听说三哥把参加竞标的虫子和石榴叫做老古董

"The US companies, which flaunt their technological leadership, are feigning hurt that their fighters were found technologically unsuitable. But it was their misjudgement to offer the IAF fighters like the F-16 and the F-18 that are decades old. It is arrogance to claim these have been modernised and are good enough for a country like India. If they wanted to argue technology, they should have fielded the F-35."
（Toga流翻譯：”拿著原始設計概念遠達1960年代的上古貨色前來兜售，還告訴我們這是老美獨步全球的尖端軍武科技！？瞧不起人也要有限度好唄....”）
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

刚刚在MDC上看的，本人不懂方言，求翻译帝。
如果是这样，那么超大的那些虫粉们（比如明月傲雪）是不是要去找三哥拼命啊。
http://news.in.msn.com/national/ ... -documentid=5159947
原始链接在这里，这里有三哥对这次对选用双风而刷掉虫子、石榴、米格35和鹰狮的解释"The US companies, which flaunt their technological leadership, are feigning hurt that their fighters were found technologically unsuitable. But it was their misjudgement to offer the IAF fighters like the F-16 and the F-18 that are decades old. It is arrogance to claim these have been modernised and are good enough for a country like India. If they wanted to argue technology, they should have fielded the F-35."
（Toga流翻譯：”拿著原始設計概念遠達1960年代的上古貨色前來兜售，還告訴我們這是老美獨步全球的尖端軍武科技！？瞧不起人也要有限度好唄....”）
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

刚刚在MDC上看的，本人不懂方言，求翻译帝。
如果是这样，那么超大的那些虫粉们（比如明月傲雪）是不是要去找三哥拼命啊。
http://news.in.msn.com/national/ ... -documentid=5159947
原始链接在这里，这里有三哥对这次对选用双风而刷掉虫子、石榴、米格35和鹰狮的解释