说T50隐身能力差的进来,毛子和三哥表示情绪稳定--雷达阻 ...

说T50隐身能力差的请进来,毛子和三哥表示压力不大.



以超大pzgr43为代表的我方观点:
1:T50没有采用类似F22,F35,J20式的整体座舱;

2:IRST不是融合孔径系统,毛5的航电在传感器融合方面能力有限;

3:T-50身上较小的设备仓开口基本都没有做隐身修型处理，说明它的RCS还没有小到需要考虑这些细节的地步。后期修改设备口形状很麻烦,任何机体上的接缝或者开口都涉及到结构强度的改变.

4:T50的进气道不隐身,甚至通过肉眼就可以看到硕大发动机叶片.

毛子表示压力不大,并回复:

你对传感器融合知识一点也不懂,如果你不认为俄罗斯的传感器融合技术很好,请仔细研究OLS-35.
You know nothing about sensor fussion, read up on the OLS-35 if you don't think Russian sensor fussion is good. And please you have demonstrated time and time again that you have no clue as to what you are saying, and this is evident by phrases such as 'Equipment storehouse openings' are you talking about weapons bays? If so give me a scientific explanation as to what is wrong with them.

让我解释一下这个最早最简单的IRST球体,球体本事显示面积很小,而且它的曲面是倾斜的.相同面积下球体比平刨体积小.甚至我们可以假定象IRST球体的大小返回的雷达信号象昆虫或更小,不管怎样,没有雷达在有效的范围可以探测到那么小的东西.
Once again a fanboy with zero understanding of stealth goes around making big red circles. Let me explain this in the simplest and easiest way possible The IRST ball is a sphere, a sphere by it self presents a very small surface area, and the surface area itself is sloped. By itself a sphere is many times smaller than a flat plane measuring the same area, even if we assume a sphere as small as an IRST housing returns a signal the signal would be insignificant likely something in the magnitude of an insect or smaller considering RAM, either way no radar would be able to detect something that small at meaningful ranges or any ranges at all.

And an illustration of a sphere and its efficiency, at scattering signals.


遮盖不是整体的变得更好,YF23比YF22的隐身性能更好,用的是两块座舱.F35的某些原型机也是.
It looks like a sphere  but wait there's more! The canopy is not a one piece canopy  it gets better, the YF-23 an aircraft said to have a smaller rcs than the YF-22 had a two piece canopy, some F-35 prototypes also had two piece canopies.

我上面已经说过N此,雷达阻截器就好像S型进气道,这在沉默鹰的正面RCS效果很明显.
And again as stated for the 20th time radar blockers are as good as S-shaped intakes, this is evident in the Silent Eagle's frontal RCS.

别逼我说J20的隐身问题,诸如鸭翼,缺少边缘绕射.
Don't make me talk about the J-20's problems such as canards and lack of edge diffraction.


没人说F15SE是五代机,我和你讨论的是雷达阻截器和正向RCS,正向RCS上,F15SE和F35是一样的......
No one said it was a '5th generation' aircraft. And the conversation is in regards to radarblockers and frontal RCS, in frontal RCS the F-15SE is equal to the F-35, period! Get your head around it, nothing you say will change that.

我之所以在讨论T50时提及F15SE,是为了说明两者使用雷达阻截器得到相同的效果.只有你这种愚蠢军迷才会分类比较飞机数据...
If you were smart, which clearly you are not, you would see that the F-15SE was not a comparison but an example of the effectivness of radar blockers, and onlt idiotic fanboys would go around comparing the data of aircraft that is classified.

=========================

针对隐身能力:F-22>J-20 ≈F-35 >>T-50的说法,三哥表示:

那是因为T50不是最终的定型产品,PAK-FA才是.
你的定论显示无知.....
没有大推力发动机,你们的J20甚至比不上Su35,这样还弄什么五代机呢?
你们中国至今还依赖俄罗斯的发动机,所以你们先搞掂发动机再跟T50比吧.
在这场游戏中,印度是一个婴儿,看着两个已婚男人和一个大学生之间打架.


this one fact proves how you are about fighter jets....

F-22 higher than J20 but F-35 greatest than T-50

true b'cos t-50 is not the final product  PAK-FA is there..

your comment shows like that...

without make a High Trust engine, your fighter is not even come close to Su-35... then why goes to 5th Gen Fighter...

Russia is provide you the engine till now so first ENGINE then compare with others...

In this game India is just a baby watching a Fight between Two married men and a College Student...

说T50隐身能力差的请进来,毛子和三哥表示压力不大.



以超大pzgr43为代表的我方观点:
1:T50没有采用类似F22,F35,J20式的整体座舱;

2:IRST不是融合孔径系统,毛5的航电在传感器融合方面能力有限;

3:T-50身上较小的设备仓开口基本都没有做隐身修型处理，说明它的RCS还没有小到需要考虑这些细节的地步。后期修改设备口形状很麻烦,任何机体上的接缝或者开口都涉及到结构强度的改变.

4:T50的进气道不隐身,甚至通过肉眼就可以看到硕大发动机叶片.

毛子表示压力不大,并回复:

你对传感器融合知识一点也不懂,如果你不认为俄罗斯的传感器融合技术很好,请仔细研究OLS-35.
You know nothing about sensor fussion, read up on the OLS-35 if you don't think Russian sensor fussion is good. And please you have demonstrated time and time again that you have no clue as to what you are saying, and this is evident by phrases such as 'Equipment storehouse openings' are you talking about weapons bays? If so give me a scientific explanation as to what is wrong with them.

让我解释一下这个最早最简单的IRST球体,球体本事显示面积很小,而且它的曲面是倾斜的.相同面积下球体比平刨体积小.甚至我们可以假定象IRST球体的大小返回的雷达信号象昆虫或更小,不管怎样,没有雷达在有效的范围可以探测到那么小的东西.
Once again a fanboy with zero understanding of stealth goes around making big red circles. Let me explain this in the simplest and easiest way possible The IRST ball is a sphere, a sphere by it self presents a very small surface area, and the surface area itself is sloped. By itself a sphere is many times smaller than a flat plane measuring the same area, even if we assume a sphere as small as an IRST housing returns a signal the signal would be insignificant likely something in the magnitude of an insect or smaller considering RAM, either way no radar would be able to detect something that small at meaningful ranges or any ranges at all.

And an illustration of a sphere and its efficiency, at scattering signals.


遮盖不是整体的变得更好,YF23比YF22的隐身性能更好,用的是两块座舱.F35的某些原型机也是.
It looks like a sphere  but wait there's more! The canopy is not a one piece canopy  it gets better, the YF-23 an aircraft said to have a smaller rcs than the YF-22 had a two piece canopy, some F-35 prototypes also had two piece canopies.

我上面已经说过N此,雷达阻截器就好像S型进气道,这在沉默鹰的正面RCS效果很明显.
And again as stated for the 20th time radar blockers are as good as S-shaped intakes, this is evident in the Silent Eagle's frontal RCS.

别逼我说J20的隐身问题,诸如鸭翼,缺少边缘绕射.
Don't make me talk about the J-20's problems such as canards and lack of edge diffraction.


没人说F15SE是五代机,我和你讨论的是雷达阻截器和正向RCS,正向RCS上,F15SE和F35是一样的......
No one said it was a '5th generation' aircraft. And the conversation is in regards to radarblockers and frontal RCS, in frontal RCS the F-15SE is equal to the F-35, period! Get your head around it, nothing you say will change that.

我之所以在讨论T50时提及F15SE,是为了说明两者使用雷达阻截器得到相同的效果.只有你这种愚蠢军迷才会分类比较飞机数据...
If you were smart, which clearly you are not, you would see that the F-15SE was not a comparison but an example of the effectivness of radar blockers, and onlt idiotic fanboys would go around comparing the data of aircraft that is classified.

=========================

针对隐身能力:F-22>J-20 ≈F-35 >>T-50的说法,三哥表示:

那是因为T50不是最终的定型产品,PAK-FA才是.
你的定论显示无知.....
没有大推力发动机,你们的J20甚至比不上Su35,这样还弄什么五代机呢?
你们中国至今还依赖俄罗斯的发动机,所以你们先搞掂发动机再跟T50比吧.
在这场游戏中,印度是一个婴儿,看着两个已婚男人和一个大学生之间打架.

Many insects add up to a lot.And IRST is just on the one hand.
Russia in detail with the United States gap too far away
That's why Stealth performance:
F-22>J-20 ≈F-35 >>T-50

this one fact proves how you are about fighter jets....

F-22 higher than J20 but F-35 greatest than T-50

true b'cos t-50 is not the final product  PAK-FA is there..

your comment shows like that...

without make a High Trust engine, your fighter is not even come close to Su-35... then why goes to 5th Gen Fighter...

Russia is provide you the engine till now so first ENGINE then compare with others...

In this game India is just a baby watching a Fight between Two married men and a College Student...