超级军网叙利亚3月2日战报：政府军光复霍姆斯
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/04/25 23:23:32
叙利亚政府军3月1日光复霍姆斯
http://www.algeria-isp.com/actua ... ssus-mars-2012.html
一名12岁孩童在霍姆斯被带路党杀害，西方媒体却嫁祸给政府军
![]()
http://www.algeria-isp.com/actua ... stes-mars-2012.html
半岛电视台在叙利亚问题上编造谎言
http://www.algeria-isp.com/actua ... ideo-mars-2012.html
半岛电视台将俄罗斯06年在车臣的飞机说成叙利亚政府军轰炸抗议平民
http://www.algeria-isp.com/actua ... ttue-mars-2012.html
一个西方独立记者3月1日在霍姆斯的调查，霍姆斯就是一场叛乱，他们只会盲目射击和杀戮，但是西方主流媒体却只报告政府军炮击该城。大部分叙利亚只希望和平生活，不支持叛乱，支持中俄决议。卡塔尔等国家早就不断支持叙利亚叛军。对这些叙利亚政府反应过慢，最终造成叛乱。而最近西方记者在霍姆斯一事也是一贯的造假
https://icanstillaccess.com/.i/j ... TouAaY3q3qi8vBp90sr
Mar-01-2012 21:02printcomments
'From Misurata we came to free Syria!'
Homs in the Hell of Armed Groups
Silvia Cattori for Salem-News.com
If you want to speak of "heroes" in Syria, then you should refer to all parties who are suffering, not only to the "heroes" recognized by the West ...
Homs under destruction
Homs, Syria
(ROME) - A direct testimony from the Syrian city of Homs collected by the Swiss journalist Silvia Cattori, who paints a very different picture than that spread by a majority of western media. Since 6 February Cattori has lost contact with her local informants, terrorized by armed groups "wildly shelling, killing to kill”, as reported in an interview with an inhabitant of Homs.
Homs, now, is nothing but a sinister battlefield where government soldiers face armed groups which, according to independent witnesses about the true nature of the rebellion, are blindly firing cannon shots to sow terror and death, then pretending that only government forces are bombarding the city.
The Western media continue, for its part, to adduce as evidence the statements of local committees which spread propaganda of the armed "opponents", in coordination with the Syrian Observatory of Human Rights, a London-based body created and funded by the rebellion-allied forces[The Syrian Observatory of Human Rights - which collects the statements of various local committees in Syria - has been repeatedly denounced as nothing but a vulgar instrument of disinformation in the service of the revolt. Despite ample evidence of that, it remains the principal source of information from Syria - together with the famous "great reporters" – and the entire Western media are referring to it, spreading day after day the reports by this rip-of observatory. [1]
To understand what happens in Syria, it is therefore not possible to rely on the Syrian Observatory or on bloggers who are part of this rebellion. We also cannot rely on foreign correspondents who are, as we can see, systematically and from the heart and soul on the side of the armed "opponents", qualifying them as "heroes" and presenting the battle that divides the Syrian people in an entirely Manichaean way: On one side the opposition which "struggles for democracy", and on the other the terrible dictator.
Things are not like that. As demonstrated by a recent poll, as well as by the massive demonstrations in support of the Russian and Chinese veto at the UN, the vast majority of the Syrian people do not want this armed revolt, which seeks solely to legitimize NATO powers and several Arab states - notoriously known as champions of democracy, such as Qatar.
If you want to speak of "heroes" in Syria, then you should refer to all parties who are suffering, not only to the "heroes" recognized by the West ...
How many Milan missiles were handed over to the rebels?
The number of Syrian citizens appealing to to their president for intervention of government forces is very high. This is especially true in Homs, where the situation is alarming because large sections of the population are held hostage by these groups occupying entire areas of the city - the neighborhoods of Baba Amr, Khaldiyeh, Karm el-Zeytoun - where the people have been calling for months for Damascus to rescue them [2].
Their fate has become even more a source of anxiety since the same Milan anti-tank missile launchers delivered to the Libyan rebels during the Libyan campaign, less than a year ago, by France and Qatar, began to be used. We can remember how at the time Sarkozy and Bernard Henry Levy misled public opinion by putting the blame on forces loyal to Gaddafi for the use of these Milan missiles, which were taking a heavy toll on the people of Syria.
This is the same disturbing scenario repeating itself in Syria. Politicians, journalists and NGOs are once again taking a firm stand concerning the war, provoked by groups exploited by foreign powers. They attribute to the government forces, as was done in Libya and without proper inspection, the acts of barbarism perpetrated by the armed ’opponents’ who are terrorizing the majority of the population.
For three weeks correspondents have been repeating that Homs has been unilaterally shelled by the Syrian army. On the contrary, the loyalist contingents attacked by the Milan missiles have suffered heavy losses since the beginning of their intervention. It is not clear whether the authorities in Damascus will be able to dislodge these groups with heavy weaponry from all quarters of the city.
Could the Syrian government not respond?
From the beginning of these battles it has been repeatedly demonstrated that the armed ‘rebels’ are trained, drilled and formed by foreign special forces; and that among their ranks the opponents have elements acting on behalf of foreign powers whose presence in Syria is self-evident. Syrian television has recently disseminated pictures of Homs taken by a foreign "war photographer" who followed and filmed these armed "opponents" - the same ones glorified by the "great reporters" – who wildly launch rockets and missiles. An image has attracted attention: In a building, whose stairs are dirty with blood and destroyed furniture, a surprising graffiti with heavy meaning stood out on a wall: "From Misurata, after we have freed Lybia, we came to free Syria!"
Who is responsible for the massacres of Homs, and which objectives does he pursue?
These armed groups, whose most violent actions are attributed to Al Assad soldiers facing them, are systematically presented by the Western press as "foes" fighting for "democracy."
Why do "great reporters" not bring evidence of Syrian victims of abductions, tortures and murders by these armed "opponents"?
Why has the President of "Doctors without Borders" recently contributed to this process of intoxication, showing as credible the testimonies of anonymous Syrians with covered faces - standing side by side with the rebels, and attributing to Al-Assad forces and to the hospitals’ doctors unspeakable acts of torture and injury of children? [3]
Who would believe in Bashar Al Assad’s interest in torturing his people, in raping children and girls? Who would believe that the majority of the Syrian people would continue supporting Bashar Al Assad if he was really such a bloody torturer as painted in the West for the purpose of war propaganda?
These incessant campaigns which defend the violent opposition, and not the people terrorized and oppressed by these rebels, are dangerous. They aim to bring grist to foreign power’s mill - France, Great Britain, the United States, backed by Qatar and Saudi Arabia – which have been preparing for months the ground for a military intervention in Syria, and are just waiting for the green light by Obama.
Silvia Cattori
« Homs, une ville plongée dans l’horreur organisée par des groupes armés et non par Damas », by Silvia Cattori, 6 February 2012.
(http://www.silviacattori.net/article2787.html)
Translated by the Alternative Information Center (29.02.2012):
http://www.alternativenews.org/e ... groups-not-damascus
Original article in French (23.02.2012):
http://www.silviacattori.net/article2861.html
[1] The Syrian Observatory of Human Rights - which collects the statements of various local committees in Syria - has been repeatedly denounced as nothing but a vulgar instrument of disinformation in the service of the revolt. Despite ample evidence of that, it remains the principal source of information from Syria - together with the famous "great reporters" – and the entire Western media are referring to it, spreading day after day the reports by this rip-of observatory.
[2] See: “Une Syrienne, dont le frère a été tué à Homs par des “opposants”, témoigne” (“A Syrian who had killed his brother in Homs by ’opponents’ witnesses”), story picked up by Nadia Khost, February 8, 2012.
(http://www.silviacattori.net/article2790.html)
[3] The role of NGOs that have contributed to the misinformation affecting Syria and thus increasing the risk of foreign intervention, and in particular Amnesty International and Medecins Sans Frontières will be the subject of further investigations.
All the versions of this article:
- Homs dans l’enfer des groupes armés
- Homs nell’inferno dei gruppi armati
URL of this article: http://www.silviacattori.net/article2898.html
叙利亚政府军3月1日光复霍姆斯
http://www.algeria-isp.com/actua ... ssus-mars-2012.html
一名12岁孩童在霍姆斯被带路党杀害，西方媒体却嫁祸给政府军
![]()
http://www.algeria-isp.com/actua ... stes-mars-2012.html
半岛电视台在叙利亚问题上编造谎言
http://www.algeria-isp.com/actua ... ideo-mars-2012.html
半岛电视台将俄罗斯06年在车臣的飞机说成叙利亚政府军轰炸抗议平民
http://www.algeria-isp.com/actua ... ttue-mars-2012.html
一个西方独立记者3月1日在霍姆斯的调查，霍姆斯就是一场叛乱，他们只会盲目射击和杀戮，但是西方主流媒体却只报告政府军炮击该城。大部分叙利亚只希望和平生活，不支持叛乱，支持中俄决议。卡塔尔等国家早就不断支持叙利亚叛军。对这些叙利亚政府反应过慢，最终造成叛乱。而最近西方记者在霍姆斯一事也是一贯的造假
https://icanstillaccess.com/.i/j ... TouAaY3q3qi8vBp90sr
Mar-01-2012 21:02printcomments
'From Misurata we came to free Syria!'
Homs in the Hell of Armed Groups
Silvia Cattori for Salem-News.com
If you want to speak of "heroes" in Syria, then you should refer to all parties who are suffering, not only to the "heroes" recognized by the West ...
Homs under destruction
Homs, Syria
(ROME) - A direct testimony from the Syrian city of Homs collected by the Swiss journalist Silvia Cattori, who paints a very different picture than that spread by a majority of western media. Since 6 February Cattori has lost contact with her local informants, terrorized by armed groups "wildly shelling, killing to kill”, as reported in an interview with an inhabitant of Homs .
Homs, now, is nothing but a sinister battlefield where government soldiers face armed groups which, according to independent witnesses about the true nature of the rebellion, are blindly firing cannon shots to sow terror and death, then pretending that only government forces are bombarding the city.
The Western media continue, for its part, to adduce as evidence the statements of local committees which spread propaganda of the armed "opponents", in coordination with the Syrian Observatory of Human Rights, a London-based body created and funded by the rebellion-allied forces[The Syrian Observatory of Human Rights - which collects the statements of various local committees in Syria - has been repeatedly denounced as nothing but a vulgar instrument of disinformation in the service of the revolt. Despite ample evidence of that, it remains the principal source of information from Syria - together with the famous "great reporters" – and the entire Western media are referring to it, spreading day after day the reports by this rip-of observatory. [1]
To understand what happens in Syria, it is therefore not possible to rely on the Syrian Observatory or on bloggers who are part of this rebellion. We also cannot rely on foreign correspondents who are, as we can see, systematically and from the heart and soul on the side of the armed "opponents", qualifying them as "heroes" and presenting the battle that divides the Syrian people in an entirely Manichaean way: On one side the opposition which "struggles for democracy", and on the other the terrible dictator.
Things are not like that. As demonstrated by a recent poll, as well as by the massive demonstrations in support of the Russian and Chinese veto at the UN, the vast majority of the Syrian people do not want this armed revolt, which seeks solely to legitimize NATO powers and several Arab states - notoriously known as champions of democracy, such as Qatar.
If you want to speak of "heroes" in Syria, then you should refer to all parties who are suffering, not only to the "heroes" recognized by the West ...
How many Milan missiles were handed over to the rebels?
The number of Syrian citizens appealing to to their president for intervention of government forces is very high. This is especially true in Homs, where the situation is alarming because large sections of the population are held hostage by these groups occupying entire areas of the city - the neighborhoods of Baba Amr, Khaldiyeh, Karm el-Zeytoun - where the people have been calling for months for Damascus to rescue them [2].
Their fate has become even more a source of anxiety since the same Milan anti-tank missile launchers delivered to the Libyan rebels during the Libyan campaign, less than a year ago, by France and Qatar, began to be used. We can remember how at the time Sarkozy and Bernard Henry Levy misled public opinion by putting the blame on forces loyal to Gaddafi for the use of these Milan missiles, which were taking a heavy toll on the people of Syria.
This is the same disturbing scenario repeating itself in Syria. Politicians, journalists and NGOs are once again taking a firm stand concerning the war, provoked by groups exploited by foreign powers. They attribute to the government forces, as was done in Libya and without proper inspection, the acts of barbarism perpetrated by the armed ’opponents’ who are terrorizing the majority of the population.
For three weeks correspondents have been repeating that Homs has been unilaterally shelled by the Syrian army. On the contrary, the loyalist contingents attacked by the Milan missiles have suffered heavy losses since the beginning of their intervention. It is not clear whether the authorities in Damascus will be able to dislodge these groups with heavy weaponry from all quarters of the city.
Could the Syrian government not respond?
From the beginning of these battles it has been repeatedly demonstrated that the armed ‘rebels’ are trained, drilled and formed by foreign special forces; and that among their ranks the opponents have elements acting on behalf of foreign powers whose presence in Syria is self-evident. Syrian television has recently disseminated pictures of Homs taken by a foreign "war photographer" who followed and filmed these armed "opponents" - the same ones glorified by the "great reporters" – who wildly launch rockets and missiles. An image has attracted attention: In a building, whose stairs are dirty with blood and destroyed furniture, a surprising graffiti with heavy meaning stood out on a wall: "From Misurata, after we have freed Lybia, we came to free Syria!"
Who is responsible for the massacres of Homs, and which objectives does he pursue?
These armed groups, whose most violent actions are attributed to Al Assad soldiers facing them, are systematically presented by the Western press as "foes" fighting for "democracy."
Why do "great reporters" not bring evidence of Syrian victims of abductions, tortures and murders by these armed "opponents"?
Why has the President of "Doctors without Borders" recently contributed to this process of intoxication, showing as credible the testimonies of anonymous Syrians with covered faces - standing side by side with the rebels, and attributing to Al-Assad forces and to the hospitals’ doctors unspeakable acts of torture and injury of children? [3]
Who would believe in Bashar Al Assad’s interest in torturing his people, in raping children and girls? Who would believe that the majority of the Syrian people would continue supporting Bashar Al Assad if he was really such a bloody torturer as painted in the West for the purpose of war propaganda?
These incessant campaigns which defend the violent opposition, and not the people terrorized and oppressed by these rebels, are dangerous. They aim to bring grist to foreign power’s mill - France, Great Britain, the United States, backed by Qatar and Saudi Arabia – which have been preparing for months the ground for a military intervention in Syria, and are just waiting for the green light by Obama.
Silvia Cattori
« Homs, une ville plongée dans l’horreur organisée par des groupes armés et non par Damas », by Silvia Cattori, 6 February 2012.
(http://www.silviacattori.net/article2787.html)
Translated by the Alternative Information Center (29.02.2012):
http://www.alternativenews.org/e ... groups-not-damascus
Original article in French (23.02.2012):
http://www.silviacattori.net/article2861.html
[1] The Syrian Observatory of Human Rights - which collects the statements of various local committees in Syria - has been repeatedly denounced as nothing but a vulgar instrument of disinformation in the service of the revolt. Despite ample evidence of that, it remains the principal source of information from Syria - together with the famous "great reporters" – and the entire Western media are referring to it, spreading day after day the reports by this rip-of observatory.
[2] See: “Une Syrienne, dont le frère a été tué à Homs par des “opposants”, témoigne” (“A Syrian who had killed his brother in Homs by ’opponents’ witnesses”), story picked up by Nadia Khost, February 8, 2012.
(http://www.silviacattori.net/article2790.html)
[3] The role of NGOs that have contributed to the misinformation affecting Syria and thus increasing the risk of foreign intervention, and in particular Amnesty International and Medecins Sans Frontières will be the subject of further investigations.
All the versions of this article:
- Homs dans l’enfer des groupes armés
- Homs nell’inferno dei gruppi armati
URL of this article: http://www.silviacattori.net/article2898.html
http://www.algeria-isp.com/actua ... ssus-mars-2012.html
一名12岁孩童在霍姆斯被带路党杀害，西方媒体却嫁祸给政府军
http://www.algeria-isp.com/actua ... stes-mars-2012.html
半岛电视台在叙利亚问题上编造谎言
http://www.algeria-isp.com/actua ... ideo-mars-2012.html
半岛电视台将俄罗斯06年在车臣的飞机说成叙利亚政府军轰炸抗议平民
http://www.algeria-isp.com/actua ... ttue-mars-2012.html
一个西方独立记者3月1日在霍姆斯的调查，霍姆斯就是一场叛乱，他们只会盲目射击和杀戮，但是西方主流媒体却只报告政府军炮击该城。大部分叙利亚只希望和平生活，不支持叛乱，支持中俄决议。卡塔尔等国家早就不断支持叙利亚叛军。对这些叙利亚政府反应过慢，最终造成叛乱。而最近西方记者在霍姆斯一事也是一贯的造假
https://icanstillaccess.com/.i/j ... TouAaY3q3qi8vBp90sr
Mar-01-2012 21:02printcomments
'From Misurata we came to free Syria!'
Homs in the Hell of Armed Groups
Silvia Cattori for Salem-News.com
If you want to speak of "heroes" in Syria, then you should refer to all parties who are suffering, not only to the "heroes" recognized by the West ...
Homs under destruction
Homs, Syria
(ROME) - A direct testimony from the Syrian city of Homs collected by the Swiss journalist Silvia Cattori, who paints a very different picture than that spread by a majority of western media. Since 6 February Cattori has lost contact with her local informants, terrorized by armed groups "wildly shelling, killing to kill”, as reported in an interview with an inhabitant of Homs
Homs, now, is nothing but a sinister battlefield where government soldiers face armed groups which, according to independent witnesses about the true nature of the rebellion, are blindly firing cannon shots to sow terror and death, then pretending that only government forces are bombarding the city.
The Western media continue, for its part, to adduce as evidence the statements of local committees which spread propaganda of the armed "opponents", in coordination with the Syrian Observatory of Human Rights, a London-based body created and funded by the rebellion-allied forces[The Syrian Observatory of Human Rights - which collects the statements of various local committees in Syria - has been repeatedly denounced as nothing but a vulgar instrument of disinformation in the service of the revolt. Despite ample evidence of that, it remains the principal source of information from Syria - together with the famous "great reporters" – and the entire Western media are referring to it, spreading day after day the reports by this rip-of observatory. [1]
To understand what happens in Syria, it is therefore not possible to rely on the Syrian Observatory or on bloggers who are part of this rebellion. We also cannot rely on foreign correspondents who are, as we can see, systematically and from the heart and soul on the side of the armed "opponents", qualifying them as "heroes" and presenting the battle that divides the Syrian people in an entirely Manichaean way: On one side the opposition which "struggles for democracy", and on the other the terrible dictator.
Things are not like that. As demonstrated by a recent poll, as well as by the massive demonstrations in support of the Russian and Chinese veto at the UN, the vast majority of the Syrian people do not want this armed revolt, which seeks solely to legitimize NATO powers and several Arab states - notoriously known as champions of democracy, such as Qatar.
If you want to speak of "heroes" in Syria, then you should refer to all parties who are suffering, not only to the "heroes" recognized by the West ...
How many Milan missiles were handed over to the rebels?
The number of Syrian citizens appealing to to their president for intervention of government forces is very high. This is especially true in Homs, where the situation is alarming because large sections of the population are held hostage by these groups occupying entire areas of the city - the neighborhoods of Baba Amr, Khaldiyeh, Karm el-Zeytoun - where the people have been calling for months for Damascus to rescue them [2].
Their fate has become even more a source of anxiety since the same Milan anti-tank missile launchers delivered to the Libyan rebels during the Libyan campaign, less than a year ago, by France and Qatar, began to be used. We can remember how at the time Sarkozy and Bernard Henry Levy misled public opinion by putting the blame on forces loyal to Gaddafi for the use of these Milan missiles, which were taking a heavy toll on the people of Syria.
This is the same disturbing scenario repeating itself in Syria. Politicians, journalists and NGOs are once again taking a firm stand concerning the war, provoked by groups exploited by foreign powers. They attribute to the government forces, as was done in Libya and without proper inspection, the acts of barbarism perpetrated by the armed ’opponents’ who are terrorizing the majority of the population.
For three weeks correspondents have been repeating that Homs has been unilaterally shelled by the Syrian army. On the contrary, the loyalist contingents attacked by the Milan missiles have suffered heavy losses since the beginning of their intervention. It is not clear whether the authorities in Damascus will be able to dislodge these groups with heavy weaponry from all quarters of the city.
Could the Syrian government not respond?
From the beginning of these battles it has been repeatedly demonstrated that the armed ‘rebels’ are trained, drilled and formed by foreign special forces; and that among their ranks the opponents have elements acting on behalf of foreign powers whose presence in Syria is self-evident. Syrian television has recently disseminated pictures of Homs taken by a foreign "war photographer" who followed and filmed these armed "opponents" - the same ones glorified by the "great reporters" – who wildly launch rockets and missiles. An image has attracted attention: In a building, whose stairs are dirty with blood and destroyed furniture, a surprising graffiti with heavy meaning stood out on a wall: "From Misurata, after we have freed Lybia, we came to free Syria!"
Who is responsible for the massacres of Homs, and which objectives does he pursue?
These armed groups, whose most violent actions are attributed to Al Assad soldiers facing them, are systematically presented by the Western press as "foes" fighting for "democracy."
Why do "great reporters" not bring evidence of Syrian victims of abductions, tortures and murders by these armed "opponents"?
Why has the President of "Doctors without Borders" recently contributed to this process of intoxication, showing as credible the testimonies of anonymous Syrians with covered faces - standing side by side with the rebels, and attributing to Al-Assad forces and to the hospitals’ doctors unspeakable acts of torture and injury of children? [3]
Who would believe in Bashar Al Assad’s interest in torturing his people, in raping children and girls? Who would believe that the majority of the Syrian people would continue supporting Bashar Al Assad if he was really such a bloody torturer as painted in the West for the purpose of war propaganda?
These incessant campaigns which defend the violent opposition, and not the people terrorized and oppressed by these rebels, are dangerous. They aim to bring grist to foreign power’s mill - France, Great Britain, the United States, backed by Qatar and Saudi Arabia – which have been preparing for months the ground for a military intervention in Syria, and are just waiting for the green light by Obama.
Silvia Cattori
(http://www.silviacattori.net/article2787.html)
Translated by the Alternative Information Center (29.02.2012):
http://www.alternativenews.org/e ... groups-not-damascus
Original article in French (23.02.2012):
http://www.silviacattori.net/article2861.html
[1] The Syrian Observatory of Human Rights - which collects the statements of various local committees in Syria - has been repeatedly denounced as nothing but a vulgar instrument of disinformation in the service of the revolt. Despite ample evidence of that, it remains the principal source of information from Syria - together with the famous "great reporters" – and the entire Western media are referring to it, spreading day after day the reports by this rip-of observatory.
[2] See: “Une Syrienne, dont le frère a été tué à Homs par des “opposants”, témoigne” (“A Syrian who had killed his brother in Homs by ’opponents’ witnesses”), story picked up by Nadia Khost, February 8, 2012.
(http://www.silviacattori.net/article2790.html)
[3] The role of NGOs that have contributed to the misinformation affecting Syria and thus increasing the risk of foreign intervention, and in particular Amnesty International and Medecins Sans Frontières will be the subject of further investigations.
All the versions of this article:
- Homs dans l’enfer des groupes armés
- Homs nell’inferno dei gruppi armati
URL of this article: http://www.silviacattori.net/article2898.html
叙利亚政府军3月1日光复霍姆斯
http://www.algeria-isp.com/actua ... ssus-mars-2012.html
一名12岁孩童在霍姆斯被带路党杀害，西方媒体却嫁祸给政府军
http://www.algeria-isp.com/actua ... stes-mars-2012.html
半岛电视台在叙利亚问题上编造谎言
http://www.algeria-isp.com/actua ... ideo-mars-2012.html
半岛电视台将俄罗斯06年在车臣的飞机说成叙利亚政府军轰炸抗议平民
http://www.algeria-isp.com/actua ... ttue-mars-2012.html
一个西方独立记者3月1日在霍姆斯的调查，霍姆斯就是一场叛乱，他们只会盲目射击和杀戮，但是西方主流媒体却只报告政府军炮击该城。大部分叙利亚只希望和平生活，不支持叛乱，支持中俄决议。卡塔尔等国家早就不断支持叙利亚叛军。对这些叙利亚政府反应过慢，最终造成叛乱。而最近西方记者在霍姆斯一事也是一贯的造假
https://icanstillaccess.com/.i/j ... TouAaY3q3qi8vBp90sr
Mar-01-2012 21:02printcomments
'From Misurata we came to free Syria!'
Homs in the Hell of Armed Groups
Silvia Cattori for Salem-News.com
If you want to speak of "heroes" in Syria, then you should refer to all parties who are suffering, not only to the "heroes" recognized by the West ...
Homs under destruction
Homs, Syria
(ROME) - A direct testimony from the Syrian city of Homs collected by the Swiss journalist Silvia Cattori, who paints a very different picture than that spread by a majority of western media. Since 6 February Cattori has lost contact with her local informants, terrorized by armed groups "wildly shelling, killing to kill”, as reported in an interview with an inhabitant of Homs
Homs, now, is nothing but a sinister battlefield where government soldiers face armed groups which, according to independent witnesses about the true nature of the rebellion, are blindly firing cannon shots to sow terror and death, then pretending that only government forces are bombarding the city.
The Western media continue, for its part, to adduce as evidence the statements of local committees which spread propaganda of the armed "opponents", in coordination with the Syrian Observatory of Human Rights, a London-based body created and funded by the rebellion-allied forces[The Syrian Observatory of Human Rights - which collects the statements of various local committees in Syria - has been repeatedly denounced as nothing but a vulgar instrument of disinformation in the service of the revolt. Despite ample evidence of that, it remains the principal source of information from Syria - together with the famous "great reporters" – and the entire Western media are referring to it, spreading day after day the reports by this rip-of observatory. [1]
To understand what happens in Syria, it is therefore not possible to rely on the Syrian Observatory or on bloggers who are part of this rebellion. We also cannot rely on foreign correspondents who are, as we can see, systematically and from the heart and soul on the side of the armed "opponents", qualifying them as "heroes" and presenting the battle that divides the Syrian people in an entirely Manichaean way: On one side the opposition which "struggles for democracy", and on the other the terrible dictator.
Things are not like that. As demonstrated by a recent poll, as well as by the massive demonstrations in support of the Russian and Chinese veto at the UN, the vast majority of the Syrian people do not want this armed revolt, which seeks solely to legitimize NATO powers and several Arab states - notoriously known as champions of democracy, such as Qatar.
If you want to speak of "heroes" in Syria, then you should refer to all parties who are suffering, not only to the "heroes" recognized by the West ...
How many Milan missiles were handed over to the rebels?
The number of Syrian citizens appealing to to their president for intervention of government forces is very high. This is especially true in Homs, where the situation is alarming because large sections of the population are held hostage by these groups occupying entire areas of the city - the neighborhoods of Baba Amr, Khaldiyeh, Karm el-Zeytoun - where the people have been calling for months for Damascus to rescue them [2].
Their fate has become even more a source of anxiety since the same Milan anti-tank missile launchers delivered to the Libyan rebels during the Libyan campaign, less than a year ago, by France and Qatar, began to be used. We can remember how at the time Sarkozy and Bernard Henry Levy misled public opinion by putting the blame on forces loyal to Gaddafi for the use of these Milan missiles, which were taking a heavy toll on the people of Syria.
This is the same disturbing scenario repeating itself in Syria. Politicians, journalists and NGOs are once again taking a firm stand concerning the war, provoked by groups exploited by foreign powers. They attribute to the government forces, as was done in Libya and without proper inspection, the acts of barbarism perpetrated by the armed ’opponents’ who are terrorizing the majority of the population.
For three weeks correspondents have been repeating that Homs has been unilaterally shelled by the Syrian army. On the contrary, the loyalist contingents attacked by the Milan missiles have suffered heavy losses since the beginning of their intervention. It is not clear whether the authorities in Damascus will be able to dislodge these groups with heavy weaponry from all quarters of the city.
Could the Syrian government not respond?
From the beginning of these battles it has been repeatedly demonstrated that the armed ‘rebels’ are trained, drilled and formed by foreign special forces; and that among their ranks the opponents have elements acting on behalf of foreign powers whose presence in Syria is self-evident. Syrian television has recently disseminated pictures of Homs taken by a foreign "war photographer" who followed and filmed these armed "opponents" - the same ones glorified by the "great reporters" – who wildly launch rockets and missiles. An image has attracted attention: In a building, whose stairs are dirty with blood and destroyed furniture, a surprising graffiti with heavy meaning stood out on a wall: "From Misurata, after we have freed Lybia, we came to free Syria!"
Who is responsible for the massacres of Homs, and which objectives does he pursue?
These armed groups, whose most violent actions are attributed to Al Assad soldiers facing them, are systematically presented by the Western press as "foes" fighting for "democracy."
Why do "great reporters" not bring evidence of Syrian victims of abductions, tortures and murders by these armed "opponents"?
Why has the President of "Doctors without Borders" recently contributed to this process of intoxication, showing as credible the testimonies of anonymous Syrians with covered faces - standing side by side with the rebels, and attributing to Al-Assad forces and to the hospitals’ doctors unspeakable acts of torture and injury of children? [3]
Who would believe in Bashar Al Assad’s interest in torturing his people, in raping children and girls? Who would believe that the majority of the Syrian people would continue supporting Bashar Al Assad if he was really such a bloody torturer as painted in the West for the purpose of war propaganda?
These incessant campaigns which defend the violent opposition, and not the people terrorized and oppressed by these rebels, are dangerous. They aim to bring grist to foreign power’s mill - France, Great Britain, the United States, backed by Qatar and Saudi Arabia – which have been preparing for months the ground for a military intervention in Syria, and are just waiting for the green light by Obama.
Silvia Cattori
(http://www.silviacattori.net/article2787.html)
Translated by the Alternative Information Center (29.02.2012):
http://www.alternativenews.org/e ... groups-not-damascus
Original article in French (23.02.2012):
http://www.silviacattori.net/article2861.html
[1] The Syrian Observatory of Human Rights - which collects the statements of various local committees in Syria - has been repeatedly denounced as nothing but a vulgar instrument of disinformation in the service of the revolt. Despite ample evidence of that, it remains the principal source of information from Syria - together with the famous "great reporters" – and the entire Western media are referring to it, spreading day after day the reports by this rip-of observatory.
[2] See: “Une Syrienne, dont le frère a été tué à Homs par des “opposants”, témoigne” (“A Syrian who had killed his brother in Homs by ’opponents’ witnesses”), story picked up by Nadia Khost, February 8, 2012.
(http://www.silviacattori.net/article2790.html)
[3] The role of NGOs that have contributed to the misinformation affecting Syria and thus increasing the risk of foreign intervention, and in particular Amnesty International and Medecins Sans Frontières will be the subject of further investigations.
All the versions of this article:
- Homs dans l’enfer des groupes armés
- Homs nell’inferno dei gruppi armati
URL of this article: http://www.silviacattori.net/article2898.html
http://news.yahoo.com/syrian-for ... city-025618757.html
叙利亚匪狗说战略转移霍姆斯，胜利转进土耳其
叙利亚匪狗说战略转移霍姆斯，胜利转进土耳其
看来大局已定。。。反对派的内乱，西方国家态度的模糊，政府军的高调光复。。。但愿叙利亚劫难告一段落。。。阿富汗小塔 发表于 2012-3-2 17:23 ![]()
http://news.yahoo.com/syrian-for ... city-025618757.html
叙利亚匪狗说战略转移霍姆斯，胜利转进土耳 ...
;P我们普通青年称之为出逃。。。
http://news.yahoo.com/syrian-for ... city-025618757.html
叙利亚匪狗说战略转移霍姆斯，胜利转进土耳 ...
;P我们普通青年称之为出逃。。。
现在疯传前天在霍姆斯抓住若干法国兵，不清楚具体身份是退伍后的雇佣兵还是现役军人，当然现役的可能不是很大。
小丹尼 发表于 2012-3-2 17:32 ![]()
现在疯传前天在霍姆斯抓住若干法国兵，不清楚具体身份是退伍后的雇佣兵还是现役军人，当然现役的可能不是很 ...
法国外籍兵团吧
现在疯传前天在霍姆斯抓住若干法国兵，不清楚具体身份是退伍后的雇佣兵还是现役军人，当然现役的可能不是很 ...
法国外籍兵团吧
小丹尼 发表于 2012-3-2 17:32 ![]()
现在疯传前天在霍姆斯抓住若干法国兵，不清楚具体身份是退伍后的雇佣兵还是现役军人，当然现役的可能不是很 ...
可能是特种部队
现在疯传前天在霍姆斯抓住若干法国兵，不清楚具体身份是退伍后的雇佣兵还是现役军人，当然现役的可能不是很 ...
可能是特种部队
保持战果。。不要让人反攻了。。。去年卡大佐也长期占上风的。。
小丹尼 发表于 2012-3-2 17:32 ![]()
现在疯传前天在霍姆斯抓住若干法国兵，不清楚具体身份是退伍后的雇佣兵还是现役军人，当然现役的可能不是很 ...
估计是被抓住了JJ，西方明显这两天消停了不少
现在疯传前天在霍姆斯抓住若干法国兵，不清楚具体身份是退伍后的雇佣兵还是现役军人，当然现役的可能不是很 ...
估计是被抓住了JJ，西方明显这两天消停了不少
美国不是说调整了方案嘛，搞人道走廊，中俄同意了。看来斗争还很复杂
bookreader 发表于 2012-3-2 17:47 ![]()
估计是被抓住了JJ，西方明显这两天消停了不少
很明显的，真要是欧美亲自上阵必定惹怒毛子，事情很可能就会失控。
估计是被抓住了JJ，西方明显这两天消停了不少
很明显的，真要是欧美亲自上阵必定惹怒毛子，事情很可能就会失控。
霍姆斯解放了？
阿萌会不会单干呢？还有火鸡……
终于知道为什么兔子，毛子偷赞成票了·~~！
chrisxua 发表于 2012-3-2 17:42 ![]()
保持战果。。不要让人反攻了。。。去年卡大佐也长期占上风的。。
没几个国家能在北约炸几个来回后还能占上风的，何况是非洲那些地方！！
保持战果。。不要让人反攻了。。。去年卡大佐也长期占上风的。。
没几个国家能在北约炸几个来回后还能占上风的，何况是非洲那些地方！！
说实在我蛮讨厌土耳其的，除了老瓦的事情以外，还可能是东突的支持者...
卡大佐也是被北约干趴下的，就利比亚反对派如同散鸡一样的战斗力...
带风的刀 发表于 2012-3-2 18:22 ![]()
美国不是说调整了方案嘛，搞人道走廊，中俄同意了。看来斗争还很复杂
人道走廊如果被发现私带武器的话，呵呵...
美国不是说调整了方案嘛，搞人道走廊，中俄同意了。看来斗争还很复杂
人道走廊如果被发现私带武器的话，呵呵...
相比那年拉姆斯菲尔德说“同时对两个大国打赢战争”的自负，如今的背约连叙利亚都不敢动了么？
要是可以就这样结束，就应该去烧下高香~~不对，是去麦加朝圣··巴沙尔能这么当赢家？我真的有点一时难以想明白啊，倒不是别的原因，相比那年拉姆斯菲尔德说“同时对两个大国打赢战争”的自负，如今的背约连叙利亚都不敢动了么？
叙利亚不能和利比亚同日而语
叙利亚不能和利比亚同日而语
叙利亚不能和利比亚同日而语
zick 发表于 2012-3-2 18:26 ![]()
阿萌会不会单干呢？还有火鸡……
叙利亚陆军起码是以色列人不敢掉以轻心的角色。。。
阿萌会不会单干呢？还有火鸡……
叙利亚陆军起码是以色列人不敢掉以轻心的角色。。。
zick 发表于 2012-3-2 21:01 ![]()
巴沙尔能这么当赢家？我真的有点一时难以想明白啊，倒不是别的原因，相比那年拉姆斯菲尔德说“同时对两个大 ...
打赢的前提是美国人想打。。。。
巴沙尔能这么当赢家？我真的有点一时难以想明白啊，倒不是别的原因，相比那年拉姆斯菲尔德说“同时对两个大 ...
打赢的前提是美国人想打。。。。
整个阿蒙和火鸡加在一起，比叙利亚强很多吧，尤其是空军。如果连叙利亚都干不掉，等于是唾面自干啊……
宁要世俗的独裁者，不要冥煮的YSL
带风的刀 发表于 2012-3-2 18:22 ![]()
美国不是说调整了方案嘛，搞人道走廊，中俄同意了。看来斗争还很复杂
几方各退一步吗
美国不是说调整了方案嘛，搞人道走廊，中俄同意了。看来斗争还很复杂
几方各退一步吗
早就该重炮轰城！搞个绿色通道，平民百姓可以出来，但是要检查，凡是摸过枪的直接就地正法，哪还有那么多事啊
zick 发表于 2012-3-2 20:34 ![]()
相比那年拉姆斯菲尔德说“同时对两个大国打赢战争”的自负，如今的背约连叙利亚都不敢动了么？
已经放弃了
相比那年拉姆斯菲尔德说“同时对两个大国打赢战争”的自负，如今的背约连叙利亚都不敢动了么？
已经放弃了
整个阿蒙和火鸡加在一起，比叙利亚强很多吧，尤其是空军。如果连叙利亚都干不掉，等于是唾面自干啊……
但是以色列在那里…阿盟很犹豫
但是以色列在那里…阿盟很犹豫
人道走廊 送什么物资 有钱吗?
叙利亚稳住了，中俄威望上升，跟班小弟会增多。
现在是西方不想自己动手(其实是没钱打),以色列也不愿出头,土耳其叫的凶但也只能来暗的。
最想动手的是那帮逊泥派的，不过中俄反对他们也不敢亲自上阵，毕竟单挑的话，这帮人谁也搞不定叙利亚。人家打不过以色列，打你这帮满身肥肉的一点问题没有。
最想动手的是那帮逊泥派的，不过中俄反对他们也不敢亲自上阵，毕竟单挑的话，这帮人谁也搞不定叙利亚。人家打不过以色列，打你这帮满身肥肉的一点问题没有。
yzbslh 发表于 2012-3-2 17:28 ![]()
我们普通青年称之为出逃。。。
撤退、逃窜、转进、狂奔、暴走、撒丫子...........
中文博大精深呀
我们普通青年称之为出逃。。。
撤退、逃窜、转进、狂奔、暴走、撒丫子...........
中文博大精深呀
jimkando 发表于 2012-3-2 22:42 ![]()
撤退、逃窜、转进、狂奔、暴走、撒丫子...........
中文博大精深呀
总而言之就是闪人了。。。
撤退、逃窜、转进、狂奔、暴走、撒丫子...........
中文博大精深呀
总而言之就是闪人了。。。小口径子弹伤，明显北约子弹的短管步枪打的
NB的北约再起不能？
看来最惨的还是普通百姓，战败的可以撤，战胜的继续推进，可他们能去哪呢，比如画面中的那个孩子
叙利亚3月2日战报：政府军光复霍姆斯
叙利亚3月3日战报：叙利亚政府军取得霍姆斯大捷，抓获11 ...
6月20日叙利亚阿勒颇政府军战报
战报：叙利亚政府军夺回霍姆斯！
利比亚2月12日战报：卡大佐余部光复一南部城市
利比亚2月13日战报:爱戴卡大佐的黑叔叔图阿雷格族光复库 ...
利比亚2月23日战报：库夫拉省部分光复地区，民众高唱国 ...
叙利亚9月22日战报：来自东古塔500多恐怖分子向政府军投 ...
叙利亚10月29日战报：共济会网站称反政府军损失近半，美 ...
叙利亚政府军战报8.16
叙利亚10月3日战报：在德拉，霍姆斯等地520多名恐怖分子 ...
叙利亚10月2日战报：俄叙联军取得霍姆斯西北大捷，击毙1 ...