超级军网会心一笑，南棒改口。。。
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/04/24 02:00:22
韩国联合通讯社报道：国防部长已经否认了南棒曾经考虑重新部署美国战术核武的想法，我们从未跟美国方面商讨过这个问题，南棒如是说。。。
链接：http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/national/2010/11/23/28/0301000000AEN20101123005600315F.HTML
South Korean Defense Minister Kim Tae-young (L) hurriedly leaves the National Assembly for the Defense Ministry upon hearing a report on North Korea's firing of hundreds of rounds of artillery toward South Korean waters and Yeonpyeong Island around 2:34 p.m. on Nov. 23, injuring several soldiers and civilians. (Yonhap)
(LEAD) S. Korea denies seeking redeployment of U.S. tactical nuclear weapons
SEOUL, Nov. 23 (Yonhap) -- South Korea on Tuesday denied it was considering redeployment of U.S. tactical nuclear weapons on its territory, watering down a sensitive remark by its defense chief who raised the possibility a day ago.
In response to North Korea's revelation of a new uranium enrichment facility, Defense Minister Kim Tae-yong had raised the possibility on Monday, telling a lawmaker who asked if South Korea would consider such redeployment that the government "will review what you said."
"South Korea and the U.S. have not discussed redeployment of tactical nuclear weapons," a senior official at the presidential office Cheong Wa Dae said. "And the issue is not a subject of discussion."
"Our aim is to denuclearize the Korean Peninsula, and that will not change," the official said on the condition of anonymity.
The defense minister made the comment as North Korea was upping the ante in its nuclear gambit by showing visiting U.S. scientists what it claimed was a new uranium enrichment facility equipped with some 2,000 centrifuges.
Uranium is an alternative means to plutonium in making nuclear bombs.
The U.S., who had fought on the South Korean side against the invading North in the 1950-53 Korean War, had tactical nuclear weapons stationed in the South until their withdrawal in 1991 as part of its disarmament initiative.
Just months after the announcement of the withdrawal, South and North Korea also signed an agreement on banning activities for nuclear arms development on their soil. The agreement, called the Joint Declaration on the Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, came into force in 1992.
"Redeploying U.S. tactical nuclear weapons in South Korea would cross the line of the denuclearization policy on the Korean Peninsula," Deputy Defense Minister Chang Kwang-il told reporters earlier in the day.
Chang said the defense minister's comment had been taken out of context and meant that South Korea could consult with the U.S. with "all possible options" on the table.
He said South Korea, however, has not considered asking the U.S. to bring back its nuclear weapons since their withdrawal.
"There has been no consideration about redeployment of U.S. tactical nuclear arms and there has been no consultation with the U.S. over the issue," Chang said.
The nuclear weapons, previously deployed at 16 military installations here five years after the end of the Korean War, were designed to be put atop missiles or artillery warheads as a deterrent against North Korea.
About 28,500 U.S. troops are stationed in South Korea, a legacy of the three-year-long war.韩国联合通讯社报道：国防部长已经否认了南棒曾经考虑重新部署美国战术核武的想法，我们从未跟美国方面商讨过这个问题，南棒如是说。。。
链接：http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/national/2010/11/23/28/0301000000AEN20101123005600315F.HTML
South Korean Defense Minister Kim Tae-young (L) hurriedly leaves the National Assembly for the Defense Ministry upon hearing a report on North Korea's firing of hundreds of rounds of artillery toward South Korean waters and Yeonpyeong Island around 2:34 p.m. on Nov. 23, injuring several soldiers and civilians. (Yonhap)
(LEAD) S. Korea denies seeking redeployment of U.S. tactical nuclear weapons
SEOUL, Nov. 23 (Yonhap) -- South Korea on Tuesday denied it was considering redeployment of U.S. tactical nuclear weapons on its territory, watering down a sensitive remark by its defense chief who raised the possibility a day ago.
In response to North Korea's revelation of a new uranium enrichment facility, Defense Minister Kim Tae-yong had raised the possibility on Monday, telling a lawmaker who asked if South Korea would consider such redeployment that the government "will review what you said."
"South Korea and the U.S. have not discussed redeployment of tactical nuclear weapons," a senior official at the presidential office Cheong Wa Dae said. "And the issue is not a subject of discussion."
"Our aim is to denuclearize the Korean Peninsula, and that will not change," the official said on the condition of anonymity.
The defense minister made the comment as North Korea was upping the ante in its nuclear gambit by showing visiting U.S. scientists what it claimed was a new uranium enrichment facility equipped with some 2,000 centrifuges.
Uranium is an alternative means to plutonium in making nuclear bombs.
The U.S., who had fought on the South Korean side against the invading North in the 1950-53 Korean War, had tactical nuclear weapons stationed in the South until their withdrawal in 1991 as part of its disarmament initiative.
Just months after the announcement of the withdrawal, South and North Korea also signed an agreement on banning activities for nuclear arms development on their soil. The agreement, called the Joint Declaration on the Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, came into force in 1992.
"Redeploying U.S. tactical nuclear weapons in South Korea would cross the line of the denuclearization policy on the Korean Peninsula," Deputy Defense Minister Chang Kwang-il told reporters earlier in the day.
Chang said the defense minister's comment had been taken out of context and meant that South Korea could consult with the U.S. with "all possible options" on the table.
He said South Korea, however, has not considered asking the U.S. to bring back its nuclear weapons since their withdrawal.
"There has been no consideration about redeployment of U.S. tactical nuclear arms and there has been no consultation with the U.S. over the issue," Chang said.
The nuclear weapons, previously deployed at 16 military installations here five years after the end of the Korean War, were designed to be put atop missiles or artillery warheads as a deterrent against North Korea.
About 28,500 U.S. troops are stationed in South Korea, a legacy of the three-year-long war.
链接：http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/national/2010/11/23/28/0301000000AEN20101123005600315F.HTML
South Korean Defense Minister Kim Tae-young (L) hurriedly leaves the National Assembly for the Defense Ministry upon hearing a report on North Korea's firing of hundreds of rounds of artillery toward South Korean waters and Yeonpyeong Island around 2:34 p.m. on Nov. 23, injuring several soldiers and civilians. (Yonhap)
(LEAD) S. Korea denies seeking redeployment of U.S. tactical nuclear weapons
SEOUL, Nov. 23 (Yonhap) -- South Korea on Tuesday denied it was considering redeployment of U.S. tactical nuclear weapons on its territory, watering down a sensitive remark by its defense chief who raised the possibility a day ago.
In response to North Korea's revelation of a new uranium enrichment facility, Defense Minister Kim Tae-yong had raised the possibility on Monday, telling a lawmaker who asked if South Korea would consider such redeployment that the government "will review what you said."
"South Korea and the U.S. have not discussed redeployment of tactical nuclear weapons," a senior official at the presidential office Cheong Wa Dae said. "And the issue is not a subject of discussion."
"Our aim is to denuclearize the Korean Peninsula, and that will not change," the official said on the condition of anonymity.
The defense minister made the comment as North Korea was upping the ante in its nuclear gambit by showing visiting U.S. scientists what it claimed was a new uranium enrichment facility equipped with some 2,000 centrifuges.
Uranium is an alternative means to plutonium in making nuclear bombs.
The U.S., who had fought on the South Korean side against the invading North in the 1950-53 Korean War, had tactical nuclear weapons stationed in the South until their withdrawal in 1991 as part of its disarmament initiative.
Just months after the announcement of the withdrawal, South and North Korea also signed an agreement on banning activities for nuclear arms development on their soil. The agreement, called the Joint Declaration on the Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, came into force in 1992.
"Redeploying U.S. tactical nuclear weapons in South Korea would cross the line of the denuclearization policy on the Korean Peninsula," Deputy Defense Minister Chang Kwang-il told reporters earlier in the day.
Chang said the defense minister's comment had been taken out of context and meant that South Korea could consult with the U.S. with "all possible options" on the table.
He said South Korea, however, has not considered asking the U.S. to bring back its nuclear weapons since their withdrawal.
"There has been no consideration about redeployment of U.S. tactical nuclear arms and there has been no consultation with the U.S. over the issue," Chang said.
The nuclear weapons, previously deployed at 16 military installations here five years after the end of the Korean War, were designed to be put atop missiles or artillery warheads as a deterrent against North Korea.
About 28,500 U.S. troops are stationed in South Korea, a legacy of the three-year-long war.韩国联合通讯社报道：国防部长已经否认了南棒曾经考虑重新部署美国战术核武的想法，我们从未跟美国方面商讨过这个问题，南棒如是说。。。
链接：http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/national/2010/11/23/28/0301000000AEN20101123005600315F.HTML
South Korean Defense Minister Kim Tae-young (L) hurriedly leaves the National Assembly for the Defense Ministry upon hearing a report on North Korea's firing of hundreds of rounds of artillery toward South Korean waters and Yeonpyeong Island around 2:34 p.m. on Nov. 23, injuring several soldiers and civilians. (Yonhap)
(LEAD) S. Korea denies seeking redeployment of U.S. tactical nuclear weapons
SEOUL, Nov. 23 (Yonhap) -- South Korea on Tuesday denied it was considering redeployment of U.S. tactical nuclear weapons on its territory, watering down a sensitive remark by its defense chief who raised the possibility a day ago.
In response to North Korea's revelation of a new uranium enrichment facility, Defense Minister Kim Tae-yong had raised the possibility on Monday, telling a lawmaker who asked if South Korea would consider such redeployment that the government "will review what you said."
"South Korea and the U.S. have not discussed redeployment of tactical nuclear weapons," a senior official at the presidential office Cheong Wa Dae said. "And the issue is not a subject of discussion."
"Our aim is to denuclearize the Korean Peninsula, and that will not change," the official said on the condition of anonymity.
The defense minister made the comment as North Korea was upping the ante in its nuclear gambit by showing visiting U.S. scientists what it claimed was a new uranium enrichment facility equipped with some 2,000 centrifuges.
Uranium is an alternative means to plutonium in making nuclear bombs.
The U.S., who had fought on the South Korean side against the invading North in the 1950-53 Korean War, had tactical nuclear weapons stationed in the South until their withdrawal in 1991 as part of its disarmament initiative.
Just months after the announcement of the withdrawal, South and North Korea also signed an agreement on banning activities for nuclear arms development on their soil. The agreement, called the Joint Declaration on the Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, came into force in 1992.
"Redeploying U.S. tactical nuclear weapons in South Korea would cross the line of the denuclearization policy on the Korean Peninsula," Deputy Defense Minister Chang Kwang-il told reporters earlier in the day.
Chang said the defense minister's comment had been taken out of context and meant that South Korea could consult with the U.S. with "all possible options" on the table.
He said South Korea, however, has not considered asking the U.S. to bring back its nuclear weapons since their withdrawal.
"There has been no consideration about redeployment of U.S. tactical nuclear arms and there has been no consultation with the U.S. over the issue," Chang said.
The nuclear weapons, previously deployed at 16 military installations here five years after the end of the Korean War, were designed to be put atop missiles or artillery warheads as a deterrent against North Korea.
About 28,500 U.S. troops are stationed in South Korea, a legacy of the three-year-long war.
棒子的话随便听听
核武器在棒子眼里都是浮云！这是在逗你玩呢，再过两天棒子就要回天顶星了，不再跟你们地球人玩咯！
棒子真脑残，MD把核武器布置在自己国家还直接高潮了，真是个没救的国家
跟棒子认真你就输了
三天不打，上房揭瓦
挨了几炮弹，这不就老实了么
挨了几炮弹，这不就老实了么
pygtlxd 发表于 2010-11-23 21:45 
不认真的话，他明天就说：不单认真考虑，而且很有动力去做
打过了脸，就醒啦
不认真的话，他明天就说：不单认真考虑，而且很有动力去做
打过了脸，就醒啦
狗德性，不听话时就得这么打几棍。
纯纯的男子汉 发表于 2010-11-23 21:50
唉，航母参加黄海军演的闹剧还没玩够吗，换玩核武器了
唉，航母参加黄海军演的闹剧还没玩够吗，换玩核武器了
jshzzr1983 发表于 2010-11-23 21:51
南棒就是这样，没政治头脑，这种事能吹的吗？吹破牛皮就要死人
南棒就是这样，没政治头脑，这种事能吹的吗？吹破牛皮就要死人
顺带宣告美国量化宽松彻底破产
TG东北亚破局越来越近了
TG东北亚破局越来越近了
脑残吧
真要部署那还真是嫌死的不够快
真要部署那还真是嫌死的不够快
小弟 就是小弟，大哥要你高潮就得高潮，大哥不想，即使已经高潮也得熄火。。
不被暴菊不舒服啊!!奴才国就是奴才国啊
被大白菜给饿疯了是吧，做事咋从不动脑子
juelian 发表于 2010-11-23 21:58
听说美元升值了，吴韩马同志估计急死了吧
听说美元升值了，吴韩马同志估计急死了吧
一个让人又气又想笑的国家？
---------------------------------
棒子
---------------------------------
棒子
老美不给力啊
棒子啊棒子
靠 这就软了？！太不给力了 美元升值得还不够呢！
国家大政方针当儿戏，随便改口。
nsa2000 发表于 2010-11-23 22:05
这个国防部长说不定没见过金日成当年的风采吧
这个国防部长说不定没见过金日成当年的风采吧
估计棒子国起码又有上千条无主JJ手指之类的东西了,这国防部长太不给力了
狗德性，不听话时就得这么打几棍。