如果重复请删掉-旧闻:f-35在北约空战模拟中多次输给su- ...

来源:百度文库 编辑:超级军网 时间:2024/04/24 11:58:14
link: http<colon slash slash>www<dot>f-16<dot>net<slash>news_article4416<dot>html

不知是真是假。原文没提到空战模拟是那个北约国家进行的。

“。。。某个专家给某个北约国家国防部官员的关于空战威胁的展示会提到f-35会输给其在服役期的主要对手。展示会的一部分是计算机模拟结果f-35往往会输给俄制su-35战机。该模拟同时指出给f-35服务的预警机和加油机同时被击败。。。”

September 7, 2011 (by Eric L. Palmer) - An unnamed source stated that earlier this year a presentation was given by an industry air combat threat assessment expert to defense officials of a NATO country which showed that the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) would not survive air combat against threats it is likely to see in its alleged service lifetime.

Part of the presentation showed a computer simulation which calculated that the F-35 would be consistently defeated by the Russian-made SU-35 fighter aircraft. The defeat calculated by the scenario also showed the loss of the F-35's supporting airborne-early warning and air-to-air refueling aircraft.

The technology in the SU-35 will also see its way into growth upgrades of other SU-fighter variants used by countries like Indonesia, India, Malaysia and Vietnam. Chinese variants of these aircraft should also see similar growth capability in the coming years.

The Russian-made T-50, PAK-FA low-observable fighter now in development is expected to be much more lethal than the SU-35 in air-to-air combat against the U.S. made F-35. The SU-35 and T-50 made appearances this year at the Russian aerospace industry air show known as MAKS2011. Both aircraft will include sensors and networking which can minimise the effects of the limited low-observable qualities of the F-35. They will also have higher performance and carry more air-to-air weapons than an F-35.

The F-35 defeat briefing runs counter to the claims by the Lockheed Martin corporation that the F-35 will be a go-it-alone aircraft in high threat situations (brief to Israel, 2007) or that it will be “8 times” more effective than “legacy” aircraft in air-to-air combat.

link: http<colon slash slash>www<dot>f-16<dot>net<slash>news_article4416<dot>html

不知是真是假。原文没提到空战模拟是那个北约国家进行的。

“。。。某个专家给某个北约国家国防部官员的关于空战威胁的展示会提到f-35会输给其在服役期的主要对手。展示会的一部分是计算机模拟结果f-35往往会输给俄制su-35战机。该模拟同时指出给f-35服务的预警机和加油机同时被击败。。。”

September 7, 2011 (by Eric L. Palmer) - An unnamed source stated that earlier this year a presentation was given by an industry air combat threat assessment expert to defense officials of a NATO country which showed that the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) would not survive air combat against threats it is likely to see in its alleged service lifetime.

Part of the presentation showed a computer simulation which calculated that the F-35 would be consistently defeated by the Russian-made SU-35 fighter aircraft. The defeat calculated by the scenario also showed the loss of the F-35's supporting airborne-early warning and air-to-air refueling aircraft.

The technology in the SU-35 will also see its way into growth upgrades of other SU-fighter variants used by countries like Indonesia, India, Malaysia and Vietnam. Chinese variants of these aircraft should also see similar growth capability in the coming years.

The Russian-made T-50, PAK-FA low-observable fighter now in development is expected to be much more lethal than the SU-35 in air-to-air combat against the U.S. made F-35. The SU-35 and T-50 made appearances this year at the Russian aerospace industry air show known as MAKS2011. Both aircraft will include sensors and networking which can minimise the effects of the limited low-observable qualities of the F-35. They will also have higher performance and carry more air-to-air weapons than an F-35.

The F-35 defeat briefing runs counter to the claims by the Lockheed Martin corporation that the F-35 will be a go-it-alone aircraft in high threat situations (brief to Israel, 2007) or that it will be “8 times” more effective than “legacy” aircraft in air-to-air combat.

正常啊,又不是娘娘
但是澳大利亚加拿大等等是那f-35做截击用?
计算机模拟结果
爱抚35本身就不制空
没侧弹仓,狗斗的时候咋办?
不外挂的话,格斗时难道主弹仓一直开着,看准时机发射了,还要把导弹丢出去再点火呀
An unnamed source stated
这种消息就好像国内论坛造谣那种,我听谁谁说,可能啥啥啥。极不靠谱。
楼主,请说普通话,不要用方言。
旧闻了,不过是给娘娘争取订单的手法
我记得貌似是澳大利亚某砖家吧,一天到晚嚷嚷要F22。

zzjj123 发表于 2012-1-13 14:58 没侧弹仓,狗斗的时候咋办? 不外挂的话,格斗时难道主弹仓一直开着,看准时机发射了,还要把导弹丢出去再 ...
ASRAAM和AIM-9 Block2都安装了双向数据链,具有发射后锁定的能力;引导头锁定前,由EODAS提供目标方位。
ASRAAM可以在内弹舱挂载;9X由于不支持弹射挂架,故暂时无法在内弹舱挂载。但这属于预算、进度问题,如果美军认为需要,让9x兼容弹射应该不难。目前的设计,9x可以在外挂架上发射。
zzjj123 发表于 2012-1-13 14:58 没侧弹仓,狗斗的时候咋办? 不外挂的话,格斗时难道主弹仓一直开着,看准时机发射了,还要把导弹丢出去再 ...
ASRAAM和AIM-9 Block2都安装了双向数据链,具有发射后锁定的能力;引导头锁定前,由EODAS提供目标方位。
ASRAAM可以在内弹舱挂载;9X由于不支持弹射挂架,故暂时无法在内弹舱挂载。但这属于预算、进度问题,如果美军认为需要,让9x兼容弹射应该不难。目前的设计,9x可以在外挂架上发射。
原文是澳大利亚某砖家。。。专职球电黑。。。。
F35空优肯定不如SU35。铁定的。
F35A 空优挂载下打苏35,妥妥的,根本不是一个级别

武器航电,RSC大小,姿态感知能力都比后者强,唯一留给苏35的机会就是近距狗斗能否抢先占位,超视距上根本没什么机会,发现和锁定对方的距离远小于于对方发现的距离,先敌攻击的机会都木有多少

而且空优作战的时候,肥电A的推比和翼载不会象唱广大衰党那样的糟糕,起码和石榴持平