也就睁一眼闭一眼了

反正我的手机是从新兵一直用到退伍  到了临退伍1个月  我们老兵都公开使用手机  当然前提是不被更高级别的领导发现  一般连一级领导也就不管了

我记得临退伍3周  晚上点名  我手机就在身上  队列中响了  我们队长也只是笑了一下而已  没别的表示
美军公发的靴子就没一双是本土外生产的人家有个啥JB修正案
美军的靴子啥时候在咱这生产了?交易版块里还一大堆美国原产百丽军靴呢~
参考这个造假新闻专业户
明显这大兵服役前被洗脑了
明显假新闻,美军N年前就禁止向外国采购军装食品等用品
影霜 发表于 2012-6-27 14:24
中国有一位高官说过:即使我们不去参观陈列有TG韩战逆行的中国人民革命军事博物馆,韩国人也不会买我们的产 ...
不顶不是美国人!!

x998877661 发表于 2012-6-27 17:24
明显假新闻,美军N年前就禁止向外国采购军装食品等用品


NO, 美军不禁止从国外获取军需品,贝瑞修正案只是针对五角大楼自己的后勤单位,其他的军需供应/承包商没有这项规定,事实上就在五角大楼内部,贝瑞修正案都有很多特例和空子存在,或者冠冕堂皇的说法是用某些灵活措施,将一些商品排除在贝瑞修正案之外

毕竟便宜的东西利润高。早在鲍威尔时期,五角大楼就希望国会废掉这个修正案。

原文:

http://www.airforcetimes.com/new ... -made-boots-062512/

Master sgt. says no to Chinese-made boots

By Jeff Schogol - Staff writer
Posted : Monday Jun 25, 2012 7:33:32 EDT

Master Sgt. Steve Adachi is willing to fight for his country, but not in the Chinese-made boots his unit gave him.

“I’m troubled that the military continues to downsize because of the budget deficits — budget deficits which are in part a result of millions of unemployed American workers,” Adachi wrote in a letter to Air Force Times. “How many American workers are unemployed because military clothing is being produced in foreign countries?”

Adachi is a reservist deployed to Kabul, Afghanistan, with the 438th Air Expeditionary Wing as an adviser to the Afghan air force. His home unit is the 624th Regional Support Group in Hawaii.

Before he deployed, his unit gave him a pair of green boots — standard wear for his airman battle uniform. Much to his dismay, they were made in China. He tried to exchange them at the Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam clothing store, but he was in store for another surprise.

“I was told that the boots were not compliant with the Berry Amendment and I could not exchange them,” Adachi said.

The Berry Amendment requires the food, clothing, fabrics and other textiles the Pentagon buys to be grown or made in the U.S.

Adachi turned red, white and blue.

“I went back to the reserves supply warehouse and asked the supply manager why I was issued Chinese-made boots,” Adachi said. “He told me that they were less expensive as opposed to the U.S.-made ones. I urged him to reissue me U.S. boots, citing that I did not feel comfortable ‘going to war’ wearing boots made in China.”

Adachi refused to let the matter drop, and he succeeded in getting a smaller pair of U.S.-made boots, which he was able to exchange for American boots in his size.

But that wasn’t the end of it. After he got to Afghanistan, he was issued his new uniform — Army Operation Enduring Freedom camouflage, known as OCP — and asked for a pair of the required tan boots. He was told he had to go through his unit, which sent him another pair of boots made in — wait for it — China.

After a flurry of emails, he asked his unit’s supply manager via email how he could exchange the boots for ones made in America. The response: “Good luck.”

So how did we get to this point?

First, Adachi’s boots didn’t come from the Defense Logistics Agency, which supplies troops with just about everything, said agency spokeswoman Mimi Schirmacher.

“Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support has an ample supply of the standard Air Force green boots, as well as tan boots worn with the Army Operation Enduring Freedom Camouflage Pattern (OCP) uniform,” Schirmacher said in an email. “DLA Troop Support purchases products that we provide to the services in accordance with the Berry Amendment, and does not purchase combat boots or other uniform items made outside the United States.”

What happened was Adachi’s unit purchased two pairs of the boots from U.S. Patriot LLC in South Carolina.

Company president Paul Yoo doesn’t know exactly why Adachi’s unit wanted those boots, but they do have some advantages over American-made boots.

The boots are lighter and less expensive than those made in the U.S., Yoo said

Because they are lighter, they can take between 2 and 3 pounds off troops’ feet, he said. That allows them to carry more gear and reduces wear and tear on their bodies.

Yoo offered to exchange Adachi’s boots free for American-made ones.

“Our organization is staffed, managed and owned primarily by veterans,” he said. “I am a 5-year veteran of the United States Army. My second in command in my retail stores, he was a command sergeant major in the Ranger battalions. The husband and wife owners of the company are ex-Army officers. This is the way that we operate.”

Adachi is taking Yoo up on his offer.

“Once I receive these boots, [at a minimum] I believe this to be a victory,” Adachi said in an email.

As for the Berry Amendment, the person who refused to exchange Adachi’s boots for American-made boots may not have been on firm legal footing after all.

Since this was a relatively small order, the Berry Amendment did not apply because the law can be waived for purchases under $150,000, Air Force spokeswoman Jennifer Cassidy said.

The law also has an exception for contingency operations, said Jim Schweiter, an attorney based in Washington who specializes in government contracts.

“If the item is to be purchased for use in support of contingency operations, or the purchase occurs outside the U.S. in support of combat operations, the Berry Amendment doesn’t apply, and the item doesn’t have to be produced in the U.S.,” Schweiter said in an email.

So the boots may comply with the law, but Adachi refuses to wear them. Until he gets his new boots from Yoo, he’s sticking with his Air Force ABUs so he can wear his green boots that were made in America.

“I am a career airman with 31 years of continuous service to country,” Adachi said. “My concerns are not borne out of retribution — I am not in some kind of administrative trouble, this is not about sour grapes. This is about the countless Americans who are struggling to feed their families; Americans whose livelihoods have been taken away in this so-called global economy.

“This is about patriotism. This is about following the [Berry Amendment] set forth over 60 years ago. This is about American soldiers wearing our country’s uniform made by Americans.”
x998877661 发表于 2012-6-27 17:24
明显假新闻,美军N年前就禁止向外国采购军装食品等用品


NO, 美军不禁止从国外获取军需品,贝瑞修正案只是针对五角大楼自己的后勤单位,其他的军需供应/承包商没有这项规定,事实上就在五角大楼内部,贝瑞修正案都有很多特例和空子存在,或者冠冕堂皇的说法是用某些灵活措施,将一些商品排除在贝瑞修正案之外

毕竟便宜的东西利润高。早在鲍威尔时期,五角大楼就希望国会废掉这个修正案。

原文:

http://www.airforcetimes.com/new ... -made-boots-062512/

Master sgt. says no to Chinese-made boots

By Jeff Schogol - Staff writer
Posted : Monday Jun 25, 2012 7:33:32 EDT

Master Sgt. Steve Adachi is willing to fight for his country, but not in the Chinese-made boots his unit gave him.

“I’m troubled that the military continues to downsize because of the budget deficits — budget deficits which are in part a result of millions of unemployed American workers,” Adachi wrote in a letter to Air Force Times. “How many American workers are unemployed because military clothing is being produced in foreign countries?”

Adachi is a reservist deployed to Kabul, Afghanistan, with the 438th Air Expeditionary Wing as an adviser to the Afghan air force. His home unit is the 624th Regional Support Group in Hawaii.

Before he deployed, his unit gave him a pair of green boots — standard wear for his airman battle uniform. Much to his dismay, they were made in China. He tried to exchange them at the Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam clothing store, but he was in store for another surprise.

“I was told that the boots were not compliant with the Berry Amendment and I could not exchange them,” Adachi said.

The Berry Amendment requires the food, clothing, fabrics and other textiles the Pentagon buys to be grown or made in the U.S.

Adachi turned red, white and blue.

“I went back to the reserves supply warehouse and asked the supply manager why I was issued Chinese-made boots,” Adachi said. “He told me that they were less expensive as opposed to the U.S.-made ones. I urged him to reissue me U.S. boots, citing that I did not feel comfortable ‘going to war’ wearing boots made in China.”

Adachi refused to let the matter drop, and he succeeded in getting a smaller pair of U.S.-made boots, which he was able to exchange for American boots in his size.

But that wasn’t the end of it. After he got to Afghanistan, he was issued his new uniform — Army Operation Enduring Freedom camouflage, known as OCP — and asked for a pair of the required tan boots. He was told he had to go through his unit, which sent him another pair of boots made in — wait for it — China.

After a flurry of emails, he asked his unit’s supply manager via email how he could exchange the boots for ones made in America. The response: “Good luck.”

So how did we get to this point?

First, Adachi’s boots didn’t come from the Defense Logistics Agency, which supplies troops with just about everything, said agency spokeswoman Mimi Schirmacher.

“Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support has an ample supply of the standard Air Force green boots, as well as tan boots worn with the Army Operation Enduring Freedom Camouflage Pattern (OCP) uniform,” Schirmacher said in an email. “DLA Troop Support purchases products that we provide to the services in accordance with the Berry Amendment, and does not purchase combat boots or other uniform items made outside the United States.”

What happened was Adachi’s unit purchased two pairs of the boots from U.S. Patriot LLC in South Carolina.

Company president Paul Yoo doesn’t know exactly why Adachi’s unit wanted those boots, but they do have some advantages over American-made boots.

The boots are lighter and less expensive than those made in the U.S., Yoo said

Because they are lighter, they can take between 2 and 3 pounds off troops’ feet, he said. That allows them to carry more gear and reduces wear and tear on their bodies.

Yoo offered to exchange Adachi’s boots free for American-made ones.

“Our organization is staffed, managed and owned primarily by veterans,” he said. “I am a 5-year veteran of the United States Army. My second in command in my retail stores, he was a command sergeant major in the Ranger battalions. The husband and wife owners of the company are ex-Army officers. This is the way that we operate.”

Adachi is taking Yoo up on his offer.

“Once I receive these boots, [at a minimum] I believe this to be a victory,” Adachi said in an email.

As for the Berry Amendment, the person who refused to exchange Adachi’s boots for American-made boots may not have been on firm legal footing after all.

Since this was a relatively small order, the Berry Amendment did not apply because the law can be waived for purchases under $150,000, Air Force spokeswoman Jennifer Cassidy said.

The law also has an exception for contingency operations, said Jim Schweiter, an attorney based in Washington who specializes in government contracts.

“If the item is to be purchased for use in support of contingency operations, or the purchase occurs outside the U.S. in support of combat operations, the Berry Amendment doesn’t apply, and the item doesn’t have to be produced in the U.S.,” Schweiter said in an email.

So the boots may comply with the law, but Adachi refuses to wear them. Until he gets his new boots from Yoo, he’s sticking with his Air Force ABUs so he can wear his green boots that were made in America.

“I am a career airman with 31 years of continuous service to country,” Adachi said. “My concerns are not borne out of retribution — I am not in some kind of administrative trouble, this is not about sour grapes. This is about the countless Americans who are struggling to feed their families; Americans whose livelihoods have been taken away in this so-called global economy.

“This is about patriotism. This is about following the [Berry Amendment] set forth over 60 years ago. This is about American soldiers wearing our country’s uniform made by Americans.”
游骑兵不骑马 发表于 2012-6-27 16:37
美军的靴子啥时候在咱这生产了?交易版块里还一大堆美国原产百丽军靴呢~
原文说的并非全部从中国购买,也有美国产的,那个大兵只是想要美国生产的,缓解下美国的失业率高的问题。
这兵借爱国的名义已经领了四双鞋子,正准备免费再拿第五双,是不是有浪费的嫌疑
哈瓦隆 发表于 2012-6-27 17:28
NO, 美军不禁止从国外采购军需品

原文:
原文链接解释是15万美元以下所以不违反贝瑞修正案么?
好事情啊。欢迎良性竞争。
影霜 发表于 2012-6-27 14:24
中国有一位高官说过:即使我们不去参观陈列有TG韩战逆行的中国人民革命军事博物馆,韩国人也不会买我们的产 ...
[:a5:]不得不顶,我大美丽贱万碎!制抵中货!
奇葩处处有啊,愿真主关照他吧,对了万一吃枪子,一定要声明:“拒绝吃中国造的枪子儿”哟!
哈瓦隆 发表于 2012-6-27 17:28
NO, 美军不禁止从国外获取军需品,贝瑞修正案只是针对五角大楼自己的后勤单位,其他的军需供应/承包商没 ...
就是说从其他的军需供应商那里,那种即便是中国制造,但是上面打着“made in U.S.”的奇葩产品只要质量上木有太大的问题就可以进入美国军队的装备序列中?