美国海军把大口径电磁炮技术，引入小口径电磁近防炮发展 ...

今天看见有帖子说取消了大口径电磁炮发展！！大家注意了，是翻译错误！！翻译错误！！英语原文新闻，已经找到！是英语原文！！一些网民翻译错误导致大家全部被误导！！！

http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a21174/navy-electromagnetic-railgun/

An EM railgun that could fire a projectile at 2,500 mph instead of 4,600 mph and hit a target at 50 nautical miles instead of 100 would still be incredibly useful, especially if the Navy could mount the weapon on existing warships. A less powerful railgun still has all the advantages of being cheaper to fire and removing dangerous explosives from a ship. According to the Wall Street Journal, the Pentagon's Strategic Capabilities office has allocated $800 million to develop a "defensive capability" for the gun—i.e. making it shoot with less power for closer ranges—as well as adapting conventional weapons to fire the tungsten projectiles.

只是说把技术转入一种近防炮，并没有取消原项目


我们都被狗逼的愤青网民欺骗了！！！！！今天看见有帖子说取消了大口径电磁炮发展！！大家注意了，是翻译错误！！翻译错误！！英语原文新闻，已经找到！是英语原文！！一些网民翻译错误导致大家全部被误导！！！

http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a21174/navy-electromagnetic-railgun/

An EM railgun that could fire a projectile at 2,500 mph instead of 4,600 mph and hit a target at 50 nautical miles instead of 100 would still be incredibly useful, especially if the Navy could mount the weapon on existing warships. A less powerful railgun still has all the advantages of being cheaper to fire and removing dangerous explosives from a ship. According to the Wall Street Journal, the Pentagon's Strategic Capabilities office has allocated $800 million to develop a "defensive capability" for the gun—i.e. making it shoot with less power for closer ranges—as well as adapting conventional weapons to fire the tungsten projectiles.

只是说把技术转入一种近防炮，并没有取消原项目


我们都被狗逼的愤青网民欺骗了！！！！！