说防空区被打脸的，看看华盛顿邮报的文章：《中国派战机 ...

那些各种高潮了的美狗日杂公知，第一段足够打他们脸了。看清了，这是你们爸爸大报的文章。
只翻译少数段落，超大从不给我几千字的原创加分，我完全翻译也是费力不讨好。
凑活看吧。

补充一点：
结尾段落，沈丁立说逼迫日本承认有争议并谈判，这只是目前统一的口径。至于钓鱼岛最后要怎么解决，我也认为是不可能共同开发的。
沈丁立教授我是很欣赏的，大家不要误会。统一口径是一种需要，俺们中国人说话一般不会赤裸裸，这是优点，也是缺点

华盛顿邮报 ：《中国派战机进入防空识别区》

China sends warplanes into air defense zone

“With regard to activity within the zone, nothing will happen — for a while,” said June Teufel Dreyer, a China expert at the University of Miami. “Then the zone will become gradually enforced more strictly. The Japanese will continue to protest, but not much more, to challenge it.”

That may wear down Japan and effectively change the status quo, she said.

“就区域内（中方）行动来看，什么都不会发生——暂时的。”June Teufel Dreyer （迈阿密大学中国专家）说。“随后该区域会逐步越来越严格的实行，日本将继续抗议，但没有更多措施能挑战防空识别区”

这可能拖垮日本并有效的改变现状，她说。

The zone is seen primarily as China’s latest bid to bolster its claim over a string of uninhabited Japanese-controlled islands in the East China Sea — known as Senkaku in Japan and Diaoyu in China. Beijing has been ratcheting up its sovereignty claims since Tokyo’s privatization of the islands last year.

But the most immediate spark for the zone likely was Japan’s threat last month to shoot down drones that China says it will send to the islands for mapping expeditions, said Dennis Blasko, an Asia analyst at think tank CNA’s China Security Affairs Group and a former Army attache in Beijing.

但最直接引起划区的可能是日本上月威胁将击落中国到钓鱼岛测绘的无人机。Dennis Blasko（CNA智库中国安全事务组亚洲分析员和前驻北京武官）说，

The zone comes an awkward time. Although Beijing’s ties with Tokyo are at rock bottom, it was building good will and mutual trust with Washington following a pair of successful meetings between President Barack Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping. However, the zone feud now threatens to overshadow both the visit by Vice President Joe Biden to Beijing next week and one by Australian Foreign Minister Julie Bishop expected before the end of the year.

China’s defense and foreign ministries offered no additional clarification Thursday as to why Beijing failed to respond to the U.S. Air Force flights. Alliance partners the U.S. and Japan together have hundreds of military aircraft in the immediate vicinity.

China on Saturday issued a list of requirements for all foreign aircraft passing through the area, regardless of whether they were headed into Chinese airspace, and said its armed forces would adopt “defensive emergency measures” against aircraft that don’t comply.

Beijing said the notifications are needed to help maintain air safety in the zone. However, the fact that China said it had identified and monitored the two U.S. bombers during their Tuesday flight seems to discredit that justification for the zone, said Rory Medcalf, director of the international security program at Australia’s Lowy Institute

“This suggests the zone is principally a political move,” Medcalf said. “It signals a kind of creeping extension of authority.”

Along with concerns about confrontations or accidents involving Chinese fighters and foreign aircraft, the zone’s establishment fuels fears of further aggressive moves to assert China’s territorial claims — especially in the hotly disputed South China Sea, which Beijing says belongs entirely to it.

Defense Ministry spokesman Yang Yujun confirmed those concerns on Saturday by saying China would establish additional air defense identification zones “at an appropriate time.”

For now, however, China’s regional strategy is focused mostly on Japan and the island dispute, according to government-backed Chinese scholars.

China will continue piling the pressure on Tokyo until it reverses the decision to nationalize the islands, concedes they are in dispute, and opens up negotiations with Beijing, said Shen Dingli, a regional security expert and director of the Center for American Studies at Shanghai’s Fudan University.

中国将继续向东京施加压力，直到东京推翻国有化岛屿的决定，承认存在争议，并开始与北京谈判，沈丁立（上海复旦大学区域安全专家和美国研究中心主任）说，

“China has no choice but to take counter measures,” Shen said. “If Japan continues to reject admitting the disputes, it’s most likely that China will take further measures.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/skorea-japan-defy-chinese-air-defense-zone/2013/11/28/c114faec-581e-11e3-bdbf-097ab2a3dc2b_story_1.html

那些各种高潮了的美狗日杂公知，第一段足够打他们脸了。看清了，这是你们爸爸大报的文章。
只翻译少数段落，超大从不给我几千字的原创加分，我完全翻译也是费力不讨好。
凑活看吧。

补充一点：
结尾段落，沈丁立说逼迫日本承认有争议并谈判，这只是目前统一的口径。至于钓鱼岛最后要怎么解决，我也认为是不可能共同开发的。
沈丁立教授我是很欣赏的，大家不要误会。统一口径是一种需要，俺们中国人说话一般不会赤裸裸，这是优点，也是缺点

华盛顿邮报 ：《中国派战机进入防空识别区》

China sends warplanes into air defense zone

“With regard to activity within the zone, nothing will happen — for a while,” said June Teufel Dreyer, a China expert at the University of Miami. “Then the zone will become gradually enforced more strictly. The Japanese will continue to protest, but not much more, to challenge it.”

That may wear down Japan and effectively change the status quo, she said.

“就区域内（中方）行动来看，什么都不会发生——暂时的。”June Teufel Dreyer （迈阿密大学中国专家）说。“随后该区域会逐步越来越严格的实行，日本将继续抗议，但没有更多措施能挑战防空识别区”

这可能拖垮日本并有效的改变现状，她说。

The zone is seen primarily as China’s latest bid to bolster its claim over a string of uninhabited Japanese-controlled islands in the East China Sea — known as Senkaku in Japan and Diaoyu in China. Beijing has been ratcheting up its sovereignty claims since Tokyo’s privatization of the islands last year.

But the most immediate spark for the zone likely was Japan’s threat last month to shoot down drones that China says it will send to the islands for mapping expeditions, said Dennis Blasko, an Asia analyst at think tank CNA’s China Security Affairs Group and a former Army attache in Beijing.

但最直接引起划区的可能是日本上月威胁将击落中国到钓鱼岛测绘的无人机。Dennis Blasko（CNA智库中国安全事务组亚洲分析员和前驻北京武官）说，

The zone comes an awkward time. Although Beijing’s ties with Tokyo are at rock bottom, it was building good will and mutual trust with Washington following a pair of successful meetings between President Barack Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping. However, the zone feud now threatens to overshadow both the visit by Vice President Joe Biden to Beijing next week and one by Australian Foreign Minister Julie Bishop expected before the end of the year.

China’s defense and foreign ministries offered no additional clarification Thursday as to why Beijing failed to respond to the U.S. Air Force flights. Alliance partners the U.S. and Japan together have hundreds of military aircraft in the immediate vicinity.

China on Saturday issued a list of requirements for all foreign aircraft passing through the area, regardless of whether they were headed into Chinese airspace, and said its armed forces would adopt “defensive emergency measures” against aircraft that don’t comply.

Beijing said the notifications are needed to help maintain air safety in the zone. However, the fact that China said it had identified and monitored the two U.S. bombers during their Tuesday flight seems to discredit that justification for the zone, said Rory Medcalf, director of the international security program at Australia’s Lowy Institute

“This suggests the zone is principally a political move,” Medcalf said. “It signals a kind of creeping extension of authority.”

Along with concerns about confrontations or accidents involving Chinese fighters and foreign aircraft, the zone’s establishment fuels fears of further aggressive moves to assert China’s territorial claims — especially in the hotly disputed South China Sea, which Beijing says belongs entirely to it.

Defense Ministry spokesman Yang Yujun confirmed those concerns on Saturday by saying China would establish additional air defense identification zones “at an appropriate time.”

For now, however, China’s regional strategy is focused mostly on Japan and the island dispute, according to government-backed Chinese scholars.

China will continue piling the pressure on Tokyo until it reverses the decision to nationalize the islands, concedes they are in dispute, and opens up negotiations with Beijing, said Shen Dingli, a regional security expert and director of the Center for American Studies at Shanghai’s Fudan University.

中国将继续向东京施加压力，直到东京推翻国有化岛屿的决定，承认存在争议，并开始与北京谈判，沈丁立（上海复旦大学区域安全专家和美国研究中心主任）说，

“China has no choice but to take counter measures,” Shen said. “If Japan continues to reject admitting the disputes, it’s most likely that China will take further measures.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/skorea-japan-defy-chinese-air-defense-zone/2013/11/28/c114faec-581e-11e3-bdbf-097ab2a3dc2b_story_1.html