超级军网求解：“阵风”M的机翼不能折叠的原因
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/04/24 12:09:56
“阵风”M的机翼不能折叠是为了和空军型保持最大程度的通用性，以降低成本，
还是因为三角翼的关系？
“阵风”M的机翼不能折叠是为了和空军型保持最大程度的通用性，以降低成本，
还是因为三角翼的关系？
还是因为三角翼的关系？
“阵风”M的机翼不能折叠是为了和空军型保持最大程度的通用性，以降低成本，还是因为三角翼的关系？
三角翼，在甲板和机库合理排列的话，折不折机翼区别不大。
三角翼可以两机中倒插一机
折叠又要增加死重，效果又不是太明显
同样，J-10上舰也可以考虑不折叠，反正翼展也不大。
翼展不大，展弦比小，折叠不划算，再说可以“两机倒插一机”，就不折了。。。楼主的图不错，貌似是福煦号，恩，比较少见
回复 5# Bearcat
棍子的进气道结构和前起落架的布置方式明显不适合上舰..........
棍子的进气道结构和前起落架的布置方式明显不适合上舰..........
大概算是两害相权衡其轻,不一定MD怎么搞就能作为唯一标准滴
棍子的鸭翼不妨碍倒插么？
wangjqi 发表于 2010-6-15 20:36 
MS主翼和鸭翼不在同一平面上。
MS主翼和鸭翼不在同一平面上。
正翼展也不大，可以不折叠！
那A-7是怎么上去的
回复 7# SV-51r
回复 7# SV-51r
三角的还折什么。f14收起来的时候和三角翼一样，不是也没折么，
zc-kf 发表于 2010-6-15 22:56
可變摺疊翼.....瘋子麼:D
可變摺疊翼.....瘋子麼:D
回复 12# dsamyu
搞清楚A-7,F-8的下颌式进气道和歼-10,F-16的机腹进气道有什么不同再说.
搞清楚A-7,F-8的下颌式进气道和歼-10,F-16的机腹进气道有什么不同再说.
Bearcat 发表于 2010-6-15 12:33
又见棍子上舰论，七爷翼展更小呢，大哥
又见棍子上舰论，七爷翼展更小呢，大哥
SV-51r 发表于 2010-6-16 09:17
记得16貌似也有舰载版 没有竞争过18而已
记得16貌似也有舰载版 没有竞争过18而已
wangjqi 发表于 2010-6-15 20:36
不行折鸭翼就是了
不行折鸭翼就是了
再折叠以后投影面积会和汽车差不多大
阵风在福煦上起飞？
毅种情操 发表于 2010-6-25 21:42
戴高乐服役前，在福煦上做的起飞试验
戴高乐服役前，在福煦上做的起飞试验
xiongmao05 发表于 2010-6-16 17:43
没这回事吧,当初空军选战斗机和F15高低搭配,洛马弄了个F-16而麦道弄了F-17后来F-17没被空军看上,却被海军看上就成了F-18了
没这回事吧,当初空军选战斗机和F15高低搭配,洛马弄了个F-16而麦道弄了F-17后来F-17没被空军看上,却被海军看上就成了F-18了
折一下不是更小了？不明白啊。
回复 23# 0083gundam
折叠机翼和增加重量之间权衡的结果吧
折叠机翼和增加重量之间权衡的结果吧
没这回事吧,当初空军选战斗机和F15高低搭配,洛马弄了个F-16而麦道弄了F-17后来F-17没被空军看上,却被海军 ...
啊机 发表于 2010-6-25 22:43
说的就是后话 F18也不是MD海军拍脑门决定装备的 一样要招标竞争 记得F16也有舰载版 不过停留在验证阶段
没这回事吧,当初空军选战斗机和F15高低搭配,洛马弄了个F-16而麦道弄了F-17后来F-17没被空军看上,却被海军 ...
啊机 发表于 2010-6-25 22:43
说的就是后话 F18也不是MD海军拍脑门决定装备的 一样要招标竞争 记得F16也有舰载版 不过停留在验证阶段
三硝基甲苯 发表于 2010-6-15 21:02
问题是鸭翅膀在同一平面上，没到主翼，鸭翅膀就打架了！！！
问题是鸭翅膀在同一平面上，没到主翼，鸭翅膀就打架了！！！
夜幽灵 发表于 2010-6-26 12:30 PM
打不到。
打不到。
问题是鸭翅膀在同一平面上，没到主翼，鸭翅膀就打架了！！！
夜幽灵 发表于 2010-6-26 12:30
基本这个样子。单纯说机翼的话折叠意义确实不大了。
问题是鸭翅膀在同一平面上，没到主翼，鸭翅膀就打架了！！！
夜幽灵 发表于 2010-6-26 12:30
基本这个样子。单纯说机翼的话折叠意义确实不大了。
为了保持好和空军阵风战斗机的通用
棍子不适合上舰，美国F16都被国会逼得上舰溜达过
time0 发表于 2010-6-26 13:45
到插的话肯定到
到插的话肯定到
到插的话肯定到
夜幽灵 发表于 2010-6-27 00:10
又不是机身紧帖着机身排列,两机中轴线离开一定距离的话就打不到.
到插的话肯定到
夜幽灵 发表于 2010-6-27 00:10
又不是机身紧帖着机身排列,两机中轴线离开一定距离的话就打不到.
回复 8# wingtirl
说得对啊
说得对啊
啊机 发表于 2010-6-25 22:43
F-16 1600
LTV Aerospace Model 1600/1601/1602
Following the YF-16’s victory over the Northrop YF-17 for the U.S. Air Force’s ACF competition, General Dynamics decided a “navalized” variant could also best it in the Navy’s revived Naval Fighter Attack Experimental (VFAX) program. Having no carrier aircraft experience, GD teamed up with LTV Aerospace, which had designed the successful carrier-capable F-8 Crusader and A-7 Corsair II for the Navy; if successful, LTV would have produced the carrier version of the F-16.
LTV created three concepts for the navalized F-16. The main proposal was the Model 1600, which was based on the Block 10 F-16. It featured structural strengthening, an arrestor hook, and a more robust undercarriage to accommodate the rigors of carrier launch and recovery operations. The Model 1600 employed the General Electric F404 (which would be selected for the F/A-18), but two other powerplant choices were also explored. The Model 1601 had an improved Pratt & Whitney F100, while the Model 1602 used the General Electric F101. However, the Navy preferred a twin-engine aircraft, and on 2 May 1975 it selected the Northrop-McDonnell Douglas YF-17-based F/A-18 Hornet proposal.
F-16 1600
LTV Aerospace Model 1600/1601/1602
Following the YF-16’s victory over the Northrop YF-17 for the U.S. Air Force’s ACF competition, General Dynamics decided a “navalized” variant could also best it in the Navy’s revived Naval Fighter Attack Experimental (VFAX) program. Having no carrier aircraft experience, GD teamed up with LTV Aerospace, which had designed the successful carrier-capable F-8 Crusader and A-7 Corsair II for the Navy; if successful, LTV would have produced the carrier version of the F-16.
LTV created three concepts for the navalized F-16. The main proposal was the Model 1600, which was based on the Block 10 F-16. It featured structural strengthening, an arrestor hook, and a more robust undercarriage to accommodate the rigors of carrier launch and recovery operations. The Model 1600 employed the General Electric F404 (which would be selected for the F/A-18), but two other powerplant choices were also explored. The Model 1601 had an improved Pratt & Whitney F100, while the Model 1602 used the General Electric F101. However, the Navy preferred a twin-engine aircraft, and on 2 May 1975 it selected the Northrop-McDonnell Douglas YF-17-based F/A-18 Hornet proposal.
艹，16还真是万金油啊
阵风中型是三角翼，相对来说机翼较长，这样折叠装置重量比就会比较大，影响飞机性能；而且三角翼本来展弦比小，折叠了效果也不明显