超级军网大英帝国为何不放弃核武器，加入到美帝的核保护伞之下？
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/04/18 20:12:32
据英国《金融时报》报道，英国政府受到资金短缺影响，目前正在与法国进行一项具有重大意义的谈判，如果谈判成功达成最终协议，英国将把该国的核弹头帮运至法国维护。
英帝看来军费挺紧张的，海军乃是英帝的立国之本，就这样航母能不能建还两说，既然英帝都放弃路基核武，海基也都是那美帝现成的三叉戟，那何不放弃SSBN，只保留SSN用于保护舰队。反正现在欧洲内部发生战争的可能性无限趋近于零，世界上想对其进行核打击的国家也可以说基本没有了吧。
据英国《金融时报》报道，英国政府受到资金短缺影响，目前正在与法国进行一项具有重大意义的谈判，如果谈判成功达成最终协议，英国将把该国的核弹头帮运至法国维护。
英帝看来军费挺紧张的，海军乃是英帝的立国之本，就这样航母能不能建还两说，既然英帝都放弃路基核武，海基也都是那美帝现成的三叉戟，那何不放弃SSBN，只保留SSN用于保护舰队。反正现在欧洲内部发生战争的可能性无限趋近于零，世界上想对其进行核打击的国家也可以说基本没有了吧。
已有jy说过英国的核按钮是由美国人暗中控制滴
回复 2# popman1999
英国人自己也这么说。而且建议撤销外交部，因为“作为美国的导弹基地，没有外交事务处理。”
英国人自己也这么说。而且建议撤销外交部，因为“作为美国的导弹基地，没有外交事务处理。”
thirty 发表于 2010-10-9 23:39 
那是英国ff吧……
那是英国ff吧……
popman1999 发表于 2010-10-9 23:43
那是英国JY吧，英国ff应该要求英帝造100艘航母。
那是英国JY吧，英国ff应该要求英帝造100艘航母。
Mailand 发表于 2010-10-9 23:46
额 我认为那是讽刺……
额 我认为那是讽刺……
回复 4# popman1999
是不是ff不知道，不过是上了主流电视剧的，BBC的“yes,minister”.
可以算是牢骚，而且是大多数的牢骚。
是不是ff不知道，不过是上了主流电视剧的，BBC的“yes,minister”.
可以算是牢骚，而且是大多数的牢骚。
本不就是靠美国嘛，
想起Yes,Minister里，英国人自己就讽刺说英国发展核武不是为了防苏联的，而是为了防法国的
想起Yes,Minister里，英国人自己就讽刺说英国发展核武不是为了防苏联的，而是为了防法国的
英国的核按钮确实掌握在美国手中的
因为根据协约 如果英国想用这些核武 就需要得到美国人的同意
同时 英国的核弹好象也是存储在美国的某一个海军基地里
因为根据协约 如果英国想用这些核武 就需要得到美国人的同意
同时 英国的核弹好象也是存储在美国的某一个海军基地里
现在起码也放弃了一半了嘛，用的是美帝的三叉戟。
紧那罗之歌 发表于 2010-10-9 23:51
那个协约？这样和日本有啥区别
那个协约？这样和日本有啥区别
popman1999 发表于 2010-10-9 23:48
额，好吧我承认我没有幽默感:D
额，好吧我承认我没有幽默感:D
我记得是兵器知识第五期里面有
英国的核武能力基本上已经是美国的附庸了
英国的核武能力基本上已经是美国的附庸了
核力量已失独立性 英国核武库沦为美国附庸
90年代，英国核力量已失独立性
尽管英国是较早开展核武器研究的国家之一，并且是当今世界核国家俱乐部的重要成员，但英国自拥有核武器之日起，就一直难以摆脱受美国控制的阴影。
上世纪90年代起英国核力量逐步向单一的海基力量过渡。1994年12月英国第一艘新型“先锋”级战略核潜艇首航。每艘“先锋”级核潜艇可携带16枚美制“三叉戟”（Ｄ－5）潜射弹道导弹。据最新估计，英国战略核潜艇舰队的未来弹头库存量将达到160枚左右。加上15%的备用弹头，库存总量可达185枚。
值得注意的是美英两国的潜射弹道导弹共同保存在美国佐治亚州的金湾潜艇基地。从此可以看出，尽管英国名义上拥有的潜射弹道导弹，但在技术上它们属于美国。不仅如此，英国的导弹训练甚至都被安排在美国境内进行。
据英国《卫报》透露，英国自购买“三叉戟”导弹之时起就与美国达成了如下协议：没有美政府的同意，英国皇家海军不得擅自使用核导弹。
1998年3月，英国皇家空军正式结束了长达40年的核战备值班使命，这也意味着英国彻底失去独立核打击能力。
未来英国核战略很迷茫
由于英国国防部早些时候曾宣布，英目前装备的“三叉戟”导弹将在2024年时全部退役，因此，英国核力量的发展方向备受关注，但英媒体指出，不管怎样发展，英国建立“独立的核威慑”只是一个“政治神话”。
前皇家海军军官们已经在私下证实，美国知道英国潜艇的位置，而且，没有美国提供的数据和卫星系统，英军想要发射导弹几乎是不可能的。
然而，有希望接替布莱尔出任英国下任首相的英国财政大臣布朗今年6月曾表示英国应拥有独立的核威慑能力。但此言一出，立即引起政治对手的攻击。英国前外交大臣里夫金德批评说，布朗关于核政策的讲话是“不负责任的”。
90年代，英国核力量已失独立性
尽管英国是较早开展核武器研究的国家之一，并且是当今世界核国家俱乐部的重要成员，但英国自拥有核武器之日起，就一直难以摆脱受美国控制的阴影。
上世纪90年代起英国核力量逐步向单一的海基力量过渡。1994年12月英国第一艘新型“先锋”级战略核潜艇首航。每艘“先锋”级核潜艇可携带16枚美制“三叉戟”（Ｄ－5）潜射弹道导弹。据最新估计，英国战略核潜艇舰队的未来弹头库存量将达到160枚左右。加上15%的备用弹头，库存总量可达185枚。
值得注意的是美英两国的潜射弹道导弹共同保存在美国佐治亚州的金湾潜艇基地。从此可以看出，尽管英国名义上拥有的潜射弹道导弹，但在技术上它们属于美国。不仅如此，英国的导弹训练甚至都被安排在美国境内进行。
据英国《卫报》透露，英国自购买“三叉戟”导弹之时起就与美国达成了如下协议：没有美政府的同意，英国皇家海军不得擅自使用核导弹。
1998年3月，英国皇家空军正式结束了长达40年的核战备值班使命，这也意味着英国彻底失去独立核打击能力。
未来英国核战略很迷茫
由于英国国防部早些时候曾宣布，英目前装备的“三叉戟”导弹将在2024年时全部退役，因此，英国核力量的发展方向备受关注，但英媒体指出，不管怎样发展，英国建立“独立的核威慑”只是一个“政治神话”。
前皇家海军军官们已经在私下证实，美国知道英国潜艇的位置，而且，没有美国提供的数据和卫星系统，英军想要发射导弹几乎是不可能的。
然而，有希望接替布莱尔出任英国下任首相的英国财政大臣布朗今年6月曾表示英国应拥有独立的核威慑能力。但此言一出，立即引起政治对手的攻击。英国前外交大臣里夫金德批评说，布朗关于核政策的讲话是“不负责任的”。
人家想得开就行小日子过得···
紧那罗之歌 发表于 2010-10-10 00:00
1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement
The 1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement is a bilateral treaty between the United States and the United Kingdom on nuclear weapons cooperation.
It was signed after the UK successfully tested its first hydrogen bomb during Operation Grapple. While the US has nuclear cooperation agreements with other countries, including France and some NATO countries, this agreement is by far the most comprehensive[citation needed].
Contents [hide]
1 Details of the agreement
2 Assistance to UK nuclear weapons development
3 Special nuclear materials barter
4 Controversy
5 See also
6 References
7 External links
[edit] Details of the agreement
The agreement enables the US and the UK to exchange classified information with the objective of improving each party's "atomic weapon design, development, and fabrication capability".
This includes development of defence plans; training personnel in the use and defence against nuclear weapons; evaluation of enemy capabilities; development of nuclear delivery systems; and research, development and design of military reactors. The agreement also provides for the transfer of special nuclear material (e.g. plutonium, highly enriched uranium, tritium), components, and equipment between the two countries, and the transfer of "non-nuclear parts of atomic weapons" to the UK.
The agreement also covered the export of one complete US submarine nuclear propulsion plant and its enriched uranium fuel which was installed in the UK's first nuclear powered submarine, HMS Dreadnought.
The UK was able to carry out underground nuclear tests at the US Nevada Test Site, the first taking place on 1 March 1962, following this agreement.[1]
There are also confidential intelligence matters covered by the agreement. The UK government has not published these sections "because of the necessity for great confidentiality and because ... it might well assist proliferation".[2]
This agreement replaced the earlier "Agreement for Cooperation Regarding Atomic Information for Mutual Defense Purposes" of 1955. A separate Polaris Sales Agreement was signed on 6 April 1963.
[edit] Assistance to UK nuclear weapons development
An early benefit of the agreement was to allow the UK to "Anglicise" the US W28 nuclear warhead as the Red Snow thermonuclear weapon for the Blue Steel missile by 1961.[3] In 1974 a CIA proliferation assessment noted that "In many cases [Britain's sensitive technology in nuclear and missile fields] is based on technology received from the US and could not legitimately be passed on without US permission."[4]
The US President authorised the transfer of "nuclear weapon parts" to the UK between at least the years 1975 to 1996.[5][6]
The UK National Audit Office noted that most of the UK Trident warhead development and production expenditure was incurred in the US who would supply "certain warhead-related components".[7][8] Some of the fissile materials for the UK Trident warhead were purchased from the US.[8] There is evidence that the warhead design of the British Trident system is similar to, or even based on, the US W76 warhead fitted in some US Navy Trident missiles, with design and blast model data supplied to the UK.[9][10]
[edit] Special nuclear materials barter
Under the agreement 5.37 tonnes (11,800 lb) of UK-produced plutonium was sent to the US in return for 6.7 kilograms (15 lb) of tritium and 7.5 tonnes (17,000 lb) of highly enriched uranium over the period 1960-79. A further 470 kilograms (1,000 lb) of plutonium was swapped between the US and the UK for reasons that remain classified.[11] Some of the UK produced plutonium was used in 1962 by the US for the only known nuclear weapon test of reactor-grade plutonium .[12]
The plutonium sent to the US included some produced in UK civil Magnox reactors, and the US gave assurances that this civil plutonium was not used in the US nuclear weapons program. It was used in civil programmes which included californium production and reactor research. However the UK did obtain military nuclear material in return, so via this barter UK civil power stations probably provided weapons material.
[edit] Controversy
Because the UK relies heavily on US assistance to maintain and develop its nuclear arsenal, this has raised questions[by whom?] about whether this level of cooperation is in breach of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Despite this, in 2004 negotiations were completed to extend the treaty for 10 years to 2014.[13]
那是cia的一份报告里分析的，是否确实是要md批准么，呵呵。内容保密，大家不知道
1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement
The 1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement is a bilateral treaty between the United States and the United Kingdom on nuclear weapons cooperation.
It was signed after the UK successfully tested its first hydrogen bomb during Operation Grapple. While the US has nuclear cooperation agreements with other countries, including France and some NATO countries, this agreement is by far the most comprehensive[citation needed].
Contents [hide]
1 Details of the agreement
2 Assistance to UK nuclear weapons development
3 Special nuclear materials barter
4 Controversy
5 See also
6 References
7 External links
[edit] Details of the agreement
The agreement enables the US and the UK to exchange classified information with the objective of improving each party's "atomic weapon design, development, and fabrication capability".
This includes development of defence plans; training personnel in the use and defence against nuclear weapons; evaluation of enemy capabilities; development of nuclear delivery systems; and research, development and design of military reactors. The agreement also provides for the transfer of special nuclear material (e.g. plutonium, highly enriched uranium, tritium), components, and equipment between the two countries, and the transfer of "non-nuclear parts of atomic weapons" to the UK.
The agreement also covered the export of one complete US submarine nuclear propulsion plant and its enriched uranium fuel which was installed in the UK's first nuclear powered submarine, HMS Dreadnought.
The UK was able to carry out underground nuclear tests at the US Nevada Test Site, the first taking place on 1 March 1962, following this agreement.[1]
There are also confidential intelligence matters covered by the agreement. The UK government has not published these sections "because of the necessity for great confidentiality and because ... it might well assist proliferation".[2]
This agreement replaced the earlier "Agreement for Cooperation Regarding Atomic Information for Mutual Defense Purposes" of 1955. A separate Polaris Sales Agreement was signed on 6 April 1963.
[edit] Assistance to UK nuclear weapons development
An early benefit of the agreement was to allow the UK to "Anglicise" the US W28 nuclear warhead as the Red Snow thermonuclear weapon for the Blue Steel missile by 1961.[3] In 1974 a CIA proliferation assessment noted that "In many cases [Britain's sensitive technology in nuclear and missile fields] is based on technology received from the US and could not legitimately be passed on without US permission."[4]
The US President authorised the transfer of "nuclear weapon parts" to the UK between at least the years 1975 to 1996.[5][6]
The UK National Audit Office noted that most of the UK Trident warhead development and production expenditure was incurred in the US who would supply "certain warhead-related components".[7][8] Some of the fissile materials for the UK Trident warhead were purchased from the US.[8] There is evidence that the warhead design of the British Trident system is similar to, or even based on, the US W76 warhead fitted in some US Navy Trident missiles, with design and blast model data supplied to the UK.[9][10]
[edit] Special nuclear materials barter
Under the agreement 5.37 tonnes (11,800 lb) of UK-produced plutonium was sent to the US in return for 6.7 kilograms (15 lb) of tritium and 7.5 tonnes (17,000 lb) of highly enriched uranium over the period 1960-79. A further 470 kilograms (1,000 lb) of plutonium was swapped between the US and the UK for reasons that remain classified.[11] Some of the UK produced plutonium was used in 1962 by the US for the only known nuclear weapon test of reactor-grade plutonium .[12]
The plutonium sent to the US included some produced in UK civil Magnox reactors, and the US gave assurances that this civil plutonium was not used in the US nuclear weapons program. It was used in civil programmes which included californium production and reactor research. However the UK did obtain military nuclear material in return, so via this barter UK civil power stations probably provided weapons material.
[edit] Controversy
Because the UK relies heavily on US assistance to maintain and develop its nuclear arsenal, this has raised questions[by whom?] about whether this level of cooperation is in breach of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Despite this, in 2004 negotiations were completed to extend the treaty for 10 years to 2014.[13]
那是cia的一份报告里分析的，是否确实是要md批准么，呵呵。内容保密，大家不知道
这问题问的好火星，现在英国核武器的部署方式是啥。我想答案早就清楚了。
英国只是比日本好一点点！
也是个附庸国！
也是个附庸国！
突突 发表于 2010-10-10 07:17
阴蒂不是鬼子能比的
阴蒂不是鬼子能比的
日不落最后的裤衩
人家和美国佬同宗同族，打虎还需亲兄弟，上阵不离父子兵嘛。