超级军网zt 英国记者指出韩国“天安”证据是造假！
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/04/19 07:49:58
2010/05/24/the-sinking-of-the-cheonan-we-are-being-lied-to/The Sinking of the Cheonan: We Are Being Lied ToPosted on May 24, 2010 by willylomanby Scott CreightonThat’s it. That’s all their “evidence” that the international investigators presented in their UNSIGNED report. That’s right, no on-e knows who the “investigators” were since they didn’t take the time to sign their work.
一个完美的比赛？
这是介绍中提到的与上述文件。他们提到，在介绍了他们的研究结果，他们发现了有关证据红隧- 02D鱼雷他们发现的示意图。他们声称他们的调查，这是一个“完美的比赛”，并正在对假冒重复政治分歧，双方不断提出索赔。
这绝不是一个“完美的”。难怪他们不希望的迹象“他们的调查”。 有4个明显的差异在这些武器的设计和娥毫无疑问是，要证明这些都是不一样的关键。
*“甲”和“D”类 - 在这里你可以清楚地看到在该中心设计的螺旋桨重大分歧。在上面你可以看到它有一个较小的中心在它下面的证据，而图，枢纽较大。
*“乙” - 第螺旋桨的实际形状是非常不同的。你可以在上面看到一个不存在的实际证据螺旋桨如下图缺口。刀片的整体形状有很大的不同，以及，无论是前方和后方螺旋桨套。
所有这一切都可能被解释为暗示这些螺旋桨被转出了。认为这是可能的，记住，这些都是经过改进和设计系统，对娥只是不能切换这些枢纽设计“不管你愿意不愿意”就像上约翰E对他们的船会。但是，这一边，尽管它可能已经把这种鱼的螺旋桨不同，它肯定不会是一个“完美匹配”。
现在，最后一点证明他们是不一样的鱼雷。
*“C”的 - 你可以清楚地看到，稳定剂（或推进系统？在图中）清楚地显示在上面的分离板前，因为它是排在下面的证据显示了。但是，下面的房子是相同的稳定（或鱼雷的推进系统）背后的分离板（分开身体和尾部的鱼雷）。
这是一个重大的区别，不能说这是市场的一些修改后一种解释。这是一个对这些武器的工作原理设计的关键部分，不能被更改。这清楚地表明这些差异是完全不同的武器。
（有已指出，这一研究其他方面的差异，“一月”注意到，轴的形状是根据证据和图直锥形。一个好主意。可能有其他人也（我注意到，在不同形状的“鳍中以及回辅导组”...。显然是没有办法说这是一个“完美匹配”）这是毫不奇怪的“调查”选择不签署他们的工作。
ConclusionIt显然，我们被欺骗了，误以为北韩背后的韩国船只沉没是操纵，天安。这是不可能的，都在这个时间，以谁负责，但我们可以得出结论的证据的基础上，使该公职人员的故事又是另一个谎言被典当对美国人民的小康结论。这个谎言是显而易见的，可以用来煽动对朝鲜人民的军事行动。
2010/05/24/the-sinking-of-the-cheonan-we-are-being-lied-to/The Sinking of the Cheonan: We Are Being Lied ToPosted on May 24, 2010 by willylomanby Scott CreightonThat’s it. That’s all their “evidence” that the international investigators presented in their UNSIGNED report. That’s right, no on-e knows who the “investigators” were since they didn’t take the time to sign their work.
一个完美的比赛？
这是介绍中提到的与上述文件。他们提到，在介绍了他们的研究结果，他们发现了有关证据红隧- 02D鱼雷他们发现的示意图。他们声称他们的调查，这是一个“完美的比赛”，并正在对假冒重复政治分歧，双方不断提出索赔。
这绝不是一个“完美的”。难怪他们不希望的迹象“他们的调查”。 有4个明显的差异在这些武器的设计和娥毫无疑问是，要证明这些都是不一样的关键。
*“甲”和“D”类 - 在这里你可以清楚地看到在该中心设计的螺旋桨重大分歧。在上面你可以看到它有一个较小的中心在它下面的证据，而图，枢纽较大。
*“乙” - 第螺旋桨的实际形状是非常不同的。你可以在上面看到一个不存在的实际证据螺旋桨如下图缺口。刀片的整体形状有很大的不同，以及，无论是前方和后方螺旋桨套。
所有这一切都可能被解释为暗示这些螺旋桨被转出了。认为这是可能的，记住，这些都是经过改进和设计系统，对娥只是不能切换这些枢纽设计“不管你愿意不愿意”就像上约翰E对他们的船会。但是，这一边，尽管它可能已经把这种鱼的螺旋桨不同，它肯定不会是一个“完美匹配”。
现在，最后一点证明他们是不一样的鱼雷。
*“C”的 - 你可以清楚地看到，稳定剂（或推进系统？在图中）清楚地显示在上面的分离板前，因为它是排在下面的证据显示了。但是，下面的房子是相同的稳定（或鱼雷的推进系统）背后的分离板（分开身体和尾部的鱼雷）。
这是一个重大的区别，不能说这是市场的一些修改后一种解释。这是一个对这些武器的工作原理设计的关键部分，不能被更改。这清楚地表明这些差异是完全不同的武器。
（有已指出，这一研究其他方面的差异，“一月”注意到，轴的形状是根据证据和图直锥形。一个好主意。可能有其他人也（我注意到，在不同形状的“鳍中以及回辅导组”...。显然是没有办法说这是一个“完美匹配”）这是毫不奇怪的“调查”选择不签署他们的工作。
ConclusionIt显然，我们被欺骗了，误以为北韩背后的韩国船只沉没是操纵，天安。这是不可能的，都在这个时间，以谁负责，但我们可以得出结论的证据的基础上，使该公职人员的故事又是另一个谎言被典当对美国人民的小康结论。这个谎言是显而易见的，可以用来煽动对朝鲜人民的军事行动。
这脸打的。。PAPA的。
唉，牛牛这次不听话呀，这么打MD的狗狗的脸。
这用的什么东西翻译的，看得头大啊{:3_98:}
约翰牛还嫌这点破事不够乱么？
楼主，原文连接呢？或者发个原文。坛子里很多人懂英文的。
翻译的这么硬[:a1:]
这个翻译好。。。
到底是谁打的，我一直觉得取决于政治需要
发原文吧
这个 翻译 太那个了
这个 翻译 太那个了
http://willyloman.wordpress.com/ ... -are-being-lied-to/
The Sinking of the Cheonan: We Are Being Lied ToPosted on May 24, 2010 by willylomanby Scott CreightonThat’s it. That’s all their “evidence” that the international investigators presented in their UNSIGNED report. That’s right, no on-e knows who the “investigators” were since they didn’t take the time to sign their work.
A Perfect Match?
This is the presentation refered to in the paper linked above. They mention that during a presentation of their findings, they showed the schematics of a CHT-02D torpedo in relation to the evidence they found. They claimed in their investigation that these are a “perfect match” and that claim is being repeated endlessly on both sides of the fake political divide. （please click on image for a larger view）This is by no means a “perfect match”。 No wonder they didn’t want to sign that “investigation” of theirs. （please click on image for a larger view）There are 4 clear differences in the design of these weapons and on-e is without a doubt, the key to proving these are not the same.
* “A” & “D” – Here you can clearly see major differences in the design of the hub of the propellers. In the diagram above you can see it has a smaller hub whereas in the evidence below it, the hub is larger.
* “B” – The actual shape of the propellers is very different. You can see a notch in the diagram above that doesn’t exist in the actual evidence propeller below. The overall shape of the blades are vastly different as well, both the front and the rear propeller sets.
All of this might be explained away by suggesting that these propellers were switched out. Thought it might be possible, remember that these are finely tuned and designed systems; on-e just can’t switch these hub designs “willy nilly” like on-e would on their John-Boat. But, that aside, though it may be possible to have put different kinds of propellers on this fish, it is certainly NOT a “perfect match”。
Now, the last point proves they are not the same torpedo.
* “C” - As you can plainly see, the stabilizers （or propulsion system?） in the diagram above are clearly shown IN FRONT of the separation plate as it is lined up in the display with the evidence below. However, the torpedo below houses that same stabilizer （or propulsion system） BEHIND the separation plate （separating the body and the tail section of the torpedo）。
This is a major difference that cannot be explained by saying it was some kind of after market modification. This is part of a key design of the workings of these weapons and can not have been changed. This difference clearly indicates these are different weapons altogether.
（there are other differences that have been pointed out to this researcher; “Jan” noticed that the axle shape is tapered on the evidence and straight on the diagram. A good point. There are probably others as well （I noticed a difference in the shape of the “fin” in the guidance section in the back as well… clearly there is no way to say these are a “perfect match”）It is no wonder the “investigators” chose not to sign their work.
ConclusionIt is clear that we are being lied to and manipulated into believing that North Korea is behind the sinking of the South Korean vessel, the Cheonan. It is impossible to draw conclusions at this time as to who is responsible but we can conclude based on the evidence, that the official story is yet another lie being pawned off on the American people. This lie is obvious and could be used to instigate military action against the people of North Korea.
The Sinking of the Cheonan: We Are Being Lied ToPosted on May 24, 2010 by willylomanby Scott CreightonThat’s it. That’s all their “evidence” that the international investigators presented in their UNSIGNED report. That’s right, no on-e knows who the “investigators” were since they didn’t take the time to sign their work.
A Perfect Match?
This is the presentation refered to in the paper linked above. They mention that during a presentation of their findings, they showed the schematics of a CHT-02D torpedo in relation to the evidence they found. They claimed in their investigation that these are a “perfect match” and that claim is being repeated endlessly on both sides of the fake political divide. （please click on image for a larger view）This is by no means a “perfect match”。 No wonder they didn’t want to sign that “investigation” of theirs. （please click on image for a larger view）There are 4 clear differences in the design of these weapons and on-e is without a doubt, the key to proving these are not the same.
* “A” & “D” – Here you can clearly see major differences in the design of the hub of the propellers. In the diagram above you can see it has a smaller hub whereas in the evidence below it, the hub is larger.
* “B” – The actual shape of the propellers is very different. You can see a notch in the diagram above that doesn’t exist in the actual evidence propeller below. The overall shape of the blades are vastly different as well, both the front and the rear propeller sets.
All of this might be explained away by suggesting that these propellers were switched out. Thought it might be possible, remember that these are finely tuned and designed systems; on-e just can’t switch these hub designs “willy nilly” like on-e would on their John-Boat. But, that aside, though it may be possible to have put different kinds of propellers on this fish, it is certainly NOT a “perfect match”。
Now, the last point proves they are not the same torpedo.
* “C” - As you can plainly see, the stabilizers （or propulsion system?） in the diagram above are clearly shown IN FRONT of the separation plate as it is lined up in the display with the evidence below. However, the torpedo below houses that same stabilizer （or propulsion system） BEHIND the separation plate （separating the body and the tail section of the torpedo）。
This is a major difference that cannot be explained by saying it was some kind of after market modification. This is part of a key design of the workings of these weapons and can not have been changed. This difference clearly indicates these are different weapons altogether.
（there are other differences that have been pointed out to this researcher; “Jan” noticed that the axle shape is tapered on the evidence and straight on the diagram. A good point. There are probably others as well （I noticed a difference in the shape of the “fin” in the guidance section in the back as well… clearly there is no way to say these are a “perfect match”）It is no wonder the “investigators” chose not to sign their work.
ConclusionIt is clear that we are being lied to and manipulated into believing that North Korea is behind the sinking of the South Korean vessel, the Cheonan. It is impossible to draw conclusions at this time as to who is responsible but we can conclude based on the evidence, that the official story is yet another lie being pawned off on the American people. This lie is obvious and could be used to instigate military action against the people of North Korea.
没时间翻译了，就翻译一个关键的，match在这里不是比赛的意思，而是契合的意思。
一切皆有可能
牛牛吗，就喜欢搞这个，《太阳报》不就是这样的
因为这事件本来就是骗局和阴谋啊
地球人都知道是假的嘛
看热闹吧，含棒的智商感觉不咋的
火星人干的，不知道吧！
牛牛这脸打的 趴趴响啊...........
文章可信度如何啊？
这是我见过最强的翻译
TG通过牛牛发声???自己闷声发财?
就近是谁打的呢？这个要看需要啊！这种无头案，说是谁就是谁，说不是谁就不是谁。
这厮估计见不到明天的太阳了吧
match翻译成比赛不太合适吧……根据语气翻译成“是完美吻合的吗？”，貌似更适合一点。同时match有“导火索”的意思，觉得这里是个双关语：“是完美吻合的吗？还是一个绝佳的借口？”
胡说的，大家不要拍啊{:3_90:}
match翻译成比赛不太合适吧……根据语气翻译成“是完美吻合的吗？”，貌似更适合一点。同时match有“导火索”的意思，觉得这里是个双关语：“是完美吻合的吗？还是一个绝佳的借口？”
胡说的，大家不要拍啊{:3_90:}
沉了这么多天才公布，公布的证据也没什么特别硬的，一看就有猫腻
揭露出来就能让李明博下台
揭露出来就能让李明博下台